English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Trump and Rouhani Flex Muscles on Nuclear Deal

Published

on

Trump and Rouhani Flex Muscles on Nuclear Deal

US and Iran differ apart in their views

US President Donald Trump and his Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani have maintained their positions intact on nuclear deal, spread of terrorism in the region and if Tehran regime was a “dictator” or most “democratic” establishment in the region. However, nuclear deal was the focal point, where both leaders shared their opinion on the “resolved but vexed” issue to the world community.

Donald Trump, on Tuesday addressed for the first time at UN General Assembly while Hassan Rouhani answered media quaries on the sensitive issues prevailing on the present US administration since January this year and even beyond: during the run-up for the Presidential elections. Both the leaders have expressed their views on situation in Syria, Iraq and other countries in the region.

President Trump spent almost ten percent of his 42,23 word-speech on Iran related issues, indicating that Iran is one of his priority areas in the US foreign policy. Trump chose to begin with describing the nature of the Iranian government as “corrupt dictatorship behind the false guise of a democracy” responsible for turning wealthy country into “an economically depleted rogue state whose chief exports are violence, bloodshed and chaos”.

He said that “longest suffering victims of Iran’s leaders are, in fact, its own people” while “its oil profits go to fund Hezbollah and other terrorists that kill Muslims and attack their peaceful Arab and Israeli neighbours.”

Trump has been actively involved in bringing Arab countries closer to Israel. His maiden foreign visit took him first to Saudi Arabia and then to Israel earlier this year. Now there is a proposal of starting direct passenger flights between Tel Aviv and Riyadh.

Trump further said that Iranian wealth, which rightly belongs to Iran’s people, also goes to shore up Basher al-Assad’s dictatorship, fuel Yemen’s civil war and undermine peace through the entire Middle East.

Then President Trump said, “We cannot let a murderous regime continue these destabilizing activities while building dangerous missiles, and we cannot abide by an agreement if it provides cover for the eventual construction of a nuclear program.”

He further said, “The Iran deal was one of the worst and most one-sided transactions the United States has ever entered into. Frankly, that deal is an embarrassment to the United States, and I don’t think you’ve heard the last of it. Believe me.”

Donald Trump, continuing his address to the world leaders at UN General Assembly, tried to gather international support to his Iran policy saying, “It is time for the entire world to join us in demanding that Iran’s government end its pursuit of death and destruction. It is time for the (Iranian) regime to free all Americans and citizens of other nations that they have unjustly detained.”

He demanded that, “Iran’s government must stop supporting terrorists, begin serving its own people, and respect the sovereign rights of its neighbours. The entire world understands that the good people of Iran want change, and, other than the vast military power of the United States, that Iran’s people are what their leaders fear the most.”  This is what causes the regime to restrict internet access, tear down satellite dishes, shoot unarmed student protesters, and imprison political reformers, he added.

Trump argued for the regime change in Tehran saying, “Oppressive regimes cannot endure forever, and the day will come when the people will face a choice. Will they continue down the path of poverty, bloodshed, and terror, or will the Iranian people return to the nation’s proud roots as a centre of civilization, culture, and wealth, where their people can be happy and prosperous once again?”

He reminded about his recent visit to Saudi Arabia and the commitment by a large number of heads of Muslim states for fighting against terrorism. He said, “The Iranian regime’s support for terror is in stark contrast to the recent commitments of many of its neighbours to fight terrorism and halt its finance, and in Saudi Arabia early last year, I was greatly honoured to address the leaders of more than 50 Arab and Muslim nations.” He said, “We agreed that all responsible nations must work together to confront terrorists and the Islamic extremism that inspires them.”

On the contrary, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani who has recently been re-elected for the second term in office remained busy with his scheduled meetings on Tuesday in New York. Most American media houses wanted to interview President Rouhani. However Iranian diplomats granted face-to-face interview to renowned CNN journalist Christiane Amanpour of Iranian origin and NBC News.

Rouhani also met with heads and editors-in-chief of several  media houses and foreign policy elites and interacted polite interaction on a wide range of issues.

He will address the UN General Assembly on Wednesday local time. New York is nine and half hours behind New Delhi time.

Reacting to Trump’s threat of exiting the nuclear deal, known as Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), President Hassan Rouhani told NBC News, “The exiting of the United States from such an agreement would carry a high cost, meaning that subsequent to such an action by the United States of America, no one will trust America again.”

He further elaborated about the long diplomatic exercise culminating into the nuclear deal signed in 2015 saying, “Every word was analyzed many times by countries involved before its ratification, so if the United States were to not adhere to the commitments and trample upon this agreement, this will mean that it will carry with it the lack of subsequent trust from countries towards the United States because the greatest capital that any country has is trust and credibility.”

He clarified about Iran’s intention in case US withdraws from the nuclear deal saying, “We can easily go back to previous conditions if counterparts were to not live up to their commitments. But you do know fairly well that Iran will not be the initiator of this return to that path,” he assured. Moreover he dismisses the US apprehensions about probable nuclear weapons program saying, “So we will never go towards production of nuclear weapons, just as in the past we never intended to go towards that path nor did we ever. It has always been peaceful.”

