English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

US vs China over Taiwan: Here’s what’s happening

Joe Biden has once again made people wonder about his stance on Taiwan after indicating that the US will assist Taiwan if China tries to invade the self-ruled island.

Published

on

joe biden
With this move, is Biden making the world wonder about his stance on Taiwan?

This is the third time in the last few months that US President Joe Biden’s comments on Taiwan have stirred controversy. Biden on Monday indicated that it would assist Taiwan with military defences and forces if China ever tries to invade and take over the self-ruled island.

Biden, who joined Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in a news conference in Tokyo, said it is the commitment the country has earlier made to protect Taiwan from a Chinese attack.

The White House promptly played down his remarks, claiming that he did not indicate a change in US policy. It’s the third time in recent months that Biden has claimed that the US would defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion, only for the White House to retract those words.

Why is the US helping Taiwan against Chinese attacks?

The United States has soldiers deployed in Taiwan to provide military security in order to safeguard Taiwan’s development and turn the crisis into peace. This pact is multi-purpose in nature, encompassing political, military, economic, and social welfare. The Taiwan Ties Act of 1979 governs US-Taiwan relations and specifies the US commitment to assist Taiwan in maintaining its armed security.

Read Also: Gyanvapi masjid case: Varanasi court to continue hearing on May 26, allows Muslim, Hindu parties to file objections to video survey

Why is Biden’s statement about deploying military forces in Taiwan making the White House defend his words?

People are arguing that Biden’s statement about deploying military forces to Taiwan to back the self-ruled island from Chinese attacks is against the One China policy. According to a White House official, Biden was not articulating a shift in US policy toward Taiwan, a self-governing island that China considers a renegade province that should be reunified with the mainland.

What is the One China policy?

The United States’ policy of One China has been in place for a long time and is the foundation of its relationship with Beijing. As a result of the policy, the US broke official diplomatic connections with the Republic of China (ROC) in Taiwan and built relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in Beijing.

On January 1, 1979, the People’s Republic of China and the United States of America agreed to join each other and establish diplomatic relations. According to the policy, the US recognizes the People’s Republic of China as China’s sole legal government. And the people of the United States will preserve cultural, commercial, and other informal ties with the people of Taiwan in this environment.

More elements are included in the One China Policy, such as the US goal of a peaceful cross-Strait dispute settlement mechanism and its distinct perception of Taiwan’s legal position from Beijing’s.

Was there ever a two Chinas system?

The Republic of China shifted its capital to Taipei, Taiwan, after communist forces won the Chinese civil war in 1949, after a two-decade struggle. Beijing was designated as the capital of the People’s Republic of China.

Read Also: Rahul Gandhi says there is nothing Hindu in Hindu nationalism if they want to murder and beat people

Both governments claimed to represent China as a whole, although only a few people recognized the PRC at the time. The PRC did not gain entry to the UN until 1971 when Resolution 2758 ousted the ROC as the official representative of China. Until 1979, the United States failed to acknowledge the PRC.

Is Biden really shifting from the One China policy?

Speaking at a news conference about the One China policy, Biden said that even though there is only one legal government in China but that doesn’t mean that the jurisdiction can go ahead and use force to take over Taiwan as it will dislocate the entire region.

One of the reasons, he stated, is that Russia will have to pay a heavy price for its invasion of Ukraine. Despite the fact that the US is significantly arming Ukraine’s military and giving intelligence support, Biden has stated that he will not send soldiers to fight against Russian forces. This might result in a nuclear-armed world war.

The Biden government, on the other hand, has criticized Beijing for its military aggression towards Taiwan, which includes flying jets inside the island’s air defence zone. Despite the crisis in Ukraine, Biden’s five-day journey to Asia was intended to send a message that he is still paying attention to the region.

With this move, is Biden making the world wonder about his stance on Taiwan?

Congress forms panel for 2024 polls, 2 Congress rebels back in panel, Prashant Kishor’s ex-associate to lead party’s poll campaign

Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann sacks health minister Vijay Singla over complaints of corruption, Singla arrested

Latest world news

Trump approves nearly $9 billion weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies amid Iran tensions

The US has fast-tracked nearly $9 billion in weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies as tensions linked to the Iran conflict continue despite a fragile ceasefire.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

The United States has approved nearly $9 billion worth of weapons sales to key Middle Eastern allies, including Israel and the United Arab Emirates, amid ongoing tensions linked to the Iran conflict.

