English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut says Congress should take blame if allies feel INDIA bloc is disintegrating

He insisted that if the initiative was only for the Lok Sabha elections, then the INDIA bloc should officially declare its dissolution and allow each ally to proceed independently.

Published

on

Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut

Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut said on Friday that Congress bears the responsibility for maintaining the integrity of the INDIA bloc, being the largest party within the Opposition alliance.

His remarks followed concerns raised by Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, who expressed disappointment over the uncertainty surrounding the leadership and objectives of the INDIA bloc, suggesting that the alliance should be dissolved if it was intended solely for the 2024 Parliamentary elections.

Raut emphasized that if the alliance members believe the INDIA bloc was established only for the Lok Sabha elections and no longer functions, the onus falls on Congress. He highlighted the absence of communication and dialogue among the coalition members, pointing out that although they collaborated successfully in the Lok Sabha elections, a subsequent meeting to strategize future plans has yet to occur, which he believes is the responsibility of Congress to initiate.

He noted that the lack of cooperation among partners in this anti-BJP coalition has created a perception of disarray, despite comprising more than twenty political parties. Raut stated, “There is no communication, dialogue, or discussion. This leads to ambiguity regarding the stability of the alliance.”

Furthermore, Raut warned that should the alliance, which was formed ahead of the 2024 elections, collapse, it would likely not be salvageable. He insisted that if the initiative was only for the Lok Sabha elections, then the INDIA bloc should officially declare its dissolution and allow each ally to proceed independently.

Stressing the need to rectify previous missteps, Raut cautioned against the dissolution of the opposition grouping, labeling it as a drastic measure. He also critiqued Congress’s central leadership for their lack of involvement during the Maharashtra Assembly elections last November, where the state unit engaged in contentious seat-sharing negotiations.

He explained that there were several Assembly constituencies where the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and Shiv Sena (UBT) had viable candidates, yet Congress refused to relinquish claims on those seats. Raut asserted that if Congress had demonstrated cooperative behavior instead of competitive ambitions, a more cohesive seat-sharing agreement could have been reached within the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA), the coalition comprising the NCP, Shiv Sena (UBT), and Congress, which performed poorly in the elections, securing only 46 seats in the 288-member assembly.

Raut further remarked on the lack of coordination not only within the national INDIA alliance but also among the MVA partners in Maharashtra. He clarified his position regarding the characterizations made by some Congress leaders about Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Arvind Kejriwal, asserting that he does not support such labels.

He predicted that neither Congress nor the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) would win the upcoming Delhi Assembly elections on February 5, foreseeing a victory for the ruling AAP. Raut expressed regret that both Congress and AAP are contesting the elections separately, suggesting that collaboration would have been beneficial.

Highlighting internal tensions, Maharashtra Congress leader Nitin Raut stated that MVA allies were preoccupied with power disputes ahead of the elections, resulting in delayed seat-sharing agreements. He acknowledged a collective failure in organizational strategy following the Lok Sabha elections.

Supporting this view, Congress leader Vijay Wadettiwar expressed concerns about potential delays orchestrated during the seat-sharing discussions, noting the precious time lost that hindered effective campaigning. He criticized the lack of timely involvement from other leaders.

NCP leader Jitendra Awhad reiterated the need for improved coordination within the MVA and suggested that conversations should be held internally rather than in public forums. Raut added that Wadettiwar was integral to the seat-sharing negotiations and emphasized that Congress could have opted to relinquish certain seats where their allies had strong candidates.

India News

Abhijeet Dipke detained ahead of CJP’s national flag march in Delhi

Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke was detained by Delhi Police on October 16, 2026, shortly before a planned national flag march. The proposed rally followed the judicial custody of two CJP members who had waved the Tricolour at Jantar Mantar.

Published

on

Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) founder Abhijeet Dipke was detained by Delhi Police on Friday, October 16, shortly before he was due to participate in a planned national flag march in the capital.

According to the report, police personnel reached Dipke’s residence and detained him just minutes before the proposed ‘Lehra Do Tiranga’ rally. The march was planned in Delhi amid tensions over restrictions on demonstrations and the detention of CJP members.

The latest detention marks the second time Dipke has been detained within a week. He was previously detained after arriving at Delhi’s airport from Mumbai for a protest against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over allegations of manipulation during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

Why was the national flag march planned?

One of the main triggers for the planned march was the judicial custody of two CJP members, Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka.

The two were sent to five-day judicial custody after entering Jantar Mantar while waving the national flag on October 13. The incident occurred a day after the historic protest site was denotified as a protest location, according to the report.

The proposed march was called ‘Lehra Do Tiranga’. CJP planned the rally amid its continuing opposition to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over alleged electoral irregularities.

The allegations concerning voter-list manipulation remain allegations and should not be presented as established findings.

Police had issued a notice before the detention

Before detaining Dipke, Delhi Police personnel visited his residence and served him a notice advising him against holding the proposed march.

The notice was issued under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), according to the report. It stated that prohibitory orders were in force in the Connaught Place area.

The notice also cited the absence of permission from the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) for the proposed Tiranga Yatra. It warned that proceeding with the march despite the restrictions would be considered a violation of the law.

The detention came amid heightened attention to the proposed gathering in central Delhi and the dispute over whether the planned march could proceed under the prevailing restrictions.

A second detention in a week

Dipke’s latest detention followed his earlier detention at Delhi airport after he arrived from Mumbai for a planned protest over the SIR exercise and allegations concerning voter-list manipulation.

