English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Pakistan positions itself as mediator as US-Iran talks may be held in Islamabad

Pakistan is attempting to mediate between the US and Iran and has offered Islamabad as a possible venue for talks as diplomatic efforts intensify.

Published

on

Pakistan positions itself as mediator as US-Iran talks may be held in Islamabad

Pakistan is reportedly attempting to position itself as a key mediator between the United States, Iran and Israel as diplomatic efforts continue amid the ongoing Middle East conflict. Islamabad has offered to host possible talks between senior US officials and Iranian representatives, according to media reports citing sources familiar with the matter.

Pakistan has maintained a cautious diplomatic stance, condemning strikes on Iran while also calling for de-escalation and dialogue. The country is now reportedly offering its capital as a venue for discussions between officials from the Trump administration and Iran, possibly within days if diplomatic progress continues.

Recent developments suggest increased diplomatic communication. Pakistan’s army chief Asim Munir spoke with US President Donald Trump, while Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif held discussions with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. These contacts took place around the same time Trump announced a delay in potential strikes on Iran’s power infrastructure, claiming there had been productive conversations with Tehran, a claim Iran has denied.

However, Iran has acknowledged that some regional countries are passing messages between the two sides. Iran’s foreign ministry said messages had been received through friendly countries regarding possible negotiations and that responses were given in line with Iran’s core positions. Tehran also stated that its stance on the Strait of Hormuz and conditions for ending the conflict remain unchanged.

Back-channel diplomacy and regional involvement

Reports suggest Pakistani officials have been involved in back-channel communications between Tehran and US envoys. Pakistan’s leadership has reportedly remained in contact with Iranian authorities since the conflict began, offering diplomatic support for de-escalation efforts.

Pakistan has also held discussions with regional countries including Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt. Diplomatic sources indicated that multiple countries are currently acting as intermediaries, relaying messages between Washington and Tehran, as there are no direct negotiations underway.

Turkey and Egypt are also reportedly engaged in mediation efforts, speaking with officials from Iran, the United States and Gulf countries to explore the possibility of a temporary ceasefire and future negotiations.

Pakistan’s position as a potential mediator is being viewed as significant because it maintains relations with both Iran and Gulf countries and has not been directly targeted in the conflict.

Chances of truce remain uncertain

Despite increasing diplomatic activity, analysts believe the chances of a quick truce remain low. Experts say current efforts are still in early stages and mostly involve message exchanges rather than formal negotiations.

Analysts also believe that both sides are currently unwilling to compromise, which makes immediate peace unlikely. Iran has warned that any attack on its infrastructure would lead to retaliation targeting critical facilities across the region, including energy and water infrastructure.

Traditionally, mediation between the US and Iran has been handled by countries such as Oman and Qatar, but recent reports suggest new diplomatic channels are being explored as the conflict continues.

Latest world news

Twin earthquakes strike Venezuela within 39 seconds, triggering panic in Caracas

Venezuela witnessed two powerful earthquakes within 39 seconds, triggering panic in Caracas, damaging infrastructure and leading authorities to declare a state of emergency.

Published

on

Two powerful earthquakes struck Venezuela within just 39 seconds, causing widespread panic, damaging buildings and disrupting key infrastructure in and around the capital, Caracas.

According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the first earthquake measured magnitude 7.2 and struck on Wednesday evening near the coastal town of Moron. Just 39 seconds later, a stronger 7.5-magnitude tremor hit roughly 45 kilometres away, creating what seismologists described as a “doublet” earthquake sequence.

The back-to-back quakes sent residents rushing into the streets as buildings shook violently across Caracas. Several structures suffered severe damage, with reports of building collapses in parts of the capital. Rescue workers were deployed to search through rubble while emergency teams assessed the extent of the destruction.

Visuals shared on social media showed scenes of chaos at Simon Bolivar International Airport, where parts of the terminal roof reportedly collapsed, filling sections of the facility with dust and smoke. Passengers were seen evacuating the airport as power flickered during the tremors. Authorities later announced the closure of the airport because of significant damage.

