English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Padmavati Controversy: Fair Is Foul And Foul Is Fair

Published

on

Padmavati

By Saeed Naqvi

Padmavati, in a sense, is a neighbourhood story. My village, Mustafabad, happens to be in Rae Bareli, which embraces numerous Chishtiya Sufi shrines or places where the saints spent some time, including Khwaja Ashraf Jehangir Semnani, the saint Malik Mohammad Jaisi, the author of Padmavat, was devoted to. Jaisi would faint at the controversy surrounding his masterpiece.

From nearby, Salon, Naeem Ata Shah in his flowing orange robes and headgear often visited Mustafabad. Jaisi, who preceded Tulsidas, in the list of great poets of Awadhi, was an endless source of quotations. So was Tulsidas, whose correspondence with emperor Akbar’s premier courtier, Abdul Rahim Khan e Khana, on meter and structure of poetry one heard about later and which is something one would have expected more scholarship on.

To a most unexpected source I owed my acquaintance with the fact that Rahim, known for his dohas, wrote devotional poetry on Lord Rama in Sanskrit. The source happened to be Vishnu Kant Shastri, former Vice Chancellor of Banaras Hindu University, Governor of UP. It always puzzled me how a man of such catholic interests – knew Jaisi as well as Akbar Allahabadi backwards – had actually emerged from the RSS stable.

If Jaisi’s flight of fancy can create so much mayhem, I shudder to contemplate the fate of the 1960 classic, Mughal-e-Azam in a similar circumstance. By today’s yardstick, that was the original, unadulterated case of “Love Jihad”. In fact the settled conventional wisdom in the 60s conceded Akbar victory at Haldighati. The national mood today has reversed the outcome of that battle in favour of Maharana Pratap. There have been suggestions that New Delhi’s Akbar Road be renamed “Maharana Pratap Road”. In other words revenge with retrospective effect is in order. To give this trend a more contemporary twist, Vishwa Hindu Parishad has demanded that an FIR be lodged against Mulayam Singh Yadav for ordering the police to fire on Kar sewaks in 1990. In that framework, it can be argued that producer K. Asif glorified Akbar’s love jihad. For that unforgiveable guilt, copies of the film must be consigned to the flames by way of historical revenge. Dilip Kumar, who played Prince Salim, is lying in coma otherwise he could have been brought into focus of public ire with great effectiveness on the eve of key elections with a singular purpose – polarize the poll.

At a time when logic has been crowded out by a rush of non sequitur, some pundits have attempted common sense. It will not work.

The new cultural brigade destroyed the grave of Wali Dakhni who showered adoration on this land with such verses as:

“Koocha e yaar ain Kashi hai

Jogiya dil wahaan ka baasi hain.”

(The lane where my beloved lives is like holy Varanasi;

The yogi of my heart has made it his dwelling place.) The sentiments the poet represents did not deter the vandals seething with anger against past historical injustices. 

Never will the bandish Munmohan Braj ke rasiya in Raag Paraj, steeped in Krishna lore, be sung better than by Ustad Faiyyaz Khan. They tried to desecrate his grave in Vadodara, regardless.

Rasoolan Bai’s plaintive appeals to Rama, in so many of her songs, did not protect her house from being gutted during the 1969 Gujarat riots. It did not matter that the Congress was in power then. What is being tapped into is something which gained a lease of life after Partition and which invites instant, angry, passionate response at the street level. In his very first speech in Parliament after the 2014 elections, this was precisely the nerve Narendra Modi touched: “the nation has to recover from the subjugation of 1200 years”. This is what differentiates the present government from previous regimes. Congressmen may have privately believed in “1200 year of subjugation”, but they considered it tactically proper to speak only of the British as foreigners.

Let us, meanwhile, revert to Jaisi’s purpose in Padmavati. The sentiment is common in western poetry too.

The “desire of the moth for the star, of the night for the morrow.

The devotion to something afar from the sphere of our sorrow”

Shelley’s lines are an ultra simplified version of the interplay between love and beauty which Jaisi is delineating. Padmini and Khalji are secular symbols of Jaisi’s elaboration of the theme on an epic scale.

Keat’s “Beauty is truth, truth beauty, that is all ye know on earth and all ye need to know” can also be tossed in to simplify communicating Jaisi.

Maulana Hasrat Mohani communicates the mood thus:

“Maslak I Ishq hai parastish e husn

Hum naheen jaante azaab-o-sawab.”

(Love’s purpose is adoration of beauty.

Gains and losses I do not measure.)

