English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Swiss Banks at the Losing End with Flight of Offshore Accounts

Published

on

Swiss National Bank

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]~Rashme Sehgal

There has been a large flight of capital from Swiss banks even prior to the introduction of the Automatic Exchange of Common Information (AECI) from 2018 signed by over 50 countries who are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developments (OECD).

The Swiss banking system has paid a heavy price for handling these unaccounted for offshore deposits especially since several of the smaller Swiss banks had specialised in handling such deposits. The blanket of secrecy surrounding Swiss banking transactions had ensured could they look after deposits of largely unaccounted wealth from well-heeled clients across the globe including India. But this is not going to be the case any longer.

Pressure on the Swiss government to provide details of all account holders has resulted in the outflow of millions of dollars of deposits from these banks thereby causing many of the smaller Swiss banks to shut shop. One such high profile Swiss bank that was forced to file for bankruptcy was Hottinger and Cie which was founded in 1786.

A KPMG study showed that 30 per cent of private banks had recorded losses in 2014-15 which resulted in several thousand bankers being laid off from their jobs.

“The smaller private banks dealing with off shore accounts posted huge losses and the result was that bankers handling these account lost their jobs under the restructuring process,” pointed out Louis Tari, a Geneva-based banking and tax advisor.

“With the introduction of the AECI, information of all non-Swiss residents belonging to the OECD countries will be automatically sent to the federal tax authorities in Berne who in turn will despatch this information to the relevant countries. The authorities in these countries can in turn check if the account holder has declared his income or not,” Tari added.

Zurich based banker Hanspeter Baumgartner pointed out, “What is very significant is that Swiss banks have frozen all accounts of account holders with ‘black’ money informing these holders that they should either regularise their account in their country or else their asset will be frozen. The flip side is that Swiss nationals who had accounts in the Bahamas or in Panama have had to declare their accounts.”

“This has seen an influx of francs into Switzerland but the amount is not very large,” Baumgartner added.

The amount of money of Indian national in Swiss banks has been steadily declining and in 2016 amounted to a mere Rs 4482 crore according to data released by Switzerland’s central bank, the Swiss National  Bank. In 2015, the money deposed was Rs 8135 crore while in 2014 it was Rs 12,350 crore.

The figures being projected by the Indian government that billions of dollars had been stashed in Swiss banks by Indian citizens was largely overstated, analysts believe, as Switzerland never saw such massive deposits from any country.

Nathalie Bersier, a lawyer who works as a consultant for Swiss investments in India, said, “From 2009,  the Indian government has been highlighting the issue of black money without realising that the easiest thing to do  is for a client to close a bank account and transfer the money out. Such a flight of capital has already occurred.”

Bersier believes, “In Switzerland, two years ago the perception was that Indian assets were between $ 900 million to $4 billion. Today I would say, the amount would be less than even $900 million.”

“More than half the undeclared money from India that was stashed in Swiss banks has been moved to Dubai and Singapore from where it would have been invested in real estate, gold or re-entered India through the hawala route,” Bersier maintains.

Former Swiss state secretary for International Financial Matters Jacques de Watteville who had visited India in 2016 to negotiate with his counterparts in the Ministry of Finance had refused to hazard a guess about just how much money has been moved out of Swiss banks to be invested in Dubai or Singapore. “There are no official figures on the assets transferred out of Switzerland,” says Watteville.

While in India he had emphasised that, “Combating the menace of black money and tax evasion is also our shared priority. We discussed the need for an early and expeditious exchange of information to bring to justice the tax offenders.”

Many Indian analysts believe some of this money has been routed to the US with the US government actively encouraging foreigners to deposit money in US banks, no questions asked. Some US states and cities have emerged as veritable tax havens. 

South Dakota, to cite an example, has been described by some analysts as the ‘new Switzerland’ and mention of its role as a tax haven was emphasised in the Panama Papers which highlighted that US offshore assets remain anonymous.

The city of Delaware is also said to be another tax haven with over one million registered entities claiming to operate from there.

The fact is that while international disclosure rules comprising the AECI  have been accepted  by the OECD countries, thhe US has refused to accept them and is not a signatory to it. The US NGO Tax Justice Network has pointed out how the US does not practise what it preaches.

In fact, a Swiss financial analyst on condition of anonymity, has accused the US of having crushed Swiss banks. Since trusts can operate as shell companies in some US states, it is ironical that a Swiss trust company has gone ahead and opened an office in South Dakota. The analyst feels that some of the flight of capital from Switzerland has ended up in the US.

This is because while non-US banks and financial institutions across the world have to reveal American account details, this is not the case with US deposits by offshore account holders.

Bersier does not see too much emerging from the Federal Council consultations with the Indian government on the need to detect, recover and repatriate illegal deposits.

“The key issue is what pressure the Indian government can exert on the Swiss government,” says Bersier. “The US threatened to close all Swiss banks operating in the US which led to the Swiss immediately signing a treaty with the US and UK. There are no Swiss banks operating in India.”

On the subject of the AEOI Information between the Swiss and Indian governments expected to be operationalised by 2018, she remains equally cynical.

Erecting the AEOI platform is all very well, she feels, but it is too little too late. Berseir believes that by the time it becomes operational, all the illegal deposits will have been moved out. There are any number of countries where this money can be moved to.

While some signatories of the AEOI are committed to sharing information from 2017, others will start providing information from 2018. Till then, we have to wait and watch.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

India envoy Dinesh Trivedi meets PM Modi after talks with Bangladesh PM Tarique Rahman 

India’s High Commissioner to Bangladesh Dinesh Trivedi met PM Modi after talks with Bangladesh PM Tarique Rahman amid diplomatic tensions.

