When Microsoft’s co-founder Bill Gates warned about future pandemics in a 2015 TED talk, many Americans believed that it was a normal warning from the billionaire philanthropist.
When Microsoft’s co-founder Bill Gates warned about future pandemics in a 2015 TED talk, many Americans believed that it was a normal warning from the billionaire philanthropist. Gates said, “If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war.” He continued, “We’ve actually invested very little in a system to stop an epidemic, we’re not ready for the next epidemic.”
The US government had received a formal notification about the outbreak of Covid-19 in China on January 3.
The government did not take the threat seriously. It delayed a response and showed no acknowledgement of the threat. It took six whole weeks for a proper response from the government. On January 31, the US banned foreigners who recently visited China. On February 29, travel restrictions expanded to Iran and an advisory for South Korea and Italy. By March 11, the US actually suspended most travel from Europe. During this time, the virus was infecting the USA, and by March 16, 2020, the United States of America had the most infections in the world.
Professor Ooi Eng Eong, the Deputy Director of the Emerging infectious Diseases Program Duke-NUS Medical School, said, “To put it bluntly, the US was unprepared for it. They held on to a very optimistic view. That this was an Asian problem that wouldn’t reach them.”
Had the tests occurred in January, with effective communication for everyone, as it was a shared risk, the US would have been in a different position.
It just took a few weeks for the coronavirus to jump from 2 million to 3 million cases, and it is now approaching 7 million cases with more than 200,000 deaths worldwide. The University of Washington Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, IHME Model, predicted that the country would witness more than 208,000 deaths by November. On March 31, Dr. Deborah Birx, the coordinator of the White House coronavirus task force, presented the following chart:
However, the current death numbers are higher than projected for the outbreak with intervention.
The pandemic response was fractured, disorganised, politicised and lacked cohesiveness, as well as containing inadequate contact tracing. The government did not act early enough. Cases in countries like South Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan were much less in the initial months as compared to the US. These countries tested citizens earlier and regularly, contact tracing was used and there was a political will of consistent messaging about the pandemic. The US tested fewer people and their policy to counter the pandemic was full of confusion and misdirection.
As recently as July 4, President Donald Trump said, “99% of Covid-19 cases are harmless.” However, medical stats suggest otherwise. 15-20% of cases need hospitalisation and nearly half of them need ICU with permanent injuries after sustaining the virus.
Anthony Fauci
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) suggested that the pandemic could affect 8 trillion dollars off from economic growth. Covid-19 has devastated service sectors, small businesses, daily wagers, hospitality and the travel industry. There were multiple revised estimates for economic contraction for 2020. It was ranging from 5% to 20% in 2020.
US President Donald Trump
Covid-19 rattled Trump’s presidency and it was the crisis of confidence in the government. His biggest narrative and talking point was the strength in the US economy, booming stock markets and the record-level unemployment rate. He was able to boast about it not only to his voter base but also to the established Republican base as well. It has given him an overarching power to sell himself to all small pockets of resistance in his own party. This also gave him the political capital to engage with Europe as well as other trading and strategic defence partner-states around the world.
Secondly, Trump dealt with the Covid-19 pandemic like he did with his adversaries. There is the predictive way of dealing his earlier crisis like the Russian collusion in his election and the firing of a few of his appointees who became adversaries. He first denied the allegations and later ridiculed, defamed, and downplayed the credibility of the messenger. Michael Cohen, John Bolton, John Kelly, Omarosa Manigault Newman, Jerome Powell, Anthony Scaramucci, Jeff Sessions, Rex Tillerson, and a few more have all gone through the same treatment. They all were praised by Trump while being hired and then thrown barbs at when they were fired.
The handling of the pandemic was on a similar pattern. Here are a few statements made by President Trump about the coronavirus cases.
On January 22, he said, “We have it totally under control – it’s going to be just fine.”
On February 24, he said, “The coronavirus is very much under control in the USA – the stock market is starting to look very good to me.”
On February 28, he said, “It is going to disappear. One day, it’s like a miracle, it will disappear.”
Again, dealing with the pandemic as his political enemy, he falsely created hope. He stockpiled millions of doses of hydroxychloroquine without any scientific evidence that it works. He purposely did not wear masks as a political notion, suggesting to his political base for the defiance of establishment.
This predictable instinct of his personality inadvertently positioned Donald Trump against the pandemic politically. His logic was that if you cannot win, talk it down and hence he started talking Covid-19 down.
When Covid-19 destroyed his economic narrative and political capital to bargain on international trade and alliances, he turned over to cultural issues, seeking refuge in his political base playing with racial tension. Two sections were being targeted, rural-supporter Republicans, and white-suburban moderates and independents.
