English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Hashimpura, Srebrenica And Rohingyas in Rakhine: Similar And So Different

Published

on

Hashimpura, Srebrenica And Rohingyas in Rakhine: Similar And So Different

By Saeed Naqvi

 

Incidents, similar in their chilling monstrosity, came to mind when I saw photographs of a row of Rohingya Muslim young men, on their knees, their hands tied behind their back. Gun wielding military police, lurking within the frame, eventually mowed them down.

 

This is the face of the horror the world will remember. In a state of funk, Myanmar’s commander-in-chief, General Min Aung Hlaing has admitted mass graves in one village: Inn Din 50 km north of the Rakhine state capital, Sittwe. Journalists have scoured many other mass graves.

 

The other gruesome episode etched on my mind is Srebrenica in Bosnia (1995). Hashimpura in Meerut (1987), of course, is our very own tragedy, still lingering. In each one of these macabre events, Muslim youth had their hands tied behind their backs and shot by the local army.

 

In the latest massacre of the Rohingya in August 2017, the local Buddhist clergy and army turned upon the Muslims. The number killed exceeds 6,700 according to the NGO Doctors without Borders.

 

In Srebrenica, the orthodox Christian troops of the Bosnian-Serbian army, murdered 7,000 Muslim youth and expelled 20,000 civilians from the area.

 

In Hashimpura, forty two young men were lined up along a nearby irrigation canal and shot by soldiers of the Provincial Armed Constabulary. These soldiers were Hindus. Can their denomination be spelt out? Apparently not, given the manner in which Asaduddin Owaisi of the Ittehadul Muslimeen has been shouted down for having dared to mention Muslims as “martyrs” because in the latest outrage it is mostly them who have been killed by terrorists.

 

Hashimpura, Srebrenica And Rohingyas in Rakhine: Similar And So DifferentOwaisi was making a simple point. Patriotism of Indian Muslims is regularly challenged on prime time television which places them on the wrong side of the secular line. But five out of seven killed in the Sunjwan army camp happened to be Muslims. Why is this detail missing from reports? Such stories would go some distance in bridging communal divide. No, said the anchors almost in chorus, “Owaisi is communalizing the army”. Pray, how? “By reporting that five of the seven killed in the camp were Muslims”? Muslims must never upstage Hindu soldiers in the martyrdom stakes?

 

Given this attitude, the killers of the 42 Muslims in Hashimpura must be seen only as instruments of the “secular” state. That 19 PAC personnel, under the platoon commander, Surinder Pal Singh, rounded up Muslims in the Hashimpura neighborhood of Meerut, should be blandly reported without mentioning religious identities. Religious identity must only be mentioned if terrorists turn out to be Muslims which is what they are when police shoots them down. The number of youth taken away is still unclear, but the police narrative suggests 42, mostly weavers and daily wage earners, who were taken in a truck to the upper Ganga canal in Murad Nagar, near Ghaziabad.

 

The men were blind folded, and shot. Their bodies were dumped in the canal. This was not the only such operation following a series of communal clashes in Meerut that year since March.

 

On May 24, 2007, 20 years after the massacre, 36 members of victim’s families filed applications under the Right to Information Act at the office of the Director General of Police in Lucknow. The inquiry revealed that all the accused remained in service. In their Annual Confidential Reports there was not even a hint of their involvement in the Hashimpura massacre. The secular state was protecting its own.

 

The case has dragged on, zig zagged without any evidence of the establishment really searching for justice. News is expected from the High Court on February 20. Reporters recall the Minister of State for Home, P. Chidambaram, outside his North Block office actually scream at officials. “Crush them” he shouted. He was very hands-on during the Meerut riots and the aftermath. Subramaniam Swamy actually named Chidambaram as an accomplice but the allegation, coming from Swamy, became prima facie suspect. In the fullness of time, the PAC men involved in the case, including Surinder Pal Singh, have all departed to their maker, one by one.

 

I have given the fairly common place details of the tragic saga of Muslims in the Hashimpura case simply to establish the contrast with massacres in Srebrenica and Rakhine in Myanmar. Orthodox Christians in one instance and Buddhists in the other brazenly targeted Muslims and for which they have been or are being punished. But in India the secular edifice would be weakened if the religious identity of police or army men who kill Muslims is mentioned. And the case will be dragged on eternally.

 

Senior journalist Saeed Naqvi compares the tragedies in Rakhine in Myanmar, Hashimpura in UP and Serbernica in Bosnia killing Muslims for different reasons.In Serbia-Bosnia, the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia concluded that what happened in Srebrenica was “genocide”. It pinned the blame on senior officers in the Bosnian Serbian Army.

 

Bill Richardson, former Governor of New Mexico and US Ambassador to the UN, resigned last week from a Myanmar Advisory Board on the Rohingya crisis. He called it a pro government “cheerleading squad”. Richardson has been a friend of the country’s civilian leader, Aung San Suu Kyi. This did not prevent him from expressing his anger at what he said was a whitewash in which she was complicit. “She has developed the arrogance of power”, he said.

 

For the horrors of Srebrenica senior commander Ratko Mladic and a host of his accomplices, have been awarded long sentences at the International Court of Justice. In Myanmar, Aung San Suu Kyi and her military accomplices are inching towards global opprobrium and eventual justice.

 

Why then are the perpetrators of Hashimpura, the oldest of the three massacres, still scot-free?

 

Supposing Owaisi were to lift the scab from another raw wound and say “wheels of justice, even when the complainants are Muslims, move faster in non Muslim theocratic states than in pretentious secular ones”. Would he be shouted down again?

 

Most Indians shy away from a glaring reality. Eruptions in former Yugoslavia and Myanmar took place when Muslims were in bad odour globally after the wars in the Arab world.

