Latest Politics News
5th day of AAP dharna: Left parties, some personalities extend support; BJP counters
Published
8 years agoon
By
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Outside support started pouring in for the sit-in protest at Raj Niwas by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and three of his cabinet colleagues that entered its fifth day today, Friday, June 15.
The Delhi CM and his ministers are staging the sit-in to persuade the Lt Governor Anil Baijal to ask the IAS officers to resume regular work[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1529059571741{border-top-width: 10px !important;border-right-width: 10px !important;border-bottom-width: 10px !important;border-left-width: 10px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-right: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;padding-left: 10px !important;background-color: #c6c6c6 !important;border-radius: 10px !important;}”]The demands are:
* Issue a direction to IAS officers to end their “strike”
* Action against those who have struck work for “four months”
* Approve the proposal for doorstep delivery of rations.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]From Thursday, support for Kejriwal-led Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government poured in from other quarters. Several personalities and regional parties, including the Trinamool Congress, backed the Kejriwal-led protest.
Appealing the Centre to resolve the crisis immediately, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee tweeted, “Elected Chief Minister must get due respect. May I appeal to the government of India and the LG to resolve the problem immediately so that people do not suffer.”
Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan also requested PM Modi’s intervention in the ongoing tussle between the Delhi government and the LG. In a letter addressed to the PM, Vijayan said, “I write to you in hope that the spirit of the Constitution will be upheld. I request your personal intervention to ensure that the work of the Delhi Government should proceed without hindrance,” he said.
Rashtriya Lok Dal (RLD) leader Jayant Chaudhary also called the situation in Delhi a “governance failure”.
Former BJP leader Yashwant Sinha, who is also a former IAS officer, too, joined the AAP workers during their protest on Tuesday. “Had Atal Bihari Vajpayee been the PM, he would have ordered the Home Minister to open a dialogue with the elected CM,” Sinha said.
Taking to Twitter, CPI(M) General Secretary Sitaram Yechury accused the BJP, at the Centre, of “using the office of the LG” to ensure the Delhi government is unable to “discharge its constitutional duties”. He tweeted, “BJP central government is using the office of the LG to obstruct the elected state government in Delhi to discharge its constitutional duties. This is despicable. The Centre must abandon this course of confrontation right away.”
CPI wrote to LG saying, “No constitutional authority of Delhi can bypass or neglect the Govt of Delhi in any matter of Governance of Delhi”. The party says the L-G is duty-bound to meet Kejriwal and his ministers.
Noted actor Kamal Haasan said in a tweet: “Interference in the functioning of an elected government is unacceptable in a democracy. In fact what is happening in Delhi and in TN/Pondicherry are not too different. It is frustrating for people who want a change for the better.”
The Delhi High Court, on the other hand, agreed to hear on June 18 a plea seeking to declare the sit-in by the CM and his cabinet colleagues as unconstitutional and illegal. The petition was mentioned before Justice C Hari Shankar who said that it be listed for hearing on Monday. The plea filed by petitioner Hari Nath Ram sought direction for discharging the chief ministerial obligations and responsibilities as the entire functioning of the Chief Minister office of National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi has been brought to a “stand still” since the sit-in started.
The IAS offcers in Delhi government claim they are not on strike – something they cannot admit to without risking their jobs – but are only staying away from meetings with Kejriwal government ministers since their feel unsafe. The reason they cite is the alleged assault on chief secretary Anshu Prakash when he went for a late night meeting at Kejriwal’s residence. They demand that the CM apologise to them for the incident.
A case was lodged with Delhi Police soon after the alleged assault and the case is under investigation. The CM and ministers have been questioned at length and their premises searched thoroughly. There are no reports of any questioning that any bureaucrat was subjected to in the case.
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) alleges that the LG, under instructions from the Modi government at the Centre, has been “coordinating” the IAS officers “strike” to hobble the Delhi government’s functioning and prevent it from carrying out any work. CM Kejriwal and his three ministers have been sitting in Raj Niwas seeking a meeting with LG Anil Baijal, asking him to get the officers back to normal work.
Kejriwal has also written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi raising the issue of problems being faced by Delhi and the need to attend to them.
So far, there is no resolution in sight.
The BJP and the Congress are both attacking the AAP government, alleging that it is trying to find excuses for its incompetence and failure to deliver by blaming officers. They also contend that officers were attending to work and that the CM and his ministers were running away from their responsibilities, accusing them of being on a strike.
The BJP has also been pointing to several problems that Delhi citizens are facing because of Delhi government’s inability to deliver – a point that AAP government says establishes its contention that work was being hampered because officers are not working.
On Thursday, several Aam Aadmi Party leaders marched to LG Anil Baijal’s residence and chanted slogans such as “LG sahab, Delhi Chhodo (LG, quit Delhi)”. The party has planned to hold a candlelight march at Raj Ghat to keep the momentum going. In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Kejriwal alleged that Baijal is doing “nothing” to break the impasse despite repeated requests from the party and sought the PM’s intervention in the case.