Former White House Communications Director for Trump, Anthony Scaramucci, has summed up on a Yahoo Finance live video program very well, “It’s a racist move and it’s designed to help him with his base,” “If you go through his internal polling numbers, he is down double-digits in most of the swing states that he needs to win. So when he’s saying nonsense like liberate Minnesota or liberate Michigan, he’s trying to rile up his base. His only play right now is to get the people that voted for him last time to turn out in higher levels than in 2016.”
In 2016, he had positioned himself against illegal immigrants in the USA, proposed to build the wall on the Mexico border. However, in 2020 he had to find another ghost enemy, to position himself and his base against something to distract people from the pandemic-related political fallout. Hence, the China trade rivalry was brought into as a recent talking point. After the approval rating dropped, failure to contain the pandemic and economic disaster needed a diversion for the 2020 election. China must pay for the damage and he bashed Biden and China.
Thirdly, overplay with his political base and not much effort to expand beyond to other segments of society had rattled traditional Republicans who voted for him in 2016. They think another four years of Trump’s presidency may harm the Republican Party in the future. The Lincoln Project, Republican Voters Against Trump, a new super PAC, Right Side PAC, and veterans of the McCain and Bush campaigns are targeting anti-Trump Republicans to support Joe Biden in the November election. Cindy McCain, the widow of the Republican Party nominee, endorses Biden for President. This has strengthened Biden.
The President’s response in handling of the pandemic has eroded confidence in a section of voters who voted for him in 2016. Trump led in the senior citizens’ group over (Hilary) Clinton by 7 points. The new poll is suggesting Joe Biden has a lead around 10 point among registered voters. (Washington Post/ABC poll). This is the same for young women voters. Similarly, for younger voters, campus life and job prospects were shattered due to the pandemic. A recent CNN poll is showing Biden leading by over 20 points among voters under the age 34. Younger voters helped Democrats in 2018 to take over the house.
According to the NBC News polling average, The RealClearPolitics general election polling average and FiveThirtyEight’s national polling tracker gave Biden a 7-8 point advantage. Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina and Arizona are in trouble. Even Georgia is showing a small lead for Biden by Fox News. Arizona is breaking more in favour of Biden. Trump’s standing on independents and seniors have eroded due to the pandemic and the civil unrest created by the killing of George Floyd.
Perhaps, Trump has realised this. His recent political conspiracy theory on mail-in ballot fraud is another political divergence narrative to make the adverse election outcome questionable, hence doubtful.
However, American democratic institutions are independent and very powerful. The comments made by FBI Director Christopher Wray on the President’s conspiracy theory on mail-in ballots in the 2020 election sums it up. “Now, we have not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it’s by mail or otherwise.”
If the statistical trend continues, as it is, in the next 40-50 days we may witness a big reversal in the 2020 US Presidential election in favour of Biden. There is a chance of a landslide victory in electoral votes as witnessed in 1980 when Republican Ronald Reagan defeated incumbent Democrat Jimmy Carter with 489/49 electoral votes.
UK condemns security breach at Jaishankar meeting in London
The UK Foreign Office has strongly condemned the security breach involving S Jaishankar in London, emphasizing swift police action. India has urged the UK to take stricter measures against pro-Khalistani elements.
The United Kingdom has strongly condemned the security breach involving India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar in London. The UK Foreign Office asserted that the Metropolitan Police acted promptly to address the situation and warned that any attempts to “intimidate and threaten” are unacceptable.
A pro-Khalistani protester attempted to breach security barricades and shouted anti-India slogans outside Chatham House, where Jaishankar had attended an interactive session at the Royal Institute of International Affairs. The foreign minister, who was on the other side of the road, remained unharmed.
Swift police action
In response to the incident, UK authorities emphasized their commitment to security and law enforcement. “The Metropolitan Police acted swiftly to address the situation,” sources from the UK Foreign Office stated. They further condemned the act and reassured cooperation in diplomatic security matters.
A video circulating on social media showed a man attempting to break through the police cordon and block Jaishankar’s motorcade. However, the individual was quickly apprehended by officers on duty.
India’s response
India has expressed strong disapproval of the incident, stressing that host nations must uphold their diplomatic responsibilities. “We condemn the provocative activities of this small group of separatists and extremists,” Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said.
“We deplore the misuse of democratic freedoms by such elements. We expect the host government in such cases to fully live up to their diplomatic obligations,” Jaiswal added.
This is not the first instance of Khalistani groups attempting to disrupt Indian diplomatic missions in the UK. In March 2023, protesters pulled down the national flag at the Indian High Commission in London, which led India to summon the senior-most British diplomat in Delhi, demanding an explanation for the “absence of security.”
India urges UK to take action
Following the latest security breach, India has once again urged the UK government to take action against separatist elements operating from British soil. The ongoing activities of pro-Khalistani groups in the UK remain a point of contention between the two countries, with India pressing for stricter measures to curb such incidents.
