English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Fearless, rationalist, vocal right-wing critic Gauri Lankesh silenced

Published

on

Gauri Lankesh

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Bengaluru-based senior journalist and editor of tabloid Gauri Lankesh Patrike was shot dead at her residence on Tuesday night by unidentified assailants, police launch manhunt as protests erupt across India

The right to free speech and dissent, rationalism and courage claimed yet another life on Tuesday night. Gauri Lankesh, a Bengaluru-based senior journalist and editor of the tabloid Gauri Lankesh Patrike, was shot dead at the doorstep of her residence by unidentified bike-borne assailants. Of the seven bullets that were fired at her, three hit her – in the head and chest.

Known as a fiercely independent journalist and a vocal critic of the BJP, RSS and other right-wing fundamentalist groups, 55-year-old Gauri had been convicted in November 2016 by a court in Hubballi and sentenced to six months in jail for defaming BJP MP from Dharwad, Prahlad Joshi, through an article that linked him with a series of criminal activities. She had been out on bail.

The killing of Gauri, a gutsy journalist who never minced her words while attacking fundamentalist groups, the BJP-RSS combine and its right-wing affiliates, appears to be a continuation of the pre-planned, cold blooded murders of rationalists across India that have seen a rise over the past five years.

In her death, Gauri joins the likes of MM Kalburgi, Narendra Dabholkar and Govind Pansare – all of whom were secularists, rationalists and unanimous in their criticism of India’s communal, fundamentalist forces – political and social – and all of whom were murdered.

Fearless, rationalist, vocal right-wing critic Gauri Lankesh silencedDabholkar, who spoke against superstition, the Indian caste system and for Dalit rights, was shot dead on August 20, 2013 by bike-borne assailants while he was out on a morning walk near the Omkareshwar temple in Pune. Pansare, a political activist associated with the CPI and a rationalist was shot at by two men on a motorcycle while he and his wife were out on a morning walk in their hometown of Kolhapur on February 16, 2015. Pansare had succumbed to his injuries on February 20 after he was airlifted for treatment at a private hospital in Mumbai. Kalburgi, a Kannada scholar and anti-superstition activist, was shot dead at his residence in Dharwad on August 30, 2015 by two men who pumped bullets into his head and chest.

Gauri had protested against the killings of Dhabolkar, Pansare and Kalburgi just as she had also stood by the likes of JNU student Kanhaiya Kumar when he was persecuted by the BJP government and those doing its bidding.

On Wednesday, amid widespread condemnation for her murder the Bengaluru police launched a massive manhunt to nab Gauri’s killers, even as her brother, Indrajit sought a CBI probe in the case – a demand that was surprisingly supported by Union minister and BJP’s Lok Sabha MP from Bengaluru Ananth Kumar who said he did not have faith on the local police.

“The three special teams have been set up to crack the case. We are taking the movements of people and vehicles at check posts and inter-state borders,” deputy commissioner of police, Bengaluru-West, M N Anucheth told the media, while adding that at least three suspects were involved in the murder. The police is also examining footage from two CCTV cameras installed near Gauri’s Rajarajeshwari Nagar residence for further leads and is “fairly certain” that the assailants had been waiting near her home on Tuesday night, waiting for her to return and shot her as she was entering the gate of her building.

Writers, social activists, journalists across India, and Bengaluru in particular, have been staging protests against Gauri’s killing. At Bengaluru’s Townhall, where a huge number of protestors had gathered demanding swift justice for their slain comrade, social activist K Neela said: “We will not be angered by this moment of death; instead, we will hail it as a day of sacrifice.”

Neela, and many other protestors like her also vented their ire against the state’s Congress government led by Siddaramaiah. “Siddaramiah, where are you? Two years ago following the deaths of Dabholkar, Pansare and Kalburgi, your police force said these were killings that had to do with differences in ideology. What were these differences? Siddaramiah, we’d told you back then to bring these killers to book. If you’d heeded us, Gauri would have been with us today,” Neela said.

