English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest business news

NSE’s old and new hands decide to settle off court in co-location case

Published

on

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Driven into a corner for favouring some High Frequency Trading brokers, exchange has no option but to agree to SEBI diktat

~By Sujit Bhar

The National Stock Exchange (NSE) had retreated into its shell after a bout of aggressive behaviour when it had slapped a Rs 100 crore defamation suit on Moneywise Media Pvt Ltd, a fortnightly magazine that is published jointly by Debashis Basu and Sucheta Dalal. The suit, filed at the Bombay High Court by the NSE on July 21, 2015 was to stop the publication and circulation of an article which blew the whistle on an alleged illicit activity within the NSE, in which certain brokers were supposedly given an unfair advantage.

This happened in an area called the co-location facility, which is a favourably positioned area for systems which use a time differential of a fraction of a second to put in bids within a High Frequency Trading (HFT) environment. The time differential is in respect to computers of other brokers.

When the magazine placed its documents, the NSE had withdrawn their suit, but its troubles did not go away. It was also ordered to pay a fine of Rs 50 lakh, which it did. SEBI, meanwhile, had taken up the issue and had show-caused the exchange and many of its top officials. Now it has been revealed that the NSE has used some of its top current and former executives to drive a settlement through the consent mechanism available with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).

A media report says that former board members and chief executives Ravi Narain and Chitra Ramkrishna and current chief of business development Ravi Varanasi are among those who have applied for settlement.

SEBI had issued notice to the NSE in May and to 14 officials (former and current) regarding preferential treatments given to some brokers. This arbitration system, available with SEBI, can be compared to out-of-court settlements in normal cases. The NSE has no option but to comply.

There was an administrative gap at the NSE for a while, and as soon as Vikram Limaye took over as CEO in June (he quit as member of the Supreme Court-appointed Committee of Administrators of the BCCI) the exchange filed its consent application with SEBI. The media report says that 12 of the 14 notified officials have filed their consent applications.

However, it is said that the man responsible for the technical part of the NSE has yet to file his consent application. In his absence, things could get murkier.

What is HFT?

In this context, it becomes necessary to know the exact nature of the NSE’s folly.

Trading on the stock markets, at least in certain sections of it, has evolved beyond normal human reaction levels. Certain sections of trading are now being done in hundredths and even millionths of a second. This is way removed from what billionaire investor Warren Buffet and his company Berkshire Hathaway does. While Buffet believes in staying invested in a stock for a while, sometimes for a very long while, there are High Frequency traders (HFT) who have brought this time down to milliseconds.

This trading technique arrived in India a decade earlier and the Securities and SEBI allowed it in 2007-2008. This was allowed across many asset classes, such as equity, currency and commodity, which means that within the overall trading environment now exists advanced computers that use special algorithms to offer, buy and sell and incredible speeds.

Technically, this would be done on very small price differences, things big investors would really not be interested in, but if worked on massive volumes (which they are) these computer traders rake in huge profits each day. They make money if they win, and they make money if they lose. This happens on their micro-commissions on each trade, win or lose. It is, therefore, a win-win. Also, for an investor going in for the long haul, the asset values rarely change because of HFT, a complete cycle of spikes and troughs (in stock value) being completed in a couple of trading hours. Unless, of course, there is an interested party that wants to drive down a stock or artificially add value to it, in which case it becomes illegal.

That is where co-location comes in. The basic idea is location. Nearer the broker’s office and his systems are to the exchange, earlier (even if it is a millisecond earlier) does it get the information through the cables connected to the exchange. Logically, it would require huge investment on the part of the broker to arrange for offices nearer the exchange and more funds to arrange for super advanced computers and expensive software and algorithms. So, while participation is low, competition is fierce.

If, amid this, the exchange had provided a further advantage (in time) to some brokers, it robs the rest the level playing field they demand.

The case was all about that.

The problem with HFT is that while it is legitimate, there are few instruments within the grasp of SEBI (or even the US’ Securities and Exchange Commission, for that matter) even today to totally control and oversee this lightning-fast activity. ‘Spoofing’, for example, is a disruptive algorithmic trading entity, in which algorithms often throw up notices of interest in buying a stock for a few milliseconds before withdrawing without trade being completed. That, in turn, drives up a stock, which also settles a direct course of trade for a short time. Fast computers and algorithms then utilise this predictable trajectory to benefit.

