English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Cheer and jubilation as SC declares instant triple talaq ‘unconstitutional’

Published

on

Cheer and jubilation as SC declares instant triple talaq ‘unconstitutional’

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Barring a section of cleric and organisations like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, political parties, social activists and most importantly the Muslim women who suffered due to the practice, all welcome the Supreme Court’s historic verdict

A sense of euphoria that went beyond communal and political identities engulfed large sections of India’s population, on Tuesday, as the Supreme Court struck down the “manifestly arbitrary and unconstitutional” practice of Talaq-e-Biddat or triple talaq.

The landmark judgment passed by a Bench that comprised five judges, each of different faiths – Chief Justice of India JS Khehar (a Sikh), Justices Kurian Joseph (a Christian), Rohinton Nariman (a Parsi), S Abdul Nazeer (a Muslim), UU Lalit (a Hindu) – was immediately welcomed by all political parties, social activists and although predictably but most importantly, scores of Muslim women across India who have suffered due to the ‘unislamic’ practice.

Left sulking were the handful of Muslim clerics and organisations like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) who opposed the ban on instant triple talaq and lost – not just the legal battle but also their stranglehold on the rights of married Muslim women in India.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who had personally advocated for an end to the practice (although his motive for the statement has often been attributed to his political concerns), took to Twitter to hail the verdict.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Expectedly, the entire spectrum of the BJP leadership – from national president Amit Shah to Union ministers Arun Jaitley, Ravi Shankar Prasad and UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath – reiterated Modi’s stand, the Congress party which had found itself in a piquant position over the case – with senior leader Kapil Sibal representing the AIMPLB in the court while Salman Khurshid was assisting the Bench as amicus curie – too welcomed the verdict.