A common refrain among other protestors at the Townhall in Bengaluru – where Gauri’s body is likely to be brought before her funeral – was “forces that take strength from those boasting of a 56-inch chest (in a clear reference to Prime Minister Narendra Modi) are the ones that have poured bullets into Gauri’s heart.”

Leaders of all political hues have expressed their shock and condolences at the killing. Congress president Sonia Gandhi issued a statement early on Tuesday morning that said: “Known for her fearless and independent views, Gauri Lankesh had extraordinary grit and determination to take on the system. The series of killings of rationalists, free thinkers and journalists in the country has created an atmosphere that dissent, ideological differences and divergence of views can endanger our lives. This cannot be and should not be tolerated. It is an extremely sad moment for our democracy and a chilling reminder of the fact that intolerance and bigotry is raising its ugly head in our society.”

Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi posted a series of tweets on Twitter condemning Gauri’s murder.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]CPM leader Sitaram Yechury termed the murder as “reprehensible” and claimed that there was an eerie pattern to such killings.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The Editors Guild of India, Press Association, Indian Women’s Press Corps and several other organisations of journalists have announced protest marches, candlelight vigil and similar demonstrations to vent their ire against the evident attempt at muzzling freedom of speech by snuffing out lives of outspoken and fiercely independent writers like Gauri.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

LPG Aadhaar authentication mandatory for subsidy from October 1

Biometric Aadhaar authentication will be required for subsidised domestic LPG refills from October 1. Here is what changes for consumers who have and have not completed the process.

Published

on

LPG cylinder

Biometric Aadhaar authentication will become a requirement for domestic LPG consumers seeking to book refills at the regulated retail selling price with applicable subsidy from October 1, 2026.

The government has said the measure is aimed at ensuring that subsidised LPG reaches eligible households and at preventing the diversion of subsidised domestic cylinders for commercial and industrial use.

What changes from October 1

Consumers who have already completed biometric Aadhaar authentication will not have to repeat the process. Their LPG refills will continue as before.

For consumers who have not completed the authentication, refill booking at the regulated price with subsidy will be enabled after the authentication is completed.

As of September 19, 2026, 27.43 crore active domestic LPG consumers, or 89.9 per cent of the total, had completed biometric Aadhaar authentication, according to the Petroleum and Natural Gas Ministry.

How to complete Aadhaar authentication

Consumers who have not yet completed the process can do so through several channels.

Authentication can be completed during LPG delivery, at the distributor’s showroom or through the mobile applications of the three state-owned oil marketing companies.

Indane customers can use IndianOil ONE, Bharatgas customers can use HelloBPCL, while HP Gas customers can use HP PAY.

What if consumers do not complete authentication

The government has clarified that consumers who are unwilling or unable to complete biometric Aadhaar authentication can still receive LPG.

However, they will have to register their choice through the available digital channels of their oil marketing company, such as its consumer portal, mobile app, WhatsApp chatbot or IVRS.

Such consumers will be supplied LPG at the applicable market price without subsidy, in 5-kg or 10-kg cylinders, subject to local availability.

Why the government is introducing the requirement

According to the Petroleum and Natural Gas Ministry, linking each LPG connection to an Aadhaar-authenticated consumer is intended to prevent diversion of subsidised domestic cylinders and remove duplicate or ineligible connections.

The government has also said the measure is intended to make subsidy delivery more targeted and transparent.

Authentication deadline and progress

Consumers were initially asked to complete biometric Aadhaar authentication by June 30, 2026. The deadline was subsequently extended several times, with September 14 being the final extended deadline mentioned by the ministry.

The nationwide authentication drive has been underway since October 2023. The government said more than 12 crore SMS and WhatsApp messages had been sent as part of the outreach campaign.

The government has urged consumers who have not yet completed the process to do so before October 1.

LPG Aadhaar authentication becomes mandatory for subsidised domestic LPG refills from October 1. Consumers who have already completed biometric authentication need not do it again. Those who haven’t can still get LPG, but at the applicable market price without subsidy.

