Latest Politics News
J&K Guv dissolves Assembly, prevents Govt formation as new alliance stakes claim
Published
8 years agoon
By
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Jammu and Kashmir Governor Satyapal Malik on Wednesday, Nov 21, night dissolved the state Assembly, which has been in suspended animation, shortly after rival alliances staked claim to form the government.
The state has been under Governor’s rule from June 19 this year after the government headed by the Peoples Democratic Party’s (PDP) Mehbooba Mufti fell when its partner BJP pulled out of the ruling coalition on June 16.
The state Assembly, which had two more years to go, was also kept in suspended animation so that political parties could explore the possibility of forming a new government. Now the six month period of Governor rule was drawing to a close on December 18 and President’s rule would have followed and, with the Assembly dissolved, would start from that date. Assembly elections would follow within six months.
The Governor’s decision came soon after Mehbooba Mufti staked the claim to form a government with the support of the Congress and the National Conference.
Shortly thereafter, People’s Conference leader Sajjad Lone also staked claim to form the government with the help of the 25-member BJP. The BJP had been discussing an alliance with Sajad Lone for weeks.
In a letter to the Governor, Mehbooba said the PDP is the largest party in the state assembly having a strength of 29 MLAs.
“You might have gathered from the media reports that the Congress and the National Conference have also decided to extend support to our party to form a government in the state. The National Conference has a strength of 15 MLAs and the Congress 12. That takes our collective strength to 56.
“Since I am presently in Srinagar, it would not be possible for me to call on you immediately and this is to keep you informed that we would be seeking your convenience shortly to stake the claim for forming the government in the state,” Mehbooba said in her letter.
After the news of dissolution of Assembly, the PDP leader charged that her message wasn’t received.
Governor Malik said on Thursday he didn’t receive her message as no one was sitting next to the fax machine when Mehbooba Mufti sent her letter as it was a holiday. “My office was shut because of Eid so I got no communication from Mehbooba Mufti. On a holiday, none was sitting next to the fax machine,” Malik told a TV news channel.
Mufti, who was ready with her letter that claimed the support of arch-rival National Conference (NC) and Congress to form the government in the restive state, turned to Twitter to deliver her claim, tagging the governor’s account.
The 59-year-old leader said she had been trying to send her letter staking claim to the Raj Bhavan. But “strangely the fax is not received”. She tried to contact him by phone too, but he was “not available”.
In a series of tweets on Wednesday, Mufti thanked NC’s Omar Abdullah and Congress’Ambika Soni “for helping us achieve the seemingly impossible” and said “the very idea of a grand coalition” had given jitters, in a sharp jibe at her former coalition partner.
“PS – In todays age of technology, it is very strange that the fax machine at HE Governor’s residence didn’t receive our fax but swiftly issued one regarding the assembly dissolution. ? (sic),” she said.
Abdullah also replied to Mufti’s tweet and said the Raj Bhawan needs a new fax machine urgently, taking a dig at Raj Bhavan with a picture of a fax machine with a shredder .
Raj Bhavan Jammu fax machine at work pic.twitter.com/RyLOhvQinc
— Omar Abdullah (@OmarAbdullah) November 21, 2018
“And I never thought I’d be retweeting anything you said while agreeing with you. Politics truly is a strange world. Good luck for the battle ahead. Once again the wisdom of the people will prevail,” he said, to Mehbooba Mufti’s tweet.
And I never thought I’d be retweeting anything you said while agreeing with you. Politics truly is a strange world. Good luck for the battle ahead. Once again the wisdom of the people will prevail. https://t.co/OcN9uRje1s
— Omar Abdullah (@OmarAbdullah) November 21, 2018
Governor Mailk’s claim of not being aware of happenings would appear doubtful, especially as the state machinery is under his command and also because everyone else was aware of the happenings. After Mehbooba Mufti staked claim, People’s Conference led by Sajjad Lone later staked a rival claim, saying it had the support of 25 legislators belonging to the BJP and “more than 18” others.
While the PDP leader could not get through to the Governor, Sajad Lone, however, did have a phone conversation with the Governor, said media reports. “I shall submit the Letter of Support from the BJP legislature Party and other members supporting the government… as and when asked to do so by your Excellency,” his letter read.
