English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Impeachment hearing: Trump’s serious misdemeanors baffle judicial committee

The political rhetoric coming from America for the next three weeks—some would call it asymmetrical verbal warfare—will most certainly lead to Articles of Impeachment for President Donald Trump.

Published

on

Former US President Donald Trump's Florida home raided by FBI, Republican leader calls it prosecutorial misconduct

By Kenneth Tiven

The political rhetoric coming from America for the next three weeks—some would call it asymmetrical verbal warfare—will most certainly lead to Articles of Impeachment for President Donald Trump.

This is unlikely to dislodge him from office. Impeachment is a two-step affair. The Republican controlled 50-person Senate, which sits as a real court for impeachment articles voted by the lower House of Representatives, will resist convicting him. Because impeachment is an optional Constitutional requirement it is a political process. Today it is also an on-going media even nationally elected Republicans believe winning reelection is determined by the intensity of the Trump voters for whom facts and reality are non-existent factors.  The backlash from impeachment, whatever its outcome, will be clear in the November 2020, presidential election: Will America remain a   free world leader or become a Banana Republic.

Releasing a scathing 300-page report the Democratic-led House Intelligence Committee concluded that Trump had “compromised national security to advance his personal political interests” and then engaged in an “unprecedented campaign” to prevent Congress from uncovering the truth.

In releasing it the chairpersons of the three committees involved said, “The President’s actions have damaged our national security, undermined the integrity of the next election, and violated his oath of office.” The Judiciary Committee not decides on Articles of Impeachment focused on obstruction of justice (cover-up of what happened) and abuse of power. Witness intimidation tactics figure in both charges.

House Republicans — as the minority political party— drafted a 123-page report that asserts that Democrats have failed in committee hearings to unearth evidence that Trump committed an impeachable offense in the Ukraine, where he and his lawyer sought negative information about Joe Biden.

Evidence cited in the GOP report strives to exonerate President Donald Trump and his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani. However, the evidence clearly incriminates both men. It shows that Giuliani, operating under Trump’s authority, pressed Ukraine to serve Trump’s personal interests rather than the interests of the United States. The technical distinctions the GOP uses in its report are transparent.

The House Judiciary Committee drafts impeachment articles based on what the Intelligence Committee has sent them. Constitutional experts will testify about history, precedent and language. These hearings will be a noisy and rude battle of fact and fiction demonstrating America, like other great democracies, has collected an assortment of colorblind politicians. Consider, says the GOP, “The Democrats’ impeachment inquiry is not the organic outgrowth of serious misconduct; it is an orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”

Democrats point out the impeachment inquiry is an organic outgrowth of serious misconduct by Trump and his administration, not only in Ukraine, but also in dealings with Russia, Turkey and elsewhere.

The fight moves soon to the Senate, where the White House and its allies believe that the president will be acquitted by the Republican-controlled chamber.

A quick timeline suggests a formal impeachment will be in Trump’s Christmas stocking with the Senate taking it up in after New Year’s.

The writer has worked in senior positions at The Washington Post, NBC, ABC and CNN and also consults for several Indian channels.

India News

MEA responds after ITBP chief flags ongoing face-offs with China in Arunachal

India said deviations by Chinese forces from established patrolling patterns periodically disturb the situation along the Line of Actual Control, as the government addressed remarks by the ITBP chief about ongoing face-offs in Arunachal Pradesh.

Published

on

MEA

India on Friday said that deviations by Chinese forces from established patrolling patterns periodically disturb the situation along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) made the remarks amid reports of continuing face-offs between Indian and Chinese forces at multiple locations in Arunachal Pradesh.

MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal addressed the issue during a regular media briefing on October 23, following remarks by Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) Director General Shatrujeet Kapur about the ongoing confrontations along the border.

“As we have noted in the past, the situation in the India-China border areas gets disturbed from time to time when Chinese forces diverge from established patrolling patterns,” Jaiswal said.

He also reiterated that maintaining peace and tranquillity in the border areas was essential for the overall development of bilateral relations between India and China.

MEA stresses diplomatic and military engagement

Jaiswal said India and China continued to use existing diplomatic and military mechanisms to resolve outstanding issues and prevent misunderstandings and miscalculations along the LAC.

He added that both countries had agreed to discuss ways to improve their understanding of the LAC in appropriate areas to strengthen border management.