Continue Reading

India News

BJP hits back at opposition over EC row, says disagreement is democracy

The BJP has defended reported differences among Election Commissioners, saying internal deliberations are part of a healthy democratic process.

Published

on

The BJP has defended the Election Commission amid a political row over reported differences among Election Commissioners concerning decisions linked to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

BJP MP Sambit Patra said discussions and exchanges of views within the poll panel should be seen as part of the democratic process rather than as evidence of institutional dysfunction.

According to the BJP’s position, disagreement during official deliberations reflects the fact that members of an institution are able to put forward their views before decisions are taken.

BJP defends EC deliberations

Patra said that if the three Election Commissioners discuss and debate issues among themselves, such exchanges should not be characterised as dictatorship. He described such deliberations as a sign of a healthy democracy.

The BJP’s response came amid reports that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had raised objections on multiple occasions over decisions and orders associated with the SIR exercise and electoral rolls.

The Election Commission has said that differences in views and observations are a normal part of deliberations within an institution. It has maintained that decisions, including those related to SIR, were taken unanimously.

Row centres on SIR process

The controversy comes against the backdrop of the ongoing political debate over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.

Opposition parties have raised concerns over the reported differences within the poll panel, while the BJP has sought to counter those arguments by pointing to the role of discussion and deliberation in institutional decision-making.

Patra also said the BJP’s understanding of the matter was based on media reports rather than access to the Election Commission’s internal documents. He said the documents, as reported, indicated that the SIR process was finalised after democratic deliberations and consensus.

What the Election Commission has said

The Election Commission has rejected the suggestion that the reported objections indicate a breakdown in its functioning.

It has maintained that differing opinions during deliberations are part of normal institutional functioning and that the decisions eventually taken by the commission were unanimous.

Continue Reading

India News

IIT Bombay Professor Suryanarayana Doolla sent on leave amid student suicide row

IIT Bombay professor Suryanarayana Doolla has been sent on leave amid the ongoing student protests following Sahil Wakode’s death.

Published

on

IIT Bombay professor Suryanarayana Doolla has been sent on leave amid the ongoing controversy following the death of 20-year-old student Sahil Wakode, with protests on the campus seeking action against the professor.

Doolla, a faculty member in IIT Bombay’s Department of Energy Science and Engineering, had been involved in the examination incident concerning Wakode. The student was allegedly found using a mobile phone during a mid-semester examination and had uploaded the question paper to an AI platform to seek answers, according to the institute.

Why Suryanarayana Doolla is at the centre of the controversy

Doolla was the course instructor and examination invigilator during the examination and was involved in reporting the alleged examination malpractice to the institute’s authorities.

IIT Bombay has said Wakode was subsequently counselled by the instructor and the Head of Department and was assured that the examination incident would not adversely affect his academic career. The institute has also maintained that no disciplinary action had been initiated against the student before his death.

Wakode’s family, however, alleged harassment and caste-based discrimination. Mumbai Police registered a case based on the family’s complaint, with Doolla among those named. The allegations remain subject to investigation.

Student protests at IIT Bombay

Following Wakode’s death, students began protesting on the IIT Bombay campus and demanded action against Doolla.

IIT Bombay Director Professor Shireesh Kedare met the protesting students on September 20 and signed an 18-point charter of demands. The demands included action against Doolla.

Doolla was subsequently removed from the post of Dean Students Welfare amid the protests. The latest action comes as the controversy surrounding Wakode’s death and the allegations against the professor continue to be investigated.

Faculty members back Doolla

While students have demanded action against Doolla, IIT Bombay’s Faculty Forum has backed the professor, saying he was performing his duties as an invigilator and had followed the institute’s prescribed procedure after detecting the alleged examination malpractice.

The controversy involves the examination incident, allegations made by Wakode’s family and the police investigation into his death. The allegations against Doolla have not been established as facts and remain part of the ongoing investigation.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com