English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

Simultaneous polls: four parties for, nine against; BJP, Congress views to come later

Published

on

Simultaneous polls: four parties for, nine against; BJP, Congress views to come later

As the two-day consultation held by Law Commission on the issue of holding Lok Sabha and assembly polls simultaneously ended on Sunday, four political parties supported the idea and nine opposed it.

The two major national parties — the BJP and the Congress — stayed away from the Law Commission’s deliberations. The BJP has, however, written to the Law Commission Chairman, Justice BS Chauhan, stating that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has always argued in favour of simultaneous polls and sought time to submit their detailed response later.

Justice Chauhan is learnt to have asked that all representations be submitted by July 31.

The Congress said it would firm up its stand on the issue only after talking to allies and other political parties.

The NDA ally Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD), the AIADMK, the Samajwadi Party (SP) and the Telangana Rashtra Samiti (TRS) supported the idea.

BJP’s ally Goa Forward Party opposed the concept as did the Trinamool Congress (TMC), Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), DMK, Telugu Desam Party (TDP), CPI, CPI (M), All India Forward Block (AIFB) and the Janata Dal (Secular) (JD-S).

The DMK, JD-S, and AAP were strongly opposed to simultaneous elections and argued that the move was against “basic tenets of the Constitution.”

The TDP said while the One Nation-One Poll may be a “good idea”, it was “incompatible with the Constitution and impracticable.”

DMK Working President MK Stalin’s letter, submitted by party MP Tiruchi Siva, pointed out, “The Working Paper does not seem to have considered that the Lok Sabha is also capable of being dissolved before its five year tenure. If such a situation were to happen, it is unclear whether all Legislative Assemblies will also be dissolved to synchronise the electoral process again.”

“In a federal democracy you cannot think of simultaneous elections. This is a futile exercise. First and foremost poll reform should be to put a ceiling on expenditure but no one’s talking about it,” senior JD-S leader Danish Ali told The Hindu and added that the proposal was aimed against smaller regional players.

The SP, TRS, AAP, DMK, TDP, JD (S) and All India Forward Block met the Law Commission to put forth their views.

The SP, represented by Ram Gopal Yadav, supported the concept. But Yadav made it clear that the first simultaneous poll should be held in 2019, when the term of the 16th Lok Sabha comes to an end.

If simultaneous polls are held in 2019, the tenure of the Yogi Adityanath’s BJP government in Uttar Pradesh will be shortened.

AAP’s Ashish Ketan told the law panel that simultaneous polls are a ploy to keep people away from forming a government as the terms of houses will be extended if the two polls are held together.

He also dubbed the idea as a move to impose “managed democracy” in the country, a senior law panel functionary present in the deliberations, said.

He also said Prime Minister Narendra Modi should be governing the country and not addressing rallies if simultaneous polls are held.

In a written response to the law panel, Telangana CM K Chandrasekhar Rao said his party supports the idea as months are spent preparing for polls throughout the year. B Vinod Kumar, who represented TRS at the meeting, said the analysis that local issues would be overshadowed by national issues if simultaneous polls are held, is incorrect. He gave examples of Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu to drive home the point that voters cast ballot keeping in mind both national and local issues.

The TDP also opposed the idea, saying, “Simultaneous elections are no longer feasible in a vast country like ours with different political complexities of the assemblies. It is not possible to cut short the tenure of the Parliament and Assemblies. Simultaneous elections are incompatible with the Constitution and are also impracticable.”

The DMK, JD-S and AIFB also opposed the concept.

JD-S representative Danish Ali told the law panel that the idea is against federal democracy. He said if the government is interested in electoral reforms, it should first implement earlier law panel reports on election reforms and then discuss simultaneous polls.

Yesterday, Shiromani Akali Dal had supported the concept, saying it would reduce expenditure of parties and shorten the period of the model code of conduct which hampers development work.

The AIADMK, represented by Lok Sabha Deputy Speaker M Thambi Durai, had said holding the two polls together is “desirable” but certain “practical” and “serious” issues need to be settled first.

The AIADMK, which rules Tamil Nadu, was of the view that if necessary, simultaneous elections should be held in 2024 and not before that. Sources said the party was also of the view that the TN Assembly should be allowed to complete its term and the Lok Sabha elections should be held as per schedule.

