English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

PM Modi directs withdrawal of the Fake News order slammed as motivated to stifle media

Published

on

PM Modi directs withdrawal of the Fake News order slammed as motivated to stifle media

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Prime Minister Narendra Modi has ordered withdrawal of the Information and Broadcasting Ministry’s controversial move to black list journalists, making them liable to lose their accreditation with Press Information Bureau (PIB) on mere accusation of fake news.

As per reports, the PM office has directed Smriti Irani-led Information and Brodcasting Ministry to leave the final decision on recent law on fake news on press bodies.

The order issued last evening had said that journalists could be denied government access just on the accusation of fake news and they could lose their accreditation with Press Information Bureau (PIB).

The guidelines were seen by journalists as an attempt to control the media in an election year.

Responding to angry tweets, I&B Minister Smriti Irani had said today that she was “more than happy to engage with journalists or organisations wanting to give suggestions so that together we can fight the menace of ‘fake news’ and uphold ethical journalism”.

In its four-para statement, now withdrawn, the government said it had amended accreditation guidelines for journalists after noting “increasing instances of fake news in various mediums including print and electronic media”.

Government accreditation for journalists allows them to access ministries and enter restricted buildings or events. A journalist is accredited with the PIB of the Centre after she/he has least five years’ experience as a full-time working journalist. Freelance journalists need to have 15 years experience and foreign correspondents five years with a valid work visa.

The I&B Ministry press release on Monday, April 2, said that if a journalist is found to have “created and/or propagated” fake news, her/his accreditation would be suspended or permanently cancelled.

Without defining fake news, it said a journalist’s PIB accreditation would be suspended the moment there was any complaint of fake news.

“The accreditation will be suspended till such time the determination regarding the fake news is made by the regulating agencies,” the government order said.

The press release said that the responsibility of determining whether a news item is fake or not would lie with the Press Council of India (PCI) for print journalists and the News Broadcasters Association (NBA) for TV journalists.

The guidelines said the PCI and the NBA would decide within 15 days whether the complaint was legit.

If the journalist was found guilty of publishing or propagating fake news, accreditation would be suspended for six months for the first violation and for a year in the case of a second violation. For a third offence, the journalist’s accreditation will be cancelled permanently.

The Accreditation Committee of the Press Information Bureau (PIB), which consists of representatives of both the PCI and the NBA, would be reached out for validating any accreditation request of any news media agency, it said.

While examining the requests seeking accreditation, the regulatory agencies would check whether the Norms of Journalistic Conduct’ and Code of Ethics and Broadcasting Standards’, prescribed by the PCI and NBA respectively, are adhered to by the journalists as part of their functioning, the ministry said. It would be obligatory for journalists to abide by these guidelines, it said.​

As journalists protested against the press release and “fake news” became the top trend on Twitter on Tuesday, Irani acknowledged the matter had “generated debate”.

Senior journalist Shekhar Gupta described the move as a “breathtaking assault on mainstream media,” and referred to a law proposed by the Rajiv Gandhi government, which had sought to make “criminal imputation” and “scurrilous writings” a crime. Gupta tweeted: “Make no mistake: this is a breathtaking assault on mainstream media. It’s a moment like Rajiv Gandhi’s anti-defamation bill. All media should bury their differences and resist this.”

NDTV’s Akhilesh Sharma questioned whether the I&B Ministry was assuming that only accredited journalists spread fake news. “What about non-accredited journalists, editors, news portals,” he asked.

Smriti Irani tweeted in reply: “Those will be considered as well @akhileshsharma1 ji through other departments of @MIB_India . Will put information in public domain soon.”

Congress leader Ahmed Patel also questioned whether the guidelines were aimed at preventing journalists from reporting news uncomfortable to the establishment. “What is guarantee that these rules will not be misused to harass honest reporters? Is it not possible that motivated complaints will be filed to suspend accreditation until enquiry is on?” he tweeted.

In response, Smriti Irani tweeted: “Glad to see you awake Ahmed Patel ji. Whether a News article / broadcast is fake or not will be determined by PCI & NBA; both of whom I’m sure you know are not controlled/ operated by GOI.”

The term “fake news” has in the past few months become a staple charge by leaders in several countries to describe media reports and organisations critical of them.

Karnataka Congress Committee president G Parmeswara said: “Irony just died a slow death as Ministry of Information & Broadcasting issued guidelines against #FakeNews. Wasn’t the #postcardnews founder arrested for peddling fake news recently? Also, the most important question is: Who has been encouraging fake news in India? Any answers?”

Congress communications incharge Randeep Singh Surjewala tweeted: “Fascism reaches its ‘nadir’ as a shaky Modi Govt, caught in its web of lies, seeks to muzzle all independent voices in media through fallacious rules!

Will the 13 Union Ministers answer for the lame duck portal tarnishing mainstream media?#FakeNewshttp://indianexpress.com/article/india/look-who-is-busting-fake-news-for-13-ministers-site-with-exam-warriors-link-5121254/ …”[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Telegram restricted ahead of NEET-UG re-exam, NTA backs move to curb exam fraud

NTA has welcomed the Centre’s decision to temporarily restrict Telegram ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, citing the need to prevent fraud and misinformation.

