English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

No option left: Supreme Court issues extraordinary order in Bengal SIR case

The Supreme Court issued an extraordinary order in the Bengal SIR case, asking the Calcutta High Court to appoint judicial officers to resolve disputes between the state and the Election Commission.

Published

on

Supreme Court

In a significant intervention in the ongoing dispute over the special intensive revision (SIR) of voter rolls in West Bengal, the Supreme Court on Friday directed the Calcutta High Court to appoint judicial officers to assist in the process.

The top court said the move was necessary due to an “unfortunate scenario of allegations and counter allegations” between the West Bengal government and the Election Commission, which has led to a trust deficit between the two constitutional authorities.

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant observed that the process had stalled at the stage of examining claims and objections from individuals whose names were included in the discrepancy list. He noted that the court was compelled to pass an “extraordinary order” owing to “extraordinary circumstances”.

The judicial officers appointed by the high court will examine claims and objections related to the voter roll clean-up drive. The Supreme Court asked the Calcutta High Court to spare serving as well as former judicial officers in the rank of additional district judge or district judge to assist in each district.

Meeting of top officials ordered

To work out the operational details, the Supreme Court directed the State Election Commissioner, the chief secretary, the police chief and other senior officials to hold a meeting with the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court.

The court highlighted that the state is obligated to provide Group A officers to perform duties of Sub-Divisional Officers (SDOs) and Sub-Divisional Magistrates (SDMs). It pointed to a dispute over the rank and competence of officials deployed to function as Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) and Assistant Electoral Registration Officers (AEROs).

“It is nearly impossible for this court to determine the status and rank of officials now deployed by the ECI given by the state,” the bench observed.

Expressing dissatisfaction, the court said it was left with “hardly any other option” but to request the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court to deploy judicial officers to ensure fairness in adjudicating the genuineness of documents and decisions regarding inclusion or exclusion from the voter list.

Strong remarks from the bench

The Supreme Court made strong remarks over what it described as a lack of cooperation.

“A situation is being created where judicial officers have to intervene. We were expecting cooperation by the state. Is this the level of communication from the state?” Chief Justice Kant said, expressing disappointment over delayed responses to earlier orders.

Sharp exchanges were reported between senior lawyers representing the West Bengal government and the Election Commission. While the state argued that sufficient Group B officers had been provided, the Election Commission maintained that competent Group A officers capable of discharging quasi-judicial functions were not made available.

“You are not providing competent Group A officers. How can incompetent officials decide the fate of the people?” the court remarked, adding that there appeared to be hesitancy on both ends.

The bench stressed that cooperation from all stakeholders was essential and cautioned the state government to create an enabling environment for the judicial officers nominated by the high court.

“Please cooperate with the high court. Please create an environment for them to function. Imagine what will happen if the SIR process is not completed,” the court said.

Political backdrop

The SIR exercise has triggered a political row in West Bengal, with Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee accusing the Election Commission of targeting the state and misusing the voter roll revision to exclude genuine voters.

Earlier this month, she met top Election Commission officials in New Delhi and warned that she could mobilise large numbers of people to protest before the poll body.

Banerjee has also questioned why a similar SIR exercise was not conducted in BJP-ruled Assam and alleged that West Bengal and Kerala were being unfairly targeted.

With the Bengal assembly election approaching and major parties stepping up campaigning, the voter roll revision has become a central political flashpoint.

India News

Omar Abdullah criticises Martyrs’ Day restrictions, calls LG administration temporary guests

Omar Abdullah criticised the LG administration after being prevented from visiting Srinagar’s Martyrs’ Graveyard, alleging the 1931 martyrs’ sacrifices are being overlooked.

Published

on

Omar Abdullah

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah on Monday criticised the Lieutenant Governor (LG) administration after he was prevented from visiting the Martyrs’ Graveyard in Srinagar to pay tribute to those killed during the 1931 uprising.

The area surrounding the Martyrs’ Graveyard in downtown Srinagar was sealed by the authorities, with police declaring it a no-go zone and restricting entry to the site.

Omar Abdullah questions restrictions

Unable to visit the graveyard, Abdullah, along with his ministers, MLAs and National Conference leaders, held a tribute meeting at the party headquarters in Srinagar.

Addressing party workers after the meeting, the Chief Minister said the administration’s decision to block access would not erase the memory of the 1931 martyrs.

Calling the LG administration “temporary guests”, Abdullah said those responsible for preventing political leaders from paying homage would not remain in office forever, while the martyrs’ cemetery would continue to stand. He added that he and his party would visit the site in the future to offer floral tributes and prayers.

Alleges selective treatment of history

Abdullah alleged that the sacrifices of those who fought against British-era rule in Jammu and Kashmir were being ignored because they were Muslims and had opposed the Dogra Maharaja, who ruled under British paramountcy.

He argued that the 1931 movement was not based on religion but represented a struggle for democratic rights, principles and freedom during the British period.

The Chief Minister also said attempts were being made to portray participation in the freedom movement against British rule in a negative light.

Background of the annual observance

July 13 was earlier observed as a public holiday in the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir. Every year, officials, political leaders and members of the public would gather at the Martyrs’ Graveyard to pay homage to those killed during the 1931 incident, with police also offering a ceremonial gun salute.

Following the abrogation of Article 370 and the reorganisation of Jammu and Kashmir into a Union Territory in 2019, July 13 was removed from the list of official public holidays. Since then, authorities have not permitted official or public commemorative events at the graveyard.

The Lieutenant Governor continues to exercise authority over key subjects in the Union Territory, including law and order and policing.

Why July 13 is significant

July 13 commemorates the deaths of 22 civilians who were killed in police firing outside Srinagar Central Jail in 1931 while protesting against the rule of Dogra Maharaja Hari Singh during the British era.