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]JTNDYmxvY2txdW90ZSUyMGNsYXNzJTNEJTIydHdpdHRlci10d2VldCUyMiUyMGRhdGEtbGFuZyUzRCUyMmVuJTIyJTNFJTNDcCUyMGxhbmclM0QlMjJoaSUyMiUyMGRpciUzRCUyMmx0ciUyMiUzRSVFMCVBNCVBNCVFMCVBNSU4MCVFMCVBNCVBOCUyMCVFMCVBNCVBNCVFMCVBNCVCMiVFMCVBNCVCRSVFMCVBNCU5NSUyMCVFMCVBNCVBQSVFMCVBNCVCMCUwQSVFMCVBNCVCOCVFMCVBNSU4MSVFMCVBNCVBQSVFMCVBNSU4RCVFMCVBNCVCMCVFMCVBNSU4MCVFMCVBNCVBRSVFMCVBNCU5NSVFMCVBNSU4QiVFMCVBNCVCMCVFMCVBNSU4RCVFMCVBNCU5RiUyMCVFMCVBNCU5NSVFMCVBNCVCRSUyMCVFMCVBNCVBOCVFMCVBNCVCRiVFMCVBNCVCMCVFMCVBNSU4RCVFMCVBNCVBMyVFMCVBNCVBRi0lMjAlRTAlQTQlQUUlRTAlQTUlODElRTAlQTQlQjglRTAlQTUlOEQlRTAlQTQlQjIlRTAlQTQlQkYlRTAlQTQlQUUlMjAlRTAlQTQlQUUlRTAlQTQlQjklRTAlQTQlQkYlRTAlQTQlQjIlRTAlQTQlQkUlRTAlQTQlOTMlRTAlQTQlODIlMjAlRTAlQTQlOTUlRTAlQTUlODclMjAlRTAlQTQlQjIlRTAlQTQlQkYlRTAlQTQlOEYlMjAlRTAlQTQlQjglRTAlQTUlOEQlRTAlQTQlQjUlRTAlQTQlQkUlRTAlQTQlQUQlRTAlQTQlQkYlRTAlQTQlQUUlRTAlQTQlQkUlRTAlQTQlQTglMjAlRTAlQTQlQUElRTAlQTUlODIlRTAlQTQlQjAlRTAlQTUlOEQlRTAlQTQlQTMlMjAlRTAlQTQlOEYlRTAlQTQlQjUlRTAlQTQlODIlMjAlRTAlQTQlQjglRTAlQTQlQUUlRTAlQTQlQkUlRTAlQTQlQTglRTAlQTQlQTQlRTAlQTQlQkUlMjAlRTAlQTQlOTUlRTAlQTUlODclMjAlRTAlQTQlOEYlRTAlQTQlOTUlMEElRTAlQTQlQTglRTAlQTQlOEYlMjAlRTAlQTQlQUYlRTAlQTUlODElRTAlQTQlOTclMjAlRTAlQTQlOTUlRTAlQTUlODAlMjAlRTAlQTQlQjYlRTAlQTUlODElRTAlQTQlQjAlRTAlQTUlODElRTAlQTQlODYlRTAlQTQlQTQlRTAlQTUlQTQlMjAlM0NhJTBBaHJlZiUzRCUyMmh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGdC5jbyUyRk5ETWNac0tKVXclMjIlM0VwaWMudHdpdHRlci5jb20lMkZORE1jWnNLSlV3JTNDJTJGYSUzRSUzQyUyRnAlM0UlMjZtZGFzaCUzQiUwQUFtaXQlMjBTaGFoJTIwJTI4JTQwQW1pdFNoYWglMjklMjAlM0NhJTIwaHJlZiUzRCUyMmh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGdHdpdHRlci5jb20lMkZBbWl0U2hhaCUyRnN0YXR1cyUyRjg5OTg5MDI2MTgwMjYyNzA3MiUyMiUzRUF1Z3VzdCUwQTIyJTJDJTIwMjAxNyUzQyUyRmElM0UlM0MlMkZibG9ja3F1b3RlJTNFJTBBJTBBJTNDc2NyaXB0JTIwYXN5bmMlMEFzcmMlM0QlMjIlMkYlMkZwbGF0Zm9ybS50d2l0dGVyLmNvbSUyRndpZGdldHMuanMlMjIlMEFjaGFyc2V0JTNEJTIydXRmLTglMjIlM0UlM0MlMkZzY3JpcHQlM0UlMEElMEElMjAlMEElM0NibG9ja3F1b3RlJTIwY2xhc3MlM0QlMjJ0d2l0dGVyLXR3ZWV0JTIyJTIwZGF0YS1sYW5nJTNEJTIyZW4lMjIlM0UlM0NwJTIwbGFuZyUzRCUyMmhpJTIyJTIwZGlyJTNEJTIybHRyJTIyJTNFJUUwJUE0JTlGJUUwJUE1JThEJUUwJUE0JUIwJUUwJUE0JUJGJUUwJUE0JUFBJUUwJUE0JUIyJTIwJUUwJUE0JUE0JUUwJUE0JUIyJUUwJUE0JUJFJUUwJUE0