Published

on

India’s High Commissioner to Bangladesh Dinesh Trivedi met Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi on Tuesday, a day after his meeting with Bangladesh Prime Minister Tarique Rahman in Dhaka.

According to the High Commission of India in Bangladesh, Trivedi sought PM Modi’s guidance on further strengthening the bilateral relationship between India and Bangladesh through a constructive and people-centric approach.

The meeting came a day after Trivedi held discussions with Tarique Rahman on matters of mutual interest and ways to advance ties between the two neighbouring countries.

Dinesh Trivedi Meets Bangladesh PM

During his meeting with Tarique Rahman on Monday, Trivedi conveyed greetings from Prime Minister Modi and reiterated India’s commitment to working with the Bangladeshi administration and its people in a positive, constructive and forward-looking manner.

The two sides discussed issues of mutual interest and explored avenues for strengthening India-Bangladesh relations with a people-centric approach.

The engagement took place at the Prime Minister’s Office in the Cabinet Division at the Bangladesh Secretariat. Trivedi also shared his experience of serving in Dhaka over the previous two months.

Sheikh Hasina Extradition Request

The meeting assumed significance as Bangladesh has expressed hope that India will expedite the extradition process involving former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who was ousted following a student-led uprising in 2024.

According to a statement issued by the Bangladesh Prime Minister’s Office, Dhaka also reiterated its request for India to return individuals it alleges were involved in the killing of Shahid Osman Hadi, a prominent figure associated with the July uprising who was shot on December 12, 2025.

Tarique Rahman stressed the need to create a suitable environment to take forward relations between Bangladesh and India.

Bangladesh Foreign Minister Khalilur Rahman, Prime Minister’s Foreign Affairs Adviser Humayun Kabir and other officials attended the meeting.

India-Bangladesh Ties Amid Diplomatic Friction

The latest high-level engagements come amid diplomatic tensions between the two countries following a virtual press interaction by Sheikh Hasina in New Delhi on August 5.

The event, organised by the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of South Asia to mark the second anniversary of her ouster, prompted strong objections from Dhaka.

During the interaction, Hasina said she remained determined to return to Bangladesh in December and restore democracy, while acknowledging the possibility of imprisonment or a death sentence upon her return.

Bangladesh’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs subsequently registered a strong protest and said the development had affected public sentiment and complicated efforts to strengthen bilateral cooperation.

India has said the government had no involvement in the event. Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said it was organised by a private media entity and clarified that New Delhi did not endorse views expressed at the forum.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump, PM Modi will resolve tariff issue over Russian oil trade, says US official

White House Trade Adviser Peter Navarro said Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi will resolve the issue over US tariff threats linked to India’s Russian oil trade.

Published

on

Modi trump

US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi will resolve the issue surrounding the threat of US tariffs linked to India’s purchase of Russian oil, White House Trade Adviser Peter Navarro said on Tuesday.

Navarro’s remarks came days after the US Senate passed a bill authorising the US President to impose tariffs of up to 100 per cent on the top five purchasers of Russian oil. The measure argues that such purchases directly contribute to financing Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Navarro comments on India’s Russian oil trade

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Navarro said India was not involved in the oil trade with Russia before the Ukraine war began in 2022.

He alleged that India became heavily involved in the trade after Russia’s invasion and sold refined products on behalf of Russia, which he said helped support the Russian war effort.

“Prior to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, India was not involved in the oil trade with Russia, but afterwards it got heavily involved,” Navarro said.

The White House adviser also claimed that the issue had since been resolved and attributed some of the shift in India’s Russian oil trade to an opinion article he recently wrote in the Financial Times.

Trump and Modi will resolve issue, Navarro says

Navarro said the relationship between Trump and Modi would help address the tariff-related issue.

“The president and your prime minister have a very good working relationship. They are going to work that out amongst themselves,” he said, adding that it was not his place to intervene.

His comments come amid US concerns over countries purchasing Russian oil and proposed measures aimed at imposing additional tariffs on major buyers.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US Senate passes Russia sanctions bill, India-China face 100% tariff risk

The US Senate has passed a Russia sanctions bill that could allow 100% tariffs on major buyers of Russian oil and gas, including India and China.

Published

on

Donald Trump

The US Senate has approved a bipartisan Russia sanctions bill that could allow President Donald Trump to impose tariffs of up to 100% on major buyers of Russian oil or natural gas, including India and China.

The legislation was passed by an 86-11 vote and will now move to the US House of Representatives, which is scheduled to reconvene on August 31.

The bill is named in honour of Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a strong supporter of Ukraine who died on July 11. Graham had pushed for tougher sanctions against Russia over its war in Ukraine.

India and China among major Russian energy buyers

The legislation gives the US president the power to impose tariffs on the world’s top five purchasers of Russian oil or natural gas.

India and China are among those countries, along with Azerbaijan, Hungary and Slovakia.

The bill also contains an exception for countries importing less than 15% of their natural gas from Russia and taking steps to reduce their dependence on Russian supplies.

What does the Russia sanctions bill contain?

Apart from the proposed tariffs, the legislation includes sanctions targeting Russian President Vladimir Putin, senior Russian political and military officials, financial institutions and energy projects.

The bill would also expand US sanctions to older and reflagged oil tankers allegedly used by Moscow to bypass existing restrictions on Russian oil and energy revenues.

At the same time, the White House would have the option to waive sanctions or restrictions if the president certifies to Congress that doing so is in the national interest.

Bill also extends Iran sanctions law

The legislation also contains a provision related to Iran. It would extend the expiration date of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 until 2031.

The law penalises companies that invest in Iran’s energy sector.

The bill’s passage in the Senate marks the next step in the US legislative process, but it still needs approval from the House of Representatives before it can move forward.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com