English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Cheer and jubilation as SC declares instant triple talaq ‘unconstitutional’

Published

on

Cheer and jubilation as SC declares instant triple talaq ‘unconstitutional’

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Barring a section of cleric and organisations like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, political parties, social activists and most importantly the Muslim women who suffered due to the practice, all welcome the Supreme Court’s historic verdict

A sense of euphoria that went beyond communal and political identities engulfed large sections of India’s population, on Tuesday, as the Supreme Court struck down the “manifestly arbitrary and unconstitutional” practice of Talaq-e-Biddat or triple talaq.

The landmark judgment passed by a Bench that comprised five judges, each of different faiths – Chief Justice of India JS Khehar (a Sikh), Justices Kurian Joseph (a Christian), Rohinton Nariman (a Parsi), S Abdul Nazeer (a Muslim), UU Lalit (a Hindu) – was immediately welcomed by all political parties, social activists and although predictably but most importantly, scores of Muslim women across India who have suffered due to the ‘unislamic’ practice.

Left sulking were the handful of Muslim clerics and organisations like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) who opposed the ban on instant triple talaq and lost – not just the legal battle but also their stranglehold on the rights of married Muslim women in India.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who had personally advocated for an end to the practice (although his motive for the statement has often been attributed to his political concerns), took to Twitter to hail the verdict.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]JTNDYmxvY2txdW90ZSUyMGNsYXNzJTNEJTIydHdpdHRlci10d2VldCUyMiUyMGRhdGEtbGFuZyUzRCUyMmVuJTIyJTNFJTNDcCUyMGxhbmclM0QlMjJlbiUyMiUyMGRpciUzRCUyMmx0ciUyMiUzRUp1ZGdtZW50JTIwb2YlMjB0aGUlMjBIb24lMjYlMjMzOSUzQmJsZSUyMFNDJTIwb24lMjBUcmlwbGUlMjBUYWxhcSUyMGlzJTIwaGlzdG9yaWMuJTIwSXQlMjBncmFudHMlMjBlcXVhbGl0eSUyMHRvJTIwTXVzbGltJTIwd29tZW4lMjBhbmQlMjBpcyUyMGElMjBwb3dlcmZ1bCUyMG1lYXN1cmUlMjBmb3IlMjB3b21lbiUyMGVtcG93ZXJtZW50LiUzQyUyRnAlM0UlMjZtZGFzaCUzQiUyME5hcmVuZHJhJTIwTW9kaSUyMCUyOCU0MG5hcmVuZHJhbW9kaSUyOSUyMCUzQ2ElMjBocmVmJTNEJTIyaHR0cHMlM0ElMkYlMkZ0d2l0dGVyLmNvbSUyRm5hcmVuZHJhbW9kaSUyRnN0YXR1cyUyRjg5OTkwNzgwNzMyMjg0MTA4OCUyMiUzRUF1Z3VzdCUyMDIyJTJDJTIwMjAxNyUzQyUyRmElM0UlM0MlMkZibG9ja3F1b3RlJTNFJTBBJTBBJTNDc2NyaXB0JTIwYXN5bmMlMEFzcmMlM0QlMjIlMkYlMkZwbGF0Zm9ybS50d2l0dGVyLmNvbSUyRndpZGdldHMuanMlMjIlMEFjaGFyc2V0JTNEJTIydXRmLTglMjIlM0UlM0MlMkZzY3JpcHQlM0U=[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Expectedly, the entire spectrum of the BJP leadership – from national president Amit Shah to Union ministers Arun Jaitley, Ravi Shankar Prasad and UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath – reiterated Modi’s stand, the Congress party which had found itself in a piquant position over the case – with senior leader Kapil Sibal representing the AIMPLB in the court while Salman Khurshid was assisting the Bench as amicus curie – too welcomed the verdict.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]While Khurshid said: “What we hoped to happen has now happened, it is a good decision… Yeh faisla sachchai, vastvikta aur sahi Islam ko ujaagar karta hai”, his party colleague Sibal, who opposed several of Khurshid’s submissions in the court since he represented the AIMPLB which was against the ban, too seemed to reconcile with the verdict. “We hail the judgement, it protects personal laws and at the same time deprecates the practice of Triple Talaq,” Sibal said.

Randeep Singh Surjewala, the Congress party’s chief spokesperson, said: “The Supreme Court has set aside and quashed the practice of ‘instant triple talaq’ or ‘talaq-e-bidat’, which by itself was an aberration and adulteration of ‘talaq’, thereby recognizing the pristine form of religious practice in Islam that abhors any exploitation. This verdict is an affirmation of the rights of women and gives relief to them against being subjected to discrimination by a practice that had been perverted over the years. We welcome the acceptance of this reality by Court”.

Similar praise for the verdict came in from other political parties like Mayawati’s Bahujan Samaj Party, Trinamool Congress, the CPI and CPM.

The AIMPLB, which will hold a meeting of its executive committee in Bhopal on September 10 to discuss the Board’s future course of action, was evidently unhappy. Its senior member, Kamal Farooqui said: “Court order has affected the rights of religious minorities to practice their religion. It will have wide-ranging ramifications… Our feeling is that the judgment contravenes Constitutional guarantees”.

All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen chief and Hyderabad MP, Asaduddin Owaisi, who has also been an opponent of any ban on triple talaq through judicial intervention, cautioned that though the “I respect the verdict but its implementation on the ground will be a Herculean task”.

Bangladeshi author Taslima Nasreen, who has often been the target of Islamic fundamentalists and has repeatedly challenged the oppression of women by a section of the Islamic clergy, however said that while the SC verdict may come as an embarrassment to the AIMPLB, it doesn’t ensure women’s freedom – which she insisted would only come through education.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Cheer and jubilation as SC declares instant triple talaq ‘unconstitutional’For former Union minister Arif Mohammad Khan, who had appeared in the SC for a bunch of petitioners seeking a ban on the controversial practice, the verdict came as sweet vindication of a stand he had consistently taken for the past 30 years. Khan, who had quit the Rajiv Gandhi government in the aftermath of the Shah Bano verdict when the then government cowered under pressure of the AIMPLB and radical Islamic clerics, said: “It is a historic verdict and I honestly feel that none of us can make a realistic assessment of the positive impact that this judgment is going to have on the Muslim community”.

“It will not only liberate Muslim women but also provide them with a sense of equality. It will provide them with a sense of empowerment. This verdict will bring about a paradigm shift and I foresee a changed scenario in the days when women will no longer accept instant talaq as a fait accompli. Empowered by the Supreme Court verdict, they will answer and retort back. They will tell their spouse that ‘This triple talaq is unconstitutional. I am not going to leave the house, you can leave the house’… This is going to be a game-changer for Muslim women”, Khan said.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com