Published

on

NEET

The Centre has imposed temporary restrictions on messaging platform Telegram ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, with the National Testing Agency (NTA) welcoming the decision as part of efforts to prevent exam-related fraud and misinformation.

The temporary curbs will remain in place until June 22, a day after the NEET-UG re-exam scheduled for June 21. Authorities said the action was taken following concerns that the platform was being misused by cheating networks and individuals circulating misleading claims related to the examination.

NTA says move aimed at protecting exam integrity

According to the NTA, the restrictions are intended to safeguard candidates from fraudulent activities and false information that could affect the fairness of the examination process. The agency stated that maintaining the integrity of the re-examination remains a priority as lakhs of students prepare to appear for the test.

The NEET-UG re-exam is being conducted after the original examination was cancelled amid allegations of question paper leaks and irregularities. Since then, authorities have been monitoring online platforms for suspicious activity and misleading content targeting candidates.

Restrictions linked to concerns over fake paper leak claims

In recent weeks, several reports surfaced about Telegram channels allegedly offering access to leaked examination papers. The NTA had repeatedly advised students not to trust such claims and referred suspicious links and posts for verification by cybercrime authorities. No official confirmation of any genuine leaked re-exam paper had been issued.

Authorities believe the temporary restrictions will help limit the spread of fake content and reduce opportunities for organised exam fraud in the days leading up to the re-test.

Wider efforts to secure the re-examination

The government and examination authorities have introduced several measures ahead of the re-exam, including monitoring social media platforms and creating channels for reporting suspicious claims related to NEET-UG 2026. The NTA has also urged candidates to rely only on official communications for updates regarding the examination.

With the re-examination approaching, officials say the latest action is part of a broader effort to ensure a fair and transparent process for all candidates.

Continue Reading

India News

Abhishek Banerjee says will not bow to BJP after nearly 11 hours of ED questioning

After spending nearly 11 hours before the Enforcement Directorate, TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee said he would not bow to the BJP and accused the ruling party of using investigative agencies for political purposes.

Published

on

Abhishek Banerjee

Trinamool Congress leader and Diamond Harbour MP Abhishek Banerjee on Tuesday said he would not bow to the BJP after spending nearly 11 hours being questioned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with an ongoing investigation.

Speaking after the questioning, Banerjee alleged that central agencies were being used to target opposition leaders and asserted that he would continue his political fight despite what he described as sustained pressure.

The TMC leader has repeatedly maintained that investigations involving him are politically motivated, a charge he has made on several previous occasions while appearing before central agencies.

His appearance before the ED comes amid a period of heightened political activity and multiple investigations involving leaders in West Bengal. Recent days have also seen Banerjee face summons and questioning in separate matters by state investigative agencies.

After leaving the ED office, Banerjee reiterated that he would not be intimidated and said he remained committed to his political responsibilities. He also accused the BJP of attempting to weaken opposition parties through investigative action, an allegation that the BJP has rejected in the past.

The Enforcement Directorate has not publicly commented on Banerjee’s remarks. The investigation related to the questioning remains ongoing.

Continue Reading

India News

DMK attacks Rahul Gandhi, accuses him of weakening opposition unity

DMK has intensified its criticism of Rahul Gandhi, alleging that the Congress leader’s actions have weakened opposition unity and strained relations within the INDIA bloc.

Published

on

Rahul-Gandhi

The war of words between the DMK and Congress has intensified, with the DMK launching a strong attack on Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi and accusing him of contributing to divisions within the opposition alliance. The criticism comes amid strained ties between the two parties following their political split in Tamil Nadu.

According to the DMK, Rahul Gandhi’s political approach has weakened unity among opposition parties. The party’s IT wing mocked the Congress leader on social media, while an editorial published in the DMK’s official mouthpiece Murasoli questioned his recent remarks on opposition solidarity.

DMK questions Rahul Gandhi’s remarks on opposition unity

In its editorial, Murasoli argued that Rahul Gandhi was speaking about opposition unity despite, according to the DMK, contributing to disagreements among alliance partners in several states. The publication cited criticism directed at Congress by various opposition parties and suggested that the party’s actions had often created tensions within the INDIA bloc.

The editorial also referred to past political disputes involving Congress and Left parties, particularly in Kerala, claiming such episodes had raised concerns among opposition allies about Congress’s approach toward its partners.

Tamil Nadu political fallout adds to tensions

The attack comes after a major political realignment in Tamil Nadu. Following the 2026 Assembly elections, Congress ended its alliance with the DMK and joined the government led by Vijay’s Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK). The move left the DMK in the opposition and significantly altered the political equation between the two former allies.

The DMK has alleged that Congress benefited from the alliance during the election and later abandoned its partner. The party’s editorial questioned whether assurances from Congress leadership would be trusted by alliance partners after the developments in Tamil Nadu.

Congress rejects allegations

Congress has not issued a detailed official response to the editorial, but party sources have rejected the allegations. According to the party, its decisions in Tamil Nadu were made in line with the mandate delivered by voters and were not intended to undermine either the DMK or the broader opposition alliance.

The latest exchange highlights growing strains between two key opposition parties even as leaders continue to stress cooperation on national issues. Just days earlier, Rahul Gandhi had said that the DMK remained aligned with the opposition on defending the “idea of India” despite political differences.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com