English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Tamil Nadu govt notifies 10 Acts stalled by Governor RN Ravi after Supreme Court verdict

Two bills—one amending the Chennai University Act and another establishing a university for Siddha, Ayurveda, Unani, Yoga, Naturopathy, and Homeopathy—remain pending with the President, leaving their fate uncertain.

Published

on

In a landmark development, the Tamil Nadu government on Friday notified ten laws previously stalled by Governor RN Ravi, leveraging a Supreme Court ruling on April 8 that declared the Governor’s decision to reserve re-adopted bills for the President’s assent unconstitutional. This move marks a historic first in India, as these laws take effect without the Governor’s or President’s signature, solely based on judicial authority.

Supreme Court’s verdict

The gazette notifications reference the Supreme Court’s verdict, which ruled that any actions taken by the President after the bills were reserved are legally void (“non est in law”). Consequently, the bills are deemed to have received the Governor’s assent on the day they were presented to him. The court also established clear timelines for Governors to act on bills—ranging from one to three months depending on circumstances—and imposed a three-month deadline for the President to decide on reserved bills. The judgment has been circulated to all High Courts and Principal Secretaries to Governors nationwide, reinforcing its nationwide significance.

The notified laws:

The ten laws, primarily amendments to university-related legislation, are:

  1. The Tamil Nadu Fisheries University (Amendment) Act, 2020
  2. The Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (Amendment) Act, 2020
  3. The Tamil Nadu Universities Laws (Amendment) Act, 2022
  4. The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University (Amendment) Act, 2022
  5. The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai (Amendment) Act, 2022
  6. The Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (Amendment) Act, 2022
  7. The Tamil University (Second Amendment) Act, 2022
  8. The Tamil Nadu Fisheries University (Amendment) Act, 2023
  9. The Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (Amendment) Act, 2023
  10. The Tamil Nadu Universities Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 2022

These laws grant the Tamil Nadu government the authority to appoint Vice-Chancellors for 18 state universities, a power previously held by the Governor as Chancellor. In some cases, the Governor retains influence by nominating a member to the Vice-Chancellor search committee.

Background of the Legal Battle

The issue arose when 12 bills passed by the Tamil Nadu Assembly, including two from 2020, remained pending with Governor Ravi. Following a state government petition, the Supreme Court advised dialogue to resolve the deadlock. The Governor returned 10 bills to the Assembly, withholding assent, and reserved two for the President’s consideration. The Assembly re-enacted all ten on November 18, 2023, and sent them back to the Governor, who again reserved them for the President. The President withheld assent to seven, approved one, and left two undecided, prompting the state to challenge the Governor’s actions in court.

The state argued that the Governor lacked constitutional authority to reserve re-passed bills. The Supreme Court agreed, affirming that such actions violated parliamentary democracy and established conventions.

Political and Legal Significance

DMK Rajya Sabha MP P Wilson, part of the legal team representing Tamil Nadu, celebrated the outcome on social media, stating, “History is made as these are the first Acts in India to take effect without the Governor’s or President’s signature, purely on the strength of the Supreme Court’s judgment.” The ruling not only resolves a prolonged standoff but also sets a precedent for gubernatorial accountability nationwide.

Two bills—one amending the Chennai University Act and another establishing a university for Siddha, Ayurveda, Unani, Yoga, Naturopathy, and Homeopathy—remain pending with the President, leaving their fate uncertain.

India News

Pawan Khera faces fresh setback as Supreme Court refuses relief in passport row case

Congress leader Pawan Khera faces fresh setback as Supreme Court refuses interim relief and directs him to seek bail from Guwahati High Court.

Published

on

Pawan Khera

Congress leader Pawan Khera suffered another legal setback on Friday after the Supreme Court of India declined to extend protection in a case linked to his remarks about Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife.

A bench of the apex court refused to interfere with an earlier order that had stayed the transit anticipatory bail granted to Khera by the Telangana High Court. This decision leaves the Congress leader open to possible arrest by Assam Police in connection with the case.

During the hearing, Khera’s counsel sought interim protection, but the court declined the request and advised him to approach the appropriate court in Assam for relief. The bench clarified that the Guwahati High Court should decide any bail plea independently and on its merits.

