English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Cheer and jubilation as SC declares instant triple talaq ‘unconstitutional’

Published

on

Cheer and jubilation as SC declares instant triple talaq ‘unconstitutional’

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Barring a section of cleric and organisations like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, political parties, social activists and most importantly the Muslim women who suffered due to the practice, all welcome the Supreme Court’s historic verdict

A sense of euphoria that went beyond communal and political identities engulfed large sections of India’s population, on Tuesday, as the Supreme Court struck down the “manifestly arbitrary and unconstitutional” practice of Talaq-e-Biddat or triple talaq.

The landmark judgment passed by a Bench that comprised five judges, each of different faiths – Chief Justice of India JS Khehar (a Sikh), Justices Kurian Joseph (a Christian), Rohinton Nariman (a Parsi), S Abdul Nazeer (a Muslim), UU Lalit (a Hindu) – was immediately welcomed by all political parties, social activists and although predictably but most importantly, scores of Muslim women across India who have suffered due to the ‘unislamic’ practice.

Left sulking were the handful of Muslim clerics and organisations like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) who opposed the ban on instant triple talaq and lost – not just the legal battle but also their stranglehold on the rights of married Muslim women in India.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who had personally advocated for an end to the practice (although his motive for the statement has often been attributed to his political concerns), took to Twitter to hail the verdict.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Expectedly, the entire spectrum of the BJP leadership – from national president Amit Shah to Union ministers Arun Jaitley, Ravi Shankar Prasad and UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath – reiterated Modi’s stand, the Congress party which had found itself in a piquant position over the case – with senior leader Kapil Sibal representing the AIMPLB in the court while Salman Khurshid was assisting the Bench as amicus curie – too welcomed the verdict.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]While Khurshid said: “What we hoped to happen has now happened, it is a good decision… Yeh faisla sachchai, vastvikta aur sahi Islam ko ujaagar karta hai”, his party colleague Sibal, who opposed several of Khurshid’s submissions in the court since he represented the AIMPLB which was against the ban, too seemed to reconcile with the verdict. “We hail the judgement, it protects personal laws and at the same time deprecates the practice of Triple Talaq,” Sibal said.

Randeep Singh Surjewala, the Congress party’s chief spokesperson, said: “The Supreme Court has set aside and quashed the practice of ‘instant triple talaq’ or ‘talaq-e-bidat’, which by itself was an aberration and adulteration of ‘talaq’, thereby recognizing the pristine form of religious practice in Islam that abhors any exploitation. This verdict is an affirmation of the rights of women and gives relief to them against being subjected to discrimination by a practice that had been perverted over the years. We welcome the acceptance of this reality by Court”.

Similar praise for the verdict came in from other political parties like Mayawati’s Bahujan Samaj Party, Trinamool Congress, the CPI and CPM.

The AIMPLB, which will hold a meeting of its executive committee in Bhopal on September 10 to discuss the Board’s future course of action, was evidently unhappy. Its senior member, Kamal Farooqui said: “Court order has affected the rights of religious minorities to practice their religion. It will have wide-ranging ramifications… Our feeling is that the judgment contravenes Constitutional guarantees”.

All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen chief and Hyderabad MP, Asaduddin Owaisi, who has also been an opponent of any ban on triple talaq through judicial intervention, cautioned that though the “I respect the verdict but its implementation on the ground will be a Herculean task”.

Bangladeshi author Taslima Nasreen, who has often been the target of Islamic fundamentalists and has repeatedly challenged the oppression of women by a section of the Islamic clergy, however said that while the SC verdict may come as an embarrassment to the AIMPLB, it doesn’t ensure women’s freedom – which she insisted would only come through education.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Cheer and jubilation as SC declares instant triple talaq ‘unconstitutional’For former Union minister Arif Mohammad Khan, who had appeared in the SC for a bunch of petitioners seeking a ban on the controversial practice, the verdict came as sweet vindication of a stand he had consistently taken for the past 30 years. Khan, who had quit the Rajiv Gandhi government in the aftermath of the Shah Bano verdict when the then government cowered under pressure of the AIMPLB and radical Islamic clerics, said: “It is a historic verdict and I honestly feel that none of us can make a realistic assessment of the positive impact that this judgment is going to have on the Muslim community”.

