English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Digvijaya Singh’s remarks trigger sleeper cell controversy in Madhya Pradesh Congress

A disagreement over allegations related to the Ujjain land allotment triggered a political storm within the Madhya Pradesh Congress, prompting senior leaders to publicly reaffirm party unity.

Published

on

Digvijay Singh

The Madhya Pradesh Congress has found itself dealing with internal differences after senior party leaders made contrasting statements over allegations related to the allotment of government land in Ujjain. What began as an attack on the BJP-led Mohan Yadav government soon developed into a political controversy within the opposition party.

The issue centres on allegations that government land in Ujjain, reportedly valued at nearly Rs. 500 crore, was allotted to Veer Bharat Nyas for a nominal amount of Re 1.

Earlier, Madhya Pradesh Congress president Jitu Patwari and the party’s media department chairman Pawan Khera alleged that the land had been allotted at a token price to the trust. Patwari questioned the decision, pointing out that one of the trustees, Shriram Tiwari, serves as the Chief Minister’s cultural adviser.

Digvijaya Singh disputes key allegation

Former Chief Minister Digvijaya Singh later presented a different interpretation during a press interaction in Ujjain. Referring to documents in his possession, Singh said the trust was not a private organisation but a government trust headed by the Chief Minister in an ex officio capacity.

He maintained that the land had not been transferred to a private trust and said he does not comment on public issues without thoroughly examining the available documents.

Singh also remarked that there was no shortage of “dalals” who make false allegations for personal gain. Although he later clarified that the remark was not directed at Jitu Patwari or any Congress leader, the statement fuelled speculation about differences within the state unit.

Internal debate intensifies during party meeting

The issue reportedly featured prominently during the Congress Political Affairs Committee meeting in Bhopal, where several leaders discussed the differing public positions taken by Singh and Patwari.

MLA Arif Masood acknowledged that the differing statements were discussed, saying internal discussions were aimed at strengthening the party.

Former minister Sajjan Singh Verma said those responsible for creating confusion had been identified and appropriate action would follow. Former MLA Praveen Pathak reportedly questioned how party workers should respond to the public when senior leaders were presenting different versions of the issue.

Former Leader of Opposition Dr Govind Singh dismissed suggestions of “sleeper cells” within the Congress, saying that a large democratic organisation naturally allows members to express differing views.

Congress leaders and BJP trade barbs

The controversy escalated further after Madhya Pradesh Congress general secretary Nidhi Satyavrat Chaturvedi criticised Digvijaya Singh in a social media post. She accused the veteran leader of undermining party discipline and alleged that his actions were influenced by his desire to see his son, Jaivardhan Singh, become the state Congress president.

The BJP quickly targeted the Congress over the episode. State Sports Minister Vishvas Sarang claimed the developments reinforced the BJP’s long-standing allegation that the Congress levels accusations without sufficient evidence. He also said the party’s internal divisions had become visible in public.

Former Union minister Arun Yadav appealed to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and the party’s central leadership to intervene and strengthen organisational unity in Madhya Pradesh. In a post on X, he stressed the importance of combining the experience of senior leaders with the energy of younger workers to effectively challenge the BJP.

Congress projects unity after controversy

Amid the growing debate, Leader of Opposition Umang Singhar met Digvijaya Singh at his residence. The meeting came as discussions over the controversy continued within the party and on social media.

Later, Digvijaya Singh and Jitu Patwari jointly addressed the media, asserting that the Congress remained united in its campaign against the alleged corruption of the Mohan Yadav government. They said complaints related to land transactions involving the Chief Minister and his family were being examined by the party and that the opposition would continue its campaign collectively.

Singh also clarified that his earlier “dalal” remark had been misunderstood. He said Patwari was like a son to him and reiterated that he would never use such language for any Congress leader, including the state party president.

India News

Uniform rules for WhatsApp, Telegram under review as Centre examines legal aspects

The Centre is reviewing responses from WhatsApp, Telegram and Zoho Bharat Eye over username-based messaging features, with a notification on uniform rules likely within 20 days.

Published

on

WhatsApp

The Centre is reviewing responses submitted by WhatsApp, Telegram and Zoho Bharat Eye regarding their username-based messaging features, as the government evaluates whether regulatory action is required. A notification on the issue could be issued within the next 20 days.

MeitY examines responses from messaging platforms

According to sources in the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), WhatsApp, Telegram and Zoho Bharat Eye have responded to government notices concerning username-based messaging features.

The ministry’s legal team is scrutinising the replies to determine whether any existing legal provisions have been violated and whether any clauses can be invoked for regulatory action or sanctions.

Speaking on the sidelines of the launch of a cybersecurity report on Monday, MeitY Secretary S. Krishnan confirmed that WhatsApp’s response had been received over the weekend and is currently under examination.

“The reply was received last week. We are examining the response and action, if any, will be taken after that examination,” he said.

