English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Facial recognition confirms identity of accused in Saif Ali Khan stabbing case

Published

on

Saif Ali Khan stabbing suspect identified through facial recognition technology

Mumbai Police have verified the identity of the accused in the stabbing of actor Saif Ali Khan using facial recognition technology. Mohammad Shariful Islam, a Bangladeshi national, was confirmed as the individual captured on CCTV footage at the crime scene, officials said.

Islam allegedly broke into Khan’s apartment on the 12th floor of a Bandra high-rise in the early hours of January 16 with the intent to commit robbery. When confronted by the 54-year-old actor, Islam allegedly stabbed him six times before fleeing the scene.

Khan was immediately taken to Lilavati Hospital, where he underwent emergency surgery. One of the wounds came dangerously close to his spinal cord, leading to a spinal fluid leak. After five days of hospitalization, he was discharged and advised strict bed rest.

Arrest and political connections

Islam was apprehended on January 19 in Thane, a neighboring city of Mumbai. His father, Mohammed Ruhul Amin, in a conversation with media, claimed that his son had fled Bangladesh due to political persecution. Amin alleged that Islam was affiliated with the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and was targeted under the long rule of the Awami League government led by Sheikh Hasina.

Despite acknowledging his son’s political past, Amin denied his involvement in the crime, asserting that the person captured on CCTV was not Islam. He claimed Islam had a distinct facial structure and hairstyle different from the suspect in the footage. Furthermore, he questioned the credibility of the CCTV visuals used to identify him.

Legal developments and forensic contradictions

A Mumbai court recently rejected the police’s request for an extension of Islam’s custody, citing a lack of new evidence. The Bandra magistrate’s court ruled that while police can seek custody again if new developments emerge, Islam would remain in judicial remand for now.

Under India’s revised criminal code, authorities can seek police custody for up to 15 days within a 40- or 60-day period, depending on the gravity of the offense.

Despite the strong facial recognition match, forensic investigations have thrown up contradictions. Fingerprint analysis conducted by the CID failed to match Islam’s prints with those collected from the crime scene. This unexpected result raised concerns, but authorities proceeded with further forensic tests on items recovered from the crime scene, including the suspect’s clothing, a knife, a towel, and a bag.

Illegal entry and alleged motive

Investigators suspect that Islam entered India illegally from Bangladesh, changing his name to Bijoy Das upon arrival. He reportedly spent time in Kolkata before relocating to Mumbai.

Police are now tracking individuals who may have aided Islam’s illegal entry and stay in India. According to his statement, Islam was promised fake Indian identity documents in exchange for money, which allegedly motivated him to commit the robbery at Khan’s residence.

Wrongful detention controversy

The case also saw a wrongful arrest when Akash Kanojia, a 31-year-old man, was mistakenly taken into custody following a tip-off. Kanojia, who was arrested while traveling on a train in Chhattisgarh, later claimed that the incident devastated his life.

Speaking to media, Kanojia said he lost his job as a driver and even had a marriage proposal withdrawn due to the stigma of being a suspect in the high-profile case. His father, Kailash Kanojia, condemned the police’s actions, stating that his son had suffered immense mental trauma.

Mumbai Police defended the mistaken detention, stating that preliminary questioning and detentions are routine during complex investigations.

Ongoing investigation

Despite the fingerprint mismatch, authorities remain confident in the facial recognition findings and other forensic evidence. The investigation continues as police work to determine how Islam entered India and whether he received assistance in forging documents.

With multiple twists in the case, including forensic inconsistencies and a wrongful arrest, the probe into the Saif Ali Khan stabbing incident remains far from over.

India News

DU VC Prof Yogesh Singh entrusted with additional charge of AICTE Chairman

Published

on

By

Prof. Yogesh Singh, Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi, has been entrusted with the additional charge of the post of Chairman, AICTE till the appointment of a Chairman of AICTE or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

It is noteworthy that AICTE Chairman Prof. TG Sitharam was relieved of his duties after his term ended on December 20, 2025. According to a letter issued by the Ministry of Education, Government of India, on Monday, Prof. Yogesh Singh’s appointment is until the appointment of a regular AICTE Chairman or until further orders whichever is earlier.

Prof. Yogesh Singh is a renowned academician with excellent administrative capabilities, who has been the Vice-Chancellor of University of Delhi since October 2021. He has also served as the Chairperson of the National Council for Teacher Education. In August 2023, he was also given the additional charge of Director of the School of Planning and Architecture (SPA).

Prof. Yogesh Singh served as the Vice-Chancellor of Delhi Technological University from 2015 to 2021; Director of Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Delhi from 2014 to 2017, and before that, he was the Vice-Chancellor of Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda (Gujarat) from 2011 to 2014. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra. He has a distinguished track record in quality teaching, innovation, and research in the field of software engineering.

Continue Reading

India News

Goa nightclub fire case: Court extends police custody of Luthra brothers by five days

A Goa court has extended the police custody of Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra, owners of the nightclub where a deadly fire killed 25 people, by five more days.

Published

on

Luthra brothers

A court in Goa on Monday extended the police custody of Saurabh Luthra and Gaurav Luthra, the owners of the Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub, by five more days in connection with the deadly fire incident that claimed 25 lives on December 6.

The order was passed as investigators sought additional time to question the two accused in the case linked to the blaze at the Anjuna-based nightclub.

Owners were deported after fleeing abroad

According to details placed before the court, the Luthra brothers had left the country following the incident and travelled to Thailand. They were subsequently deported and brought back to India on December 17, after which they were taken into police custody.

Advocate Vishnu Joshi, representing the families of the victims, confirmed that the court granted a five-day extension of police custody for both Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra.

Another co-owner sent to judicial custody

The court also remanded Ajay Gupta, another owner of the nightclub, to judicial custody. Police did not seek an extension of his custody, following which the court passed the order, the victims’ counsel said.

The Anjuna police have registered a case against the Luthra brothers for culpable homicide not amounting to murder along with other relevant offences related to the fire incident.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi High Court issues notice to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi in National Herald case

Delhi High Court has sought responses from Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on the ED’s plea challenging a trial court order in the National Herald case.

Published

on

The Delhi High Court has sought responses from Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on a petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the National Herald case. The petition challenges a trial court order that refused to take cognisance of the agency’s prosecution complaint.

Justice Ravinder Dudeja issued notices to the Gandhis and other accused on the main petition, as well as on the ED’s application seeking a stay on the trial court’s December 16 order. The high court has listed the matter for further hearing on March 12, 2026.

The trial court had ruled that taking cognisance of the ED’s complaint was “impermissible in law” because the investigation was not based on a registered First Information Report (FIR). It observed that the prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was not maintainable in the absence of an FIR for a scheduled offence.

According to the order, the ED’s probe originated from a private complaint rather than an FIR. The court further noted that since cognisance was declined on a legal question, it was not necessary to examine the merits of the allegations at that stage.

The trial court also referred to the complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and the summoning order issued in 2014, stating that despite these developments, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) did not register an FIR in relation to the alleged scheduled offence.

The ED has accused Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and a private company, Young Indian, of conspiracy and money laundering. The agency has alleged that properties worth around Rs 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), which publishes the National Herald newspaper, were acquired through Young Indian.

The agency further claimed that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi held a majority 76 per cent shareholding in Young Indian, which allegedly took over AJL’s assets in exchange for a Rs 90 crore loan.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com