The People’s Conference was founded by Sajad Lone’s father Abdul Ghani Lone, who was killed by Pakistan-based terrorists in 2002.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1542883647550{border-top-width: 10px !important;border-right-width: 10px !important;border-bottom-width: 10px !important;border-left-width: 10px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-right: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;padding-left: 10px !important;background-color: #dbdbdb !important;border-radius: 10px !important;}”]Governor Satyapal Malik’s reasoning
The Governor cited various reasons for his decision to dissolve the assembly. He said he concluded the assembly had to be dissolved due to “The impossibility of forming a stable government by the coming together of political parties with opposing political ideologies” and “Reports of extensive horse trading and possible exchange of money in order to secure the support of legislators.”
On Thursday he justified his decision claiming that MLAs were receiving terrorist threats and even directions on government formation.
“I had been receiving reports from various quarters, including intelligence agencies, for the last week to ten days that in efforts to form the government, the atmosphere has been made vicious,” Malik said.
“Bade paimane par paisa diya ja raha hai. Logon ko daraya ja raha hai, dhamkaya ja raha hai. Kuch logon ko terrorist threat diya ja raha hai. Is tarah se sarkar banane ki koshish ki ja rahi hai. Main is ko kaisey allow karta (I had been receiving reports from various quarters, including intelligence, that the atmosphere has been so vitiated that money is being offered at large scale. People are being threatened and even issued terrorist threats. This is how efforts are being made to form government. How could I have allowed it?),” Malik asked.
This was in reference to accusations by the People Democratic Party (PDP) and National Conference (NC) that dissolution of the Assembly was murder of democracy in the state.
About PDP and NC leaders’ charge that the Governor’s House did not receive Mehbooba Mufti’s fax Wednesday staking claim to form government, Malik said that his office was closed on account of Eid. He added there was no one in his office to even serve him food and that the leaders could have sent it to him a day earlier.
“Even if they had delivered it to us, it would have made no material impact in view of reports received by me during the past ten days,” Malik said. Even PDP leader Mehbooba Mufti had been complaining of attempts to break her party, the Governor said, adding that others were talking about attempts to create an unholy alliance by parties which had nothing in common.
“Those crying foul have themselves been asking me for last five months to dissolve the Assembly. However, I had been keeping it alive as MLAs were having funds and public works were going on. The political process was halfway through, but it was on,” Malik said.
About NC and PDP, Malik said that they were the people who had been opposed to urban and rural local body elections. This (government formation attempts) would have adversely hit the security forces and police efforts to successfully conduct the ongoing panchayat elections, he said.
The Governor described the PDP-NC efforts to stitch an alliance for government formation as “unholy”. He said, “This was a power-hungry alliance and for self-preservation, to avoid split in their respective parties. There has been a lot of dissatisfaction among both the parties.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The governor, said media reports quoting sources, met Prime Minister Narendra Modi two days ago and reportedly followed it up with a meeting with BJP president Amit Shah.
Shortly after the governor dissolved the assembly, Omar Abdullah tweeted: “@JKNC_ has been pressing for assembly dissolution for 5 months now. It can’t be a coincidence that within minutes of @MehboobaMufti letter staking claim the order to dissolve the assembly suddenly appears.”
In a later tweet, Mufti said, “PS – In todays age of technology, it is very strange that the fax machine at HE Governor’s residence didn’t receive our fax but swiftly issued one regarding the assembly dissolution.”
The reaction from Congress was strange. Senior Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad contradicted Mehbooba Mufti and Omar Abdullah’s line, saying, “nobody was keen to form a government”. “Neither was National Conference keen to form a government, the Congress was not keen at all to form a government. It was a suggestion,” Azad told NDTV.
The BJP jeered in a series of tweets. “The proposed alliance between the INC and the PDP broke up even before it was formed. They have taken contradictory positions on dissolution. One supports it and the other opposes it,” said one tweet.
The dissolution of assembly found support from the BJP, whose tie-up with PDP with diametrically different ideology had unravelled in June. Questioning Mufti’s Grand Alliance, the BJP said in a tweet, “The best option in such a scenario is to go in for a fresh election at the earliest. This assembly cannot produce a stable government.”
The BJP has called for an urgent meeting with all its MLAs on Thursday to decide the future course of action, BJP state president Ravinder Raina told ANI. “We wish that the Assembly elections in J&K should be conducted along with the Parliament elections,” he said.