“It will not only liberate Muslim women but also provide them with a sense of equality. It will provide them with a sense of empowerment. This verdict will bring about a paradigm shift and I foresee a changed scenario in the days when women will no longer accept instant talaq as a fait accompli. Empowered by the Supreme Court verdict, they will answer and retort back. They will tell their spouse that ‘This triple talaq is unconstitutional. I am not going to leave the house, you can leave the house’… This is going to be a game-changer for Muslim women”, Khan said.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Delhi Police offers 11-person limit for CJP’s Connaught Place protest

Delhi Police has offered to facilitate a group of 11 people at Central Park in Connaught Place for the Cockroach Janata Party’s October 16 protest, while warning that violations of prohibitory orders could invite legal action.

Published

on

CJP protest to continue

Delhi Police has proposed allowing a group of 11 people to carry the national flag and sing the national anthem at Central Park in Connaught Place on October 16, ahead of a protest called by the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) over alleged electoral fraud.

The police said it could facilitate the group at a suitable place in the park, while appealing to the public not to join the proposed gathering in large numbers. The offer comes amid prohibitory orders in Connaught Place and adjoining areas under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke has called on people to assemble at Central Park at 5 pm on Friday with the national flag. The proposed demonstration, named “Lehra Do Tiranga”, follows the detention of CJP members Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka during an earlier protest.

Why Delhi Police proposed limiting the gathering

In its statement, Delhi Police cited the prevailing security and law-and-order situation in the area. It also referred to information from the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) that Central Park would remain closed on October 16 and 17 for administrative reasons.

Deputy Commissioner of Police Neha Yadav said the NDMC had informed the police about the closure and had asked that no gathering be allowed near the park.

The police also cited representations from trader and market associations in Connaught Place and surrounding areas. According to the police, the associations had raised concerns about unlawful assemblies and their impact on businesses, particularly during the festive season.

Police warned that violations of Section 163 BNSS would invite appropriate legal action. It also stressed that the national flag must be displayed and carried, and the national anthem sung, in the prescribed manner with due respect and dignity.

Delhi High Court declines to stop CJP protest

The proposed gathering reached the Delhi High Court after a vendor sought intervention over concerns about disruption to businesses and public movement in Connaught Place.

On Thursday, the court declined to restrain the CJP from holding the protest. It recorded the police’s assurance that all possible measures under the law would be taken to regulate the gathering and maintain peace.

The petition was filed by a vendor at Palika Bazar in Connaught Place, who raised concerns about the potential impact of the demonstration on traders and others working in the area.

Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, appearing for the authorities, told the court that steps had already been taken to regulate the proposed protest.

CJP’s protest call follows detention of party members

Dipke’s October 16 protest call follows earlier demonstrations over alleged electoral fraud. CJP members Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka are in jail on trespass charges after raising the national flag at Jantar Mantar earlier this week, according to the report.

The party has been protesting over alleged electoral fraud and has raised questions about the Election Commission.

Dipke has urged people to gather at Central Park with the national flag, arguing that raising the Tricolour should not be treated as a crime.

The police’s proposal to facilitate a group of 11 people came as the authorities sought to prevent a larger gathering at the site. The CJP’s response to the police’s offer was still awaited in the report published on October 15.

Continue Reading

India News

Actor Imran Khan asked to leave India after CJP protest

Actor Imran Khan has been asked to leave India by October 28, days after participating in a protest called by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in Mumbai.

Published

on

Actor Imran Khan, nephew of Bollywood star Aamir Khan, has been asked to leave India by the Mumbai Police, days after participating in a protest organised by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in Mumbai.

