English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Entertainment

Hari Hara Veera Mallu review: Pawan Kalyan powers a patchy epic built for the big screen

Hari Hara Veera Mallu is a high-energy historical drama anchored by Pawan Kalyan’s commanding performance and gripping action, but its uneven pacing and poor CGI hold it back.

Published

on

After years in the making, Pawan Kalyan’s long-delayed period action film Hari Hara Veera Mallu: Part 1 – Sword vs Spirit has finally arrived in theatres. Directed jointly by Krish Jagarlamudi and Jyothi Krishna, the film attempts to blend history, rebellion, and spirituality with mass commercial appeal. While it delivers in parts — especially in its larger-than-life action — it struggles to maintain momentum throughout its runtime.

Storyline weaves intrigue but leaves too much for later

Set in the 17th century, the film traces the journey of Veera Mallu (Pawan Kalyan), a Robin Hood-like figure whose daring exploits catch the attention of the royal court. Assigned a mission to steal the legendary Koh-i-Noor diamond from the Mughal Empire, Veera’s path crosses with historical figures like Qutub Shah and Aurangzeb (played by Bobby Deol). As Veera journeys to Delhi with hidden motives, the film explores themes of loyalty, strategy, and personal loss.

Strengths lie in performance and action

Pawan Kalyan brings composure and depth to his role, striking a fine balance between spiritual gravitas and mass appeal. His screen presence is magnetic, especially in fight sequences and emotionally charged scenes. The action choreography is a standout, particularly scenes set at Machilipatnam port and Charminar, and a dramatic Kushti bout in Kollur.

Music director M. M. Keeravaani elevates the film’s emotional quotient with an evocative background score. The cinematography by Gnana Shekar V. S. and Manoj Paramahamsa gives a rich, historical texture to the visuals.

Flaws that hold back the grandeur

Despite a gripping first half, the narrative falters in the latter segment. Prolonged filler scenes and an absence of major confrontations weaken the pacing. Bobby Deol, while promising as the antagonist Aurangzeb, is given minimal screen time, with the real conflict saved for the sequel. Nidhhi Agerwal, who shines early on, is sidelined as the plot progresses.

Most notably, the film suffers from subpar CGI that breaks immersion during key visual moments, diminishing the impact of otherwise well-constructed sequences.

Final verdict

Hari Hara Veera Mallu succeeds in laying the foundation for a historical saga, powered by Pawan Kalyan’s performance and stylish action. However, it stumbles due to pacing issues and inconsistent visual quality. While not without its flaws, the film still offers a theatrical experience worth catching — especially for fans of large-scale period dramas and star-led action.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

120 Bahadur box office day 1: Farhan Akhtar’s film starts slow with Rs 2.35 crore opening

Farhan Akhtar’s new release 120 Bahadur opened to Rs2.35 crore, while De De Pyaar De 2 continued its strong hold on day eight.

Published

on

Farhan akhtar

Farhan Akhtar’s latest release 120 Bahadur hit theatres on November 21 but registered a dull opening on its first day, earning Rs 2.35 crore. In comparison, De De Pyaar De 2, which is now in its second week, continues to show stronger hold at the box office.

Slow start for 120 Bahadur on day one

The action-drama opened to modest numbers on Friday, collecting Rs2.35 crore on its first day. Despite pre-release buzz around Farhan Akhtar’s performance, the film has begun its run on the lower side.

De De Pyaar De 2 maintains its advantage

Meanwhile, De De Pyaar De 2 continues its steady run. On its eighth day, the film maintained an edge over 120 Bahadur in overall earnings, according to media. The strong hold of the Ajay Devgn-led sequel appears to have impacted the new release’s opening day business.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Family Man 3 ending triggers online backlash despite strong reviews

The Family Man 3 has impressed viewers with its performances and storytelling, but its abrupt ending has sparked online criticism, leaving fans demanding closure.

Published

on

Family man

Fans of The Family Man 3 are celebrating the gripping new season, but a large section of viewers has taken to social media to criticise what they describe as an “abrupt” and “unsatisfying” ending. The latest season, which released on Amazon Prime Video on Friday, has drawn praise for its emotional depth and high-stakes storytelling, yet its final moments have left many feeling short-changed.