Statements from the BJP and Governor Satyapal Malik were on the similar lines.
The BJP said on Twitter that the border state cannot afford horse-trading and instability keeping its security scenario in mind.
It added that the state needs a firm administration to deal with terrorism and not a combination of “terror-friendly parties”.
In an online interview, BJP national general secretary Ram Madhav was reported to have claimed that the regional parties had received “instructions from across the border.”
“The PDP and the NC boycotted local body polls last month because they had instructions from across the border. Probably, they had fresh instructions from across the border to come together and form government… The sudden love between NC and PDP and the hurry to form a government leads to many suspicions and political comments,” Madhav had said.
Governor Malik had said the political parties in the State were indulging in “horse-trading” and money was “changing hands”. He had also spoken of terror threat.
Omar Abdullah responds
National Conference leader and former state chief minister Omar Abdullah took exception to these statements and said his party will take legal action against BJP.
“This is ridiculous, to say the least. It is outright defamatory. It is too much now. They (BJP) had nothing to say in response to us so they make this defamatory allegation. Till yesterday, they were partners of PDP.
“Our party will explore the option of legal action against BJP. Such allegations cannot go unanswered. Because non-BJP parties have the numbers in assembly and are coming together to form a government, they become ‘terror-friendly’ and ‘anti-national’. This won’t be tolerated,” he said.
“One of their (tv) channels was even claiming that this mahaghatbandan (of PDP, NC, Congress) was hatched in Dubai and London by Pakistan. This is becoming too much. No party has given more sacrifices than NC. Thousands of our workers have been killed over the years. What is BJP’s contribution in J&K other than this defamatory language,” Abdullah said.
Taking to Twitter, Abdullah ‘dared’ Madhav to prove his allegation – that the NC and PDP boycotted the Urban Local Body (ULB) elections in Jammu and Kashmir by acting behest of Pakistan – and put the evidence in public domain or “be man enough” to apologise.
At a press conference in Srinagar, Abdullah asked Governor Malik and Ram Madhav to prove the allegations they had made against the new alliance.
“The Governor while enumerating reasons to dissolve the Assembly mentioned attempts at horse trading and money being spent. People of J&K need to know who spent the money? Where did it come from? And at whose behest the MLAs were being purchased?” said Abdullah in a press conference in Srinagar.
He also sought an explanation on why the fax machine at the Raj Bhawan “was one sided.” “It failed to receive PDP’s claim at forming government but was able to send letter on dissolution of Assembly. This need to be explained,” he said.
Terming the coming together of National Conference, Congress and BJP as “bid to clean up the mess, striking a balance and ending uncertainty in J&K,” Abdullah said, “The aim was to protect the special status of J&K, as Article 35A was coming up for hearing before the Supreme Court in January. We wanted a defence of the Article and would have dissolved the Assembly to pave for fresh elections.”
Abdullah remained non-committal on continuing his party’s alliance with the PDP. “J&K requires a genuine opposition too. We do not want to create a situation where fringe elements will fill any political vacuum,” he said.
He challenged Ram Madhav to prove his allegations on Pakistan hand in the alliance. “Mr. Madhav, you are disrespecting sacrifices of my workers who died because they refused to dance on the tunes of Pakistan. More NC workers died than BJP workers in Kashmir. If you have evidence, place it before the public. This politics of shoot and scoot will not work, else apologise,” he added.
He said Madhav is not upset with Pakistan “but his own failure to install a government in J&K through a backdoor.”
Earlier, in a series of tweets, Abdullah refuted Madhav’s allegations. “Misplaced attempts at humour won’t work. You have claimed my party has been acting at the behest of Pakistan. I dare you to prove it. Place the evidence of your allegation of NC boycott of Urban Local Bodies polls at Pakistan’s behest in the public domain. It’s an open challenge to you and your government,” he tweeted.
“You have RAW, NIA and IB at your command (CBI too is your parrot) so have the guts to place evidence in the public domain. Either prove this or be man enough to apologise. Don’t practice shoot and scoot politics,” he responded to Madhav.
Ram Madhav backtracks
After Omar Abdullah’s strong remarks, Madhav backtracked and said said, “I take back my comment.”
