English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

Maharashtra political tussle: All you need to know about the Supreme Court verdict

CJI ruled that the erstwhile Maha Vikas Aghadi government in Maharashtra cannot be restored due to the resignation.

Published

on

Maharashtra political tussle

On Thursday, a constitution bench of the Supreme Court headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud pronounced its verdict on the petitions filed by both Uddhav Thackeray faction and Eknath Shinde faction in regards to the rebellion by Shinde last year that resulted to split of Shiv Sena and him ruling the state allying with the BJP.

The bench along Justice Chandrachud included Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha.

Here’s all you need to know about today’s verdict

CJI said cannot quash resignation

CJI Chandrachud ruled the bench cannot quash the resignation of Uddhav Thackeray from the CM post as he did not face floor test, Status quo ante cannot be restored as Thackeray resigned.

CJI ruled that the erstwhile Maha Vikas Aghadi government in Maharashtra cannot be restored due to the resignation.

During the rebellion episode last year, the Shinde camp approached then Maharashtra Governor Bhagat Singh Koshiyari citing life threats after which Koshiyari asked Thackeray to call for a trust vote but just before it could take place, Thackeray resigned.

Read Also: Delhi govt vs Centre: Elected government has power over services, L-G duty-bound to comply, says Supreme Court

Bench on Governor’s role

The bench ruled that the Governor has no role to play in any intra party to inter party disputes and is not entitled to jump into political matters.

The bench also ruled that the Governor is ought not to act on the basis that some members want to leave a party (referring to action taken by Koshiyari when Shinde along other leaders wished to leave Shiv Sena expressing their dissatisfaction).

The bench in its verdict talking about the decision taken by Koshiyari to call for floor test, said he should not have done it relying on the security concerns raised by Shinde group and that he is ought not to take a decision on a letter that states that Thackeray has lost the majority.

The bench ruled that that Governor has no power in its hands to say that ruling government has lost the majority count.

On the speaker’s role of disqualification of MLAs

Chief Justice Chandrachud on the role of speaker in disqualification of MLAs said, the matter has been refereed to a larger bench.

The Shinde Camp last year raised a no-confidence motion against then deputy speaker of the house who issued disqualification notice to the rebel MLAs.

In a petition filed by Shinde faction, it raised questions over the power of a assembly Speaker to consider disqualification proceedings as the 2016 Nabam Rebia judgment of a five-judge bench pronounced a verdict that a Speaker cannot consider such proceedings if any no- confidence motions against him/her are pending before the House.

Stalin govt files defamation suit against Tamil Nadu BJP chief

Nearly a dozen army school shut down in Jammu after intel of terror attack, high alert issued

India News

Congress, SP send mixed signals on AIMIM’s role ahead of 2027 Uttar Pradesh polls

Congress and Samajwadi Party leaders have responded differently to questions about AIMIM’s role ahead of the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, highlighting ongoing discussions over opposition strategy.

Published

on

Differing responses from Congress and Samajwadi Party leaders have highlighted varying approaches within the Opposition camp regarding the possible role of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) in the run-up to the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections.

The discussion gained momentum after AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi launched his party’s campaign preparations for the 2027 elections from Bahraich and reiterated that his party is open to alliances, provided it is treated with respect and as an equal partner.

Different responses from Congress and SP

Reacting to questions about a possible understanding with AIMIM, Congress leader Imran Masood said any decision on alliances would be taken by the party leadership. He also stressed that there could be no compromise with communalism.

On the other hand, Samajwadi Party leader Ram Gopal Yadav adopted a more accommodating tone, stating that anyone capable of defeating the BJP would be welcome. His remarks were viewed as leaving the door open to broader anti-BJP political cooperation.

The differing responses have drawn attention as Opposition parties continue to assess their electoral strategies ahead of the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections.

AIMIM steps up preparations

AIMIM has begun expanding its campaign activity in Uttar Pradesh, with Owaisi launching the party’s preparations from Bahraich. The Hyderabad MP has indicated that AIMIM is willing to consider alliances but has maintained that any partnership must be based on mutual respect and equality.

The party is also working to strengthen its organisational presence in the state as it seeks a larger role in Uttar Pradesh politics ahead of the next Assembly election.

No formal alliance announced

Despite the ongoing discussion, no formal alliance or seat-sharing arrangement involving AIMIM and major Opposition parties has been announced so far.

With more than a year remaining before the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, political equations are expected to evolve as parties finalise their strategies and alliance plans.

Continue Reading

India News

Vijay meets PM Modi for second time as Tamil Nadu Chief Minister during Delhi visit

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay met Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi during his latest visit to the capital, marking their second interaction since Vijay became Chief Minister.

Published

on

Actor vijay

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay met Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi on Thursday, marking their second meeting since Vijay assumed office last month.

The meeting took place during Vijay’s visit to the national capital, where he has also been scheduled to attend the Governing Council meeting of NITI Aayog. Reports indicate that the interaction between the two leaders lasted around 20 minutes.

This follows Vijay’s first official meeting with the Prime Minister on May 27, shortly after taking charge as Tamil Nadu Chief Minister. During that meeting, Vijay submitted a memorandum on several issues concerning the state, including the Mekedatu dam project, Tamil Nadu fishermen detained in Sri Lanka, and other matters related to the state’s interests.

Vijay’s latest Delhi visit has included meetings with several national leaders as he continues engagements with the Centre and leaders from different political parties. Reports said he also met senior Congress leaders during the trip.

The Tamil Nadu Chief Minister took office on May 10 after his party, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), emerged as a key force in the 2026 Assembly elections and formed the government with support from alliance partners.

While details of the latest discussion between Vijay and the Prime Minister were not immediately disclosed, the meeting is being viewed as part of ongoing Centre-state consultations on issues concerning Tamil Nadu.

Continue Reading

India News

Abhishek Banerjee gets three-week interim protection in Bengal signature forgery case

TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee has secured three weeks of interim protection from coercive action in the Bengal signature forgery case while the CID probe continues.

Published

on

Abhishek Banerjee

Trinamool Congress MP Abhishek Banerjee has received interim protection from coercive action for three weeks from the Calcutta High Court in connection with the alleged signature forgery case being investigated by the West Bengal CID. The relief comes amid an ongoing legal challenge by the senior party leader against repeated summons issued by investigators.

The case relates to allegations that signatures of several Trinamool Congress MLAs were forged on a party resolution submitted to the West Bengal Assembly during a leadership dispute. The complaint led to the registration of a case and a CID investigation, with the agency seeking to question Banerjee regarding the disputed document.

Court grants temporary relief

During the hearing, the court granted Banerjee protection from arrest and other coercive measures for three weeks while the matter remains under judicial consideration. The interim order provides temporary relief as the legal proceedings continue and the CID investigation moves forward.

Banerjee had approached the High Court challenging the CID summons and seeking protection from any adverse action. He had also requested additional time to appear before investigators, citing legal proceedings and other commitments.

CID probe and summons

The West Bengal CID has issued multiple notices to Banerjee in the alleged forgery case and has maintained that his statement is important for the investigation. Investigators have also questioned several MLAs and carried out searches linked to the probe.

According to investigators, the inquiry focuses on allegations that signatures appearing on a party communication submitted to the Assembly did not match those of some legislators. The authenticity of the document and related records remains under examination.

The matter is expected to return to court after the expiry of the interim protection period, while the CID investigation continues.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com