English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

World Leaders and Cyber Security

Published

on

World Leaders and Cyber Security

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]There is reason to be cautious, whether you are in India, or in the US—Modi or Trump

By Sujit Bhar

Eric Geller, an American cyber security reporter, reiterates in Politico that the Android phone that US President Donald Trump uses could be a cyber security threat for the White House and even for those inside the administration. Trump has been given a super secure, encrypted phone by his security aides and Geller quotes a New York Times report which said Trump keeps using “his old, unsecured Android phone, to the protests of some of his aides”.

He lays out two troubling issues. First, Trump reportedly uses a 2012 Samsung Galaxy S3, that “no longer receives software updates from their manufacturers or wireless carriers”. Which, in turn, means that it is open to security threats. Secondly, he points out that while Google’s Android technology offers many more options to the user than an Apple iPhone does, it is hardly secure. The Apple encryption, on the other hand, is so secure that even the FBI has reported that it can’t break through.

So what are the problems? Geller talks about a research that found “one of the most dangerous Android vulnerabilities, the so-called Stagefright bug, which lets hackers take control of a phone using only a text message.”

Now that is scary. Geller talked to Matthew Green, a computer science professor at Johns Hopkins University, who said: “It’s just crazy that the president is interacting with such an out-of-date and likely insecure device.” This was echoed by Bruce Schneier a leading cyber security expert, who told Politico: “His (Trump’s) off-the-shelf Android could potentially become a room bug without his knowledge. An attacker could certainly hijack his apps.”

The question is whether Trump uses this phone to discuss state secrets, in which case somebody can easily snoop. If he texts from this phone, it possible that somebody (outside the administration) can read it. And since Trump is a Twitter-bug, a quick entry point is provided to the hackers through this.

This was made evident in India through hackers who call themselves ‘Legion’; they had hacked into the email databases of some top journalists. That would be chicken feed if top hackers of the world manage to plant a Trojan-type bug into Trump’s phone and then start listening.

Technically, Trump’s using his personal Andriod phone for official purposes would be akin to Hillary Clinton using her personal email to transfer important state documents; an issue Trump has never stopped harping on.

Okay, there is this knowledge that Trump actually is less of a cyber guy and uses paper from a small notepad to scribble instructions. That, though, remains in the realm of uncertainty.

Epiphany time

What this has done is that it has enlightened the pubic on the risks of existing in an insecure cyber atmosphere. India has taken this seriously too. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been seen with a number of phones, and there is curiosity as to which brand his phone actually is. But he has also been seen with an iPhone, and this probably is because of its security features.

It is possible to secure an Android phone to only that extent. The intrinsic security structure of an iPhone has been upgraded to a very high level. So Modi, who is also a bit of a Twitter-bug will be secure while doing so.

India is trying to get its act together as far as cyber security is concerned.

According to the site SecurityIntelligence there is major work on to bring India on a par with international security standards. India is set to introduce freshly minted encryption and privacy policies and will move to amend the existing laws that mostly fail to address international systems, and link with international law-enforcers.

To start with, Indian has appointed a Chief Information Security Officer (CISO). At this point there is no national agency that can assess India’s cyber security threats and weave responses. This is in the discussion stage, but things are moving fast. However, top level officers and the Prime Minister cannot wait for a system to be in place before securing national secrets and himself.

During Modi’s trip to the US in the Barack Obama regime, he had talks with the Americans regarding US-India Cyber Relationship Framework which will lead to legal frameworks as well as proper mechanisms for implementation. This has not, yet, translated into a treaty.

India has cyber security deals with Malaysia and the European Union and more countries would soon come into this ambit.

India is in a position to secure top government offices with alacrity, because India can afford to leapfrog the preliminary stages of development of a security system and directly adopt one that has worked so far.

This is also relevant to commerce and industry. A report, “2016 Cost of Data Breach Study: India” said such cost increased 9.5 percent for each Indian company, with 41 percent of all Indian companies experiencing such data breach. This could be disastrous in the software and the pharmaceutical industries, which are India’s Intellectual Property strengths at this point of time.

Maybe Modi understands the threats a little more than Trump. There is reason to be cautious, whether you are in India, or in the US. Every level of citizenry is under a threat perception, probably for the first time in history.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Israel-Lebanon ceasefire to begin within hours as Trump announces 10-day truce

Israel and Lebanon may begin a 10-day ceasefire within hours after a proposal announced by Donald Trump amid ongoing tensions.