During his meeting with Editors in-Chief of American media houses, Iranian President was quoted saying, “Therefore, whatever happens in the JCPOA, Iran is victorious. Of course, if the United States exits the agreement, it will suffer losses and if it stays, it will benefit. We are ready for any situation and we have no problem to continue our journey, but if the United States wants to withdraw its commitment, it means that the agreement is undermined, in which case, Iran may choose another way”.

Rouhani referred to the recent presidential election in Iran and said: “People’s turnout by 73% shows that Iran is run based on people’s will and democracy”.  He further said, “The attendance of 41 million Iranians at the ballot boxes was the best response of the Iranian nation to the threats of some countries and the words of Trump, and Iranians showed that they believe in their system and democracy and choose their officials at the ballot box”.

Iranian President clarified that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the supervisory agency in all of its seven quarterly reports has emphasised that Iran has fully complied with its obligations. “Therefore if the US government breaks this obligation, it will bear all the losses and responsibilities and will show that Iran is a country that adheres to its obligations and that America is a country that no one can trust, because it may agree some day and, with the coming of another government, all those agreements will be violated”.

It would be rather useful to recall that George Bush-II had announced billions of dollars for promoting anti Tehran regime forces to overturn the Iranian government. Disturbances after re-election of Mehmoud Ahmedinejad in 2009 as country’s President were seen as part of the Washington strategy.

Syria and Iraq have also been matters of different strategies pursued by Washington and Tehran. Both governments claim of heir important contribution in fighting against IS and other terror groups in Iraq. However, US claims of supporting  to anti-Bashar al-Assad elements except IS in Syria. Russia and Iran support Bashar al-Assad regime in Damascus.

Latest world news

India rejects Hague court proceedings on Indus Waters Treaty

India has reiterated it will not participate in Hague arbitration proceedings under the Indus Waters Treaty, stating the agreement remains in abeyance following the Pahalgam attack.

Published

on

Indus Water Treaty

India has reiterated its refusal to recognise or participate in proceedings initiated by a Court of Arbitration in The Hague under the Indus Waters Treaty framework, asserting that the treaty itself remains in abeyance following the Pahalgam terror attack last year.

Despite the arbitration court moving ahead with fresh hearings and procedural orders, New Delhi has made it clear that it does not consider the panel legally constituted and will not respond to its communications.

India dismisses court orders as illegitimate

The latest development centres on an order issued by the Court of Arbitration directing India to submit operational pondage logbooks of the Baglihar and Kishanganga hydroelectric projects. The documents were sought as part of what the court described as the “second phase on the merits” of the dispute.

Hearings have been scheduled for February 2 and 3 at the Peace Palace in The Hague. The court has noted that India has neither filed counter submissions nor indicated its participation in the process.

However, government sources said the arbitration panel was “so-called and illegally constituted” and accused it of conducting parallel proceedings alongside the neutral expert mechanism prescribed under the treaty. According to the sources, India does not acknowledge the court’s authority and therefore does not engage with its directions.

They further stated that since the Indus Waters Treaty has been placed in abeyance, India is under no obligation to respond to such requests, describing the move as an attempt by Pakistan to draw New Delhi back into the process.

Treaty placed in abeyance after Pahalgam attack

India’s decision to suspend the treaty dates back to April 23, 2025, a day after a terror attack in Pahalgam claimed the lives of 26 civilians. The government formally placed the six-decade-old water-sharing agreement in abeyance, linking cooperation under the treaty to Pakistan’s continued support for cross-border terrorism.

The move marked a significant shift in policy, signalling that bilateral arrangements could not operate independently of security considerations.

Pakistan escalates international outreach

Since the decision, Pakistan has stepped up diplomatic and legal efforts, approaching international forums, sending delegations abroad and initiating multiple legal actions to challenge India’s stance.

The Indus river system remains critical for Pakistan’s economy, with a large share of its agriculture dependent on its waters. Limited storage capacity and stressed reservoirs have further heightened Islamabad’s concerns, turning what was once a technical dispute into a strategic issue.

Neutral expert versus arbitration court

Under the treaty’s dispute resolution mechanism, technical disagreements are to be examined by a neutral expert, while legal disputes may be referred to a Court of Arbitration. India has consistently maintained that the current issues fall within the technical domain and has accused Pakistan of forum shopping by activating arbitration proceedings.

The arbitration court has, however, proceeded with the case, stating that India’s position on suspending the treaty does not affect its competence. It has also warned that adverse inferences could be drawn if India fails to comply with its directions.

New Delhi rejects this interpretation and continues to recognise only the neutral expert process, viewing attempts to link the two mechanisms as illegitimate.

Strategic standoff continues

Officials believe the ongoing proceedings in The Hague, conducted without India’s participation, are unlikely to result in binding outcomes. Instead, they see the situation as part of a broader strategic contest, with India choosing disengagement and Pakistan seeking internationalisation of the dispute.