Government stresses uniform regulatory approach

The government has maintained that any regulatory framework introduced in connection with username-based messaging will apply equally across all messaging platforms rather than targeting any single service.

Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw has indicated that a notification on the matter is expected within the next 20 days. The ongoing review is focused on examining the legal implications rather than being a purely policy exercise.

Why the government raised concerns

MeitY had issued notices to WhatsApp, Telegram and Signal after expressing concerns that username-based messaging, which allows users to communicate without sharing their phone numbers, could be misused for impersonation, phishing, identity theft and so-called “digital arrest” scams.

Earlier, a WhatsApp spokesperson said the platform is primarily designed as a private messaging service that helps people stay connected with friends and family.

The review forms part of the government’s broader efforts to strengthen online safety, curb the misuse of digital communication platforms and ensure that any future regulations are implemented uniformly across messaging services.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi Police arrest 2 Lucknow University law students for disrupting Supreme Court proceedings

Published

on

By

The Delhi Police on Tuesday arrested Lucknow University law students Prabal Pratap Singh and Chandrabhan for disrupting proceedings inside the Supreme Court. The incident took place on July 10 in Courtroom No. 13 during a hearing before the bench of Justice K.V. Viswanathan and Justice Alok Aradhe.

Police said Prabal Pratap Singh, a third-year LLB student from Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, interrupted the court proceedings by shouting slogans, using abusive language against Chief Justice of India Justice Surya Kant, throwing court papers into the air, and creating chaos inside the courtroom. His associate, Chandrabhan, allegedly supported the disruption.

Security personnel in the Supreme Court overpowered the two and removed them from the courtroom, allowing the hearing to resume. The Court had magnanimously let them go without punishing them, CJI Surya Kant had also dismissed any action against the two law students saying they were like children.

Police said the accused had approached the Supreme Court in connection with a legal dispute after challenging an order of the Allahabad High Court. Investigators believe the disruption was linked to dissatisfaction with the progress of the case, although the exact motive is still being examined.

Following the incident, the Tilak Marg Police Station registered an FIR under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including charges of obstructing public servants from performing their duties, disturbing judicial proceedings, and acting with common intention. After their arrest, both accused were produced before a Delhi court, which remanded them to two days of police custody for questioning.

The incident has raised fresh concerns over security inside the country’s highest court. Although the Supreme Court has strict entry procedures and multiple security checks, the disruption has prompted authorities to review existing security arrangements to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Police are now analyzing CCTV footage, questioning the accused, and investigating whether anyone else was involved or if the act was planned in advance. Further legal action will depend on the findings of the investigation.

Continue Reading

India News

Congress invites Mamata Banerjee to July 21 event, asks her to admit leaving party was a mistake

The West Bengal Congress has invited Mamata Banerjee to its July 21 programme, asking her to publicly acknowledge that leaving the Congress was a political mistake while paying tribute to the 1993 martyrs.

Published

on

Mamata Banerjee

The West Bengal Congress has invited Trinamool Congress (TMC) chief Mamata Banerjee to its July 21 programme in Kolkata, saying she should publicly acknowledge that quitting the Congress nearly three decades ago was a political mistake.

The invitation came from West Bengal Congress president Subhankar Sarkar, who addressed reporters after reviewing preparations for the party’s ‘Martyrs’ Day’ programme at Shahid Minar.

Congress asks Mamata to acknowledge 1993 movement

Sarkar said Banerjee should recognise the historical importance of the July 21, 1993 movement instead of trying to alter its legacy.

According to him, the movement was organised under the banner of the Youth Congress, making it an integral part of the Congress’ political history.

He said political leaders who respect their own political journey earn greater public respect and urged Banerjee to pay tribute to the martyrs at the Congress programme.

‘Leaving Congress was a mistake’

Sarkar said Banerjee’s participation in the event would carry greater significance if she publicly admitted that leaving the Congress was the wrong political decision.

He described such a move as an act of political atonement and said the Congress stage remains open for anyone wishing to pay homage to those who died during the July 21, 1993 movement.

July 21 remains politically significant in West Bengal

The July 21, 1993 protest, led by Mamata Banerjee during her time in the Youth Congress, ended in police firing in which 13 people allegedly lost their lives.

After leaving the Congress in December 1997 to form the Trinamool Congress, Banerjee continued observing July 21 every year through large public rallies that gradually became a major display of the party’s organisational strength. The Congress, meanwhile, continued marking the day with comparatively smaller programmes.

Multiple events planned this year

The political landscape has changed following the TMC’s loss of power in the West Bengal Assembly elections, with the party also facing internal rebellion.

A rebel TMC faction led by Ritabrata Banerjee has announced a separate observance near the Mahatma Gandhi statue in Esplanade. Meanwhile, police have denied permission to another group loyal to the former chief minister to hold its programme at its traditional venue in front of Victoria House. The matter is currently pending before the court.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com