He said he was not questioning Abdullah’s patriotism. “Just take it in your stride @OmarAbdullah Not questioning your patriotism at all. But d sudden love between NC n PDP n d hurry to form government leads to many suspicions n political comments. Not to offend u,” Madhav tweeted, with a toothy smile emoji.
Abdullah was unyielding. “No, misplaced attempts at humour won’t work. You HAVE claimed my party has been acting at the behest of Pakistan. I dare you to prove it! Place the evidence of your allegation of NC boycott of ULB polls at Pak behest in public domain,” he tweeted.
Subsequently, Madhav backtracked his comment and also quipped that Abdullah should fight the next elections alongside PDP.
“Just landed@Aizawl n saw this. Now tht u deny any external pressure I take back my comment, bt, now tht u proved it ws genuine love btw NC n PDP tht prompted a failed govt formation attempt,u shud fight nxt elections 2gether. Mind u it’s pol comnt, not personal,” Madhav tweeted along with “tears of joy” emoji.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
You may like
-
Jammu and Kashmir parties observe August 5 as Black Day, hold protests over Article 370
-
Omar Abdullah criticises Martyrs’ Day restrictions, calls LG administration temporary guests
-
Omar Abdullah hits back at BJP over Rs 100 crore legal notice, says party is hiding behind court
-
Lashkar terrorist killed in Shopian encounter after days-long search operation
-
Heavy rain triggers flash floods and landslides across Jammu and Kashmir, damaging roads and property
-
India will never bow to terror, PM Modi says on Pahalgam attack anniversary
India News
INDIA bloc likely to meet on September 30 over Gyanesh Kumar row
INDIA bloc parties are likely to meet in New Delhi on September 30 amid growing opposition to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.
Published
1 day agoon
September 26, 2026By
APNLive Desk
Opposition parties belonging to the INDIA bloc are set to meet in New Delhi on September 30 to discuss concerns surrounding the Election Commission, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and a proposed removal motion against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.
The proposed meeting comes amid growing coordination among opposition parties over the functioning of the poll panel and demands for action against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The parties are also discussing a possible joint response to the developments.
Why is the INDIA bloc meeting being planned?
The INDIA bloc meeting on September 30 comes amid reports of objections within the Election Commission over certain decisions and orders related to the SIR exercise.
According to the report, Opposition leaders have been discussing a coordinated response to their concerns over the Election Commission and the electoral-roll revision process.
The issue is also expected to be discussed at the Congress Working Committee meeting scheduled for September 29, a day before the proposed INDIA bloc meeting.
Gyanesh Kumar removal demand in focus
The demand for the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar has become a major point of contention between the Opposition and the Election Commission.
The CPI(M), CPI and CPI(ML)-Liberation have demanded Kumar’s removal and an immediate halt to the SIR exercise. Congress has also intensified its criticism of the CEC.
Opposition parties are also working on a fresh removal motion against Gyanesh Kumar. The September 30 meeting is expected to finalise the strategy for the motion, including the collection of signatures. According to the report, this would be the Opposition’s third such attempt.
What is the SIR controversy?
The political dispute is linked to the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, or SIR.
The controversy intensified following a report that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had recorded objections on several occasions concerning decisions and orders related to the SIR process.
The Election Commission has said that differing views and observations are part of normal deliberations in a multi-member constitutional body. The poll panel has also maintained that its orders have legal sanction and follow statutory procedures, while stating that the final decisions on the SIR were taken unanimously.
TMC and Left parties coordinate over the issue
The developments have also brought the Trinamool Congress and the CPI(M) together on the Election Commission issue, despite their political differences in West Bengal.
CPI(M) general secretary M A Baby proposed an immediate meeting to discuss a joint strategy. According to the report, Mamata Banerjee spoke with M A Baby and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, after which the leaders settled on September 30 for the meeting.
What could be discussed at the September 30 meeting?
The proposed meeting is expected to focus on:
- Concerns surrounding the Election Commission
- The Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls
- Opposition demands concerning CEC Gyanesh Kumar
- A possible fresh removal notice against the CEC
- A coordinated response by INDIA bloc parties
The exact agenda and participation will depend on the discussions among the opposition parties before the proposed meeting.
India News
Gandhi Parivar vs Sangh Parivar, Revanth Reddy’s remark sparks BJP attack
Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy’s remarks contrasting the Gandhi Parivar with the Sangh Parivar triggered a BJP response accusing Congress of prioritising the Gandhi family.
