English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

2020: Pandemic, protest and popular unrest

Most people will have memories of 2020 as the year in which the unforeseeable happened.

Published

on

year ender modiji

Most people will have memories of 2020 as the year in which the unforeseeable happened. Who would know that there will be virus that will mutate and continue killing people of all ages when all the killer diseases, even HIV/AIDS, barring cancer, came under the power of medicine.

From coronavirus to cyclones, unplanned national lockdown to migrant labour crisis, anti-CAA protests to farmers’ protests, riots in Delhi after 36 years and the verdict in the Babri Masjid conspiracy case to the work beginning the construction of the Ram Mandir right in middle of the pandemic and tensions at Indian borders with China and Nepal to Donald Trump’s India visit, the entire year contained the world-changing developments. And a dedicated attempt to leave a new political legacy on New Delhi by rebuilding Parliament in the Central Vista redevelopment, shorn of Edwin Lutyens and the British Raj.

While India struggled with the pandemic, the year saw some sensational crime stories such as the Vikas Dubey encounter, the Hathras gangrape case, Palghar mob lynching and Ballabhgarh daylight murder that dominated media headlines, drawing room discussions and social media trolling. Moreover, the swollen streams of jobless migrants heading home from cities shut in the nationwide lockdown, prompted by sheer panic, and the Hathras case shook the nation in 2020.

As 2020 ends, here are the top-of-the-mind political developments of the year.

  • Anti-CAA protests

2020 dawned with protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act occurred after the government enacted the law on December 12, 2019. Citizens across the country were on the streets, demanding the abrogation of the discriminatory citizenship law. Most of these protests were led by Muslim women.

The year began with the Shaheen Bagh protests which began in December 2019 after the police brutality in Jamia Millia Islamia and Aligarh Muslim University, when students were protesting the citizenship law. On the lines of Shaheen Bagh protests, the protests against Citizenship Amendment Act started in various parts of the country.

The Shaheen Bagh protests, however, hit the news in 2020 due to increasing number of attacks on the protesters by CAA supporters which resulted in the riots in Northeast Delhi.

The women of Shaheen Bagh were against the CAA because they saw it as anti-minority, specifically against the Muslims of India. The citizens had the fear that many of them would be declared non-citizens after implementing the law and would become stateless and could be locked up in detention centres, with the talk of the National Register of Citizens, like in Assam.

The agitation lasted 101 days, finally, with the Covid-19 outbreak and the lockdown, the government was able to quell the protests. The CAA has not been withdrawn, but its rollout has been delayed in West Bengal, the BJP is not talking about CAA and NRC in its campaign, apart from their use as dogwhistles.

  • Delhi riots

On the evening of February 23, riots broke out in Northeast Delhi between anti-CAA and pro-CAA people which took a communal turn and led to the death of over 53 people, including a policeman and an Intelligence Bureau personnel, while 200 were reported injured. The communal tensions continued for the next week. Shops and houses were burnt down and even mosques were attacked and protesters threw stones, set vehicles and shops ablaze and transformed a small part of the capital into a war zone. The violence occurred a few hours before United States President Donald Trump was expected to visit Delhi.

The opposition’s demand for the resignation of Union Home Minister Amit Shah didn’t work as Shah replied that the Congress had no right to point fingers at any party. Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal paraded his usual line, that Delhi Police was not under his control and the Centre remained the boss.

  • Madhya Pradesh political crisis

In 2018, the Congress emerged as the single largest party in Madhya Pradesh by winning 114 seats in Madhya Pradesh Assembly elections and had formed the government with the help of one Bahujan Samaj Party MLA and one Samajwadi Party MLA and four independent MLAs. The BJP gave the Congress a tough fight and bagged 109 seats. Mayawati’s Bahujan Samaj Party won two seats while Akhilesh Yadav’s Samajwadi Party had won one seat.

On March 5, 2020, 10 MLAs including 6 Congress, 2 BSP, 1 SP member and 1 Independent Member of Parliament flew to Delhi without informing the party. Initially, 6 Congress MLAs returned home while the remaining 4 flew to Bengaluru, where Congress MLA Hardeep Dang resigned. The remaining 3 MLAs returned soon and denied the claims made by Congress leaders that they were a part of horse-trading.

Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia switched to the BJP in the presence of JP Nadda. After joining the party, Scindia slammed the Madhya Pradesh CM Kamal Nath and other Congress leaders for not accepting his importance in the party. Later, he got the BJP Rajya Sabha ticket.

