English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

PM Modi directs withdrawal of the Fake News order slammed as motivated to stifle media

Published

on

PM Modi directs withdrawal of the Fake News order slammed as motivated to stifle media

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Prime Minister Narendra Modi has ordered withdrawal of the Information and Broadcasting Ministry’s controversial move to black list journalists, making them liable to lose their accreditation with Press Information Bureau (PIB) on mere accusation of fake news.

As per reports, the PM office has directed Smriti Irani-led Information and Brodcasting Ministry to leave the final decision on recent law on fake news on press bodies.

The order issued last evening had said that journalists could be denied government access just on the accusation of fake news and they could lose their accreditation with Press Information Bureau (PIB).

The guidelines were seen by journalists as an attempt to control the media in an election year.

Responding to angry tweets, I&B Minister Smriti Irani had said today that she was “more than happy to engage with journalists or organisations wanting to give suggestions so that together we can fight the menace of ‘fake news’ and uphold ethical journalism”.

In its four-para statement, now withdrawn, the government said it had amended accreditation guidelines for journalists after noting “increasing instances of fake news in various mediums including print and electronic media”.

Government accreditation for journalists allows them to access ministries and enter restricted buildings or events. A journalist is accredited with the PIB of the Centre after she/he has least five years’ experience as a full-time working journalist. Freelance journalists need to have 15 years experience and foreign correspondents five years with a valid work visa.

The I&B Ministry press release on Monday, April 2, said that if a journalist is found to have “created and/or propagated” fake news, her/his accreditation would be suspended or permanently cancelled.

Without defining fake news, it said a journalist’s PIB accreditation would be suspended the moment there was any complaint of fake news.

“The accreditation will be suspended till such time the determination regarding the fake news is made by the regulating agencies,” the government order said.

The press release said that the responsibility of determining whether a news item is fake or not would lie with the Press Council of India (PCI) for print journalists and the News Broadcasters Association (NBA) for TV journalists.

The guidelines said the PCI and the NBA would decide within 15 days whether the complaint was legit.

If the journalist was found guilty of publishing or propagating fake news, accreditation would be suspended for six months for the first violation and for a year in the case of a second violation. For a third offence, the journalist’s accreditation will be cancelled permanently.

The Accreditation Committee of the Press Information Bureau (PIB), which consists of representatives of both the PCI and the NBA, would be reached out for validating any accreditation request of any news media agency, it said.

While examining the requests seeking accreditation, the regulatory agencies would check whether the Norms of Journalistic Conduct’ and Code of Ethics and Broadcasting Standards’, prescribed by the PCI and NBA respectively, are adhered to by the journalists as part of their functioning, the ministry said. It would be obligatory for journalists to abide by these guidelines, it said.​

As journalists protested against the press release and “fake news” became the top trend on Twitter on Tuesday, Irani acknowledged the matter had “generated debate”.

Senior journalist Shekhar Gupta described the move as a “breathtaking assault on mainstream media,” and referred to a law proposed by the Rajiv Gandhi government, which had sought to make “criminal imputation” and “scurrilous writings” a crime. Gupta tweeted: “Make no mistake: this is a breathtaking assault on mainstream media. It’s a moment like Rajiv Gandhi’s anti-defamation bill. All media should bury their differences and resist this.”

NDTV’s Akhilesh Sharma questioned whether the I&B Ministry was assuming that only accredited journalists spread fake news. “What about non-accredited journalists, editors, news portals,” he asked.

Smriti Irani tweeted in reply: “Those will be considered as well @akhileshsharma1 ji through other departments of @MIB_India . Will put information in public domain soon.”

Congress leader Ahmed Patel also questioned whether the guidelines were aimed at preventing journalists from reporting news uncomfortable to the establishment. “What is guarantee that these rules will not be misused to harass honest reporters? Is it not possible that motivated complaints will be filed to suspend accreditation until enquiry is on?” he tweeted.

In response, Smriti Irani tweeted: “Glad to see you awake Ahmed Patel ji. Whether a News article / broadcast is fake or not will be determined by PCI & NBA; both of whom I’m sure you know are not controlled/ operated by GOI.”

The term “fake news” has in the past few months become a staple charge by leaders in several countries to describe media reports and organisations critical of them.

Karnataka Congress Committee president G Parmeswara said: “Irony just died a slow death as Ministry of Information & Broadcasting issued guidelines against #FakeNews. Wasn’t the #postcardnews founder arrested for peddling fake news recently? Also, the most important question is: Who has been encouraging fake news in India? Any answers?”

Congress communications incharge Randeep Singh Surjewala tweeted: “Fascism reaches its ‘nadir’ as a shaky Modi Govt, caught in its web of lies, seeks to muzzle all independent voices in media through fallacious rules!