Published

on

Donald Trump

A temporary halt in hostilities between Israel and Lebanon is expected to begin within hours after US President Donald Trump announced a proposed 10-day ceasefire between the two sides, amid ongoing tensions in the region.

According to his statement, the ceasefire is likely to take effect around 5 p.m. Eastern Time, although independent confirmation from both sides is still awaited.

The development follows discussions involving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, with mediation efforts led by the United States.

Officials indicated that the proposed truce is aimed at creating a limited window to reduce violence and potentially pave the way for broader diplomatic engagement. The situation along the Israel-Lebanon border has remained tense in recent weeks, with escalation linked to the activities of Hezbollah.

Diplomatic efforts have intensified in recent days, with discussions facilitated by the United States, including the involvement of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, details of the agreement and the extent of coordination between the parties remain unclear.

The situation remains fluid, and the success of the ceasefire will depend on adherence by all sides involved. The conflict has already led to significant humanitarian and geopolitical consequences, including displacement and disruption in affected areas.

While the proposed ceasefire is being seen as an important step toward de-escalation, broader negotiations involving regional stakeholders are expected to be necessary for any lasting resolution.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US ends oil sanctions waiver for Iran and Russia, impact likely on India’s energy imports

The US decision to end the Iran and Russia oil waiver may impact India’s oil imports, fuel prices and global energy markets.

Published

on

US oil tanker

The United States has decided not to extend a temporary sanctions waiver that allowed limited trade in Iranian and Russian oil, marking a shift towards stricter enforcement of economic restrictions.

The waiver, introduced in March 2026, had permitted the sale of oil already loaded on ships to stabilise global supply during heightened geopolitical tensions. However, it is now set to expire around mid-April without renewal.

US officials have indicated that the move is part of a broader strategy to increase pressure on both Iran and Russia amid ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions.

What the waiver did and why it mattered

The short-term waiver allowed millions of barrels of oil—estimated at around 140 million barrels—to enter global markets, helping ease supply shortages and prevent sharp price spikes.

It also enabled countries like India to purchase discounted crude oil from Russia and resume limited imports from Iran after years of restrictions.

Impact on India

India, one of the world’s largest oil importers, is expected to feel the impact of the decision in several ways:

  • Reduced access to discounted oil
    India had been buying cheaper Russian crude and recently resumed Iranian imports under the waiver. Its end may limit these options.
  • Potential rise in fuel costs
    With fewer discounted supplies available, India may need to rely more on costlier sources, which could increase domestic fuel prices.
  • Supply diversification pressure
    India may need to explore alternative suppliers in the Middle East, Africa, or the US to maintain energy security.
  • Geopolitical balancing challenge
    The move adds pressure on India to align with US sanctions while managing its own economic interests.

Global energy market concerns

The end of the waiver comes at a time when global oil markets are already under stress due to conflict in West Asia and disruptions in key routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

Analysts warn that tightening sanctions could:

  • Reduce global oil supply
  • Increase price volatility
  • Intensify competition among major buyers like India and China

Bigger picture

The US decision reflects a broader shift from temporary relief measures to stricter enforcement of sanctions, even if it risks tightening global energy markets.

For India, the development highlights a recurring challenge—balancing affordable energy access with geopolitical realities.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Sanctioned tanker fails to breach US blockade, turns back near Strait of Hormuz

A US-sanctioned tanker failed to cross the Hormuz blockade and turned back, underscoring rising tensions and disruption in global shipping routes.

Published

on

A US-sanctioned oil tanker failed to break through a newly imposed American naval blockade and was forced to turn back near the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting growing tensions in the region.

The vessel, identified as the Rich Starry, reversed its course after attempting to exit the Gulf, according to shipping data. The development comes just days after the United States enforced restrictions on ships linked to Iranian ports.

The blockade was announced by Donald Trump following the collapse of recent diplomatic talks with Iran. The move aims to restrict maritime traffic associated with Iranian trade.

Officials said that during the first 24 hours of enforcement, no vessel successfully crossed the blockade. Several ships, including the sanctioned tanker, complied with instructions from US forces and turned back toward regional waters.

The tanker is reported to be linked to a Chinese company previously sanctioned for dealing with Iran. It was carrying a cargo of methanol loaded from the United Arab Emirates at the time of the incident.

The situation underscores the rising risks in one of the world’s most critical oil transit routes. The Strait of Hormuz typically handles a significant share of global energy shipments, but traffic has sharply declined due to ongoing geopolitical tensions.

The blockade, which applies specifically to vessels travelling to or from Iranian ports, has added further uncertainty for shipping companies, insurers and global energy markets.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com