 Should the ever expanding tribe of the new cultural warriors run out of ideas, here are some on offer, gratis. They should denigrate with retrospective effect those Muslims who dared to take liberties with Hindu Gods. Remember, how India’s greatest modern painter, Maqbool Fida Hussain was exiled for his supreme guilt: excessive adoration of Goddesses. His “adoration” was considered lewd by the protectors of culture and faith.

Well, in like fashion, Maulana Hasrat Mohani deserves to be shamed retrospectively. He wrote a great deal about Krishna in Urdu, but in his Bhasha or Braj verses he takes liberties:

“Mose ched karat Nandlal”

(Krishna teases me all the time)

“hum hoon jo dei liptai ke Hasrat

Saari yeh chalbal nikaal”

(One day I shall embrace him tight and squeeze out all his mischief)

“Squeeze out”, in a tight embrace, has erotic connotations which should be unacceptable to the new cultural brigade.

India News

Telangana Assembly clash: Congress targets BRS over remarks against Speaker

Telangana Assembly witnessed a political clash between Congress and BRS over alleged remarks against Speaker Gaddam Prasad Kumar. Revanth Reddy demanded action against BRS MLC Tata Madhu.

Published

on

A political confrontation erupted in the Telangana Assembly on Monday as the ruling Congress and Opposition Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) clashed over alleged objectionable remarks against Assembly Speaker Gaddam Prasad Kumar.

Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy condemned the remarks allegedly made by BRS MLC Tata Madhu and demanded an apology from BRS president K Chandrashekar Rao. Tata Madhu, however, denied making any statement targeting the Speaker.

The controversy unfolded on the opening day of the Telangana Assembly session, which also witnessed a separate confrontation between BRS leaders and police outside the Assembly premises.

Revanth Reddy demands action against BRS MLC

Raising the issue in the House, Revanth Reddy said the remarks against the presiding officer could not be tolerated. He demanded that K Chandrashekar Rao apologise and sought the resignation of the BRS leader accused of making the remarks.

The Chief Minister also called for the membership of the legislator responsible for the alleged remarks to be revoked.

Congress leaders said the matter was particularly serious as Gaddam Prasad Kumar is a Dalit leader holding the constitutional post of Speaker.

SC legislators from the Congress also met Revanth Reddy and urged strict action against Tata Madhu.

Congress seeks suspension of Tata Madhu

The Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee demanded the immediate suspension of Tata Madhu from the Legislative Council over the alleged remarks against the Speaker.

Congress workers also protested against the BRS MLC by burning his effigy.

The BRS legislator, however, denied making objectionable remarks against the Speaker. He maintained that the comments attributed to him were not directed at Gaddam Prasad Kumar.

BRS leaders detained outside Assembly

The controversy inside the House came amid another confrontation outside the Telangana Assembly.

BRS working president K T Rama Rao, former minister T Harish Rao and other party leaders were detained by police after they attempted to enter the Assembly premises wearing black T-shirts.

The BRS leaders were protesting against what they described as the Congress government’s performance during its 1,000 days in office.

The confrontation between BRS leaders and police added to the tension surrounding the opening day of the Assembly session.

Telangana High Court intervenes

The political dispute also took another turn after the Telangana High Court directed the Director General of Police not to prevent BRS MLAs from entering the Assembly.

The court’s intervention came amid the Opposition’s allegations concerning the treatment of its legislators outside the Assembly.

With Congress demanding disciplinary action over the alleged remarks and the BRS accusing the government of suppressing the Opposition, the first day of the Assembly session ended amid a sharp political confrontation.

Continue Reading

India News

India clears Rs. 1.1 lakh crore defence procurement plan for radars, mine layers

India has cleared defence procurement proposals worth around Rs. 1.10 lakh crore for the Army, Navy and Air Force, including radars, mine layers, helicopters and electronic warfare systems.

Published

on

Rajnath Singh

The Defence Ministry has cleared military procurement proposals estimated at around Rs. 1.10 lakh crore for the Indian Army, Navy and Air Force, in a major push to strengthen operational capabilities and promote indigenous defence manufacturing.

The proposals were approved by the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), headed by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. The ministry said the DAC accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN) for a range of acquisitions. AoN is the first stage of the defence procurement process.

Nearly 98 per cent of the approved procurements are expected to be sourced from Indian industry, according to the Defence Ministry.

What the Army will get

The Army-related approvals include Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) reconnaissance vehicles, high-mobility vehicles, self-propelled mechanical mine layers, Advanced Light Helicopters (ALHs), trawl tanks and the Sarvatra bridge system.

CBRN reconnaissance vehicles will be used to detect and monitor areas contaminated by chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear agents.

The high-mobility vehicles are intended to support troop movement and logistics in difficult terrain. The trawl tanks and Sarvatra bridge system will help combat formations with mobility and crossings during military operations.