Meanwhile, the stand of the bureaucrats, the LG , the Centre and the BJP has come in for some scathing criticism. The officers’ continuing protest and their demand for apology, on the very face of it, lacks merit when a criminal case has already been filed with Delhi Police. The demand would mean they want the CM to apologise and also prosecute him.
Some former bureaucrats also questioned the IAS officers’ stand, pointing out instances where they have been subjected to worse under governments of other parties but there was not a squeak from any of them. Instances mentioned include the treatment meted out to bureaucrats by different chief ministers of Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, the assault on Puri district collector, the remarks on IAS officers by union minister Dharmendra Pradhan. They have also not dared to protest the move to allot cadres only after Foundation Course rather than civil service examination results, or the decision to bypass the UPSC in going for lateral recruitment into IAS at joint secretary level.
A former bureaucrat who resigned from IAS to follow his own interests, TR Raghunandan has this to say: “So what makes IAS officers unusually bold when it comes to Kejriwal? Why are they capable of defying him to the extent that they have done? The answer is simple: he does not, in his current position as Chief Minister of Delhi, control the progression of their careers. If he were a CM of a full state, or if Delhi were a full state, they would toe his line.
“So all this hype about the behaviour of the Delhi government being unprecedented is nonsense. In fact, on the other hand, the differential outrage of the IAS to the alleged misconduct of the Delhi government, while being silent to other slurs and body blows to the IAS delivered by the Modis and Adityanaths of this world, is entirely predictable, given their careerist obsessions.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
You may like
-
AAP dominates Punjab zila parishad polls, leads in most panchayat samiti zones
-
Delhi orders 50% work from home as pollution emergency deepens
-
Rahul Gandhi attacks BJP over Delhi pollution, says no more excuses
-
AAP targets Rekha Gupta as Delhi chokes on toxic air, BJP points to citizens and farm fires
-
Delhi Government appeals to Supreme Court to allow green firecrackers for Diwali
-
Kejriwal criticizes PM Modi, calls India-US trade talks surrender to Trump
India News
Renaming MGNREGA removes core spirit of rural employment law, says Shashi Tharoor
Published
2 days agoon
December 19, 2025
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has strongly criticised the renaming of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), saying the move strips the rural employment programme of its core essence. His remarks came after Parliament cleared the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Bill, also referred to as the VB-G RAM G Bill.
Speaking to media, Tharoor said the decision to remove Mahatma Gandhi’s name from the scheme “takes out the heart” of the rural employment programme that has been in place for years. He noted that the identity and philosophy associated with Mahatma Gandhi were central to the original law.
Tharoor also objected to the way the new name was framed, arguing that it unnecessarily combined multiple languages. He pointed out that the Constitution envisages the use of one language in legislation, while the Bill’s title mixes English and Hindi terms such as “Guarantee”, “Rozgar” and “Ajeevika”, along with the conjunction “and”.
‘Disrespect to both names’
The Congress leader said that inserting the word “Ram” while dropping Mahatma Gandhi’s name amounted to disrespecting both. Referring to Mahatma Gandhi’s ideas, Tharoor said that for Gandhi, the concepts of Gram Swaraj and Ram Rajya were inseparable, and removing his name from a rural employment law went against that vision.
He added that the name of Lord Ram could be used in many contexts, but questioned the rationale behind excluding Mahatma Gandhi from a programme closely linked to his philosophy of village self-rule.
Protests over passage of the Bill
The VB-G RAM G Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on December 18 and cleared by the Rajya Sabha in the early hours of December 19 amid protests from Opposition members. Several MPs opposed the manner in which the legislation was pushed through, with scenes of sloganeering and tearing of papers in the House.
Outside Parliament, members of the Trinamool Congress staged a sit-in protest near Samvidhan Sadan against the passage of the Bill. Congress also announced nationwide protests earlier this week, accusing the government of weakening rights-based welfare schemes.
Despite opposition criticism, the government has maintained that the new law will strengthen rural employment and livelihood security. The Bill raises the guaranteed employment from 100 days to 125 days per rural household and outlines a 60:40 cost-sharing formula between the Centre and states, with a higher central share for northeastern, Himalayan states and certain Union Territories.
India News
Rahul Gandhi attacks G RAM G bill, says move against villages and states
Rahul Gandhi has criticised the G RAM G bill cleared by Parliament, alleging it dilutes the rights-based structure of MGNREGA and centralises control over rural employment.
Published
2 days agoon
December 19, 2025
Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi has launched a sharp attack on the Modi government after Parliament cleared the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Employment and Livelihood Mission (Rural) Bill, commonly referred to as the ‘G RAM G’ bill. He described the proposed law as “anti-state” and “anti-village”, arguing that it weakens the core spirit of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).
The new legislation, which is positioned as an updated version of MGNREGA, was passed amid protests by opposition parties and is expected to replace the existing scheme once it receives presidential assent.