Both the parties moved to the Supreme Court for a floor test in Madhya Pradesh and the Court set March 20, 2020 for the floor test in Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly. Kamal Nath then quit. By July 23, 2020, another 3 Congress MLAs had exited the party to join the BJP. The Madhya Pradesh Assembly was adjourned till March 26 in view of the state government’s concern over coronavirus even as the BJP raised the demand for the holding of a floor test.

  • Ram Mandir Bhoomi Pujan

Ayodhya continued to remain in focus and grabbed media headlines. Just months after the Supreme Court settled the decades-old land dispute over the site where the Babri Masjid stood till 1992. The Ram Mandir construction officially started after a Bhoomi Poojan ceremony. On August 5, Prime Minister Narendra Modi along with Yogi Adityanath and RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat performed the Bhoomi Pujan ceremony which was live telecast.

Three-day long Vedic rituals were held before the ground-breaking ceremony where PM Modi installed a 40-kg silver brick as the foundation stone of the Ram Temple. There were a large number of devotees who attended the ceremony despite the Covid outbreak. The guest list, including religious leaders who formed part of the movement that started in the 1980s, was limited to 175 people in view of the Coronavirus. All 7,000 temples in a 7 km radius of Hanumangarhi were also asked to join the celebrations by lighting diyas.

PM Narendra Modi paid his respects to the many who had sacrificed for the Ram temple. Bhagwat also thanked L.K. Advani for his contributions to the movement to get the temple built.

  • Nirbhaya convict hanged

Finally, justice was delivered in the Nirbhaya rape case almost after eight years. All four death-row convicts in the 2012 Nirbhaya gangrape and murder case were hanged on March 20. Akshay Thakur, Vinay Sharma, Pawan Gupta and Mukesh Singh had been sentenced to death by a trial court in 2013.

The 23-year-old physiotherapy student died from her injuries days after being raped by six men on a moving bus. The incident caused outrage and led to new anti-rape laws in India.

Six people were arrested in the case, one of them, Ram Singh, was found dead in jail in March 2013, having apparently taken his own life. Another, who was 17 at the time of the attack, was released in 2015 after serving three years in a reform facility.

In the last few months, all four convicts filed petitions in the Supreme Court in a bid to reduce their sentences to life imprisonment but the top court rejected their petitions, leaving the men with no other legal recourse.

A last-minute appeal to have the death penalties commuted was also rejected hours before their hanging. Minutes after the hanging, the victim’s mother said she hugged her daughter and finally got justice.

  • Babri conspiracy case

A special CBI court acquitted all 32 accused in the Babri Masjid demolition case saying the act was spontaneous while the country’s apex court had already termed the demolition of Babri as a pre-planned act. The accused, including LK Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, Uma Bharati, Kalyan Singh, faced charges like criminal conspiracy, rioting, promoting enmity between different groups, and unlawful assembly.

Acquitting accused, the court said the demolition of Babri Masjid was not pre-planned and the accused had tried to stop the mob, those who climbed on the dome were anti-social elements and the authenticity of the audio and video clips produced by the CBI is not reliable.

At the end of a long trial, each of the 32 living accused persons were given a clean chit and 17 other accused who died during the 28 years since the demolition.

In the title suit, the verdict for which was given in November 2019, the bench, headed by then Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, had observed that the entire structure of the mosque was brought down in a calculated act of destroying a place of public worship. Muslims have been wrongly deprived of a mosque which had been constructed well over 450 years ago, they said.

A similar sentiment was expressed in the report of the Justice Liberhan Commission, set up by the then P.V. Narasimha Rao government within days of the demolition. Justice M.S. Liberhan, who took 17 long years to complete his findings, said the demolition was orchestrated.

All evidence gathered by the country’s premier investigation agency was said to be insufficient or weak by the court. The court acquitted all the accused by giving simple reason that the video and audio clips furnished by CBI as the most incriminating evidence against them appeared to be either doctored or fabricated.

Also Read: World highlights 2020: Trump, Covid, Biden, Vaccine?

  • Bihar Assembly election

Bihar pulled off a mammoth electoral exercise in the wake of the Covid-19 which saw the National Democratic Alliance of Nitish Kumar’s Janata Dal United and the BJP retain power by winning 122 seats in a closely contested 243-member Bihar legislative assembly election.