Will the 13 Union Ministers answer for the lame duck portal tarnishing mainstream media?#FakeNewshttp://indianexpress.com/article/india/look-who-is-busting-fake-news-for-13-ministers-site-with-exam-warriors-link-5121254/ …”[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Pawan Khera faces fresh setback as Supreme Court refuses relief in passport row case

Congress leader Pawan Khera faces fresh setback as Supreme Court refuses interim relief and directs him to seek bail from Guwahati High Court.

Published

on

Pawan Khera

Congress leader Pawan Khera suffered another legal setback on Friday after the Supreme Court of India declined to extend protection in a case linked to his remarks about Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife.

A bench of the apex court refused to interfere with an earlier order that had stayed the transit anticipatory bail granted to Khera by the Telangana High Court. This decision leaves the Congress leader open to possible arrest by Assam Police in connection with the case.

During the hearing, Khera’s counsel sought interim protection, but the court declined the request and advised him to approach the appropriate court in Assam for relief. The bench clarified that the Guwahati High Court should decide any bail plea independently and on its merits.

“Am I a terrorist?” remark during hearing

While seeking protection, Khera’s legal team expressed concern over the urgency of the situation. In court, his counsel remarked, “Am I a terrorist?” highlighting the plea for temporary relief until a fresh bail application could be filed.

The Supreme Court also raised concerns over the submission of incorrect documents during the proceedings, adding another layer to the legal complications faced by the Congress leader.

Case linked to remarks on CM’s wife

The case stems from a press conference held earlier this month, where Khera made allegations regarding the citizenship status and financial assets of the Assam Chief Minister’s wife, Riniki Bhuyan Sharma.

He had claimed that she possessed multiple passports and owned undisclosed overseas properties. These allegations were strongly denied by the Chief Minister’s family, who termed them fabricated and misleading.

Legal battle intensifies

Earlier, the Telangana High Court had granted Khera temporary transit anticipatory bail, allowing him time to seek relief from a competent court in Assam. However, the Supreme Court stayed that order following a challenge by Assam authorities, escalating the legal battle.

With the latest ruling, Khera is now expected to move the Guwahati High Court for anticipatory bail as the case continues to unfold.

Continue Reading

India News

Congress suspends 5 Haryana MLAs over cross-voting in Rajya Sabha polls

Congress suspends five Haryana MLAs for cross-voting in Rajya Sabha elections, citing serious indiscipline and anti-party activities.

Published

on

The Congress has suspended five of its MLAs in Haryana for cross-voting during the recent Rajya Sabha elections, taking disciplinary action over what it described as “anti-party activities”.

The move came after the state unit reviewed the conduct of certain legislators during the polls, where some were found to have voted against the party’s authorised candidate.

Five MLAs suspended after disciplinary process

According to party sources, the MLAs were issued show-cause notices seeking an explanation for their actions. After reviewing their responses, the Congress disciplinary committee recommended suspension.

The decision was approved by the party leadership, including Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, and has been implemented with immediate effect.

Party calls it ‘grave indiscipline’

Haryana Congress chief Udai Bhan said the action was necessary to uphold party discipline, stressing that defying the official party line during elections weakens organisational unity.

He said the party takes such violations seriously and will continue to act against any form of indiscipline.

Leadership backs strict action

Senior Congress leader and Leader of Opposition Bhupinder Singh Hooda supported the decision, saying it was taken after due consideration.

He noted that while Rajya Sabha elections are conducted through an open ballot system, allowing legislators some flexibility, the party retains the authority to initiate internal disciplinary action in cases of deviation.

Background

The action follows cross-voting reported during the recent Rajya Sabha elections in Haryana, which led to internal concerns within the party. The development has highlighted organisational challenges and prompted the leadership to take corrective steps to reinforce discipline.

Continue Reading

India News

Harivansh set to be elected Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairperson unopposed

Harivansh is set to be elected unopposed as Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman after no opposition nominations were filed before the deadline.

Published

on

Former Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman Harivansh is set to be re-elected to the same post unopposed in the election due to be held later today.
The date has been fixed by the Chairman under the relevant rules governing the conduct of business in the Upper House.
According to sources, the deadline for submitting motions for the election was 12 noon on April 16. A total of five notices were received within the stipulated time, all proposing Harivansh for the post.

Multiple nominations, single candidate
The motions were submitted by members across parties, including Jagat Prakash Nadda, Nitin Nabin, Nirmala Sitharaman, Sanjay Kumar Jha, and Jayant Chaudhary, each backed by seconding members.
All five motions explicitly state that Harivansh be chosen as the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.

No opposition nomination filed

Notably, no motion was submitted by the Opposition before the deadline. This effectively clears the path for a unanimous election, as there is no contest for the position.
As per parliamentary procedure, motions will be taken up one by one. Once any one motion is adopted by the House, the remaining motions will not be put to vote.

Likely to be elected by voice vote
In line with established practice, the first motion — expected to be moved by Nadda — may be adopted through a voice vote. Following this, the Chairman will formally declare Harivansh as elected Deputy Chairman.
After the declaration, Harivansh will be escorted to the Chair by members from both the Treasury and Opposition benches, adhering to parliamentary convention.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com