English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Hosni Mubarak, the survivor, returns

Published

on

CHEATER OF MISFORTUNE: Egypt’s ousted president Hosni Mubarak inside a dock at the police academy on the outskirts of Cairo in 2014. An Egyptian court sentenced him to three years in prison on charges of stealing public funds, Reuters/UNI

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The former Egyptian president’s acquittal shows he still wields power with the West. The question is will his influence lead to the release of the thousands of other political prisoners languishing behind bars?  

By Sujit Bhar

That Egypt’s military junta respects tradition was proved once again through the acquittal and release of ex-President Hosni Mubarak from house arrest.

On March 24 Mubarak left the military hospital where he was detained—in Maadi, south of Cairo—and immediately left under heavy security for his home in the posh Heliopolis area. Egyptian newspaper al-Masry al-Youm has quoted his lawyer Farid el-Deeb as saying that Mubarak had a relaxed breakfast with wife Suzanne and their two sons Alaa and Gamal.

The 88-year-old leader had always maintained that he was in no way responsible for the death of nearly 900 protesters during the 25 January 25 to February 11 uprising in 2011. He had been sentenced to life, but an appeals court later had dismissed charges against him.

Technically, there has been no one directly held responsible for the deaths and, according to experts, nor will any one be. The deaths will have been for nothing. The expert, quoted in the media, says that for all practical purposes Egypt has remained in the grips of the military since 1952. That was when Egypt’s first president Gamal Abdel Nasser took over power, overthrowing King Farouk in what can be called the first Egyptian Revolution.

Anwar Sadat, who can be called the real builder of modern Egypt, was a confidante of Nasser, and became his vice-president as the new junta took control. Sadat was never too far away from the military, which always had a say in matters of policy.

When Sadat was assassinated in 1981, openly during a military parade in Cairo, Mubarak was at his side, and narrowly escaped the bullets. He was inducted into the presidency, with senior leaders expecting him to be a puppet president who does their bidding. Mubarak was, anyway, not expected to last long in the position.

The military believed it too, but later joined hands with Mubarak in steering the country, and Mubarak lasted a little under 30 years in his position with the tacit support from the military and, of course, the West.

The Sadat-Mubarak period has been the most colourful and, according to some, the most politically romantic in Middle East politics.

Sadat was a visionary. Despite the overarching presence of the military, he led the country from relative insignificance to a politically prominent position the world. In the 11 years that he led Egypt (he became president in 1970), he not only set up another multi-party system of democracy, but also opened up the country’s economy in what was called his Infitah economic policy.

Those were his wise development agendas, while on the populist side his dealings with old enemy Israel were incredibly impressive. As a start, he gave his Arab reply to Israel’s 1967 Six-Day War through his 1973 Yom Kippur War in which he regained Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula. That sealed the hearts of the people of not just Egypt, but of all the Arab world.

IN MARKED CONTRAST: Muhammad Anwar el-Sadat, the visionary president who put Egypt on the path of peace and progress, was assassinated in 1981

IN MARKED CONTRAST: Muhammad Anwar el-Sadat, the visionary president who put Egypt on the path of peace and progress, was assassinated in 1981

And then he did a bit for himself as well. He negotiated the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty that won him and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin the Nobel Peace Prize in 1978. It might also have sown the seed of his own destruction.

Following in the footsteps of a person like Sadat wasn’t easy for Mubarak. He survived no less than six assassination attempts. But he again managed to dodge the assassins’ bullets.

Mubarak’s hold on the throne was primarily because of his proximity to the West, especially the US, a shift in policy from being close to the then USSR. The US, of course, decided to overlook all of Mubarak’s indiscretions, installing him as virtually a dictator and a key ally in the Arab world.

He would have faced the same fate as Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi, but he chose to keep his allies close in every move he made. It has been said that even during the Arab Spring uprising, when social media for the first time carried live pictures around the world,  Mubarak was well ensconced within his Western allies’ security.

The difference between Mubarak and Sadat would be in their relation with the masses. Human rights abuse has been rampant in Egypt in the years that followed the Arab Spring movement. Even as Mubarak enjoyed a lavish and comfortable breakfast with his family, there were “thousands… still languish[ing] in horrific prison conditions”, which was how Harriet McCulloch, deputy director of human rights organisation Reprieve, described ground realities to Al Jazeera. “Many face the death penalty on charges relating to protests, in mass trials that make a mockery of due process.”

