English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Madrid takes control of Catalonia but the region’s future is best with Spain

Published

on

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]File photo of pro-independence Catalans in Barcelona during a referendum march. Photo credit: Quartz

~By Lilly Paul

The Catalans may have declared their independence from Spain but not even half of the region’s population had turned out to vote during the referendum

Catalonian President Carles Puigdemont’s declaration of independence (on Friday, October 27) from Spain has lead to Madrid, in turn, imposing direct rule on Saturday. The current turn of events is set to lead both Madrid and Catalonia towards a messy state of affairs.

Puigdemont’s announcement of Catalonia’s secession from Spain has, expectedly, not gone down well with Madrid and also the European Union. In a referendum (on October 1) held by the regional government of Catalonia, 90 percent of the voters chose to separate from Spain. However, the voter turnout for this referendum was 2.26 million, which is not even half the total population of Catalonia.

The referendum had already been declared illegal by Spanish courts and Madrid tried its best to stop such a voting. The anti-election crackdown by the Spanish government left hundreds of Catalans injured with Barcelona being the most affected region. The government raided polling booths, confiscated ballot papers and law enforcers even fired rubber bullets at the people. Madrid also invoked Article 155 of the Spanish constitution to impose direct control over Catalonia. The Article gives the Spanish government liberty to take over any autonomous region if it “does not fulfill the obligations imposed on it by the constitution or other laws, or acts in a way that is seriously prejudicial to the general interest of Spain.”

The crackdown of the Spanish government on Catalonia is not going to solve the problem. Instead it would further worsen the situation. The law and order situation of Catalonia is already getting disrupted. Since police administration is under the Catalonian government, a section of the police had already declared that it would not comply with the orders of Spain and will not carry out any action against the regional leaders. The current crackdown of the Spanish government is likely to affect the other half of the population of Catalonia which did not appear for voting and was perhaps not in favour of separating from Spain.

Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy sacked Puigdemont and dissolved the Catalan parliament. He has also announced fresh elections for the region to be held on December 21. The practicality of the elections is in doubt as it was not desired by the Catalans nor is it clear as to how many of them would participate in these polls. The parties which would contest the elections fear presenting an anti-Catalonia stance and the ones not contesting for the election will not stand any chance for the upcoming five years.[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1509202128649{padding-top: 5px !important;padding-right: 5px !important;padding-bottom: 5px !important;padding-left: 5px !important;background-color: #a2b1bf !important;border-radius: 5px !important;}”]Catalonia has had a distinct culture, history and language—this distinction has been the main reason behind their wish for autonomy. Its identity has been constantly suppressed by successive regimes.

Catalonia was first recognized as a nation in 1931 by the second Spanish Republic’s constitution. It also recognized Catalan as the official language of Catalonia. However, this freedom and recognition had a very short life. The victory of General Francisco Franco in the Spanish Civil War marked the end of Catalonia’s freedom. Catalonia’s culture, its language and even the symbols of Catalan identity were prohibited and suppressed under the military ruling of Franco.

The death of Franco paved the way for Spain’s democracy in 1978. The Spanish constitution extended autonomy to some of its regions, and Catalonia was also among them. However, this autonomy has not actually solved the underlying desire for freedom of the Catalans.

Catalonia as defined in the Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia “exercises its self-government constituted as an autonomous community in accordance with the Constitution and with this Estatut, which is its basic institutional law”.

In 2006, the Catalans campaigned to improve the terms of this Statute of Autonomy which made way to a new statute after which Catalonia was referred to as a “nation” in the preamble. This new statute extended Catalonia’s privileges in terms of taxation, judicial independence, and the official use of the Catalan language. The Catalan language enjoys joint language status along with Castilian, such that the teachers, the doctors and other public sector employees have to use the language in their workplace.[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]What do the Catalans want?

Much of Catalonia’s independence drive and enthusiasm has been carried forward through the football team FC Barcelona. Posters reading “Independence” and “Catalonia is not Spain” have been a common sight in matches played by Barcelona. FC Barcelona is located in Catalonia. One such instance of Catalan nationalism was seen in a football match played between FC Barcelona and Real Madrid, where right at 17 minutes and 14 seconds the stadium started chanting “Independencia”. This was because in 1714 Catalonia fought its battle of Independence.

Catalonia has been constantly in favour of independence. It is one of the Spain’s wealthiest regions and accounts to 20 percent of its economic output. Catalonia is also one of the most famous tourist spots in Spain and also contributes more than one-fifth of its GDP. But the major push for separation came after Spain’s debt crisis in 2008. Economists even predict that Spain is unlikely to cope up with the present debt crisis for several years to come.

This being said, one of the major arguments for separation from Spain is that Catalonia gives to Spain far more than it ever received. Catalans now want more autonomy to decide where their money is being used. The economic progress of Catalonia is also one of the reasons why the region thinks that it can sustain on its own.

This is not for the first time that the Catalans have voted for Independence. Earlier, in 2014, they had held a symbolic vote where more than 80 percent of the votes were cast in favour of freedom. However, the voting turnout in the current and the previous plebiscite has been less than 50 percent. This is possibly because the Catalans know that it is illegal at present. If there happens to be a fresh referendum form the Spanish government on Independence, which is unlikely, a higher voter turnout can be expected.

However, the Catalans are very well aware of the economic loss that it will have to incur if separated from Spain. Since most of the business houses have moved their headquarters to Spain, the separation will have an adverse effect on Catalonia’s economy. Moreover, with the EU not supporting an independent Catalonia, the path ahead will be even more difficult for the region. If Catalonia breaks away from Spain, it will also be out of the EU. Its way back will be decided by the EU members, of which Spain is also a member. One can easily expect a Spanish veto.