Published
1 day agoon
September 26, 2026By
APNLive Desk
Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy’s remarks comparing the Gandhi Parivar and Sangh Parivar have triggered a political exchange, with the BJP hitting back at the Congress leader.
Speaking in Kerala on Friday, Mr Reddy described the contest over India’s future as a fight between the two “parivars”. He said the Gandhi family had made sacrifices for the country while accusing the Sangh Parivar of attempting to divide India on the basis of religion, caste, region and language.
What Revanth Reddy said
Mr Reddy cited Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi while speaking about what he described as sacrifices made by the Gandhi family.
He also referred to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi, saying they had given up positions, power and high office.
The Telangana Chief Minister said he had no remaining personal political ambitions and described his objective as working towards a Congress-led government at the Centre with Rahul Gandhi as Prime Minister.
Mr Reddy also appealed to people to stand with the Gandhi Parivar and oppose the Sangh Parivar. He described the latter as a threat to India’s democracy.
BJP hits back
The BJP responded to Mr Reddy’s remarks on Saturday.
BJP spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari said the Telangana Chief Minister’s comments amounted to an admission that Congress’s objective was to bring the Gandhi family back to power.
He also linked Mr Reddy’s remarks to the ongoing political debate around “vote chori”, the Election Commission, the Constitution and democracy, arguing that the Congress’s focus was instead on the Gandhi family.
The exchange adds to the political confrontation between the BJP and Congress, with Mr Reddy presenting the Gandhi Parivar and Sangh Parivar as opposing forces in India’s political future, while the BJP has interpreted his remarks as evidence of Congress’s focus on the Gandhi family.
India News
Veeramani POCSO case: Vijay questions Stalin over earlier probe
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay has questioned MK Stalin over the handling of the Veeramani POCSO case, while Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected anyone.
Published
2 days agoon
September 25, 2026By
APNLive Desk
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) president C Joseph Vijay has questioned DMK president MK Stalin over the handling of the POCSO case involving Gem Granites founder R Veeramani. The political exchange follows renewed investigation into allegations involving minor girls.
Vijay’s remarks came as the ruling TVK stepped up its questions about how the case was handled during the previous DMK government. The party’s IT wing has alleged that the earlier investigation was weakened and questioned why a final report was filed.
The allegations have been rejected by the DMK. Stalin has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to protect anyone in the case and has called the allegations false and defamatory.
What did Vijay say about the Veeramani case?
Vijay questioned Stalin over the handling of the case and demanded an explanation from the former chief minister.
The TVK has specifically questioned why action was not taken against Veeramani during the previous administration and why the earlier investigation resulted in a closure report.
The party has also raised questions about the role of officials involved in the earlier investigation. These are political allegations made by the TVK and have not been established as facts.
What is the Veeramani POCSO case?
The case concerns allegations of sexual abuse of minors involving R Veeramani, the founder of Gem Granites.
The case came under renewed scrutiny after a special POCSO court rejected an earlier closure report and ordered further investigation. The expanded probe has subsequently identified additional alleged survivors who were minors at the time of the alleged offences, according to current reporting.
The investigation is also examining the circumstances surrounding the earlier probe and whether there were any lapses in how the case was handled.
What has MK Stalin said?
Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected Veeramani.
He has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to shield anyone in the case. Stalin has also said that everyone responsible for the alleged offences, including anyone who aided or attempted to protect the accused, should face the law.
The DMK president has further said that the focus should remain on securing justice for the affected girls rather than making political allegations.
Why has the case become a political issue?
The Veeramani case has become the subject of a political dispute between the ruling TVK and the DMK over the handling of the earlier investigation.
The TVK is questioning the previous government’s handling of the case, while the DMK has denied that it intervened to protect the accused.
At this stage, claims about political interference or deliberate weakening of the earlier investigation should be treated as allegations unless established by the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.
S Jaishankar calls Pakistan a “serial practitioner of terrorism” at UN
LPU students protest over reported rape allegation, police call it rumour
LPU students protest over reported rape allegation, police call it rumour
S Jaishankar calls Pakistan a “serial practitioner of terrorism” at UN
INDIA bloc likely to meet on September 30 over Gyanesh Kumar row
“Will die but won’t give up”: Sahil Wakode’s parents urge IIT students to continue fight