With most computer systems within HFT facilities at almost the same level, running similar algorithms, a minor time advantage is of great use.

The source

Dalal had gained access to a document from Singapore that opened the can of worms. The magazine wrote: “Fortunately, we have in our possession a detailed document that blows the whistle on what’s possibly going on in NSE. The document came by snail mail from Singapore and addressed to Mr B K Gupta, DGM Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). It is dated 14th January 2015 with a copy to Sucheta Dalal. It is not clear what SEBI has done with it in all these months.”

The NSE wanted this news to be aborted. When it was not, the defamation suit ensued.

NSE moved the Bombay High Court on 21 July 2015 to stop the publication and circulation of the article and also asked Moneylife to offer an unconditional apology. This application was heard by Justice Gautam Patel, who passed severe strictures against NSE and imposed a cost and penalty of Rs 50 lakhs. Moneywise Media was represented by Advocate Bapoo Malcolm while Debashis Basu and Sucheta Dalal argued their own positions. NSE had filed an appeal against this order before a division Bench of the Bombay High Court.

Then the NSE told the division Bench of Justice Naresh Patil and Justice Z A Haq that it would honour the judgement of Justice Patel and withdraw appeal in the defamation case.

In any case, this could put brakes on technical trading that really adds no value to the overall net worth of a stock or company.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Google announces country-specific domain names for its search page

This transition to a centralised domain may help Google optimise AI performance in delivering relevant search results.

Published

on

In a significant move aimed at unifying its search experience, Google has announced plans to phase out country-level domain names, such as google.ng for Nigeria and google.com.br for Brazil. Instead, the tech giant will redirect users globally to a standardised domain, google.com. This decision aligns with Google’s ongoing effort to enhance search functionality and accessibility, building on the improvement in local search capabilities introduced in 2017.

In a recent blog post, Google explained that it will begin redirecting traffic from these country code top-level domains (ccTLDs) to google.com. This transition will be implemented gradually over the coming months. Users may be prompted to adjust their search preferences during this process, as the company works to streamline the user experience.

“Historically, our approach to delivering localised search results relied on ccTLDs,” Google stated. “However, our capability to offer localised experiences has evolved significantly, making these distinctions unnecessary.” The company reassured users that the core functionality of its search platform will remain unchanged and that compliance with various national regulations will continue.

This initiative reflects Google’s commitment to improving how search results are tailored to individual users without the need for separate country-specific domains. While the official rationale emphasises enhancing global user experience, some industry experts speculate that the change may also be motivated by a desire to better integrate artificial intelligence (AI) into search results, potentially leading to reduced operational costs.

Google employs AI Overviews, a tool designed to aggregate information from a broad range of online sources to provide concise responses to user inquiries. This transition to a centralised domain may help Google optimise AI performance in delivering relevant search results.

Overall, as Google implements this shift, users can expect a more unified search experience. While changes in browser addresses may occur, Google emphasises that the way search operates and its compliance with national laws will remain consistent. This strategic shift signifies Google’s ongoing efforts to adapt to the evolving digital landscape and user needs globally.

Continue Reading

India News

In HUL vs HCL defamation case, Delhi HC orders take down of Lakme sunscreen ad disparaging Derma Co

Honasa, in its plea to the Delhi High Court, argued that HUL’s claims are misleading and disparage competitors, damaging their reputation. In retaliation, HUL filed a countersuit against Honasa in the Bombay High Court, escalating the corporate feud.

Published

on

A legal showdown between Honasa Consumer Ltd. (HCL), the parent company of Mamaearth, and Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL), which owns Lakmé, reached the Delhi High Court this week, with both FMCG giants filing defamation lawsuits against each other. On Thursday, the court ordered HUL to pull its current Lakmé sunscreen advertisements, prompting the company to agree to revise its campaign by removing references to “online bestseller” and altering the depicted packaging colours.

The dispute centres on Lakmé’s recent “SPF Lie Detector Test” campaign, which HCL alleges unfairly targets its Derma Co. sunscreen by questioning the efficacy of rival products.

