English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

Congress lists 3 options before Patidar Andolan leaders over quota demand

Published

on

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Nominees of Hardik Patel-led Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti (PAAS) hold late night talks with Congress delegation led by Kapil Sibal on reservation for Patels

With barely a month left before the first phase of polling for the 182-member Gujarat Assembly, the Congress party is literally burning the midnight oil to finalise its alliance with Hardik Patel’s Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti (PAAS) in a bid to secure their endorsement for its bid at power.

Late on Wednesday night, a Congress delegation led by senior party leader Kapil Sibal held talks with PAAS representatives – though Hardik Patel chose to skip the meet – to discuss their demand for carving out a reservation policy that would enable the state’s politically crucial 18 percent Patidar/Patel population to seek government jobs and seats in educational institutions under a clearly defined quota.

The meeting that began shortly after 11.30 pm on Wednesday night in Ahmedabad continued almost till 2 am on Thursday. At the end of the deliberations, PAAS leaders claimed that the Congress had laid out before them three options through which the sticky issue of carving out the reservation – beyond the existing Supreme Court mandated cap of a total of 49 per cent – can be resolved.

Hardik Patel had made it clear to the Congress leadership that an endorsement from him and the PAAS for the party’s election campaign in Gujarat will come only after the grand old party clearly lays out its plan on how it would bypass the 49 per cent cap for reservations to grant a new quota that will largely benefit the Patidar community.

“We have been given three options by the Congress party on how to provide reservation to our community in educational institutions and government jobs,” PAAS convener Dinesh Bambhania said after the meeting.

Though the details of the options laid out by the Congress are being kept a secret, Bambhania said that the PAAS leaders will “discuss these with Hardik Patel, social leaders of the community, legal experts and then place them before our community.” The PAAS convener said that if any of the options listed by the Congress is found legally tenable and is also accepted by the Patidar community, then talks with the Congress over backing it in the upcoming elections will continue.

“The Congress proposal has not touched 49 per cent reservations for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes which exists in the state. The options that have been given are over and above it,” Bambhania said, while adding that an earlier offer made by the party of carving out a quota “under the Economically Backward Class” category has been rejected by PAAS “as it is not constitutionally valid”.

Congress leader Kapil Sibal who led the talks from his party’s end expressed hope that the discussions will lead to a positive outcome soon and added: “we have discussed all the aspects and will do all the things (to provide reservation to the Patidar community) as per the Constitution.”

Another meeting between the Congress and PAAS leaders, Sibal said, would be convened over the next 2-3 days to take the talks forward.

The polling for the two-phase Gujarat elections will take place on December 9 and 14 and votes will be counted on December 18.

Promising Hardik Patel and his PAAS comrades a reservation for Patidars in Gujarat will not be an easy choice for the Congress as in doing so the party risks alienating backwards castes, Dalits and adivasis who currently enjoy benefits of reservation and could see such a commitment as one that impinges on their constitutionally mandated right. This is why the Congress and even the PAAS leaders have made it clear that the Patidar reservation formula must leave the existing reservation system in the state untouched.

In Gujarat, OBCs comprise 146 castes and make up around 40 per cent of the state’s population. They have a 27 per cent quota in government jobs and education. The scheduled castes are entitled to a 7 per cent quota while the 15 per cent has been reserved for scheduled tribes. This makes a total of 49 per cent reserved seats in the state which is just under the 50 per cent reservation cap set by the Supreme Court.

The Congress has roped in OBC leader Alpesh Thakore within its ranks while popular Dalit leader from the state, Jignesh Mevani has assured Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi that he will ask his supporters to “not vote for the BJP” in the largely bi-polar state. If the Congress also manages to get Hardik’s endorsement during the upcoming election, it hopes that its 22-year-long exile from the seat of power in the BJP ruled state could come to an end.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest Politics News

Congress chief Kharge says BJP won Maharashtra elections through fraud like never before

He issued a stern warning to party members who do not contribute to the party’s efforts, suggesting that they should consider stepping aside.

Published

on

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Wednesday alleged that the BJP secured its victory in the Maharashtra assembly elections through unprecedented “fraud,” and called for a return to using ballot papers instead of electronic voting machines (EVMs).

Speaking at the AICC session held along the banks of the Sabarmati River, Kharge accused the Modi government of “selling off” government assets to favor cronies while gradually undermining democracy.

Kharge pointed out that while many nations are moving away from EVMs to traditional ballots, India remains locked in using the electronic system. “What occurred in Maharashtra was fraudulent, and this is something Rahul Gandhi and our party have raised extensively,” he stated. He highlighted that the BJP’s sweeping success in winning 90% of the assembly seats was an unprecedented feat.

In his address, Kharge claimed that the ruling party has attacked the Constitution and its institutions over the past eleven years. He criticized the government for manipulating parliamentary procedures, which has prevented opposition leaders from voicing their concerns. He specifically remarked on the late-night debates that prioritized divisive issues over pressing matters affecting the public.

Kharge expressed grave concerns about the state of democracy in India, arguing that the BJP was establishing monopolies by funneling resources to a few capitalist allies. He also claimed that the rights of SC, ST, and OBC communities are at risk due to privatization efforts, emphasizing the urgent need for a nationwide caste census to better address the needs of these groups.