Mubarak is the last president wowed by the West. The western relationship with the Middle East had undergone a sea change during President Barack Obama’s regime, with focus shifting to Syria, where the Muslim Brotherhood was fooling people, mingling with the rebels against President Bashar al-Assad. Obama was stopped in the nick of time from sending support strikes for the “rebels”, because that would have been technically helping the Brotherhood’s agenda. The Brotherhood has been considered a terrorist right wing organisation.

That the Muslim Brotherhood has its roots in Egypt is no secret. With the Saudi-UAE axis against the Brotherhood presenting a strong force, the West was more inclined to back that group, with Egypt’s interests left in its wake.

There seems to have been no special change in this approach in the Donald Trump era, though no clear policy consensus has emerged from this befuddled administration, more inward looking than ever before. That, sort of, leaves Egypt in the lurch.

The military junta in Egypt cannot survive in isolation, quickly becoming a footnote in the overall Arab picture. The dominance it had during Sadat’s regime has eroded and the only secure link that the country still has with the West is through one Hosni Mubarak.

Mubarak’s release from prison, therefore, should not surprise anybody. It would be unwise for the military junta to carry out policy decisions against the wishes of its western allies, and Mubarak is a person who still wields immense clout in regions that matter.

Egypt’s economy has hit a plateau, with his humongous tourism industry having dipped dangerously. Its exports are in very bad shape and domestic consumption cannot be pushed without further outside incentives.

The sins of the uprising will now vest with the commoners still behind bars. Those few days of freedom have resulted in many more years of subjugation. One has to see if the West can do a double deal of getting those unfortunate souls released from jail.

That, probably, would be Mubarak’s only gift to Egypt.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

US proposes ending H-4 work permits, Indian spouses face major impact

The US has proposed ending employment authorisation for certain H-4 spouses of H-1B visa holders, potentially affecting Indian families significantly.

Published

on

Donald Trump

The US government has proposed removing employment authorisation for certain H-4 dependent spouses of H-1B visa holders, a move that could significantly affect Indian families living in the country.

The proposal seeks to reverse a rule introduced in 2015 that allowed eligible H-4 spouses to obtain an Employment Authorisation Document (EAD) and work legally in the US. However, the proposal has not yet become a final rule.

Indian H-4 spouses could be among the hardest hit

Data on H-4 EAD applications from 2014 to 2017 showed that 93 per cent of approvals went to Indian nationals, while 94 per cent of those Indian beneficiaries were women.

Indian families could therefore face a significant impact if the proposal eventually takes effect. Indian nationals accounted for about 71 per cent of approved H-1B petitions in fiscal year 2024, according to data cited in the report.

What does the US proposal say?

The plan, listed on the US government’s regulatory information website, is titled “Removing H-4 Dependent Spouses From the Classes of Noncitizens Eligible for Employment Authorisation.”

The Department of Homeland Security has included it in its long-term regulatory agenda. No date has yet been set for its release as a formal proposed rule.

The proposal would reverse changes made under the 2015 rule that extended employment authorisation eligibility to certain H-4 dependent spouses.

H-4 work permits will not end immediately

The proposed change does not immediately take away the right to work from H-4 spouses.

For the proposal to become effective, the Department of Homeland Security would first have to publish a formal Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register. It would then have to allow public comments before issuing a final rule.

Until that process is completed, H-4 spouses holding valid EADs can continue working under the existing rules.

What is an H-4 visa?

An H-4 visa allows eligible spouses and children of H-1B visa holders to live in the US. The visa itself does not provide work authorisation.

Eligible H-4 spouses need a separate EAD to work legally. Under the current rules described in the report, this employment authorisation is available to spouses whose H-1B partners meet certain green-card-related requirements.

The latest proposal would seek to remove H-4 dependent spouses as a category eligible to request this employment authorisation.

Not the first attempt to change H-4 work rules

The US government had previously attempted to remove employment authorisation for certain H-4 spouses during Donald Trump’s first term.

That proposal was not finalised and was ultimately withdrawn in 2021. The latest proposal represents another attempt to reverse the H-4 EAD policy.