NASA astronaut Sunita Williams describes her longest space mission as an emotional rollercoaster
Sunita Williams’ planned eight-day mission turned into a nine-month space stay due to technical faults in Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft. NASA now confirms her return on 19 March.
NASA astronaut Sunita Williams is finally preparing to return to Earth after an unplanned nine-month stay in space. Originally intended to be an eight-day mission, her journey stretched unexpectedly due to technical difficulties with Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft.
Williams, along with fellow astronaut Butch Wilmore, embarked on the mission in June last year aboard Boeing’s new Starliner capsule. This marked the spacecraft’s first crewed flight. However, technical malfunctions surfaced upon their arrival at the International Space Station (ISS), prompting NASA to deem the capsule unfit for their return. Consequently, the agency opted to send the spacecraft back without any passengers, leaving Williams and Wilmore in space indefinitely.
NASA confirms return schedule
With multiple delays over the months, NASA had to wait for a safe alternative. Now, with the upcoming launch of SpaceX’s Crew-10 mission on 12 March, their replacements will finally arrive at the ISS. The returning astronauts, including Williams, are scheduled to depart on 19 March in an older SpaceX capsule.
Emotional and mental challenges of prolonged space stay
Speaking during a press conference, Williams reflected on the challenges of an extended mission. She described the experience as “an emotional rollercoaster,” emphasizing the difficulty of being away from family for such an extended period.
While the ISS provides astronauts with an extraordinary perspective of Earth and space, the psychological toll of isolation and uncertainty has been a significant challenge. Williams’ return will mark the end of an unexpectedly long and complex mission, highlighting both the rewards and difficulties of human spaceflight.
US Supreme Court rejects Trump’s bid to avoid paying USAID contractors, beneficiaries
Justice Samuel Alito, leading the dissenting conservative justices, criticized the ruling, calling it a reward for “an act of judicial hubris” and arguing that it imposes a $2 billion burden on American taxpayers. Alito contended that Judge Ali lacked the authority to mandate such payments.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a federal judge’s authority to order the Trump administration to pay $2 billion to contractors of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) but stopped short of requiring immediate payment. The 5-4 decision rejected an emergency application filed by the Justice Department, which sought to block the order issued by U.S. District Judge Amir Ali.
Judge Ali had issued a series of rulings demanding the government release funds that President Donald Trump froze through an executive order targeting what he called wasteful foreign aid programs. While the Supreme Court’s decision is a temporary setback for the Trump administration, the nonprofit organizations and businesses awaiting payment remain in limbo. One organization recently laid off 110 employees due to the funding freeze, according to court documents.
Justice Samuel Alito, leading the dissenting conservative justices, criticized the ruling, calling it a reward for “an act of judicial hubris” and arguing that it imposes a $2 billion burden on American taxpayers. Alito contended that Judge Ali lacked the authority to mandate such payments.
The Supreme Court’s decision leaves in place Ali’s temporary restraining order, which had paused the spending freeze. Judge Ali is scheduled to hold a hearing on Thursday to consider a more permanent solution.
The majority opinion, supported by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett alongside the court’s three liberal justices, noted that the Trump administration had not challenged Ali’s initial order but only the deadline for compliance, which has already passed. The court instructed Ali to clarify the government’s obligations under the temporary restraining order, taking into account the feasibility of compliance timelines.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh joined Alito in dissent.
The Trump administration argued that the situation had evolved since the initial freeze, as it replaced the blanket spending halt with individualized assessments. These assessments led to the cancellation of 5,800 USAID contracts and 4,100 State Department grants, totaling nearly $60 billion in aid.
The funding freeze was implemented following an executive order by President Trump, who criticized foreign aid programs as wasteful and misaligned with his foreign policy objectives. The subsequent lawsuit alleged that the freeze violated federal law and disrupted critical, life-saving programs abroad.
Judge Ali initially ordered the temporary restoration of funding on February 13. However, after nearly two weeks of non-compliance, he set a deadline for the government to release payments for work already completed. The administration appealed, calling Ali’s order “incredibly intrusive and profoundly erroneous” and objecting to the timeline for releasing the funds.
The Supreme Court’s decision underscores the ongoing tension between the judiciary and the executive branch over the administration’s foreign aid policies. While the ruling affirms the judiciary’s role in overseeing executive actions, the delay in payment leaves contractors and aid organizations grappling with financial uncertainty.
As the legal battle continues, the fate of billions of dollars in foreign aid remains unresolved, with significant implications for global humanitarian efforts and U.S. foreign policy.
APN News is today the most watched and the most credible and respected news channel in India. APN has been at the forefront of every single news revolution. The channel is being recognized for its in-depth, analytical reportage and hard hitting discussions on burning issues; without any bias or vested interests.