English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Fodder Scam: Lalu sentenced to total 14 year jail term, Rs 60 lakh fine in Dumka Treasury case

Published

on

RJD chief Lalu Prasad yadav

A special CBI court sentenced Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Lalu Prasad to 14 years in prison for corruption on Saturday, March 24, in the Fodder Scam related Dumka Treasury case.

Prasad has been in a Ranchi jail since last December after his conviction in two similar cases of what is widely known as fodder scam.

The court said Prasad will have to serve two separate seven-year terms consecutively for charges framed against him under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and for his conviction in charges under the Prevention of Corruption Acts in the case related to the fraudulent withdrawal of Rs 3.76 crore from Dumka treasury during December 1995 to January 1996.

The Special CBI court of judge Shivpal Singh has also fined the RJD chief Rs 60 lakh for his role in the Dumka Treasury case.

Earlier, on March 19, the CBI court convicted Lalu and 18 others on various charges related to fraudulent withdrawal of Rs 3.13 crore from the Dumka treasury between December 1995 and January 1996. Judge Shivpal Singh had, however, acquitted former Bihar chief minister Jagannath Mishra – a co-accused in all Fodder scam related cases – and 12 others of all charges in the Dumka Treasury case.

The first case when Lalu Prasad has been sentenced for more than five years imprisonment, this is the fourth of five fodder scam cases in which Lalu has been convicted.

After the Supreme Court order in 2017 that he has to be tried in each of the five cases separately, the CBI court order that jail term will run separately constitute a major blow for Lalu Prasad.

His first conviction came on September 30, 2013, in the Chaibasa treasury case related to the fraudulent withdrawal of Rs 37.70 crore. The conviction and award of a five-year jail term, had led to the disqualification of Lalu’s membership of the Lok Sabha. After spending 77 days in Ranchi’s Birsa Munda jail, Lalu was granted bail by the Supreme Court in December 2013.

Four years later, the RJD chief was in fresh trouble with the special CBI court convicting him on December 23, 2017 him in the Deoghar Treasury case related to the fraudulent withdrawal of Rs 89.27 lakh and sentencing him to 3.5 years in prison. A month later, on January 24, Lalu was convicted and sentenced to five years imprisonment in another case linked with the Chaibasa treasury, one related to fraudulent withdrawal of Rs 33.13 crore.

The fodder scam cases in which Lalu has been convicted had been transferred to Ranchi after Jharkhand was carved out of Bihar in 2000.

The RJD chief is still awaiting judgment in the fifth fodder scam case, one linked to allegedly fraudulent withdrawals to the tune of Rs 139 crore made from the Doranda Treasury which involves a staggering 120 other accused.

Lalu’s son Tejashwi Yadav and his lawyer Prabhat Kumar have said that they will appeal against the conviction. Tejashwi Yadav, who has emerged as the political successor of Lalu and has been leading the RJD ever since his father was sent to jail last year, told reporters: “We will challenge the verdict in the high court. We will decide our legal strategy after studying all verdicts delivered in the four fodder scam related cases. There is also a threat to Lalu ji’s life and a conspiracy is being hatched against him by the BJP and (Bihar chief minister) Nitish Kumar.”

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com