English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Bengal woman forced to deliver baby on e-rickshaw after hospital denied admission, infant dies

In an alleged incident of medical negligence, a pregnant woman in Krishnanagar town of West Bengal’s Nadia district was reportedly forced to deliver her baby on an e-rickshaw after she was allegedly refused admission in the hospital by a doctor citing diagnosis that her due date was still a month away.

Published

on

woman forced to deliver baby on e-rickshaw

In an alleged incident of medical negligence, a pregnant woman in Krishnanagar town of West Bengal’s Nadia district was reportedly forced to deliver her baby on an e-rickshaw after she was allegedly refused admission in the hospital by a doctor citing diagnosis that her due date was still a month away.

According to reports, the woman’s family said that she was suffering from labour pains and was rushed to the Krishnanagar district hospital on Wednesday where the on-duty doctor allegedly refused to admit her after diagnosing that the woman’s delivery date wasn’t due until a month later.

The family claimed that despite pleading and begging the doctor to admit the pregnant woman as she was experiencing critical labour pains, the doctor remained unmoved and refused to admit her and turned them away, following which the family decided to take her back home.

The woman’s grandmother Bhagirathi Biswas told reporters that she had brought her granddaughter to the district hospital as she was experiencing intense labour pains but the doctor there refused to admit her saying that she wouldn’t deliver the baby before the due date.

Read Also: Bengaluru landlord is mind-blown after educated bachelor leaves flat messy before vacating

Narrating the family’s ordeal, the elderly woman said that as they were heading home after being denied admission into the hospital, her granddaughter started facing excruciating contractions and they were forced to deliver the baby in unhygienic conditions in a Toto e-rickshaw.

After childbirth, the family took the newborn and the mother back to the district hospital where the infant was declared dead by the doctors.

Following the incident, the bereaved family wrote an application to the Chief Medical Health Office, accusing the doctor of medical negligence that led to the newborn’s death and for risking the mother’s health.

The accused doctor had denied all allegations and claimed that the child was stillborn and had already died inside the womb four days before birth.

The Chief Medical Officer’s office has filed a complaint of medical negligence against the doctor, while the family has also filed a police complaint against her.

Man dies in Uttar Pradesh jail, family alleges custodial torture

Bengaluru landlord is mind-blown after educated bachelor leaves flat messy before vacating

India News

DU VC Prof Yogesh Singh entrusted with additional charge of AICTE Chairman

Published

on

By

Prof. Yogesh Singh, Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi, has been entrusted with the additional charge of the post of Chairman, AICTE till the appointment of a Chairman of AICTE or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

It is noteworthy that AICTE Chairman Prof. TG Sitharam was relieved of his duties after his term ended on December 20, 2025. According to a letter issued by the Ministry of Education, Government of India, on Monday, Prof. Yogesh Singh’s appointment is until the appointment of a regular AICTE Chairman or until further orders whichever is earlier.

Prof. Yogesh Singh is a renowned academician with excellent administrative capabilities, who has been the Vice-Chancellor of University of Delhi since October 2021. He has also served as the Chairperson of the National Council for Teacher Education. In August 2023, he was also given the additional charge of Director of the School of Planning and Architecture (SPA).

Prof. Yogesh Singh served as the Vice-Chancellor of Delhi Technological University from 2015 to 2021; Director of Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Delhi from 2014 to 2017, and before that, he was the Vice-Chancellor of Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda (Gujarat) from 2011 to 2014. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra. He has a distinguished track record in quality teaching, innovation, and research in the field of software engineering.

Continue Reading

India News

Goa nightclub fire case: Court extends police custody of Luthra brothers by five days

A Goa court has extended the police custody of Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra, owners of the nightclub where a deadly fire killed 25 people, by five more days.

Published

on

Luthra brothers

A court in Goa on Monday extended the police custody of Saurabh Luthra and Gaurav Luthra, the owners of the Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub, by five more days in connection with the deadly fire incident that claimed 25 lives on December 6.

The order was passed as investigators sought additional time to question the two accused in the case linked to the blaze at the Anjuna-based nightclub.

Owners were deported after fleeing abroad

According to details placed before the court, the Luthra brothers had left the country following the incident and travelled to Thailand. They were subsequently deported and brought back to India on December 17, after which they were taken into police custody.

Advocate Vishnu Joshi, representing the families of the victims, confirmed that the court granted a five-day extension of police custody for both Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra.

Another co-owner sent to judicial custody

The court also remanded Ajay Gupta, another owner of the nightclub, to judicial custody. Police did not seek an extension of his custody, following which the court passed the order, the victims’ counsel said.

The Anjuna police have registered a case against the Luthra brothers for culpable homicide not amounting to murder along with other relevant offences related to the fire incident.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi High Court issues notice to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi in National Herald case

Delhi High Court has sought responses from Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on the ED’s plea challenging a trial court order in the National Herald case.

Published

on

The Delhi High Court has sought responses from Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on a petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the National Herald case. The petition challenges a trial court order that refused to take cognisance of the agency’s prosecution complaint.

Justice Ravinder Dudeja issued notices to the Gandhis and other accused on the main petition, as well as on the ED’s application seeking a stay on the trial court’s December 16 order. The high court has listed the matter for further hearing on March 12, 2026.

The trial court had ruled that taking cognisance of the ED’s complaint was “impermissible in law” because the investigation was not based on a registered First Information Report (FIR). It observed that the prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was not maintainable in the absence of an FIR for a scheduled offence.

According to the order, the ED’s probe originated from a private complaint rather than an FIR. The court further noted that since cognisance was declined on a legal question, it was not necessary to examine the merits of the allegations at that stage.

The trial court also referred to the complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and the summoning order issued in 2014, stating that despite these developments, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) did not register an FIR in relation to the alleged scheduled offence.

The ED has accused Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and a private company, Young Indian, of conspiracy and money laundering. The agency has alleged that properties worth around Rs 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), which publishes the National Herald newspaper, were acquired through Young Indian.

The agency further claimed that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi held a majority 76 per cent shareholding in Young Indian, which allegedly took over AJL’s assets in exchange for a Rs 90 crore loan.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com