“Am I a terrorist?” remark during hearing

While seeking protection, Khera’s legal team expressed concern over the urgency of the situation. In court, his counsel remarked, “Am I a terrorist?” highlighting the plea for temporary relief until a fresh bail application could be filed.

The Supreme Court also raised concerns over the submission of incorrect documents during the proceedings, adding another layer to the legal complications faced by the Congress leader.

Case linked to remarks on CM’s wife

The case stems from a press conference held earlier this month, where Khera made allegations regarding the citizenship status and financial assets of the Assam Chief Minister’s wife, Riniki Bhuyan Sharma.

He had claimed that she possessed multiple passports and owned undisclosed overseas properties. These allegations were strongly denied by the Chief Minister’s family, who termed them fabricated and misleading.

Legal battle intensifies

Earlier, the Telangana High Court had granted Khera temporary transit anticipatory bail, allowing him time to seek relief from a competent court in Assam. However, the Supreme Court stayed that order following a challenge by Assam authorities, escalating the legal battle.

With the latest ruling, Khera is now expected to move the Guwahati High Court for anticipatory bail as the case continues to unfold.

Continue Reading

India News

Congress suspends 5 Haryana MLAs over cross-voting in Rajya Sabha polls

Congress suspends five Haryana MLAs for cross-voting in Rajya Sabha elections, citing serious indiscipline and anti-party activities.

Published

on

The Congress has suspended five of its MLAs in Haryana for cross-voting during the recent Rajya Sabha elections, taking disciplinary action over what it described as “anti-party activities”.

The move came after the state unit reviewed the conduct of certain legislators during the polls, where some were found to have voted against the party’s authorised candidate.

Five MLAs suspended after disciplinary process

According to party sources, the MLAs were issued show-cause notices seeking an explanation for their actions. After reviewing their responses, the Congress disciplinary committee recommended suspension.

The decision was approved by the party leadership, including Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, and has been implemented with immediate effect.

Party calls it ‘grave indiscipline’

Haryana Congress chief Udai Bhan said the action was necessary to uphold party discipline, stressing that defying the official party line during elections weakens organisational unity.

He said the party takes such violations seriously and will continue to act against any form of indiscipline.

Leadership backs strict action

Senior Congress leader and Leader of Opposition Bhupinder Singh Hooda supported the decision, saying it was taken after due consideration.

He noted that while Rajya Sabha elections are conducted through an open ballot system, allowing legislators some flexibility, the party retains the authority to initiate internal disciplinary action in cases of deviation.

Background

The action follows cross-voting reported during the recent Rajya Sabha elections in Haryana, which led to internal concerns within the party. The development has highlighted organisational challenges and prompted the leadership to take corrective steps to reinforce discipline.

Continue Reading

India News

Harivansh set to be elected Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairperson unopposed

Harivansh is set to be elected unopposed as Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman after no opposition nominations were filed before the deadline.

Published

on

Former Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman Harivansh is set to be re-elected to the same post unopposed in the election due to be held later today.
The date has been fixed by the Chairman under the relevant rules governing the conduct of business in the Upper House.
According to sources, the deadline for submitting motions for the election was 12 noon on April 16. A total of five notices were received within the stipulated time, all proposing Harivansh for the post.

Multiple nominations, single candidate
The motions were submitted by members across parties, including Jagat Prakash Nadda, Nitin Nabin, Nirmala Sitharaman, Sanjay Kumar Jha, and Jayant Chaudhary, each backed by seconding members.
All five motions explicitly state that Harivansh be chosen as the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.

No opposition nomination filed

Notably, no motion was submitted by the Opposition before the deadline. This effectively clears the path for a unanimous election, as there is no contest for the position.
As per parliamentary procedure, motions will be taken up one by one. Once any one motion is adopted by the House, the remaining motions will not be put to vote.

Likely to be elected by voice vote
In line with established practice, the first motion — expected to be moved by Nadda — may be adopted through a voice vote. Following this, the Chairman will formally declare Harivansh as elected Deputy Chairman.
After the declaration, Harivansh will be escorted to the Chair by members from both the Treasury and Opposition benches, adhering to parliamentary convention.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com