Continue Reading

India News

India became Vishwaguru through service, not power, says Mohan Bhagwat

RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat said India became a Vishwaguru through selfless service and its tradition of respecting diversity, rather than through power.

Published

on

Mohan Bhagwat

RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat said India’s standing in the world was built through its tradition of selfless service and humanitarian assistance, rather than through military or imperial power.

Addressing the “Hindu Vishwa Bandhu – Embrace the World in Friendship” gathering in Toronto, Bhagwat said India became a “Vishwaguru” (world teacher) through its character and service to humanity, rather than as a “Mahashakti” (superpower).

Bhagwat recalls India’s humanitarian tradition

Bhagwat cited historical examples of India providing refuge to people fleeing persecution and war. He recalled how the Maharaja of Jamnagar provided shelter and protection to Polish refugees during the Second World War until they could return safely.

He also referred to more recent humanitarian operations, saying Indian military transport aircraft had rescued citizens of seven other countries along with Indians during evacuations from a conflict zone in the Middle East.

The RSS chief said India has historically provided peaceful refuge to people belonging to different faiths, including Muslims, Christians, Jews and Parsis.

‘India never conquered any country’

Bhagwat contrasted India’s civilisational outreach with imperial expansion, saying Indian traditions focused on sharing knowledge rather than conquering territories.

He said Indian travellers historically reached different parts of the world but did not conquer countries. Instead, he said, they shared knowledge in areas including astronomy, Ayurveda and civilisational values.

Calling this tradition the “DNA of Bharat”, Bhagwat said India has continued to help people in distress, including in situations where assistance was not specifically requested.

Bhagwat stresses diversity and unity

Bhagwat also spoke about his understanding of the word “Hindu”, saying it cannot be defined by a particular language, form of worship or lifestyle. He said Hindus “respect all” and “accept all”.

He emphasised the need to respect and embrace diversity, describing it as an expression of an underlying unity.

According to Bhagwat, India’s ancient ethos recognises diversity as natural while treating unity as the fundamental reality.

He further invoked the philosophy of “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam”, or the belief that the entire world is one family.

Bhagwat said that despite differences in appearance and other forms of diversity, people are essentially one and therefore serving others is a duty.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Nepal to bury unidentified flood victims, DNA tests to help identify them later

Nepal will bury unidentified flood victims after collecting DNA samples, assigning identification numbers and recording burial locations.

Published

on

Nepal will begin burying unidentified and unclaimed bodies recovered from this week’s devastating flash floods, as authorities struggle with the deteriorating condition of the remains and limited facilities to store them.

At least 675 bodies have been recovered so far. Chitwan district, which borders India, has reported the highest number, with 233 bodies recovered.

Authorities decided to proceed with burials after health experts warned that the decomposition of bodies kept in temporary facilities could increase the risk of infection. In Chitwan, officials had been using a house as a temporary cooling centre, but the facility eventually ran out of space.

DNA samples collected before burial

Nepalese authorities are collecting DNA samples from unidentified bodies before they are buried. Each body is also being assigned a unique identification or reference number, along with details of its location.

The system is intended to allow relatives to identify and recover the remains later if a DNA match is established.

More than 100 bodies had undergone DNA profiling by Saturday afternoon and were ready for burial.

Burial sites designed for future exhumation

The burial pits are being dug about 1.5 metres deep, with a 40-centimetre gap between individual bodies. This arrangement is intended to make it possible to retrieve a specific body if its identity is established later.

The bodies are being placed in bags marked with their identification numbers. Concrete platforms and signboards will also be installed at burial sites to display the corresponding numbers.

Authorities also plan to document the burial process through photographs and video and geo-tag the burial locations.

How families can identify missing relatives

People searching for missing family members will be required to provide DNA samples at designated hospitals across Nepal.

Once the DNA results are available, health authorities will compare them with samples collected from the unidentified bodies. If a match is found, the corresponding identification number will be used to locate the burial site.

The police will then use their records to determine where the body was buried. The remains can subsequently be exhumed and handed over to the family.

Nepal Police has also uploaded details of unidentified and unclaimed bodies online to help with the identification process.

According to officials, 2,426 people, including hundreds of foreigners, remain missing in Nepal.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com