JTk1JTIwJUUwJUE0JUFBJUUwJUE0JUIwJTBBJUUwJUE0JUI4JUUwJUE1JTgxJUUwJUE0JUFBJUUwJUE1JThEJUUwJUE0JUIwJUUwJUE1JTgwJUUwJUE0JUFFJTIwJUUwJUE0JTk1JUUwJUE1JThCJUUwJUE0JUIwJUUwJUE1JThEJUUwJUE0JTlGJTIwJUUwJUE0JTk1JUUwJUE1JTg3JTIwJUUwJUE0JUFCJUUwJUE1JTg4JUUwJUE0JUI4JUUwJUE0JUIyJUUwJUE0JUJFJTIwJUUwJUE0JTk1JUUwJUE0JUJFJTIwJUUwJUE0JUI5JUUwJUE0JUFFJTIwJUUwJUE0JUI4JUUwJUE1JThEJUUwJUE0JUI1JUUwJUE0JUJFJUUwJUE0JTk3JUUwJUE0JUE0JTIwJUUwJUE0JTk1JUUwJUE0JUIwJUUwJUE0JUE0JUUwJUE1JTg3JTIwJUUwJUE0JUI5JUUwJUE1JTg4JUUwJUE0JTgyJTJDJTIwJUUwJUE0JTg3JUUwJUE0JUI4JUUwJUE0JTk1JUUwJUE1JTg3JTIwJUUwJUE0JUFFJUUwJUE0JUJFJUUwJUE0JUE3JUUwJUE1JThEJUUwJUE0JUFGJUUwJUE0JUFFJTIwJUUwJUE0JUI4JUUwJUE1JTg3JTIwJUUwJUE0JUFFJUUwJUE1JTgxJUUwJUE0JUI4JUUwJUE1JThEJUUwJUE0JUIyJUUwJUE0JUJGJUUwJUE0JUFFJTIwJUUwJUE0JUFFJUUwJUE0JUI5JUUwJUE0JUJGJUUwJUE0JUIyJUUwJUE0JUJFJUUwJUE0JTkzJUUwJUE0JTgyJTIwJUUwJUE0JTk1JUUwJUE1JThCJTIwJUUwJUE0JUE4JUUwJUE1JThEJUUwJUE0JUFGJUUwJUE0JUJFJUUwJUE0JUFGJTIwJUUwJUE0JUFFJUUwJUE0JUJGJUUwJUE0JUIyJUUwJUE0JUJFJUUwJUE1JUE0JTIwJTNDYSUwQWhyZWYlM0QlMjJodHRwcyUzQSUyRiUyRnR3aXR0ZXIuY29tJTJGaGFzaHRhZyUyRlRyaXBsZVRhbGFxJTNGc3JjJTNEaGFzaCUyMiUzRSUyM1RyaXBsZVRhbGFxJTNDJTJGYSUzRSUwQSUzQ2ElMEFocmVmJTNEJTIyaHR0cHMlM0ElMkYlMkZ0LmNvJTJGakdwRFhaeEVGOSUyMiUzRXBpYy50d2l0dGVyLmNvbSUyRmpHcERYWnhFRjklM0MlMkZhJTNFJTNDJTJGcCUzRSUyNm1kYXNoJTNCJTBBWW9naSUyMEFkaXR5YW5hdGglMjAlMjglNDBteW9naWFkaXR5YW5hdGglMjklMjAlM0NhJTBBaHJlZiUzRCUyMmh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGdHdpdHRlci5jb20lMkZteW9naWFkaXR5YW5hdGglMkZzdGF0dXMlMkY4OTk5MDExOTAxNDE1NTQ2OTMlMjIlM0VBdWd1c3QlMEEyMiUyQyUyMDIwMTclM0MlMkZhJTNFJTNDJTJGYmxvY2txdW90ZSUzRSUwQSUwQSUzQ3NjcmlwdCUyMGFzeW5jJTBBc3JjJTNEJTIyJTJGJTJGcGxhdGZvcm0udHdpdHRlci5jb20lMkZ3aWRnZXRzLmpzJTIyJTBBY2hhcnNldCUzRCUyMnV0Zi04JTIyJTNFJTNDJTJGc2NyaXB0JTNF[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]While Khurshid said: “What we hoped to happen has now happened, it is a good decision… Yeh faisla sachchai, vastvikta aur sahi Islam ko ujaagar karta hai”, his party colleague Sibal, who opposed several of Khurshid’s submissions in the court since he represented the AIMPLB which was against the ban, too seemed to reconcile with the verdict. “We hail the judgement, it protects personal laws and at the same time deprecates the practice of Triple Talaq,” Sibal said.