More than 20 aftershocks were recorded following the twin earthquakes, raising concerns about additional structural damage. The USGS warned that the disaster could result in significant casualties and economic losses, while landslides were also reported in affected areas.

Venezuela’s interim president Delcy Rodriguez declared a state of emergency following the earthquakes and urged citizens to remain cautious as emergency response efforts continued. Opposition leader Maria Corina Machado also expressed solidarity with those affected by the disaster.

The earthquakes are being described as among the strongest to strike Venezuela in more than a century. Authorities continue to assess the full scale of the damage and search for possible victims trapped beneath collapsed structures.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

London court orders Nirav Modi to pay Bank of India over $11.5 million in loan guarantee case

A London court has ruled that fugitive businessman Nirav Modi must pay Bank of India more than $11.5 million, including interest, in a loan guarantee dispute.

Published

on

Fugitive diamond merchant Nirav Modi has been ordered by a London court to pay Bank of India more than $11.5 million, including accrued interest, in connection with a personal guarantee linked to a loan extended to one of his Dubai-based firms.

In a significant ruling delivered by the London Circuit Commercial Court, Justice Simon Tinkler held that Modi remained liable under the personal guarantee issued for a loan granted to Firestar Diamond FZE, a Dubai-incorporated company associated with him. The court rejected Modi’s challenge to the enforceability of the guarantee.

The court examined whether Modi had been properly served with a demand notice, whether the demand related to a liability owed to the bank, and whether the personal guarantee was legally enforceable. Justice Tinkler ruled in favour of Bank of India on all three issues.

According to the judgment, Modi is liable for the principal outstanding amount of $4.1 million. After adding accumulated interest, the total payable amount has risen to an estimated $11.5 million as of March 2026, with additional interest continuing to accrue.

The public sector lender has been pursuing recovery proceedings against Modi since 2018, following the emergence of allegations involving companies linked to the businessman. Modi, who has largely represented himself in the proceedings, is currently lodged in a UK prison while contesting his extradition to India in a separate Punjab National Bank fraud and money laundering case.

Law firm Fladgate LLP, representing Bank of India, clarified after the verdict that the proceedings were strictly related to a commercial banking recovery claim and did not deal with the wider allegations connected to the Punjab National Bank fraud case.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump rejected JD Vance’s proposal for Indian peacekeepers in Ukraine, says new book

A newly published book claims Donald Trump rejected JD Vance’s proposal to include Indian troops in a potential Ukraine peacekeeping mission.

Published

on

trump

US President Donald Trump reportedly dismissed a proposal by Vice President JD Vance to involve Indian troops in a potential peacekeeping mission in Ukraine, according to a newly released book detailing internal White House discussions on the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

The revelation appears in “Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump”, authored by journalists Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan. The book claims that the discussion took place during an Oval Office meeting held shortly after Trump’s return to the White House, when senior officials were considering options to end the war in Ukraine.

Vance suggested India and Saudi Arabia

According to the book, retired Lieutenant General Keith Kellogg, Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, presented a peace proposal that included deploying foreign troops to monitor a possible ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. Initial plans reportedly considered personnel from European countries, including France, Britain and the Netherlands.

However, Vance is said to have raised concerns over deploying troops from NATO countries, arguing that such a move could escalate tensions with Russia. He then reportedly suggested that countries outside Europe, such as India and Saudi Arabia, could contribute troops for the mission.

Trump’s reported response

The book claims Trump laughed off the suggestion and responded by saying, “The Indians won’t do that,” adding that India would not be willing to bear the costs associated with such a deployment. The authors further state that Trump remarked on his relationship with Prime Minister Narendra Modi while expressing doubts about India’s participation.

There has been no official response from the Indian government regarding the claims mentioned in the book.

The reported exchange comes amid ongoing international efforts to secure a ceasefire and find a diplomatic solution to the prolonged Russia-Ukraine war. Several proposals involving multinational peacekeeping arrangements have been discussed in recent years, though no agreement has yet been reached.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com