Advanced Light Helicopters will be used by both the Army and the Air Force for operations across different terrains and mission requirements.

Navy to receive Arudhra radars

For the Indian Navy, the DAC approved the procurement of Arudhra radars, along with the design, development and subsequent procurement of Marine Gas Turbines (MGTs).

The Marine Gas Turbine programme is aimed at developing a key propulsion system for warships while reducing dependence on foreign suppliers.

The Arudhra radars will replace existing air-route surveillance radars at naval air stations and are expected to strengthen the Navy’s surveillance capabilities.

Air Force gets electronic warfare systems

The Indian Air Force also received approval for projects aimed at strengthening the capabilities of its fighter aircraft, transport fleets and helicopters.

Among the approved systems is the Ground-Based Multi-Purpose Jammer (GBMPJ). The ministry said the jammer will provide electronic warfare capability against adversary radar networks.

Approval was also given for the installation of the Defence Forces Secure Access Card system.

Push for domestic defence manufacturing

The latest approvals are part of the government’s broader effort to strengthen the operational capabilities of the armed forces while promoting self-reliance in defence manufacturing.

The Defence Ministry said nearly 98 per cent of the approved procurements will be sourced from Indian industry, potentially giving further impetus to domestic defence production.

The Rs. 1.10 lakh crore figure represents the estimated value of the procurement proposals that received the DAC’s Acceptance of Necessity at this stage. It does not by itself mean that all the equipment has already been contracted or delivered.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi hostel collapse: Rent agreement raised questions over student safety and hostel liability

The Satya Niketan hostel collapse has brought its rent agreement, building status and student safety conditions under scrutiny.

Published

on

The rent agreement of Delhi’s now-collapsed Hostel Daze has come under scrutiny after the five-storey building in Satya Niketan collapsed, killing seven residents.

According to the agreement, students were required to pay three months’ security along with one month’s advance rent. It also stated that the security deposit would not be refunded before the completion of the agreement period and that any damage to furniture or fixtures could be deducted from the deposit.

One clause in the agreement stated that the PG authorities were not responsible for casualties or risks to a student.

A separate terms-and-conditions document linked to the hostel also stated that the management would not be liable for compensation in cases involving personal injury, loss or damage to a tenant’s belongings caused by circumstances described as beyond the PG’s control, including sealing, fire, earthquakes and heavy rains.

Strict conditions for students

The agreement also laid down several conditions for tenants. Students were prohibited from putting posters or stickers on hostel walls.

It further stated that students leaving before the agreed period, including those removed for disciplinary reasons, would not receive a refund of hostel fees or security money.

The hostel management was also given the right to shift students to another room or hostel location when circumstances required it. The terms allowed immediate eviction for disciplinary issues without a refund.

Building was unauthorised, report says

The collapsed structure was a five-storey building in Satya Niketan that housed a boys’ hostel. According to a senior MCD official cited in the report, the nearly 50-year-old building stood on around 55 square yards of land in a resettlement colony where permission had been granted only for a two-storey structure.

No building plan had reportedly been approved for the structure.

The building had earlier been in a dilapidated condition. Its owner, Hari Ram Bansal, subsequently spent several months renovating it, and tenants began moving in during August 2026.

The hostel had around 30 rooms, with each room intended to accommodate two to three students. However, construction work was reportedly still underway when the building collapsed.

Labourers were working in the basement at the time of the incident. Of the 11 people rescued, two were labourers, one of whom later died.

Three arrested in Delhi hostel collapse case

Three people have been arrested in connection with the case — Hariram Bansal, his wife Urmila and their son Mahesh Bansal.

Records cited in the report show that electricity connections for the property were registered in the names of Hariram Bansal and Mahesh Bansal, while the property itself was registered in Urmila’s name.

The report also noted that the building was residential and was not intended for commercial use such as operating a paying-guest hostel.

Delhi civic body suspends five officials

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi suspended five officials a day after the tragedy.

Those suspended were Deputy Commissioner (South Zone) Rakesh Kumar, Superintending Engineer Ranvir Singh, Executive Engineer (Building) Lalit Kumar Goel, Assistant Engineer (Building) Sunil Chauhan and Junior Engineer (Building) Ashish Kumar.

Separately, the Delhi High Court ordered a high-level investigation into the collapse and observed that hostel facilities for students coming from outside Delhi were in a “pathetic condition.”

MCD order concerned neighbouring property

On September 6, the MCD had issued an order concerning the neighbouring property, number 13 in Satya Niketan, directing its owner or occupier to demolish the structure because it posed a threat to residents, visitors, passers-by and neighbouring buildings.

The collapsed building, however, was property number 14, according to an MCD statement.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com