English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

“Police commissioner system is a positive step”

Panelists observe that a lot will depend on individual officers taking charge and they will need to resist political pressures. Alok Singh will be Commissioner, Noida, and Surjit Pandey, Commissioner, Lucknow.

Published

on

Monday Mudda

Panelists observe that a lot will depend on individual officers taking charge and they will need to resist political pressures

The Uttar Pradesh cabinet has approved a proposal to set up the police commissioner system in Lucknow and Noida, as a pilot project. Alok Singh will be Commissioner, Noida, and Surjit Pandey, Commissioner, Lucknow. Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath said that two women officers of Superintendent of Police (SP) and Additional Superintendent of Police (ASP) ranks each are being deployed to curb crimes against women in the new police commissionerates. The Chief Minister asserted that the new system will help in improving the law and order situation in the state. APN’s popular debate Mudda discussed the issue. Anchorperson Akshay posed the questions to the panelists, including the BJP’s Shambam Pandey, PSPL’s Farhat Khan, retired IPS officer Ajay Raj Sharma, and noted scribes Panjak Kishore and Pramod Goswami.

Kishore said: “Since the last 50 years, talk has been there to have the police commiserate system, from time to time. In reality, our systems are old. The IAS controls the CRPC and IPC. Now power will move to the new commissioners. Look at the crime situation in Noida, police still have no clues regarding the killing of corporate employee Gaurav Chandel. Effective police administration is needed to curb crime.”

Sharma said: “Since 1977, there has been a demand that big towns in the country–and there are over 5 lakh such towns–should have a police commissioner system. England has the system. This is the need of the hour. The DM is head of the administration, but there is divided loyalty. Now the commissioner will have magisterial powers too, to place a town under curfew, and so on, in times of riot, for example.” Sharma added that the IAS lobby will fight for their turf, but this system is very successfully employed in London and New York too.

Goswami said: “Sharma has been IG and DIG, and I respect him a lot for his work. The success of the commissioner system will also depend on the particular officer and the political pressures at work. Sharma has never allowed any pressure on him. The point is to deal with the counter-pressures. I have myself seen Sharma in Farrukhabad, he has not allowed any pressure to prevail upon him.”

Pandey said: “Whenever there’s a new law, people talk about both the negatives and the positives. I would like to quote Munshi Premchand in Panch Parmeshwar and say that accountability comes with the post. So the concerned officers will feel responsible. It is indeed a welcome move and the DM will get to focus on his/her other responsibilities.”

Sharma said: “See, right now magisterial powers are not with the police, still there’s lawlessness. In the commissioner system, accountability and responsibility both will be with the police.”

Khan said: “What’s wrong with the existing law ? Why make more laws? In UP, there would be fear and competition among the IAS and the police. Licence raj will be effectively put in place. In JNU, how come police allowed goondas inside the campus?”

Kishore said: “The effort is to improve governance. IAS lobby will resist and that would lead to confrontation. See, the police and the people will remain the same, what’s needed is an attitudinal shift.”

Goswami said: “True the people are the same, but checks and balances will be there. People show more responsibility when power is thrust upon them. Sujit Pandey is a highly acclaimed officer.”

Pandey said: “The IAS-IPS tussle is only since it’s just been announced. It will all settle down. This is as a pilot project for Noida and Lucknow. People will remain the same, but all people are different. People will get adequate scope to show their efficiency. We need to trust the officers.”

Khan said: “I can’t understand, only names are being changed. As far as efficiency is concerned, the police force gets a lot of opportunities to show that. I am fearful, officers will get busier, people’s representatives will have problem.”

Kishore said: “This law is for the common man. I am hopeful that a lot will change for the better.”

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi accuses Congress of anti-Sikh bias over Rahul Gandhi’s ‘traitor’ remark

Prime Minister Narendra Modi accused Rahul Gandhi of targeting BJP MP Ravneet Singh Bittu with a ‘gaddar’ remark because of his Sikh identity while speaking in the Rajya Sabha.

Published

on

PM Modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday launched a sharp attack on Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi, alleging that his “traitor” remark against BJP MP Ravneet Singh Bittu reflected the Congress party’s animosity towards the Sikh community.

The Prime Minister made the remarks in the Rajya Sabha while replying to the motion of thanks on the President’s address. Referring to an incident in the Parliament complex a day earlier, Modi said Gandhi’s comment had crossed all limits of political decency.

The controversy stems from a protest by suspended Opposition MPs, during which Ravneet Singh Bittu — a former Congress leader who joined the BJP ahead of the 2024 Lok Sabha elections — allegedly made a remark suggesting the protesters were behaving as if they had won a war.

In response, Rahul Gandhi was heard saying, “A traitor is walking by, look at his face,” before approaching Bittu and extending his hand. Gandhi then reportedly added, “Hello, brother. My traitor friend. Don’t worry, you will come back.”

