English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Child traffickers mistakenly call Delhi police to sell minor girl, arrested

Published

on

Child traffickers mistakenly call Delhi police to sell minor girl, arrested

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The two child traffickers, residents of Bihar, had called the GB Road police station thinking the number belonged to a brothel owner

In an unusually ironical, albeit fortunate, twist of fate, two child traffickers reportedly called up a station house officer (SHO) of the Delhi police’s GB Road station, on Thursday, with an offer to sell a minor girl into flesh trade. The duo were tracked and arrested by the Delhi police while the minor girl was rescued.

The two men, both residents of Supaul district in Bihar, had believed that the phone number belonged to a brothel owner in GB Road, a central Delhi locality infamous for its prostitution rings and a dark underbelly that thrives on flesh trade.

A Hindustan Times report quoted Deputy Commissioner of Police (central Delhi) MS Randhawa as saying: “the two men fell into a police trap when they called up the station house officer of GB road area in central Delhi, believing the number belonged to an owner of a brothel.”

The men – 24-year-old Amar and 27-year-old Ranjeet Shah, told police the during interrogation that they had got the number from a friend, who claimed he had taken it off the Internet, and had informed them that it belonged to a brothel owner on GB Road.

Randhawa told mediapersons that Sunil Kumar, the SHO of Kamla Market police station under whose jurisdiction the GB Road locality falls, had for the past few days been receiving phone calls from different numbers. The caller, obviously unaware that he had dialed the number of a police station, reportedly told Kumar that there was a “beautiful” minor girl for sale.

“Our officer realised that the callers had mistaken him for a brothel owner. He played along and did not allow them to suspect anything. He struck a deal with the callers to buy the girl. According to the plan, they were to meet outside New Delhi Railway Station,” Randhawa told reporters.

Explaining how the ‘trap’ unfolded and ended in the child traffickers being nabbed, Randhawa said inspector Kumar told the caller that he would send a man to pick up the girl. Thereafter, two police constables, Gulab and Sunder, were sent to deal with the caller posing as buyers. The caller identified himself to the two police constables as Amar.

“Our officers met Amar outside the New Delhi Railway Station. However, he had come without the child. Amar demanded Rs 3.5 lakh for the minor girl. Our team fixed the deal at Rs 2.3 lakh. They agreed and promised to hand over the girl on Wednesday at IFFCO Chowk in Gurgaon,” Randhawa explained.

However, while the police had the nab and rescue operation planned for Gurgaon, Amar and his associate Ranjeet changed the plan at the last minute and asked the two constables to come to the New Delhi Railway Station where they said that the girl would be handed over.

“We again laid a trap outside the railway station. Around 5.30pm, our officers paid Amar an advance of Rs 20,000, after which they brought the minor girl. A police team in plainclothes overpowered the two men and rescued the girl,” said Randhawa.

The interrogation of the alleged child traffickers revealed that the minor girl had been conned by Amar into leaving her house and coming to Delhi. Amar had reportedly met the girl in September in Bihar and told her that he had fallen in love with her. He used to call the girl regularly, telling her that he was based in Delhi, and promised that he’d find her a well-paying job if she decided to move to Delhi.

“In October, the minor girl ran away from her family and came to Delhi. Amar then took her to a house and made physical relations with her. After this, he along with his friend, decided to sell her off and had planned to flee Delhi,” an officer investigating the case told reporters.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

DU VC Prof Yogesh Singh entrusted with additional charge of AICTE Chairman

Published

on

By

Prof. Yogesh Singh, Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi, has been entrusted with the additional charge of the post of Chairman, AICTE till the appointment of a Chairman of AICTE or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

It is noteworthy that AICTE Chairman Prof. TG Sitharam was relieved of his duties after his term ended on December 20, 2025. According to a letter issued by the Ministry of Education, Government of India, on Monday, Prof. Yogesh Singh’s appointment is until the appointment of a regular AICTE Chairman or until further orders whichever is earlier.

Prof. Yogesh Singh is a renowned academician with excellent administrative capabilities, who has been the Vice-Chancellor of University of Delhi since October 2021. He has also served as the Chairperson of the National Council for Teacher Education. In August 2023, he was also given the additional charge of Director of the School of Planning and Architecture (SPA).

Prof. Yogesh Singh served as the Vice-Chancellor of Delhi Technological University from 2015 to 2021; Director of Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Delhi from 2014 to 2017, and before that, he was the Vice-Chancellor of Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda (Gujarat) from 2011 to 2014. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra. He has a distinguished track record in quality teaching, innovation, and research in the field of software engineering.

Continue Reading

India News

Goa nightclub fire case: Court extends police custody of Luthra brothers by five days

A Goa court has extended the police custody of Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra, owners of the nightclub where a deadly fire killed 25 people, by five more days.

Published

on

Luthra brothers

A court in Goa on Monday extended the police custody of Saurabh Luthra and Gaurav Luthra, the owners of the Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub, by five more days in connection with the deadly fire incident that claimed 25 lives on December 6.

The order was passed as investigators sought additional time to question the two accused in the case linked to the blaze at the Anjuna-based nightclub.

Owners were deported after fleeing abroad

According to details placed before the court, the Luthra brothers had left the country following the incident and travelled to Thailand. They were subsequently deported and brought back to India on December 17, after which they were taken into police custody.

Advocate Vishnu Joshi, representing the families of the victims, confirmed that the court granted a five-day extension of police custody for both Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra.

Another co-owner sent to judicial custody

The court also remanded Ajay Gupta, another owner of the nightclub, to judicial custody. Police did not seek an extension of his custody, following which the court passed the order, the victims’ counsel said.

The Anjuna police have registered a case against the Luthra brothers for culpable homicide not amounting to murder along with other relevant offences related to the fire incident.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi High Court issues notice to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi in National Herald case

Delhi High Court has sought responses from Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on the ED’s plea challenging a trial court order in the National Herald case.

Published

on

The Delhi High Court has sought responses from Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on a petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the National Herald case. The petition challenges a trial court order that refused to take cognisance of the agency’s prosecution complaint.

Justice Ravinder Dudeja issued notices to the Gandhis and other accused on the main petition, as well as on the ED’s application seeking a stay on the trial court’s December 16 order. The high court has listed the matter for further hearing on March 12, 2026.

The trial court had ruled that taking cognisance of the ED’s complaint was “impermissible in law” because the investigation was not based on a registered First Information Report (FIR). It observed that the prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was not maintainable in the absence of an FIR for a scheduled offence.

According to the order, the ED’s probe originated from a private complaint rather than an FIR. The court further noted that since cognisance was declined on a legal question, it was not necessary to examine the merits of the allegations at that stage.

The trial court also referred to the complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and the summoning order issued in 2014, stating that despite these developments, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) did not register an FIR in relation to the alleged scheduled offence.

The ED has accused Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and a private company, Young Indian, of conspiracy and money laundering. The agency has alleged that properties worth around Rs 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), which publishes the National Herald newspaper, were acquired through Young Indian.

The agency further claimed that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi held a majority 76 per cent shareholding in Young Indian, which allegedly took over AJL’s assets in exchange for a Rs 90 crore loan.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com