Managing victory in 72 seats, the BJP gained an upper hand while the JDU as a part of the NDA managed to win 52 seats in the 243-seat legislative assembly. More importantly, the BJP emerged as the stronger partner, returning with a tally far greater than that of the JDU, a development that is expected to alter power equations in the times to come. The NDA has contested the election on the formula of equal seat share in the state.

The fear and anxiety experienced by Muslims during the BJP’s campaign which was more focused on Hindutva rhetoric, triggered the success of Asaduddin Owaisi’s All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen, which won 5 Muslim-dominated seats.

The Mahagathbandhan, comprising Rashtriya Janata Dal, Congress, and Left parties, secured 110 seats. Winning 75 seats, the Tejashwi Yadav-led RJD emerged as the single largest party. The Congress could win only 19 of the 70 seats it contested, impacting the Mahagathbandhan tally. In contrast, the Left performed beyond expectations by winning 20 seats out of the 29.

  • Hathras gang rape case

On September 14, 2020, a 19-year-old Dalit woman was gangraped by upper caste men in Hathras district of Uttar Pradesh. After fighting for her life for two weeks, the victim died in Delhi’s Safdarjung hospital.

The nationwide outrage, however, was triggered when UP Police cremated the victim’s remains at 3 am on September 29, 2020 without the consent of the family. The case and its subsequent handling was the subject of protests against the Yogi Adityanath government by activists and opposition.

UP Police didn’t let media or opposition leaders meet the victim’s family. After an abortive march, Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra met the family of the victim in their second attempt.

The BJP criticised the Congress saying it doesn’t care about the welfare of the people or the victim’s family and it was all politics in meeting the victim’s family, the Congress accused the BJP government of being insensitive in dealing with the incident and the protests that followed.

  • Kangana Ranaut vs Shiv Sena

A war of words broke out between actor Kangana Ranaut and the ruling Shiv Sena in Maharashtra after Ranaut posted on Twitter that she feels unsafe after Sushant Singh Rajput’s death in Mumbai and compared Mumbai with Pakistan-occupied Kashmir while saying she does not feel safe in the city.

In reaction, Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut slammed Ranaut and called her names. Reacting to the same, Kangana posted series of Tweets in which she said the actor had been given many titles in past like psycho, witch and stalker.

Amidst this controversy, the BMC visited Kangana’s production house office in Mumbai’s Bandra and carried out a demolition of her office on September 9. However, the Bombay High Court ordered a stay on BMC’s move.

But Kangana was not done. She posted a series of videos on Twitter, showcasing the damage done by BMC’s demolition at her Bandra property. She said her home has been demolished and CM Uddhav Thackeray’s ego will be destroyed tomorrow.

  • Migrant Crisis

Migrant workers faced multiple hardships because of the coronavirus-induced lockdown across the nation. The major Opposition parties questioned the Centre’s “poor” handling of the pandemic and sought compensation for the migrant workers who died during the lockdown. To repair its image dented by the allegations, the ruling BJP soon took various measures to help migrants and later arranged transport for them. Congress also raised the migrant crisis issue, to attack the NDA, during a poll rally Bihar in Bihar. But still the Congress and the Mahagathbandhan could not win Bihar.

Also Read: Bollywood in 2020: A year of tired remakes, yucky sequels and phones becoming theatres

  • Chinese app ban

2020 is the year that saw many bans on Chinese apps in the country, in three separate lists.. Here’s list of all the apps that got banned by the government of India.

The first list of banned apps came out on June 29, 2020 in which India banned 59 apps including TikTok, ShareIt, UC Browser, Shein, Likee, and CamScanner. The ban was seen as a response to India-China clashes in the Galwan Valley in Ladakh.

According to the reports, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeITY) said the apps were prejudicial to sovereignty and integrity of India, defence of India, security of state and public order. The apps were banned under Section 69A of the Information Technology (IT) Act.

The second list was released on September 5, 2020. This list was even bigger than the first which includes 118 apps in total in including PUBG Mobile and PUBG Mobile Lite were the parts of it. The third list came out on November 24, which included 43 apps in total.

  • India-China Clash along LAC in Ladakh

20 Indian soldiers were killed after a clash with Chinese troops that started late in the night on June 15. The violence, the first to claim lives since four Indian soldiers were killed in Arunachal Pradesh in 1975, led to a rapid escalation of tension between the two countries. There were casualties on the Chinese side as well, but the numbers have not been declared by Beijing.