The protesters had gathered in support of Abdul Qadeer, who had urged Kashmiris to oppose the Maharaja’s administration.

The incident led to widespread protests and prompted the Maharaja and the British administration to appoint commissions to examine the grievances of the Valley’s Muslim population. It also contributed to political reforms, with Jammu and Kashmir holding its first Assembly elections in 1934, marking the beginning of an electoral process in the region.

Changes after 2019

Since 2020, both July 13 and December 5—the birth anniversary of former Jammu and Kashmir Prime Minister and Chief Minister Sheikh Abdullah—have ceased to be official holidays in the Union Territory.

Instead, the birth anniversary of Dogra ruler Maharaja Hari Singh is now observed as a public holiday in Jammu and Kashmir.

Continue Reading

India News

Centre urged to introduce India’s first LPG efficiency policy amid global energy uncertainty

Pune Gas has proposed India’s first LPG Efficiency Policy Framework, urging the Centre to improve fuel utilisation, reduce wastage and strengthen energy security as commercial LPG prices rise amid global market uncertainty.

Published

on

LPG cylinder

As geopolitical tensions in the Middle East continue to affect global energy markets, an Indian energy company has urged the Centre to introduce a national policy focused on improving the efficient use of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG).

Pune Gas has submitted a proposal to the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas seeking what it describes as India’s first LPG Efficiency Policy Framework. The recommendation comes as uncertainty in global LPG markets has increased following the ongoing conflict involving Iran, contributing to higher commercial LPG prices and increasing costs for businesses that depend on the fuel.

According to the company, commercial LPG cylinder prices have risen to around Rs 3,100 from nearly Rs 1,884 earlier this year due to supply constraints. The increase has affected sectors such as restaurants, hotels, hospitals, food processing units, laundries, MSMEs and manufacturing industries that rely heavily on LPG.

While India has largely maintained uninterrupted LPG supplies through government measures, Pune Gas said improving the efficiency of LPG consumption should become the next step towards strengthening the country’s energy security.

Company proposes national LPG efficiency framework

In its representation to Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Hardeep Singh Puri, Pune Gas has recommended a comprehensive policy framework aimed at reducing LPG wastage, promoting standardisation and encouraging the adoption of efficient LPG infrastructure across commercial and industrial establishments.

Among its key recommendations, the company has urged the government to improve LPG utilisation efficiency across industries and encourage Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) to promote 47.5-kg LOT cylinders wherever operationally suitable.

According to Pune Gas, the larger cylinders can help reduce fuel wastage, improve safety standards, minimise pilferage and optimise available LPG supplies.

The proposal also recommends nationwide awareness campaigns on efficient LPG usage, greater collaboration between the government, OMCs and industry stakeholders to standardise practices, and policy incentives to encourage the adoption of efficient LPG systems.

CEO says efficiency should become national priority

Explaining the proposal, Jesal Sampat, Executive Director and CEO of Pune Gas, said India has traditionally focused on increasing LPG procurement and supply, but should now also emphasise efficient utilisation.

He said the country’s next step in strengthening energy security would come not only from increasing fuel availability but also by reducing avoidable wastage, adding that efficient LPG use can lower operating costs, reduce pressure on national demand and improve the resilience of India’s energy ecosystem.

Sampat also urged the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas to recognise LPG efficiency as a national priority by introducing a dedicated policy framework focused on efficiency and standardisation, stating that such measures would strengthen India’s energy resilience while supporting industries dependent on LPG.

Pune Gas offers technology and implementation support

As part of its proposal, Pune Gas highlighted LPGenius, an indigenous LPG management system developed by the company under the Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative. According to the company, the system is designed to improve LPG efficiency, operational safety and cost optimisation for commercial and industrial users.

The company has also offered to support the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas and Oil Marketing Companies by sharing field data, implementation insights and case studies, besides assisting with pilot projects aimed at developing a more efficient and sustainable LPG ecosystem in India.

Continue Reading

India News

Omar Abdullah hits back at BJP over Rs 100 crore legal notice, says party is hiding behind court

Omar Abdullah has responded to the BJP’s Rs 100 crore legal notice, accusing the party of avoiding political debate and announcing legal action against BJP leaders.

Published

on

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah on Monday responded sharply after receiving a Rs 100 crore legal notice from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), accusing the party of avoiding a political confrontation by taking the matter to court.

The BJP’s notice demands that Abdullah either apologise or provide evidence to support his allegation that BJP leaders had offered between Rs 20 crore and Rs 30 crore to National Conference (NC) legislators to persuade them to switch sides.

Omar Abdullah calls legal notice a ‘love letter’

Speaking to reporters in Srinagar, Abdullah said he had received an electronic copy of the legal notice and described it as a “love letter” from the BJP.

He said he viewed the notice as a sign that the BJP considered him a significant political opponent.

“I am perhaps the only politician who has been bestowed with a ‘love letter’ like this by the BJP. I consider this a mark of respect that I am obviously a political force they cannot ignore,” Abdullah said.

Says BJP chose court over political response

Abdullah criticised the BJP for pursuing legal action instead of responding politically to his allegations.

He said he deliberately made the remarks at a political event rather than in the Assembly, where statements are protected from legal challenge, because he expected a political rebuttal.

According to Abdullah, the BJP’s decision to approach the court reflected its style of handling political disputes.

National Conference to initiate legal action

The Chief Minister also announced that the National Conference would begin issuing legal notices to BJP leaders in Jammu and Kashmir over what he described as unfounded and defamatory allegations against his party.

He said senior BJP leaders had been making slanderous remarks against the National Conference over the past few months and that the party would now respond through legal channels.

Abdullah added that the National Conference would serve legal notices to those leaders and see how the legal process unfolds.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com