English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Habeas corpus petition in SC challenges detention of Saifuddin Soz.

Mumtazunnisa Soz has filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Consitution of India in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus for production of Prof. Saifuddin Soz before the Supreme Court and for an appropriate writ quashing the impugned order(s) of detention and/or further directions.

Published

on

Supreme-Court

May 29, 2020: Former Union Minister and Congress leader Prof. Saifuddin Soz’s detention in Kashmir has been challenged by his wife in the Supreme Court.

Mumtazunnisa Soz has filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Consitution of India in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus for production of Prof. Saifuddin Soz before the Supreme Court and for an appropriate writ quashing the impugned order(s) of detention and/or further directions.

She has made Government of India and Government of Union Territory Jammu and Kashmir as respondents.

The petitioner says that her husband is in house arrest in Kashmir since August 5 last year and despite passage of 10 months, he has not been told the reason for his house arrest.

Soz’s wife claims that her husband was informed of the detention on the morning of August 5, when the Presidential order abrogating Article 370 in erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir was passed.

The plea, to be argued by Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, further states that all of Soz’s attempts to get a copy of the detention order were fruitless.

The petition challenges Soz’s detention on the ground that “the Constitution of India, under Article 22(5), provides that when any person is detained in pursuance of an order made under any law providing for preventive detention, the authority making the order shall, as soon as may be, communicate to such person the grounds on which the order has been made and shall afford him the earliest possible opportunity of making representation against the order”.

Since Prof. Soz is not informed about the grounds of his detention, he has been deprived of his fundamental right of making effective representation guaranteed to the detenu under Article 22(5) of the Consitution, as also the statutory right under Section 13 of the Act, says the petition.

Further, the petitioner also claims that since Soz was kept under “illegal” detention for over 10 months, the respondents were guilty of violating his right to life and personal liberty under Article 21.

The petitioner also highlights that Soz ‘has no criminal antecedents and past’ and apart from illustrious career in politics he has also authored several books and plays on Kashmir as well as the concept of secularism.

Soz’s wife has prayed that her husband “be immediately released from the unlawful detention pending the disposal of the accompanying petition”.

India News

Delhi Palam fire leaves 6 dead, massive rescue operation underway

Six people died after a fire broke out in a residential building in Delhi’s Palam. Firefighters continue rescue efforts with 30 tenders at the spot.

Published

on

Delhi's palam

A tragic fire incident in southwest Delhi’s Palam area on Wednesday morning claimed the lives of six people, triggering a large-scale emergency response.

According to officials, the blaze erupted in a residential building, prompting immediate action from fire and police authorities. Around 30 fire tenders were rushed to the spot to control the flames and carry out rescue operations.

Authorities said they received a distress call at approximately 7 am reporting the fire at a house within the building. Firefighters were deployed swiftly amid concerns that several residents could be trapped inside the structure.

A fire services official stated that initial information suggested people might still be inside, leading to an intensive search and rescue effort. Emergency teams, including police personnel, reached the congested locality to assist in evacuation and crowd management.

The firefighting operation was still ongoing at the time of reporting. The exact cause of the fire has not yet been determined, and further details are awaited as authorities continue their investigation.

Continue Reading

India News

Centre mandates 60% free seat allocation on flights, caps selection fees

Airlines must now offer 60% seats without extra charges and ensure better seating arrangements for passengers under new government rules.

Published

on

In a significant move aimed at protecting air travellers, the Union Ministry of Civil Aviation has directed airlines to ensure that at least 60 per cent of seats on every flight are offered without any additional selection fee. The decision follows widespread complaints from passengers about hidden charges, particularly for seat selection.

The directive has been issued through the Directorate General of Civil Aviation, which has introduced a series of passenger-friendly norms to enhance transparency and improve the overall flying experience.

Under the new guidelines, airlines have also been instructed to seat passengers travelling on the same PNR together, preferably in adjacent seats. This is expected to address long-standing concerns among families and group travellers, who often face inconvenience due to scattered seating arrangements.

The regulator has further emphasised the need to safeguard passenger rights in situations such as flight delays, cancellations, and denied boarding. Airlines have been asked to prominently display these rights across their websites, mobile applications, booking platforms, and airport counters to ensure better awareness.

In addition, carriers must establish clear and transparent policies regarding the carriage of sports equipment, musical instruments, and pets. The move comes in response to frequent complaints over inconsistent rules and high charges. Airlines have been directed to align such policies with safety and operational standards while ensuring they are communicated in a simple and passenger-friendly manner.

To improve accessibility, the regulator has also asked airlines to share passenger rights information in regional languages.

Continue Reading

India News

Mamata Banerjee warns BJP, EC over Bengal polls, says they will be accountable

Mamata Banerjee holds BJP and Election Commission responsible for any incidents during Bengal polls, raising concerns over officer transfers.

Published

on

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has held the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Election Commission of India responsible for any untoward incidents in the state during the upcoming assembly elections, following the transfer of key officials.

Addressing concerns over administrative reshuffles, Banerjee said that changes involving senior bureaucrats, including the chief secretary and home secretary, could affect governance and law and order in the state during a crucial period.

The Trinamool Congress chief also announced candidates for 291 constituencies for the elections scheduled to be held in two phases on April 23 and 29.

Criticising the Election Commission, Banerjee alleged that the transfers were being carried out in a manner that benefits the BJP. She questioned the timing of the decisions and said such actions weaken the state administration at a sensitive time.

She further raised concerns about disaster management and essential services, stating that experienced officials familiar with the state’s situation have been replaced. According to her, this could impact administrative efficiency if any emergency arises before the new government is formed.

Protecting Bengal’s identity

Banerjee emphasised that the election is not merely about forming a government but about safeguarding Bengal’s identity and existence. She accused the BJP of misusing central agencies and attempting to influence the electoral process.

She urged that elections should be conducted peacefully, without external interference, and in line with democratic principles. The chief minister also expressed confidence that her party would return to power with a stronger mandate.

Appealing to voters, she called for support for the Trinamool Congress, asserting that the people of Bengal will ultimately decide the outcome and protect their democratic rights.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com