English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Delhi HC Grants Bail To AAP MLA Prakash Jarwal

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday granted bail to Aam Aadmi Party MLA Prakash Jarwal who was arrested in connection with a doctor’s suicide

Published

on

Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday granted bail to Aam Aadmi Party MLA Prakash Jarwal who was arrested in connection with a doctor’s suicide. He will be released on bail on furnishing of personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and surety of like amount before Trial Court. Jarwal is currently lodged in Tihar Jail accused of the abetment of suicide.

 A Single Judge Bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait observed that there seems to be no proximity and link in alleged commission of offence as prior to the date that the deceased committed suicide, there were no allegations against the accused in the suicide note and the diary recovered by the police.

According to the Court, the other allegations of extortion, and the suicide note being in different handwriting or without signatures needs to be tested during the trial. The Court, therefore, without commenting on merits of the prosecution case, directed to release the accused on bail, noting that he has been in judicial custody since May 9 and no more is required for further investigation and the trial will take substantial time.

The Delhi High Court on June 19, had reserved its order on the bail petition and had also asked the Delhi Police to file a status report, including the suicide note and the diary of the deceased. His bail plea was earlier dismissed by a trial court.

Senior advocate Rebecca John argued on behalf of  Jarwal, contended that the suicide note is in different ink, different handwriting and the second portion of suicide note does not bear the signature of the deceased. There has been no previous complaint by the deceased in the last six years.

The lawyer also argued that the wife of the deceased gave one complaint to the Delhi Jal Board just one week before the suicide but there were no allegations of extortion and the name of Jarwal was not mentioned anywhere. According to Rebecca John, the family of the deceased had a motive to implicate Prakash Jarwal as he and his son were disengaged from the DJB from carrying out any water tanker activities.

Additional public prosecutor Hiren Sharma, appearing for Delhi Police, opposed the bail plea and stated that the accused was in a dominant position and the possibility of influencing the witnesses cannot be ruled out. He had submitted that there is a nexus of Tanker Mafias run by MLA Jarwal with help of his associates, and have full control over operating the water tankers, if released on bail they may hamper and influence the investigation.

In his Complaint to the police, son of the deceased doctor had stated that his father supplied water tankers to the DJB, and was upset because of monetary loss as the accused had demanded money from the victim failing which his payment was stopped.

Rajendra Singh, 52, a resident of south Delhi had committed suicide on April 18 and had allegedly held Garwal and his associate responsible for his suicide, following which police registered a case at Neb Sarai Police Station against the MLA.

Jarwal had, however, denied these allegations. His bail application before the court had stated that the allegations against him were completely false and fabricated and he had no role in the unfortunate suicide of the deceased and as a public representative, he is equally pained by the death of the person.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com