In the ads, HUL claims that some “online bestseller” sunscreens, marketed as SPF 50, provide protection closer to SPF 20, based on in-vivo testing data from the past decade. While no brands are explicitly named, visuals juxtaposing yellow bottles—resembling Derma Co.’s packaging—against Lakmé’s sparked Honasa’s ire.

Honasa, in its plea to the Delhi High Court, argued that HUL’s claims are misleading and disparage competitors, damaging their reputation. In retaliation, HUL filed a countersuit against Honasa in the Bombay High Court, escalating the corporate feud.

The controversy erupted when Ghazal Alagh, co-founder of Honasa, took to LinkedIn to criticise the FMCG sector’s lack of competitive drive, suggesting that legacy brands like HUL have grown complacent. Her comments were seen as a direct jab at Lakmé’s campaign, which challenges the SPF claims of newer sunscreen brands dominating online markets. “The industry needs fresh competition to shake things up,” Alagh wrote, igniting a public spat.

Lakmé’s campaign asserts that some top-selling sunscreens falsely claim in vivo testing—a method involving live organisms like humans or animals—while delivering subpar protection. In a social media statement, Lakmé doubled down, saying, “Certain online bestsellers advertise SPF 50, but their in-market samples test closer to SPF 20.”

Continue Reading

India News

Sensex and Nifty jump nearly 2% as US suspends additional 26% tariffs on India until July 9

Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) had sold equities worth ₹4,358.02 crore on Wednesday, signaling caution, but Friday’s momentum suggested a shift in sentiment.

Published

on

Indian stock markets staged a robust rally on Friday, with the BSE Sensex skyrocketing 1,310.11 points, a 1.77% gain, to close at 75,157.26. The NSE Nifty followed suit, climbing 429.40 points or 1.92% to settle at 22,828.55, breaching the 22,900 mark during intra-day trading. The surge came on the heels of a White House announcement suspending additional tariffs on India for 90 days until July 9, offering a reprieve amid global trade tensions.

The US decision, detailed in recent executive orders, pauses levies that President Donald Trump had imposed on April 2, targeting India and roughly 60 other nations. Those duties threatened Indian exports ranging from steel to shrimp, raising concerns about competitiveness in the US, the world’s largest economy. The temporary suspension sparked optimism among Indian investors, propelling gains across major sectors.

Leading the charge among Sensex constituents were heavyweights like Tata Steel, Reliance Industries, Power Grid, NTPC, Kotak Mahindra Bank, and Adani Ports. However, not all stocks joined the rally—Asian Paints and Tata Consultancy Services lagged behind, unable to capitalize on the upbeat mood.

Vinod Nair, Head of Research at Geojit Investments Limited, attributed the market’s buoyancy to the tariff relief. “The unexpected pause on US tariffs provided a much-needed breather amid global uncertainties,” Nair noted. He added that while a major IT firm’s recent results fell short of expectations, its robust order book signaled potential growth in the latter half of FY26.

The Indian markets’ performance stood in stark contrast to global trends, where fears of a US-China tariff war cast a shadow. On Friday, China escalated its trade spat with the US, hiking tariffs on American imports to 125% in response to Washington’s 145% levies on Chinese goods.

Asian markets reflected the unease, with Tokyo’s Nikkei 225 plunging nearly 3% and South Korea’s Kospi slipping, though Shanghai’s SSE Composite and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng bucked the trend with gains. European markets traded lower, while US indices had closed sharply down on Thursday, with the Nasdaq tumbling 4.31%, the S&P 500 falling 3.46%, and the Dow Jones shedding 2.50%.

Back home, the rally followed a lackluster Wednesday, when the Sensex dipped 379.93 points to 73,847.15 and the Nifty fell 136.70 points to 22,399.15. Thursday’s market holiday for Shri Mahavir Jayanti gave investors a pause before Friday’s surge. Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) had sold equities worth ₹4,358.02 crore on Wednesday, signaling caution, but Friday’s momentum suggested a shift in sentiment.

Elsewhere, global oil prices edged up, with Brent crude rising 0.32% to $63.53 a barrel, reflecting ongoing volatility in commodity markets.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com