Mother Dairy has increased the prices of its liquid milk variants by Rs 2 to Rs 4 per litre, with the revised rates coming into effect from Thursday, November 12. The price revision will affect consumers in the Delhi-NCR market, where the dairy company is a major milk supplier.

The increase comes amid rising input costs, particularly higher procurement prices paid to farmers. According to sources, the company has decided to pass on part of the additional cost to consumers.

A spokesperson for Mother Dairy declined to comment on the latest price revision.

Check new Mother Dairy milk prices

The revised rates cover several liquid milk variants sold in the NCR market. Full cream milk has seen the highest increase of Rs 4 per litre.

Here are the revised prices:

The new prices will be applicable from November 12.

Why Mother Dairy has increased milk prices

The latest revision follows an increase in the procurement prices of milk from farmers. Sources said the higher procurement costs have prompted Mother Dairy to partly transfer the additional input expenses to consumers.

The company passes on around 75-80 per cent of its milk sales realisation to farmers.

Mother Dairy had last increased milk prices on May 14, 2026. Before that, its previous price revision took place in April 2025.

Mother Dairy’s daily milk sales

Mother Dairy sells approximately 35 lakh litres of milk every day in the Delhi-NCR market through its own outlets, general trade channels and e-commerce platforms.

Its overall daily milk sales exceed 50 lakh litres.

The company recorded a 17 per cent increase in turnover to Rs 20,300 crore in the last financial year. The growth was supported by improved demand for its milk products and cooking oils.

About Mother Dairy

Commissioned in 1974, Mother Dairy is a wholly owned subsidiary of the National Dairy Development Board (NDDB).

The company sells milk and milk products under the Mother Dairy brand. It markets edible oils under the Dhara brand, while fresh fruits and vegetables, frozen vegetables, snacks, pulps and concentrates are sold under the Safal brand.

Mother Dairy operates nine milk processing plants and four horticulture processing plants. Its edible oil operations are supported by 16 associated plants.

Air pollution should be treated as a major public health emergency requiring an urgent and coordinated response, former World Health Organisation (WHO) Chief Scientist Dr Soumya Swaminathan has said.

In an exclusive interview, Dr Swaminathan compared the scale of the air pollution health crisis with COVID and said its effects can extend across the body, including the brain, lungs and cardiovascular system. She also highlighted links between pollution exposure and conditions such as asthma and diabetes.

Why air pollution needs a COVID-like response

Dr Swaminathan said COVID triggered an immediate public response because it was sudden, visible and associated with an unknown virus. Air pollution, by contrast, is often less visible and its effects accumulate over time.

She said people may become accustomed to pollution because it is not always visible, particularly outside the winter months. But she stressed that prolonged exposure can still cause serious health damage.

She called for the issue to receive an “equal, urgent, coordinated and scientific” response, similar to the approach taken during the COVID crisis.

PM2.5 poses risks from pregnancy to childhood

Dr Swaminathan also highlighted concerns about exposure to fine particulate matter, particularly PM2.5, among pregnant women and children.

According to her, these tiny particles can enter the lungs and bloodstream and may also reach the placenta. She pointed to higher rates of premature births and low birth weight among babies born in areas where mothers are exposed to high levels of air pollution.

She also said children are particularly vulnerable because their brains and other organs are developing rapidly. Children breathe faster than adults, and those growing up in heavily polluted areas can have smaller lungs, she said.

Why AQI may not tell the full health story

Dr Swaminathan suggested moving beyond the conventional Air Quality Index (AQI) towards an Air Quality Health Index (AHQI).

The proposal would place greater emphasis on how individual pollutants affect different groups of people. She noted that the dominant pollutant can vary from one city to another, while its health impact may also differ for groups such as pregnant women and children.

The current AQI uses eight major pollutants as parameters: PM10, PM2.5, ozone, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, lead and ammonia. The overall AQI is determined by the highest pollutant sub-index.

Swaminathan does not favour shutting schools

On protecting children from polluted air, Dr Swaminathan said she was not in favour of simply closing schools.

She argued that children from poorer families may continue breathing polluted air at home, while also losing access to education, social interaction and midday meals.

Instead, she suggested making school environments cleaner. Her proposals included installing air purifiers in classrooms, providing pick-and-drop bus facilities and encouraging older children to wear masks when outdoors.

Five measures suggested to tackle pollution

Dr Swaminathan outlined five key measures for addressing the pollution crisis:

1. Launch a national clean air programme, which she suggested could be called the “Swachh Vaayu Abhiyan”.
2. Prepare a costed, long-term plan with sustained investment and study lessons from countries such as China.
3. Establish empowered leadership and accountability for tackling air pollution.
4. Create a panel of experts to develop a science-based, multi-sectoral and multi-year plan.
5. Put health at the centre of air pollution policy.

She also supported treating the right to clean air as a basic public health entitlement, linking it to the constitutional right to life.

Dr Swaminathan’s central argument was that air pollution should no longer be treated as a slow-moving or routine environmental problem, but as a serious health crisis requiring sustained action.

Sonia Gandhi’s memoir Belonging: A Journey of Love was released on Tuesday, with N Ram saying its publication was not planned around the 2029 Lok Sabha election despite the book containing several political references that could become relevant to the electoral debate.

In an interview, N Ram, former Editor-in-Chief of The Hindu, said political issues emerged naturally as part of Sonia Gandhi’s narration. He said the memoir was primarily an effort by the former Congress president to tell her own story and portray her family as people she knew and loved.

Why Sonia Gandhi’s memoir was released now

According to N Ram, Sonia Gandhi began jotting down material for the memoir around 10 years ago. He said that although the writing process had periods when she was unable to continue, she devoted the last five years to the project.

He said the timing was driven by her desire to tell her own story after years of others writing about her and her family.

Sonia Gandhi has described the memoir as a personal account rather than a political book. In a statement ahead of its release, she said she wanted to portray her family honestly and share what she had witnessed during more than five decades in India.

Political issues find space in the book

N Ram said the memoir does contain political material that could have a bearing on the 2029 elections.

He specifically referred to Sonia Gandhi’s comments about the BJP and the RSS, concerns about people being restless, allegations of “vote stealing” and her criticism concerning institutions. He also pointed to her references to the Election Commission of India.

However, N Ram said these issues appearing in the book should not be interpreted as evidence that it was deliberately timed for the 2029 elections.

He argued that the 2029 election is still some distance away and said that if the memoir had been intended specifically for the election, its release could have been delayed by another couple of years.

Sonia Gandhi’s own account of the memoir

Sonia Gandhi has said the book emerged from her wish to speak about her own experiences after remaining largely private for much of her life.

The memoir traces her journey from Italy to India, her relationship with Rajiv Gandhi and the Nehru-Gandhi family, the personal losses that shaped her life and her eventual entry into politics. It also covers important political moments, including her decision not to become prime minister after the Congress-led alliance won the 2004 election.

N Ram said Sonia Gandhi had previously discussed the idea of telling her story and had maintained that others had spent decades telling her story, making her feel it was now her turn to do so.

He said the memoir therefore came from a desire to tell her own version of her life rather than from an immediate electoral strategy.