According to the notice, the actor has been given until October 28 to leave the country. The development follows his participation in the demonstration, which brought the actor into the spotlight over his involvement in a political protest.

Imran Khan is believed to hold US citizenship and an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card rather than full Indian citizenship, according to the report.

What led to the notice against Imran Khan?

The notice came days after Imran Khan joined a protest called by the CJP in Mumbai. The group, described as a satirical political organisation, had called for the demonstration.

The actor’s participation was followed by action from the authorities, with the Mumbai Police directing him to leave India by the specified deadline.

The notice does not, by itself, mean that the actor has already left the country or has been deported. October 28 is the deadline mentioned for his departure.

Imran Khan and his citizenship status

Imran Khan is known for his work in Hindi films, including Jaane Tu… Ya Jaane Na and Delhi Belly. He is also the nephew of actor Aamir Khan.

The report states that Imran Khan is believed to be a US citizen and hold an OCI card. OCI status does not confer Indian citizenship, although it provides eligible foreign citizens of Indian origin with specified privileges under Indian law.

The notice directing the actor to leave India follows his participation in the Mumbai protest. The reported development has brought attention to the intersection of immigration rules and the participation of foreign nationals in political demonstrations.

Continue Reading

India News

Election Commission orders voter roll revision in 17 states, UTs

The Election Commission has ordered a Special Summary Revision of electoral rolls in 17 states and Union Territories. Draft rolls are scheduled for November 12, with final rolls due on January 4, 2027.

Published

on

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has ordered a Special Summary Revision (SSR) of electoral rolls in 17 states and Union Territories, with the exercise aimed at facilitating voter registration and including eligible electors who may have been left out during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR).

The order was issued on Thursday, October 15, amid continuing political controversy over the SIR process and concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the exclusion of names from electoral rolls.

Under the announced schedule, January 1, 2027, will be the qualifying date for the revision. The draft electoral rolls are scheduled to be published on November 12, while the final rolls are due on January 4, 2027. Uttar Pradesh and Punjab, two states included in the exercise, are scheduled to go to the polls by February 2027.

Which states and Union Territories are covered?

The Special Summary Revision will cover the following 17 states and Union Territories:

  • Andaman and Nicobar Islands
  • Assam
  • Bihar
  • Chhattisgarh
  • Goa
  • Gujarat
  • Kerala
  • Lakshadweep
  • Madhya Pradesh
  • Manipur
  • Puducherry
  • Punjab
  • Rajasthan
  • Tamil Nadu
  • Uttar Pradesh
  • Uttarakhand
  • West Bengal

The Election Commission’s order follows earlier instructions issued to state election officials on September 29 to undertake a special drive to enrol eligible voters who had been left out, along with young and first-time electors.

Why has the Election Commission ordered the revision?

The announcement comes amid protests and political disagreements over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. Opposition parties have raised concerns about names being excluded during the exercise.

Another point of contention has been an additional declaration required from applicants submitting Form 6 for voter enrolment while the SIR was underway. The declaration required applicants to map their parents to the last SIR, which was conducted around 20 years ago.

The Election Commission had clarified on October 7 that the additional declaration applied only in states and Union Territories where the SIR was being conducted. It said the regular forms prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, would apply outside the SIR period.

The latest SSR order refers to applications for inclusion through Form 6 but does not mention the additional declaration.

What happens in states not covered by the current schedule?

The Election Commission has said that the schedule for the Special Summary Revision will be announced later in states and Union Territories where the SIR is ongoing or has recently been completed.

These include Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, Haryana, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, the National Capital Territory of Delhi, Odisha, Sikkim, Tripura and Telangana.

For Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh, where the SIR has not yet started, the schedule for electoral roll revision will be announced in due course, taking local weather conditions into account.

The Election Commission’s latest order sets out a separate timeline for the 17 states and Union Territories covered by the current SSR exercise, while leaving the schedules for the other regions to be announced later.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com