Catalonia has kept some of the key sectors such as education, healthcare and welfare under its control, but it is not financially independent.

The best way out for Catalonia is to be a part of Spain and demand for more autonomy as complete separation will land them in ruins and the tourism revenue will not be enough for the region to stand on its own.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

After Trump’s proposal to take over Gaza Strip, Hamas says recipe for creating chaos in Middle East

During a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump outlined his vision for Gaza, stating, “The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a job with it too.”

Published

on

A day after President Donald Trump suggested that the United States might “take over” the Gaza Strip, potentially involving American troops, the Gaza-based Hamas militant group condemned his remarks, calling them a “recipe for creating chaos” in the Middle East.

In a statement, Hamas said, “We consider this a recipe for generating chaos and tension in the region. Our people in Gaza will not allow these plans to proceed.”

During a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump outlined his vision for Gaza, stating, “The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a job with it too.”

He described his plan as transforming the area into a new “Riviera,” adding, “We’ll own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site, levelling the area, and clearing the destroyed buildings.”

When asked if he would deploy U.S. troops to address security gaps in Gaza, Trump did not dismiss the possibility, saying, “As far as Gaza is concerned, we’ll do what is necessary. If it’s necessary, we’ll do that. We’re going to take over that piece and develop it.”

Trump’s comments mark a striking departure from his previous stance, particularly given his rise to power in the U.S. by criticizing America’s prolonged military engagements in the Middle East and promising to redirect resources back to American citizens.

His proposal raises significant questions about the legal framework for such a move, the process of implementation, and the financial burden it would entail.

In response to Trump’s announcement, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reiterated his government’s support for a two-state solution in the Middle East. Speaking at a press briefing in Parliament House on Wednesday, Albanese stated, “Australia’s position remains consistent with what it was this morning, last year, and in previous years.

The Australian government, on a bipartisan basis, supports a two-state solution.” This statement came after Trump revealed his plans during a bilateral meeting with Netanyahu at the White House on Tuesday.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump administration deports 205 Indians in collaboration with New Delhi

Published

on

donald trump

In a significant operation indicating the deepening cooperation between the United States and India, a US military aircraft has repatriated 205 Indian nationals who had previously entered the US illegally. The deportation was carried out using a C-17 aircraft from Texas, underscoring the enforcement of stringent immigration policies championed by US President Donald Trump.

The operation aligns with Trump’s aggressive stance on illegal immigration, a policy cornerstone that has seen similar deportations to countries like Guatemala, Peru, and Honduras. The deported individuals were thoroughly verified, a process suggesting active involvement by the Indian government, which is handling the logistics of repatriation in collaboration with the US.

This deportation comes ahead of a planned visit to the US by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, his first since Trump’s re-election. The timing of the deportation underscores ongoing discussions between the two nations regarding the management of Indian nationals residing in the US without legal status. Earlier statements from External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar and MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal emphasized India’s commitment to accept nationals who are verified as Indians and found to be staying illegally abroad.

The US embassy in New Delhi reiterated the US government’s resolve to enforce immigration laws and eliminate illegal migration. This joint operation could potentially be the precursor to more such flights intended to address the issue of illegal Indian immigrants in the US, with estimates suggesting up to 18,000 Indians could be affected.

This coordinated approach demonstrates a shared commitment to upholding immigration laws and addressing challenges associated with illegal residency, aiming to deter the associated risks and underline the consequences of non-compliance with immigration policies.

Continue Reading

India News

After Trump’s tariff imposition on Canada, Trudeau says he has no choice but to impose countermeasures

Trudeau warned, highlighting the interconnectedness of the North American economy.

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s decision to impose a 25% tariff on nearly all US imports from Canada sparked immediate and forceful retaliation from Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Hours after the executive order was signed, Trudeau addressed the nation and the American people directly, deploying a carefully calibrated blend of diplomacy and defiance.

Trudeau’s press conference in Ottawa served as a powerful counterpoint to Trump’s unilateral action. He acknowledged the long and intertwined history of the two nations, invoking shared sacrifices on battlefields from Normandy to Kandahar. “From the beaches of Normandy to the mountains of the Korean peninsula,” he stated, emphasizing the deep bonds forged through military cooperation and shared values. This appeal to shared history was a strategic move, designed to resonate with American audiences and underscore the absurdity of the trade war.

He directly challenged Trump’s rationale, arguing that partnership, not punitive tariffs, was the optimal path for both countries’ prosperity. “If President Trump wants to usher in a new golden age for the United States, the better path is to partner with Canada, not to punish us,” Trudeau declared. This carefully worded statement avoided direct confrontation while firmly asserting Canada’s position.

While acknowledging Canada’s desire to avoid escalation, Trudeau made it unequivocally clear that his government would not passively accept the economic harm inflicted by the tariffs. “We are certainly not looking to escalate. But we will stand up for Canada, for Canadians, for Canadian jobs,” he asserted, signalling a firm commitment to retaliatory measures.

He painted a stark picture of the potential consequences for American consumers and businesses, warning of job losses in the auto industry and increased costs for everyday goods. “Tariffs against Canada will put your jobs at risk, potentially shutting down American auto assembly plants and other manufacturing facilities,” Trudeau warned, highlighting the interconnectedness of the North American economy.

The tariffs, imposed on Canada, Mexico, and China, were justified by the White House as a response to a “major threat” from illegal immigration and drugs. However, the lack of specific criteria for lifting the tariffs left a cloud of uncertainty over the future of North American trade relations.

Trudeau’s response signalled a willingness to defend Canadian interests while simultaneously appealing to reason and the long-standing relationship between the two nations. The coming weeks promised to be fraught with tension as both countries grappled with the implications of Trump’s protectionist policies.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com