Also Read: Gone in 2020: The stars who died this year

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and other leaders soon launched a series of attacks on the government over the “violent clashes”. While Gandhi accused PM Modi of “surrendering” to Chinese aggression along the border, BJP slammed the leader for trying to politicise the issue by making statements that are “weak on facts” and “strong on mudslinging”. Gandhi also asked the Centre why soldiers were sent “unarmed to martyrdom”. Hitting back at Gandhi, External Affairs Minister Jaishankar told him to get “the facts straight”. Jaishankar said the Army cannot use firearms during faceoff as per 1996 and 2005 agreements. He also added that is why the Indian soldiers didn’t have arms.

Farmers force their way into India’s consciousness

2020 saw farmers lay siege to Delhi in protest against the 3 farm laws passed by the Narendra Modi government. Though the passing itself was not short on heroics and last-minute dramatics, the steamrolling of the laws through the Rajya Sabha made it seem like all was done and gone. But, no. The Indian farmer, call him rich or call him poor, landed up at the gates of the capital on his tractor with his brethren to protest the silence of the laws on a minimum price guarantee. The crushing of the APMC and the MSP regime led farmers to demand that the laws be repealed, even when the government and its best spokesmen turned their voice hoarse that all was well with the MSP and what-not.

With the Opposition keeping a long distance away from the protesting farmers, the BJP has not got the ammo it needed to discredit similar previous upsurges, like Shaheen Bagh. Some of the farmers did speak English and enjoyed their pizzas leading to much heartburn on TV prime time.

Before the end of the year, the government revitalised talks but the agreement much touted by the media has been on two peripheral issues and not the core laws. So, this struggle of the farmers will continue into 2021 and has to combat the media fatigue that can kill people’s attention span.

Inputs: Mohammad Javed Rasheedi, Shahrukh Shah and Vikram

India News

Case against Flipkart, others for selling T-shirts idiolising Bishnoi, Dawood

During the online vigil, the cyber security officials found that several e-commerce platforms, including Flipkart, AliExpress, and marketplaces like TeeShopper and Etsy, had been selling T-shirts that glorify gangsters like Lawrence Bishnoi and Dawood Ibrahim.

Published

on

The Maharashtra cyber crime branch has filed a police case against Flipkart, online marketplaces and other e-commerce platforms for selling T-shirts glorifying gangster Lawrence Bishnoi and underworld don Dawood Ibrahim, officials said on Thursday.

According to the release, the state’s cyber wing has filed a case under various Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections, including 192 (wantonly giving provocation with intent to cause riot), 196 (promoting enmity between different groups) and 353 (public mischief) and provisions of the Information Technology Act.

During the online vigil, the cyber security officials found that several e-commerce platforms, including Flipkart, AliExpress, and marketplaces like TeeShopper and Etsy, had been selling T-shirts that glorify gangsters like Lawrence Bishnoi and Dawood Ibrahim.

The statement said the cyber unit has filed the case not only against the platforms that hosted these listings, but also against the sellers responsible for listing these objectionable products.

An official said, “The products, which idolise criminal figures, pose a significant risk to the society by promoting a distorted image (of values) which could influence young minds negatively.”

In its release, the cyber unit said it considers this as material harmful, as it attempts to corrupt the values of the youth by using seemingly casual apparel to spread messages that glorify criminal lifestyles.

Earlier, another popular e-commerce platform Meesho faced backlash from people for selling t-shirts branded with Bishnoi.

Filmmaker and journalist Alishan Jafri, taking to X, highlighted the issue and called it an example of India’s latest online radicalisation.

“People are literally selling gangster merchandise on platforms like @Meesho_Official and Teeshopper. This is just one example of India’s latest online radicalisation,” he wrote on X.

In a series of posts, he pointed out various concerning incidence that he came accrosed. “For much of October, I was following India’s online gangster fan groups. At a time when the police and NIA are struggling to stop youths from joining gang crime, social media influencers are making quick money by promoting gang content and glorifying gangsters,” he said.

Continue Reading

India News

India calls out Canada’s move to ban Australia Today for airing S Jaishankar’s press conference

The MEA said that these actions yet again highlight the hypocrisy of Canada towards freedom of speech.