In a pointed critique of the government’s financial policies, Kharge denounced the rising excise duties on petrol and diesel as well as the increasing price of LPG cylinders. He issued a stern warning to party members who do not contribute to the party’s efforts, suggesting that they should consider stepping aside.

The Congress session also paid tribute to party members who passed away since the last meeting, including former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. The gathering aims to articulate the party’s social, political, and economic viewpoints and is expected to lead to the passage of at least two resolutions.

In a strategic move to counter the BJP’s narrative of nationalism, Congress reasserted its claim to the legacy of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, pledging to engage in an “ideological war” against the BJP-RSS alliance.

Continue Reading

India News

BJP suspends Gyandev Ahuja for purifying temple after Dalit Congress MLA’s visit

BJP suspends Rajasthan leader Gyandev Ahuja after he performed a ‘purification ritual’ at a temple following a visit by Dalit Congress MLA Tikaram Jully.

Published

on

Gyandev Ahuja temple purification

The BJP has suspended Gyandev Ahuja after the Rajasthan leader sprinkled gangajal to purify a temple in Alwar, following a visit by Congress MLA Tikaram Jully, a Dalit and Leader of the Opposition in the Rajasthan Assembly. The suspension comes amid mounting pressure from the opposition and growing criticism from civil society over what is being widely condemned as a casteist act.

The BJP’s Rajasthan unit, wary of alienating Dalit voters in eastern Rajasthan ahead of key elections, swiftly acted against Ahuja. The party, in a notice issued by BJP MP Damodar Agarwal, has given Ahuja three days to explain his conduct. The notice accuses him of violating the oath taken during party membership, which prohibits discrimination based on caste, gender, or religion.

“Your action has maligned the party’s image and falls into the category of indiscipline,” the BJP’s show cause notice against Ahuja reads. If the leader fails to respond to state BJP president Madan Rathore within the stipulated time, he may face further disciplinary action.

The controversy erupted after a Ramnavami consecration ceremony at a temple in Alwar, where Tikaram Jully was one of the guests. A day later, Gyandev Ahuja performed a purification ritual at the same temple, claiming the premises had become impure due to Jully’s presence. A video of the act, in which he is seen sprinkling gangajal and conducting a puja, went viral on social media, prompting severe criticism from the Congress and Dalit leaders.

Mr Ahuja, however, defended his actions, saying he had no personal animosity against Jully but blamed the Congress for hypocrisy over religious issues. “The Congress calls Ram Setu fictional. Then why do they come to a temple?” he asked.

Congress condemns remarks as casteist, demands accountability

Tikaram Jully, reacting to Ahuja’s actions, said, “This is not just an attack on my faith but a statement that encourages a crime like untouchability.” He also questioned whether BJP leaders believe Dalits are unfit to perform religious rituals.

Senior Congress leaders also slammed the BJP. Former Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot called the act unacceptable in a civilised society, while Congress MP Jairam Ramesh said Ahuja’s actions insult the ideals of Lord Ram and demanded an apology from the BJP leadership.

Not Ahuja’s first brush with controversy

Gyandev Ahuja, who served as MLA from Ramgarh between 2013 and 2018, has a history of controversial remarks. In 2016, he falsely claimed thousands of condoms and liquor bottles were found daily at JNU. In 2017, he defended the lynching of Pehlu Khan, a dairy farmer, by cow vigilantes, saying those who smuggle cows deserve such fate.

His repeated inflammatory statements have long drawn criticism, but this latest episode appears to have forced the BJP to take public action.

Continue Reading

India News

Supreme Court slams Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi over Bills, calls action illegal

In a strong rebuke to RN Ravi, the Supreme Court has declared his withholding of Tamil Nadu Bills illegal and arbitrary, reinforcing limits on Governor’s discretion.

Published

on

Supreme Court

In a significant setback for Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that his action of withholding assent and subsequently reserving 10 key Bills for the President was “illegal” and “arbitrary.” The court sided with the MK Stalin-led state government, asserting that the Governor failed to act in good faith.

A bench comprising Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan declared that the Governor’s decision to reserve the re-passed Bills for the President’s consideration was constitutionally impermissible. The court said all such actions by the Governor “are set aside,” and the 10 Bills in question “shall be deemed to be cleared from the date they were re-presented to him.”

Citing Article 200 of the Constitution, the bench emphasized that while Governors do have limited discretion — such as giving assent, withholding it, or reserving a Bill — once a Bill is re-passed by the Assembly, the Governor must give assent and cannot further delay or reserve it again. The ruling reinforces that a Governor cannot act on personal opinion or political preference when the democratic will of the legislature is clear.

The judgment also prescribed strict timelines to prevent indefinite delays by Governors. The court stated that a Governor must act on a Bill within one month — either by giving assent, withholding assent, or reserving it for the President’s consideration with the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers.

Judicial scrutiny for future delays

Highlighting the misuse of discretion, the Supreme Court warned that any failure to act within this stipulated timeframe would invite judicial scrutiny. The ruling is expected to have nationwide implications, especially in states where confrontations between Raj Bhavans and elected governments have become frequent.

This verdict is widely seen as a win for federalism and legislative supremacy, reinforcing the accountability of constitutional authorities to the elected governments they serve.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com