The TMC Congress was represented by Kalyan Bandhopadhyay, a Lok Sabha member, at the meeting. His party too had opposed the concept saying, regional issues would be overshadowed by national issues, and national parties with their “money power” would steal a march over smaller players.

The CPI, AIDUF and Goa Forward Party also expressed similar views.

The CPI(M) had last week told the Law Commission that holding Lok Sabha and Assembly polls together is inherently “anti-democratic” and negates the principles of federalism which is a fundamental feature of Constitution.

CPI(M) General Secretary Sitaram Yechury had written to the panel, listing the party’s objections to the proposal stating that it goes beyond the ambit of law reform entailing major amendments to Constitution, and would run against both the “letter and spirit of our Constitution”.

Yechury had said that it “may not be necessary” that his party attends the consultation.

Seeking to give shape to the government’s concept of “one nation, one election”, the Law Commission’s internal working paper has recommended holding the Lok Sabha and Assembly polls simultaneously but in two phases beginning 2019.

India News

Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Azmi alleges threat to life after suspension from Maharashtra Assembly

Abu Azmi has claimed that his suspension from the Maharashtra Assembly is unfair and that he and his family are facing threats. The decision has sparked a political debate.

Published

on

SP MLA Abu Azmi addressing the media post-suspension

Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Azmi has alleged threats to his life and family after being suspended from the Maharashtra Assembly for the entire duration of the ongoing budget session. The suspension was imposed following his remarks on Mughal emperor Aurangzeb, which sparked controversy within the House.

Taking to social media platform X, Azmi called the decision “arbitrary” and accused the government of silencing elected representatives. He stated, “My suspension is arbitrary on the part of the government. There is a threat to my life and that of my family. Two laws are in force in Maharashtra. If democracy has ended in Maharashtra, then the government can do anything to the public and elected representatives.”

Azmi expresses disappointment over the decision

Prior to this, Azmi had expressed his disappointment over the suspension and mentioned that he was willing to withdraw his remarks for the smooth functioning of the Assembly. “To ensure that the House functions, I spoke about withdrawing my statement. I did not say anything wrong. Still, there is a controversy, and the proceedings of the House are being stalled,” he said.

He also clarified that his controversial remarks were made outside the Assembly and not during the House proceedings. Despite his attempts to clarify, the Maharashtra Assembly Speaker upheld the suspension.

Akhilesh Yadav comes out in support

Samajwadi Party Chief and former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav condemned the suspension, calling it a violation of freedom of expression. “If the basis of suspension starts getting influenced by ideology, then what difference will there be between freedom of expression and subjection?” Yadav questioned.

He further added that such actions would not deter party leaders, stating, “If some people think that by ‘suspension’ one can rein them in, then this is the childishness of their negative thinking.”

Speaker justifies suspension over ‘objectionable’ remarks

Maharashtra Assembly Speaker Rahul Narwekar announced the suspension of Abu Azmi on Wednesday, following a proposal introduced against him in the House. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Chandrakant Patil asserted that Azmi’s remarks had hurt the dignity of the Assembly, prompting the move.

Azmi had reportedly stated that Aurangzeb was not a “cruel administrator” and that he had “built many temples.” He also claimed that the conflict between Aurangzeb and Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj was about state administration rather than a Hindu-Muslim issue.

The decision to suspend Azmi has triggered a political debate, with supporters questioning the fairness of the move while the ruling government defends it as necessary to uphold the decorum of the House.

Continue Reading

Latest Politics News

RJD slams Nitish Kumar after Bihar CM says he made Lalu Yadav

The RJD has consistently criticized the JD(U)-led government for its handling of unemployment, education, and healthcare, among other concerns.

Published

on

Rajya Sabha MP and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Manoj Jha on Wednesday took a sharp dig at Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, sarcastically referring to him as the “creator of the universe” and “Brahma.” Jha’s remarks came a day after Kumar engaged in a heated exchange in the Bihar Assembly, where he claimed credit for elevating RJD patriarch Lalu Prasad Yadav in the state’s politics.

During the Assembly session on Tuesday, Nitish Kumar had targeted Tejashwi Yadav, the leader of the opposition and Lalu Prasad’s son, stating, “What was in Bihar before? I made your father. When he entered politics, there was nothing in Bihar at the time.” Kumar also claimed that even members of Lalu’s caste opposed his rise, but he supported him nonetheless. “Even people from your caste were asking me why I was doing this, but I still supported him,” Kumar said.