India has consistently maintained that treaties cannot function in isolation from ground realities and that cooperation will remain suspended until what it describes as persistent hostility is addressed.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Lashkar commander admits Hamas links, raises alarm over expanding terror nexus

A senior Lashkar-e-Taiba commander’s admission of meetings with Hamas leaders has intensified concerns over growing coordination between terror groups operating across regions.

Published

on

Lashkar Commander

A senior commander of Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba has publicly acknowledged links with Hamas and confirmed meetings with its top leadership, triggering fresh concerns among security agencies about an emerging alliance between globally designated terrorist organisations.

In a recent video accessed by media, Faisal Nadeem, a senior figure associated with the Pakistan Markazi Muslim League, widely regarded as Lashkar’s political front, said he met senior Hamas leaders in Doha, Qatar, in 2024. Nadeem operates in Pakistan’s Sindh province and claimed that Saifullah Kasuri, alleged by Indian agencies to be involved in the Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir, accompanied him during the visit.

According to Nadeem’s statement, the delegation met senior Hamas leader Khaled Mashal, a disclosure that intelligence officials view as direct evidence of coordination between terror networks operating across South Asia and the Middle East. Security analysts say the admission points to a growing effort to share operational experience, logistics and propaganda strategies.

The confession follows earlier reports of a meeting between a senior Hamas commander and a Lashkar leader in Pakistan’s Gujranwala during a public event organised by the same political outfit. An undated video that surfaced recently showed both leaders sharing the stage, with officials noting that the public nature of the interaction reflected increasing confidence and deepening ties between the groups.

Investigators have pointed out that the Hamas representative attended the event as a chief guest, while the Lashkar leader appeared under the cover of a political role. Security officials have also flagged multiple visits by Hamas operatives to Pakistan since October 2023, indicating sustained engagement.

Counter-terrorism experts note that both Hamas and Lashkar-e-Taiba are designated terrorist organisations by the United States and several other countries. Any coordination between them, they warn, could have serious implications for regional and international security.

Indian intelligence agencies are closely monitoring developments related to the Hamas-Lashkar engagement. Officials said the emerging evidence may be raised at international platforms, including financial watchdogs and counter-terror forums, as authorities assess potential legal and diplomatic responses.

Analysts tracking the evolving situation say the growing trail of videos and public statements points to a broader ideological and operational alignment, marking a concerning shift in the global terror network landscape.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

India-EU free trade pact set to lower prices of luxury cars, wines and medicines

The India-EU free trade pact is set to cut import duties on luxury cars, wines and medicines, while opening European markets for Indian exports.

Published

on

India European Deal

After nearly two decades of negotiations, India and the European Union have sealed a Free Trade Agreement that is expected to significantly reduce prices of several European products in India while expanding export opportunities for Indian manufacturers.

Described by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen as the “mother of all trade deals”, the pact aims to deepen economic cooperation by easing tariffs and improving market access on both sides.

Luxury cars likely to become more affordable

One of the most noticeable impacts of the agreement will be in the premium automobile segment. Imported European cars such as Mercedes, BMW and Audi currently face import duties exceeding 100 per cent in India.

Under the new agreement, vehicles priced above 15,000 euros (around Rs 16 lakh) will see duties reduced to 40 per cent initially, with a further cut to 10 per cent planned over time. This is expected to bring down prices by several lakh rupees.

The concessions will operate under a quota system to safeguard India’s domestic automobile industry. Officials clarified that smaller, mass-market cars — which dominate India’s auto sector — will not be directly exported by European manufacturers, though local manufacturing remains an option.

Imported wines and spirits to get cheaper gradually

European wines from countries such as France, Italy and Spain are also set to become more affordable. India currently levies an import duty of 150 per cent on wines. Under the pact, this will be reduced to 20 per cent, though the change will be phased in over five to ten years to limit disruption to domestic producers.

The agreement is expected to reduce prices of premium spirits such as cognac, high-end gins and vodkas. However, wines priced below 2.5 euros will not receive duty concessions, a move aimed at protecting Indian manufacturers. Indian wines, meanwhile, will gain improved access to European markets.

Cheaper medicines and medical equipment

The trade deal is expected to benefit India’s healthcare sector by lowering the cost of imported medicines, particularly for cancer and other critical illnesses. Advanced medical equipment sourced from Europe is also likely to become cheaper.

At the same time, pharmaceuticals manufactured in India will gain access to all 27 EU member countries, strengthening India’s position as a global supplier of affordable medicines.

Electronics, steel and chemicals to benefit

The agreement removes tariffs on aircraft spare parts, mobile phone components and other high-tech electronic items imported from Europe. This could reduce manufacturing costs for electronic devices in India, potentially benefiting consumers.

Additionally, proposals for zero tariffs on iron, steel and chemical products may lower raw material costs for industries such as construction, with possible downstream benefits for homebuyers and infrastructure projects.

Overall, the India-EU Free Trade Agreement is being seen as a major boost for Indian exports, particularly in sectors such as garments, leather and jewellery, while offering Indian consumers access to more competitively priced European goods.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com