Viewers disappointed with the “sudden” conclusion

Soon after the release, frustrated fans began sharing their reactions online. One viewer wrote that the season “ends so abruptly it feels like the makers simply packed up and went home,” calling the lack of closure “exhausting”. Another comment read, “#TheFamilyMan3… ahh ending entra. Fully disappointed.”

Some tried to strike a balanced tone, acknowledging the well-crafted emotional arc and a comic cameo stretch that offered relief. However, the overall complaint remained the same — that the season cuts off just when the tension reaches its peak. “Why make us watch the entire season if the makers plan to keep the best part hanging for the next one?” a user questioned.

Still, many fans have labelled the show “engaging” and applauded the team for delivering another compelling chapter.

Season 3: Srikant caught between personal turmoil and a national crisis

The new season places Srikant Tiwari (Manoj Bajpayee) in one of the most complicated phases of his life. His relationship with Suchitra (Priyamani) appears strained, marked by distance and unspoken tension. Even as his home life falters, a series of coordinated blasts in the Northeast within 48 hours threatens a major peace initiative led by Prime Minister Basu (Seema Biswas).

Srikant and his senior officer Gautam Kulkarni (Dalip Tahil) travel to Nagaland to salvage Project Sahakar, relying on regional leader David Khuzou (Sunil Thapa) to bring warring sides to agreement. But the fragile situation collapses after a deadly ambush by drug kingpin Rukma (Jaideep Ahlawat), leaving David and Kulkarni dead. Srikant survives but soon becomes a suspect as investigators scrutinise how he was the only one aware of the convoy’s route.

Meanwhile in Mumbai, Suchitra faces her own crisis after the government bans 69 Chinese apps, including her platform ShrinkMe, sparking online targeting that impacts her family.

With an arrest warrant issued against him, Srikant chooses to escape with his family, setting off a tense chase as he tries to prove his innocence. Each twist raises new questions — who planned the ambush, and why is Srikant being framed?

Final reactions

While audiences largely appreciated the writing, performances and momentum, the widespread sentiment remains that the season’s final act lacked the closure fans expected. Many now hope the next instalment arrives sooner and concludes the arc that Season 3 left unresolved.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Satish Shah, beloved Sarabhai vs Sarabhai actor, passes away at 74 in Mumbai due to kidney failure

Veteran actor Satish Shah, celebrated for his iconic comic roles in Sarabhai vs Sarabhai and Jaane Bhi Do Yaaro, passed away in Mumbai at the age of 74 due to kidney failure.

Published

on

Satish Shah

Veteran Bollywood actor Satish Shah, best known for his memorable comic roles in films and television, passed away on Saturday in Mumbai. He was 74.

Filmmaker Confirms The News

Confirming the tragic news, filmmaker Ashoke Pandit expressed grief over the actor’s demise, saying that Shah died around 2:30 pm following kidney failure. His condition reportedly worsened at home before being rushed to the hospital, where he could not be revived. His cremation is expected to take place later today.

“It’s a very big loss for the industry. I have worked with him on many projects,” said the filmmaker, recalling that he learned about Shah’s death shortly after attending adman Piyush Pandey’s last rites.

A Legacy Of Laughter

Born on June 25, 1951, in Bombay (now Mumbai), Satish Shah hailed from a Kutchi Gujarati family. His career began in 1978 with Arvind Desai Ki Ajeeb Dastaan, but it was his portrayal of Municipal Commissioner D’Mello in the 1983 satire Jaane Bhi Do Yaaro that brought him widespread recognition.

Over a remarkable film career spanning decades, Shah appeared in more than 250 movies, including Hum Saath Saath Hain (1999), Kal Ho Naa Ho (2003), Mujhse Shaadi Karogi (2004), and Om Shanti Om (2007).

Television Stardom

Shah also left a lasting impact on Indian television. His 1984 sitcom Yeh Jo Hai Zindagi became iconic, where he played a new character in each of its 55 episodes. His role as Indravadhan Sarabhai in Sarabhai vs Sarabhai (2004), opposite Ratna Pathak Shah, remains one of the most loved comic portrayals in Indian TV history.

He also starred in Filmy Chakkar (1995) and later judged comedy-based reality shows such as Comedy Circus, continuing his association with humour and entertainment.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com

Left Menu Icon