Bittu refused to shake hands with the Congress leader and instead described him as an “enemy of the country” before walking away from the scene.

While the Congress later clarified that Gandhi’s remark was aimed at Bittu for leaving the party, the BJP seized upon the comment, calling it an insult to the Sikh community. Protests were subsequently held by members of the Sikh community outside the Congress headquarters and at other locations.

Addressing the House, Prime Minister Modi said that many leaders had quit the Congress in the past and that the party itself had split multiple times, but none of those leaders had been labelled a traitor. “He called this MP a traitor because he is Sikh,” the Prime Minister alleged, as treasury bench members raised slogans condemning the remark.

Continue Reading

India News

Manipur Assembly to meet at 4 pm today, floor test likely under new chief minister

The Manipur Legislative Assembly will convene at 4 pm today, with a floor test likely as the new chief minister seeks to prove his majority in the House.

Published

on

Manipur assembly

The Manipur Legislative Assembly will convene at 4 pm on Thursday in Imphal, a day after Yumnam Khemchand Singh was sworn in as the chief minister. A floor test is likely to be held on the first day of the session to establish the majority of the newly formed government.

In the 60-member Assembly, the BJP holds 37 seats, while its ally National People’s Party has six members, giving the ruling combine a clear majority in the House.

Singh chaired the first Cabinet meeting of his government late Wednesday evening, shortly after taking oath as the 13th chief minister of Manipur. The meeting marked the formal start of administrative functioning under the new Council of Ministers.

His appointment came nearly a year after the resignation of former chief minister N Biren Singh, who stepped down following months of ethnic violence between the Meitei and Kuki communities in the state.

After taking oath, Singh thanked Prime Minister Narendra Modi and said he would work with “utmost diligence to advance development and prosperity in Manipur,” aligning the state’s efforts with the vision of Viksit Bharat.

He said the government’s focus would be on inclusive economic growth while preserving Manipur’s cultural heritage, adding that he would discharge his responsibilities with sincerity and dedication, mindful of the trust placed in him.

The summoning of the 12th Manipur Legislative Assembly by Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla, along with the first Cabinet meeting, signals the resumption of legislative and administrative processes in the state, officially bringing President’s rule to an end.

The sixth session of the 12th Manipur Legislative Assembly was last held from July 31 to August 12, 2024.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi skips Lok Sabha reply as protests force repeated adjournments

PM Modi did not deliver his Lok Sabha reply today after sustained Opposition protests led to repeated adjournments over a dispute involving Rahul Gandhi’s proposed speech.

Published

on

PM Modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi did not deliver his scheduled reply to the Motion of Thanks on the President’s address in the Lok Sabha today after sustained Opposition protests led to multiple adjournments of the House.

The disruption followed an escalation of tensions linked to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s proposed speech and the suspension of eight Opposition MPs a day earlier. The situation worsened after remarks made by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey during the proceedings.

Dispute over references to books sparks fresh ruckus

The controversy intensified when Nishikant Dubey responded to Rahul Gandhi’s demand to speak on national security and references to the unpublished memoirs of former Army chief General MM Naravane. Dubey said that while Gandhi wanted to quote from an unpublished book, he himself had brought several books that, according to him, made claims about the Gandhi family.

As Dubey began listing these books and their contents, strong protests erupted from Opposition members. Krishna Prasad Tenneti, who was presiding over the House at the time, cited Rule 349, which restricts members from reading out books, newspapers, or letters unless directly related to parliamentary business. Despite repeated warnings, the matter remained unresolved, leading to another adjournment.

Rahul Gandhi accuses government of silencing debate

Earlier in the day, Rahul Gandhi alleged that he was being prevented from speaking on an issue of national importance. He claimed the government was uncomfortable with references to General Naravane’s memoirs, which he said discussed the handling of the 2020 China border crisis.

In a social media post, Gandhi said he intended to present the Prime Minister with a book authored by the former Army chief, adding that some cabinet ministers had even questioned the existence of the book. He also wrote to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla after the suspension of eight Opposition MPs, alleging that parliamentary debate was being curtailed.

After it became clear that the Prime Minister would not speak in the House today, Gandhi posted that PM Modi had avoided Parliament because he was “scared” to face the truth. Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra echoed the allegation, claiming the Prime Minister was unwilling to enter the House.

Proceedings disrupted throughout the day

Lok Sabha proceedings were first adjourned until 2 pm amid loud protests over the issue linked to Naravane’s memoirs. Even after the House reconvened, disruptions continued, preventing normal business from resuming.

Later, Congress MPs staged a demonstration outside the Parliament complex, demanding that Rahul Gandhi be allowed to speak on the President’s address.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com