 

Communal clashes in India, particularly police versus people, have been endemic since the Partition of 1947. And the world does not take much notice because it is a routine “internal affair” of a sovereign state.

Latest world news

UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper visits India to strengthen bilateral partnership

UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper held high-level meetings in New Delhi during her first official visit to India, underscoring efforts to deepen cooperation in trade, security, technology and regional stability.

Published

on

UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper visited New Delhi for her first official trip to India since assuming office, holding key meetings with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar as both countries seek to deepen cooperation across trade, security and strategic sectors.

The visit comes at a significant time in India-UK relations, with both governments working toward the implementation of their recently concluded trade agreement while also expanding collaboration in areas such as technology, climate action, supply chains and regional security.

Focus on trade and strategic cooperation

During her engagements in New Delhi, Cooper discussed ways to strengthen the comprehensive strategic partnership between the two countries. Conversations also touched on accelerating the implementation of the India-UK trade agreement and enhancing economic cooperation.

Her visit followed recent discussions between Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal and UK Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle regarding the rollout of the bilateral trade pact.

New initiatives announced

India and the UK also announced fresh cooperation initiatives during the visit, including the launch of a Critical Minerals Global Supply Chain Observatory aimed at strengthening collaboration on critical minerals and supply-chain resilience.

Officials described the initiative as an important step in expanding cooperation in emerging strategic sectors and supporting resilient global supply chains.

Addressing global challenges

Apart from bilateral issues, discussions covered wider global concerns, including regional stability, economic disruptions arising from international conflicts and maritime security. The visit reflects the growing importance both countries attach to their strategic partnership amid evolving geopolitical challenges.

India and the UK have increasingly broadened cooperation across defence, technology, innovation, clean energy and people-to-people ties, with both sides aiming to further strengthen engagement in the coming years.

Fact-check assessment

The core angle—Yvette Cooper’s first official visit to India, meetings with PM Modi and S. Jaishankar, focus on trade, security, strategic cooperation and the launch of new bilateral initiatives—is supported by multiple current reports and appears factually sound.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump says India-US trade deal likely soon, calls PM Modi a good friend

Donald Trump has expressed confidence that India and the United States will soon finalize a trade agreement, while praising Prime Minister Narendra Modi and highlighting ongoing bilateral negotiations.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

US President Donald Trump has expressed confidence that the United States and India will reach a trade agreement in the near future, even as discussions continue amid concerns over potential new tariffs. Trump also praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi, describing him as a good friend and highlighting the strong relationship between the two leaders.

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said he expects the two countries to finalize a deal and pointed to his personal rapport with Prime Minister Modi. He said the relationship between Washington and New Delhi remains strong and that ongoing negotiations are moving toward an agreement.

The remarks come shortly after a US trade delegation concluded discussions in India on an interim bilateral trade arrangement. According to Indian officials, the talks were conducted in a cooperative atmosphere, with both sides reaffirming their commitment to a mutually beneficial agreement aimed at strengthening economic ties.

During the interaction, Trump also repeated his criticism of India’s past tariff policies, arguing that India had imposed high duties on American goods for many years. He claimed recent US trade measures were intended to address what he views as an imbalance in the trading relationship.

His comments come days after the US administration proposed additional tariffs on imports from India and several other economies under a separate trade investigation related to forced-labour concerns. The proposal remains under review and has become one of the issues running alongside broader trade negotiations between the two countries.

Despite the tariff dispute, both governments have continued negotiations. Recent statements from officials on both sides suggest that substantial progress has already been made on several aspects of the proposed agreement, with discussions focused on resolving the remaining issues.

The United States is one of India’s largest trading partners, and a bilateral agreement is expected to further expand trade and investment flows between the two countries. Trump’s latest remarks are being seen as a sign that both sides remain committed to finding common ground despite ongoing trade disagreements.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

India considers tax relief to attract foreign investors amid Iran war impact

India is evaluating tax incentives, including a possible capital gains tax exemption on government securities for foreign investors, to support capital inflows amid economic pressures linked to the Iran war.

Published

on

India is considering a set of measures aimed at attracting more foreign investment as the ongoing Iran war continues to create pressure on the country’s economy, according to reports citing government sources. One of the key proposals under discussion is the removal of capital gains tax on investments made by foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) in government securities.

The move comes at a time when geopolitical tensions in West Asia have pushed up global oil prices, weakened investor sentiment and increased pressure on the Indian rupee. India, which imports a significant share of its crude oil requirements, has been among the countries closely monitoring the economic fallout from the conflict.

Government exploring ways to boost capital inflows

Officials are reportedly evaluating tax-related incentives to make Indian debt markets more attractive to overseas investors. The proposed exemption on capital gains from government securities is aimed at encouraging foreign portfolio investment and supporting capital inflows during a period of heightened global uncertainty.

The government is seeking to counter the impact of foreign capital outflows that have intensified amid concerns over the Iran conflict and its implications for energy markets and global economic growth.

Rupee and markets under pressure

Recent weeks have seen increased volatility in financial markets, with foreign investors pulling money out of Indian equities. Analysts have linked part of the pressure on the rupee to rising oil prices and continued overseas investor withdrawals.

Market participants believe that measures aimed at attracting foreign investment into government securities could help improve investor confidence and provide support to the domestic currency.

Broader economic concerns

The Iran war has added to concerns about inflation, economic growth and India’s external sector. Higher energy prices can increase import costs and put pressure on inflation, while sustained foreign capital outflows may affect financial market stability.

While no final decision has been announced, discussions on easing tax rules for foreign investors reflect the government’s efforts to strengthen capital inflows and cushion the economy from external shocks.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com