Responding to Kumar’s comments, Manoj Jha expressed concern over the Chief Minister’s tone and language. Speaking to ANI, Jha said, “I am worried about Nitish Kumar now. It is so unfortunate that he is using such language. You (Nitish Kumar) were in Lalu ji’s team, you were called Lalu ji’s man.”

Jha defended Tejashwi Yadav’s speech in the Assembly, stating that the RJD leader had presented a logical and comprehensive analysis of Bihar’s contemporary challenges and future prospects. “Yesterday, Tejashwi Yadav, without any bitterness, gave a historical analysis, contemporary challenges, and an outline of the future. He explained everything based on logic… You (Nitish Kumar) did not answer it… You are the creator of the universe, you are Brahma. If such thoughts are coming to your mind these days, then I am even more worried about you,” Jha added.

The RJD leader’s sarcastic remarks highlight the growing tension between the ruling Janata Dal (United) and the opposition RJD in Bihar. Earlier on Tuesday, Tejashwi Yadav had compared the governance of his father, Lalu Prasad Yadav, with that of Nitish Kumar, criticizing the current administration’s policies and performance.

Tejashwi also slammed the budget presented by the Nitish Kumar government, accusing it of failing to address the state’s pressing issues. The RJD has consistently criticized the JD(U)-led government for its handling of unemployment, education, and healthcare, among other concerns.

The war of words between the two political heavyweights underscores the deepening rift in Bihar’s political landscape. As the state gears up for future elections, the verbal sparring between Nitish Kumar and the RJD leadership is likely to intensify, with both sides vying to assert their influence and credibility.

Manoj Jha’s jibe at Nitish Kumar as the “creator of the universe” reflects the RJD’s strategy to portray the Chief Minister as out of touch with reality, while Kumar’s claims about Lalu Prasad’s rise aim to reinforce his own political legacy. The ongoing political drama in Bihar continues to captivate the state’s electorate, setting the stage for a fierce electoral battle in the coming months.

Continue Reading

India News

Ramdas Athawale invites Akash Anand to join Republican Party of India after BSP expulsion

After Mayawati expelled her nephew Akash Anand from BSP, RPI chief Ramdas Athawale extended an invitation to him, stating it would strengthen their party’s presence in Uttar Pradesh.

Published

on

Ramdas Athawale offers Akash Anand to join RPI

Republican Party of India (A) chief Ramdas Athawale has extended an invitation to Akash Anand, the expelled nephew of Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) chief Mayawati, to join his party. Athawale stated that if Anand is committed to carrying forward the mission of Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar, he would be welcomed into the Republican Party of India (RPI), which would further strengthen the party’s presence in Uttar Pradesh.

“If he (Akash Anand) wants to take forward the mission of Baba Saheb Bhimrao Ambedkar, he should join the Republican Party of India. If he joins the party, the Republican Party of India will get more strength in UP,” Athawale remarked.

Mayawati expels Akash Anand, calls his response ‘selfish and arrogant’

On Monday, Mayawati expelled Akash Anand from the BSP, stating that his reaction after being relieved from his duties was immature and self-centered. The BSP supremo accused him of being heavily influenced by his father-in-law, Ashok Siddharth, who was also ousted from the party.

“In the interest of the self-respect and self-esteem movement of the most revered Babasaheb Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar and following the tradition of discipline of the venerable Kanshiram, Akash Anand, like his father-in-law, is expelled from the party in the interest of the party and the movement,” Mayawati posted on X.

She criticized Anand’s response as lacking political maturity and suggested that he should have gracefully accepted his removal.

Akash Anand stands firm despite expulsion

Despite his removal from all key positions, Akash Anand expressed his unwavering commitment to the ideals of the Bahujan Movement. He stated that his involvement in politics is not a mere career but a fight for the dignity and rights of marginalized communities.

Following his expulsion, Anand termed the decision an emotional one but reaffirmed his dedication to the cause. “The test is difficult,” he said, implying that he would continue his political journey despite the setback.

With Ramdas Athawale’s offer now on the table, the political future of Akash Anand remains uncertain, but his next move could significantly impact the Dalit political landscape in Uttar Pradesh.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com