Randeep Singh Surjewala, the Congress party’s chief spokesperson, said: “The Supreme Court has set aside and quashed the practice of ‘instant triple talaq’ or ‘talaq-e-bidat’, which by itself was an aberration and adulteration of ‘talaq’, thereby recognizing the pristine form of religious practice in Islam that abhors any exploitation. This verdict is an affirmation of the rights of women and gives relief to them against being subjected to discrimination by a practice that had been perverted over the years. We welcome the acceptance of this reality by Court”.

Similar praise for the verdict came in from other political parties like Mayawati’s Bahujan Samaj Party, Trinamool Congress, the CPI and CPM.

The AIMPLB, which will hold a meeting of its executive committee in Bhopal on September 10 to discuss the Board’s future course of action, was evidently unhappy. Its senior member, Kamal Farooqui said: “Court order has affected the rights of religious minorities to practice their religion. It will have wide-ranging ramifications… Our feeling is that the judgment contravenes Constitutional guarantees”.

All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen chief and Hyderabad MP, Asaduddin Owaisi, who has also been an opponent of any ban on triple talaq through judicial intervention, cautioned that though the “I respect the verdict but its implementation on the ground will be a Herculean task”.

Bangladeshi author Taslima Nasreen, who has often been the target of Islamic fundamentalists and has repeatedly challenged the oppression of women by a section of the Islamic clergy, however said that while the SC verdict may come as an embarrassment to the AIMPLB, it doesn’t ensure women’s freedom – which she insisted would only come through education.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Cheer and jubilation as SC declares instant triple talaq ‘unconstitutional’For former Union minister Arif Mohammad Khan, who had appeared in the SC for a bunch of petitioners seeking a ban on the controversial practice, the verdict came as sweet vindication of a stand he had consistently taken for the past 30 years. Khan, who had quit the Rajiv Gandhi government in the aftermath of the Shah Bano verdict when the then government cowered under pressure of the AIMPLB and radical Islamic clerics, said: “It is a historic verdict and I honestly feel that none of us can make a realistic assessment of the positive impact that this judgment is going to have on the Muslim community”.

“It will not only liberate Muslim women but also provide them with a sense of equality. It will provide them with a sense of empowerment. This verdict will bring about a paradigm shift and I foresee a changed scenario in the days when women will no longer accept instant talaq as a fait accompli. Empowered by the Supreme Court verdict, they will answer and retort back. They will tell their spouse that ‘This triple talaq is unconstitutional. I am not going to leave the house, you can leave the house’… This is going to be a game-changer for Muslim women”, Khan said.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Jammu and Kashmir: CRPF vans damaged, stones hurled amid protests against Vaishno Devi ropeway project

The residents have been complaining that the project would negatively impact the environment and their livelihoods.

Published

on

Jammu and Kashmir: CRPF vans damaged, stones hurled amid protests against Vaishno Devi ropeway project

Massive violence broke out in Jammu and Kashmir’s Katra after the protestors pelted stones and clashed with the security forces during their protests against the proposed ropeway project along the trek route to the holy shrine of Vaishno Devi atop Trikuta hills. 

Reports said that the protestors hurled stones at the security personnel and damaged a CRPF vehicle. Paramvir Singh, Reasi SSP told media that the protest was going on peacefully for the past three days but on Monday some protesters pelted stones at the security forces. 

In Jammu and Kashmir’s Katra, the shopkeepers and labourers on Sunday took out a protest rally on the third day of their strike and held a sit-in outside the office of the subdivisional magistrate and Shalimar Park in Katra, the base camp for pilgrims visiting the shrine. 

A member of the joint committee of shopkeepers and pony and palanquin owners had said that the 72-hour strike has been extended by another 24 hours, adding that they will meet again and announce our future course of action. Notably, the three-day strike called by them began on Friday. 

Reports stated that while the businesses located at the base camp of Katra remained operational, shops lining the pilgrimage route from Ban Ganga to Charan Paduka observed closures. Nonetheless, the suspension of pony and palanquin services is causing hardships for the pilgrims, especially the elderly and differently-abled, to continue their sacred journey.

The residents have been complaining that the project would negatively impact the environment and their livelihoods. They asserted that the ropeway project would render them jobless, and also accused the authorities of pushing through the development without adequate consultation.

Meanwhile, Jammu and Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha has assured the protestors of their employment. He mentioned that the committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner has been deliberating on the ropeway project and the rehabilitation of the locals. Furthermore, he also emphasised that the genuine concerns of the locals would be considered while the development of the region would not be ignored.

The Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board (SMVDSB) had announced implementation of the long-awaited ropeway project to facilitate a safer and faster journey for the pilgrims. As per the project details, the ropeway will be developed with a cost of Rs 250 crore between Tarakote Marg to Sanji Chhat along the 12-kilometre track.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi Pollution: GRAP IV restrictions to continue in national capital, says Supreme Court

The court also pulled up the Delhi Police over no checkpoints at the borders of the city for checking the pollution measures and said that it was a serious lapse.

Published

on

Delhi Pollution: GRAP IV restrictions to continue in national capital, says Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to relax GRAP IV measures in Delhi and ordered the CAQM to consider relaxing norms for students. The apex court observed that several students cannot avail midday meals, online classes and cannot access air purifiers.

The court also pulled up the Delhi Police over no checkpoints at the borders of the city for checking the pollution measures and said that it was a serious lapse. A bench headed by Justice AS Oka stated that they would consider prosecution of the Delhi Police Commissioner under the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) Act for deploying police personnel at only 23 checkpoints, when Stage 4 of the GRAP was implemented.

Earlier, the court has also appointed 13 members from the court as commissioners to check whether the GRAP IV measures are being implemented or not. On Monday, the commissioners submitted their report to the court.

Subsequently, the court told the Delhi government that there were no checkposts at borders of the city and that the ban on trucks entering into the capital was not being followed properly.

The top court bench said that they were informed that no police or government personnel were present at the border checkpoints, and they were only manned by toll collection staff of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. Mentioning that they will direct prosecution against all officials, the court questioned why the police were not directed to take action under Stage IV of the GRAP.

Responding, Advocate Shadan Farasat representing the Delhi government said that the CAQM had issued directions. Consecutively, the court asked him to show what written instructions were given by the state and the central government to the police on November 18. To this, Advocate Farasat said that directions were issued to post police personnel at 23 checkpoints where trucks could enter the city.

The court continued that this was negligence, adding that it will direct CAQM to prosecute the Delhi Police Commissioner.

Continue Reading

India News

Maharashtra elections: Ajit Pawar criticises Sharad Pawar’s decision to field Yugender Pawar against him

Ajit Pawar said that Yugendra is a business person, and he had no connection with politics.

Published

on

Maharashtra elections: Ajit Pawar criticises Sharad Pawar’s decision to field Yugender Pawar against him

After the Maharashtra Assembly Elections results, NCP leader Ajit Pawar criticized NCP faction led by Sharad Pawar for its decision to field his nephew Yugender Pawar against him in the family bastion of Baramati. Ajit Pawar also mentioned that his decision to field wife Sunetra Pawar against his sister Supriya Sule in the Lok Sabha election was a mistake. 

Sharad Pawar led NCP had fielded Yugender Pawar, son of Ajit Pawar’s elder brother Shrinivas Anantrao Pawar, in the Baramati Assembly segment. The constituency was represented by Sharad Pawar for over two decades, followed by Ajit Pawar for over three. In this assembly election, 33-year-old Yugendra Pawar was backed by Sharad Pawar and four-time Baramati MP Supriya Sule. However, Yugender Pawar lost out against his formidable uncle by a margin of over 1 lakh votes.

While addressing the media, Ajit Pawar said that Yugendra is a business person, and he had no connection with politics. He added that there was no reason to field his own nephew against him in the elections.

Earlier in the Lok Sabha elections 2024, Ajit Pawar had fielded his wife Sunetra Pawar against his cousin and Sharad Pawar’s daughter Supriya Sule, who won the contest by a 1.5 lakh votes margin. Later, Ajit Pawar admitted that it was a mistake.

Sharad Pawar had defended the decision to field Yugendra Pawar, mentioning that someone had to contest the polls. He had also said there was no comparison between Ajit Pawar and Yugendra Pawar. 

Notably, a 2023 rebellion led by Ajit Pawar against his uncle split the NCP founded by Sharad Pawar. Since then, the senior Pawar has been fighting to win his party’s name and symbol back. 

Previously In the Lok Sabha election, the veteran had trumped his nephew, with his faction winning 8 seats compared to Ajit Pawar’s score of 1. However this time, the tables turned as NCP (Sharad Pawar) scored 10, but Ajit Pawar’s party won 41.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com