Published

on

India calls out Canada’s move to ban Australia Today for airing S Jaishankar's press conference

A few hours after Australia Today aired External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar’s press conference in Australia, Canada banned the outlet. The External Affairs Minister gave remarks on the India-Canada diplomatic standoff. 

Reacting to this, India on Thursday said it was surprised by Canada’s move to ban the outlet and emphasized that it highlighted Ottawa’s hypocrisy towards freedom of speech. Australia Today, which is an important outlet for the Indian community in the country, had aired the joint press conference of S Jaishankar and his Australian counterpart Penny Wong in Canberra.

In a weekly media briefing, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said that they understand that the social media handles, pages of this particular outlet, which is an important diaspora outlet, have been blocked and are not available for viewers in Canada. He continued that this happened just an hour or a few hours after this particular handle carried the press conference of S Jaishankar with Penny Wong. He called out the incident, mentioning that they are surprised, and the matter looks strange to them.

He further underlined that these are the actions which yet again highlight the hypocrisy of Canada towards freedom of speech. He noted that the External Affairs Minister spoke about three things: Canada making allegations and a pattern had developed without any specific evidence, surveillance of Indian diplomats in Canada, which he termed as unacceptable, and  the political space which has been given in Canada to anti-India elements. 

With this one can draw conclusions, why Australia Today channel was blocked by Canada, the spokesperson said. Australia Today focuses on news and analytical pieces related to the Indian community in Australia and elsewhere across the world.

This incident follows days after devotees were attacked by pro-Khalistani at a Hindu temple in Canada’s Brampton, with S Jaishankar calling it deeply concerning. Furthermore, Prime Minister Narendra Modi also condemned the attack and said that there were cowardly attempts to intimidate Indian diplomats.

The diplomatic standoff between India and Canada began in September last year when Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau alleged that Indian government agents might have been involved in the killing of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a claim outrightly rejected by New Delhi.

Later in October 2024, ties between both the countries nosedived when Canada termed the Indian High Commissioner a person of interest in its investigation into Nijjar’s murder. Issuing a strongly worded statement, India dismissed the fresh charge and recalled the envoy and some diplomats, while expelling six Canadian officials, including Canada’s acting High Commissioner.

Continue Reading

India News

Wikimedia Foundation says no notice from Indian government received

The government also questioned why Wikipedia should not be classified as a publisher, rather than an intermediary.

Published

on

The Wikimedia Foundation said on Thursday that it has not received any official notice from the Indian government pertaining to its content.

The statement from the Wikimedia Foundation comes days after reports citing government sources, reported that the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had issued a notice to Wikipedia casting aspersions about bias and inaccuracies in its articles. However, there was no official communication from the Indian government on the matter.

According to the alleged notice, the Government of India questioned Wikipedia over multiple complaints about bias and inaccuracies on the platform. The government in its alleged letter to Wikipedia noted that a small group of editors appears to have significant control over the contents, particularly influencing its neutrality. 

The government also questioned why Wikipedia should not be classified as a publisher, rather than an intermediary.

In a statement, the platform spokesperson said: “The Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that operates Wikipedia, has not received any official notice from the Indian government regarding editing practices or the accuracy of content on Wikipedia in the last two days.”

The statement further noted that Wikipedia volunteers carefully curate information from reliable news sources and other reputable external publications and they don’t add original content to the site.  

It added that such an approach ensures that Wikipedia compiles information from credible sources. “All sources are cited on article pages, upholding our commitment to transparency,” said the spokesperson.

“More than 850 million Indians visit the site every month, the fifth highest in the world,” the statement said. “Globally, more than 260,000 volunteers contribute content to the site,” the statement added.

It also mentioned that Indian Wikipedia editors are constantly ranked as “one of the top number of contributing editors from a single country globally.

Furthermore, the statement said that the platform articles are required by its editorial policies to maintain a neutral point of view, adding volunteers from many backgrounds and political persuasions to edit Wikipedia.

“This model reinforces that Wikipedia articles present a broad view of knowledge about a topic, rather than any one perspective,” the spokesperson said.

This development occurs alongside ongoing legal proceedings involving WF in a defamation lawsuit filed by news agency ANI regarding its Wikipedia page, which describes the news agency as a “propaganda tool for the incumbent government.” In its lawsuit, ANI has requested the identities of three anonymous editors who made changes to the page. It’s important to note that WF has no physical presence in India.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com