The decision, cleared by the administration of Donald Trump, includes expedited military transfers to Israel, the UAE, Qatar, and Kuwait. The approvals were granted under an emergency provision, allowing authorities to bypass the usual congressional review process.

Emergency clearance amid ongoing conflict

Officials said the move was necessary due to the evolving security situation in the region, particularly as the conflict involving Iran continues despite a fragile ceasefire. The war, which began earlier in 2026, has heightened instability across West Asia.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked emergency powers to fast-track the deals, citing urgent defence requirements for allied nations.

What the arms package includes

The approved package includes a mix of advanced defence systems and precision weapons:

  • Patriot missile defence replenishments worth over $4 billion for Qatar
  • Precision-guided weapon systems for multiple countries
  • Integrated battle command systems for Kuwait
  • Additional advanced weapons support for Israel and the UAE

The total value of these deals is estimated at over $8.6 billion, often rounded to nearly $9 billion.

Timing linked to iran war

The approval comes nearly nine weeks into the conflict involving the US, Israel, and Iran, with tensions still high despite a ceasefire that has been in place for several weeks.

Analysts note that the move signals continued US military backing for its regional allies, particularly in strengthening air defence and precision strike capabilities during uncertain conditions.

Criticism and concerns

The decision to bypass congressional oversight has drawn criticism from some quarters, particularly over transparency and the broader implications of increasing arms supplies in a conflict-prone region.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump and Putin hold over 90-minute call, discuss Iran war and Ukraine conflict

Trump and Putin held a 90-minute call focusing on Iran tensions and the Ukraine conflict, with warnings over escalation and talks of ceasefire.

Published

on

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held a phone conversation lasting more than 90 minutes, focusing on escalating tensions in the Middle East and the ongoing war in Ukraine.

According to official statements, the discussion was described as “frank and businesslike,” with both leaders addressing key global security concerns. A major part of the conversation centred on the situation involving Iran and developments in the Persian Gulf.

Putin supported Trump’s decision to extend the ceasefire related to Iran, suggesting that continued restraint could create space for negotiations and help stabilise the region. However, he also issued a strong warning, stating that renewed military action by the United States or Israel could lead to “extremely damaging consequences” not only for Iran but for the wider international community.

Ukraine conflict also discussed

The leaders also discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine, which has continued for several years since Russia’s invasion in 2022. During the call, there were indications of potential efforts toward a temporary ceasefire, although no final agreement has been confirmed.

Reports suggest that the idea of a short-term pause in hostilities was explored, possibly linked to upcoming symbolic dates, but significant differences between the parties remain unresolved.

Focus on diplomacy amid global tensions

The call highlights ongoing diplomatic engagement between Washington and Moscow at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions involving both the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

While both sides acknowledged the importance of dialogue, the situation on the ground in both conflict zones remains complex, with no immediate resolution in sight.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump rejects Iran peace plan as tensions rise, Tehran signals military readiness

Trump rejects Iran’s peace plan, keeping focus on nuclear concerns as Tehran signals readiness and tensions continue to rise.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

U.S. President Donald Trump has rejected a proposal from Iran aimed at easing ongoing tensions, signaling a continued deadlock between the two countries.

The proposal reportedly included steps linked to easing restrictions around the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil route. However, the United States declined the offer, maintaining that any agreement must address concerns related to Iran’s nuclear programme.

Washington has made it clear that resolving nuclear issues remains a priority and that partial measures without broader commitments will not be accepted.

Nuclear issue remains central

The U.S. position continues to focus on preventing Iran from advancing its nuclear capabilities. Officials believe that without a comprehensive agreement, temporary arrangements could delay a long-term resolution.

The rejection of the proposal indicates that negotiations remain stalled, with both sides holding firm on key demands.

Iran issues warning

Following the rejection, Iranian officials have issued strong statements, indicating readiness to respond if pressure from the U.S. continues.

Reports suggest that Iran has asserted its military preparedness, warning that any escalation could lead to serious consequences. The remarks reflect growing tensions as diplomatic efforts struggle to produce results.

Rising geopolitical tension

The situation remains volatile, with both countries engaged in a prolonged standoff. Measures such as restrictions on trade routes and strategic pressure points continue to impact the broader region.

The Strait of Hormuz remains a critical factor in the conflict, given its importance for global energy supplies.

Outlook uncertain

With no immediate breakthrough in sight, tensions between the United States and Iran are expected to persist. The lack of agreement on key issues, particularly the nuclear programme, continues to hinder progress toward de-escalation.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com