‘Bulldozed without scrutiny’, says Rahul Gandhi
Rahul Gandhi criticised the manner in which the bill was cleared, saying it was pushed through Parliament without adequate debate or examination. He pointed out that the opposition’s demand to refer the bill to a standing committee was rejected.
According to him, any law that fundamentally alters the rural employment framework and affects crores of workers should undergo detailed scrutiny, expert consultation and public hearings before approval.
Claim of dilution of rights-based guarantee
Targeting the central government, the Congress leader said the proposed law dismantles the rights-based and demand-driven nature of MGNREGA and replaces it with a rationed system controlled from Delhi. He argued that this shift undermines the autonomy of states and villages.
Rahul Gandhi alleged that the intent behind the move is to centralise power and weaken labour, particularly impacting rural communities such as Dalits, OBCs and Adivasis.
Defence of MGNREGA’s impact
Highlighting the role of MGNREGA, Gandhi said the scheme provided rural workers with bargaining power, reduced distress migration and improved wages and working conditions, while also contributing to rural infrastructure development.
He also recalled the role of MGNREGA during the Covid period, stating that it prevented crores of people from slipping into hunger and debt. According to him, any rationing of a jobs programme first affects women, landless workers and the poorest communities.
Opposition to name change and provisions
The Congress has also objected to the renaming of the scheme, accusing the government of attempting to erase the legacy associated with Mahatma Gandhi. Opposition MPs staged a dharna within the Parliament complex, questioning provisions of the bill that they claim dilute the “soul and spirit” of the original law enacted in 2005.
Under MGNREGA, the government guaranteed 100 days of work in rural areas along with an unemployment allowance if work was not provided. The ‘G RAM G’ bill proposes to raise the guaranteed workdays to 125, while retaining other provisions. However, critics have flagged concerns over employment being linked to pre-approved plans.
The bill was cleared after a midnight voice vote in the Rajya Sabha, following its passage in the Lok Sabha amid protests and walkouts. It will become law once approved by the President.
India News
AAP dominates Punjab zila parishad polls, leads in most panchayat samiti zones
AAP has won 201 out of 317 declared zila parishad zones in Punjab so far and is leading in a majority of panchayat samiti seats, with counting still underway.
Published
3 days agoon
December 18, 2025
The ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has recorded a strong performance in the Punjab zila parishad elections and is leading in the majority of panchayat samiti zones, as per results declared so far on Thursday. The counting process is still underway and complete results are awaited, officials said.
Polling for the rural local bodies was held on December 14 to elect representatives across 347 zones of 22 zila parishads and 2,838 zones of 153 panchayat samitis in the state.
AAP secures clear edge in zila parishads
According to the available results, outcomes have been declared for 317 zila parishad zones so far. Of these, the AAP has won 201 zones, placing it well ahead of other parties.
The Congress emerged second with victories in 60 zones, followed by the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) with 39 zones. The BJP won four zones, the BSP secured three, while independents claimed 10 zones.
District-wise data shows that the AAP won 22 zones in Hoshiarpur, 19 each in Amritsar and Patiala, 17 each in Tarn Taran and Gurdaspur, and 15 zones in Sangrur. The Congress registered its best performances in Gurdaspur and Ludhiana with eight zones each, followed by Jalandhar with seven zones. The SAD performed strongly in Bathinda with 13 zones, while the BJP managed to win four zones in Pathankot.
AAP leads in panchayat samiti results
In the panchayat samiti elections, trends declared so far indicate that the AAP is leading in a majority of zones. However, officials clarified that counting is ongoing and the final picture will be clear only after all ballot papers are tallied.
Kejriwal, Mann reject opposition allegations
Reacting to the trends, AAP supremo Arvind Kejriwal said the party’s performance reflected strong rural support for the Bhagwant Mann government’s work. Addressing the media in Mohali along with Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann, Kejriwal dismissed allegations of irregularities raised by opposition parties.
He said the elections were conducted in a fair and free manner and claimed that the results so far showed a clear wave in favour of the AAP in rural Punjab. Kejriwal stated that nearly 70 per cent of the zila parishad and panchayat samiti seats had gone in favour of the party.
Congress, SAD question poll conduct
The Congress and the Shiromani Akali Dal, however, accused the ruling party of misusing official machinery. Punjab Congress chief Amrinder Singh Raja Warring alleged that the AAP had “stolen” the rural mandate and claimed that the results did not reflect genuine public support.
Opposition parties had earlier also accused the AAP government of high-handedness during the polling process, allegations that the ruling party has strongly denied.
India announces T20 World Cup 2026 squad, Shubman Gill dropped as Axar Patel named vice-captain
Veteran Malayalam actor and filmmaker Sreenivasan passes away at 69
T20 World Cup 2026: Selectors weigh Shubman Gill role as India squad announcement awaited
Thick smog engulfs Delhi, flights and trains delayed as air quality slips to very poor