The latest episode adds to the ongoing confrontation between CJP and the authorities over its proposed demonstrations. The immediate context for the October 16 march was the judicial custody of two party members following their appearance at Jantar Mantar with the national flag.

The report does not establish that the allegations of electoral manipulation are proven, nor does it provide a final judicial determination of the dispute surrounding the planned march.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi deploys 25,000 personnel, installs CCTV cameras ahead of CJP march

More than 25,000 police and paramilitary personnel have been deployed in Delhi ahead of the CJP’s planned protest march at Connaught Place. Authorities have also imposed restrictions and stepped up CCTV surveillance.

Published

on

Delhi has stepped up security ahead of a planned protest march by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), with more than 25,000 police and paramilitary personnel deployed and additional surveillance measures introduced in parts of the national capital.

The planned “Lehra Do Tiranga” march is scheduled to take place at Central Park in Connaught Place on Friday, October 16. Authorities have also imposed prohibitory orders in Connaught Place and surrounding areas as part of the security arrangements.

Security tightened across Connaught Place

The security arrangements include the deployment of police and paramilitary personnel, along with the installation of additional CCTV cameras at Central Park and Rajiv Chowk Metro Station.

Prohibitory orders have been imposed under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in Connaught Place and nearby areas. Central Park is also scheduled to remain closed for two days, with authorities advising the public to avoid the area during the arrangements.

A high-level meeting chaired by Delhi Police Commissioner Anurag Kumar, attended by senior police officers, was held on Thursday to review preparations ahead of the planned demonstration.

Why CJP is planning the march

The CJP has called the march to protest the arrest of its leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka and to demand the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over alleged irregularities in voter rolls.

The party’s protest is centred on its allegations concerning the electoral roll revision process. These are the protesters’ claims and should not be treated as independently established findings.

With Jantar Mantar no longer designated as a protest site, Central Park in Connaught Place has emerged as the proposed location for the fresh demonstration. The protest has also received support from the Aam Aadmi Party and the All India Students’ Association, according to the report.

Traders raise concerns over business disruptions

The heightened security measures have also prompted concerns among traders in the area.

Traders at Palika Bazaar have expressed concern about disruptions during the festive season, pointing to losses associated with previous protests. The concerns reflect the potential impact of repeated demonstrations and security restrictions on commercial activity in central Delhi.

Delhi Police has said it will facilitate peaceful demonstrators selectively while maintaining public order and protecting property.

Continue Reading

India News

Mallikarjun Kharge’s ‘Your Friends’ jab at Rahul Gandhi over congress exits

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge took a dig at Rahul Gandhi after the Leader of the Opposition reportedly described former party leaders Jyotiraditya Scindia and Ghulam Nabi Azad as among those who had left the Congress.

Published

on

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge made a pointed remark about former Congress leaders after Rahul Gandhi reportedly described some of those who left the party as people who had been driven by personal interests or fear. The exchange took place during an informal interaction involving young Congress workers, according to a report published on October 15.

Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, reportedly referred to former Congress leaders Jyotiraditya Scindia and Ghulam Nabi Azad while discussing people who had left the party. Kharge responded with a quip that drew attention to Rahul Gandhi’s earlier association with the leaders.

What Rahul Gandhi said about leaders who left Congress

During the interaction, Rahul Gandhi reportedly said that the Congress was now left with committed workers, describing those who remained in the party as ‘babbar sher’ or lions. He alleged that people who were greedy or afraid had left, citing Scindia and Azad as examples.

His reported remarks referred to people who, he suggested, had left because of the attraction of positions and security or fear of investigative agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

These were Rahul Gandhi’s political characterisations of the leaders who left the Congress, rather than independently established explanations for their departures.

Kharge’s response to Rahul Gandhi

Reacting to Rahul Gandhi’s account, Kharge remarked, “They were all your friends.”

The comment referred to the association Rahul Gandhi had previously shared with some of the leaders who later left the Congress. Rahul Gandhi responded by saying that his sister, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, was present and knew that Scindia was not his friend.

He subsequently reflected on the difficulty of identifying friends and opponents in politics, saying that people who appear to be friends may not necessarily be so, and the reverse may also be true.

Why Jyotiraditya Scindia and Ghulam Nabi Azad were mentioned

Jyotiraditya Scindia left the Congress in 2020 and joined the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). His departure was followed by a political crisis in Madhya Pradesh that resulted in the fall of the Congress government led by Kamal Nath.

Ghulam Nabi Azad, a veteran Congress leader, resigned from the party in August 2022. In his resignation letter, he criticised Rahul Gandhi’s leadership and the functioning of the party’s internal decision-making process.

Both leaders subsequently became prominent examples in political discussions about senior figures leaving the Congress, although their reasons and circumstances differed.

Rahul Gandhi’s message to young Congress workers

The interaction also focused on protests and political mobilisation. Rahul Gandhi reportedly told young Congress workers that demonstrations and struggles were part of their political training and encouraged them to explore new and creative ways of protesting.

He also suggested holding protests at Jantar Mantar, according to the report.

Congress president Kharge and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were present during the interaction. Rahul Gandhi also claimed that the government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was dependent on the next eight to 10 months, though the report did not establish this as an independently verified assessment.

The exchange between Kharge and Rahul Gandhi offered a glimpse into the Congress leadership’s informal discussions, while bringing the departures of Scindia and Azad back into the political conversation.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com