The spokesperson did not elaborate on the specific confrontations mentioned by the ITBP chief, with further questions on the details referred to the Ministry of Defence, according to reporting on the briefing.

ITBP chief confirms ongoing face-offs in Arunachal Pradesh

A day before the MEA briefing, Kapur said face-offs between Indian and Chinese forces had occurred at several locations in Arunachal Pradesh in recent days and that the situation was continuing.

Speaking to ITBP personnel at a base in Alwar, Rajasthan, on Thursday, Kapur also discussed the force’s efforts to strengthen its operational capabilities along the border.

He said the ITBP had mobilised its newly raised Shaurya commando unit during the ongoing face-offs. He also highlighted the creation of drone platoons for border units and the development of a new training course to prepare personnel for battles similar to the 2020 Galwan Valley clash.

The remarks came as the ITBP continued its modernisation efforts, including a greater focus on specialised training and emerging warfare technologies.

Border management remains central to India-China ties

The latest statements underline the importance India places on maintaining peace along the disputed boundary while addressing unresolved issues through diplomatic and military channels.

India and China have continued engagements aimed at managing tensions along the LAC. However, reported confrontations at multiple locations in Arunachal Pradesh have brought the border situation back into focus.

The MEA reiterated that peace and tranquillity along the border remained essential for the broader development of bilateral relations, while emphasising continued engagement to improve border management.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi High Court rejects Neha Bora’s plea against peace bond notice

The Delhi High Court has rejected AISA president Neha Bora’s petition challenging a police notice requiring her to execute a peace bond following her participation in recent protests in the national capital.

Published

on

The Delhi High Court has rejected a petition filed by All India Students’ Association (AISA) president Neha Bora challenging a police notice that required her to execute a peace bond before a special executive magistrate.

Justice Subramonium Prasad pronounced the order on Friday, October 23, after reserving the verdict following arguments from both sides a day earlier.

The notice, issued by the Special Executive Magistrate in New Delhi district on October 17, directed Bora to appear before the magistrate and execute a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety to maintain peace.

The proceedings stemmed from her participation in protests in the national capital, including a gathering at Mandi House on October 16, amid demonstrations over alleged electoral fraud.

Why Neha Bora challenged the notice

Bora approached the High Court seeking to challenge the notice, arguing that it was ambiguous and factually incorrect. Her petition also alleged that the proceedings infringed her fundamental rights under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution.

She contended that the notice did not provide sufficient material to establish a likelihood of a breach of peace. It also failed to specify the period, occasion or event in connection with which the authorities apprehended such a breach, according to her petition.

Bora’s counsel further argued that she had organised a separate gathering at Mandi House and was not involved in the Cockroach Janta Party’s protest call at Central Park in Connaught Place on October 16.

The petition sought relief against the notice and the proceedings arising from it.

What the police told the court

During the hearing, Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, appearing for the Delhi Police, referred to 12 instances of alleged violations involving Bora and argued that the proceedings were preventive in nature.

The police also referred to a gathering at which activist Prashant Bhushan and Cockroach Janta Party leaders allegedly called for a change of regime.

Bora’s counsel countered that she had attended a separate protest at Mandi House and that statements made at a gathering could not automatically be attributed to her.

The arguments centred on the basis for initiating preventive proceedings and the allegations cited in the notice.

Neha Bora was detained during a protest on October 16

Bora was detained on October 16 while taking part in a flag march with AISA activists demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. She was released at around 6 am on October 17.

The peace bond notice was issued on October 17, the day she was released from detention. It directed her to appear before the special executive magistrate and explain why she should not be required to furnish the bond.

The notice referred to allegations including raising slogans during the Mandi House protest, participating in repeated protest-related activities around Jantar Mantar despite prohibitory orders, and encouraging people to join an unauthorised demonstration at Central Park in Connaught Place.

Bora disputed aspects of the allegations in her court petition, including the claim that she had instigated people to participate in the Central Park demonstration.

What happens after the court’s decision

With the High Court rejecting Bora’s petition, she has not obtained the relief she sought against the police notice. The notice requiring her to execute the peace bond remains in effect, according to reports on the court’s decision.

The dismissal concerns her challenge to the notice. The allegations cited in the preventive proceedings should not, by themselves, be treated as findings that she committed an offence.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi to inaugurate Rs 169-crore RBI data centre in Odisha on October 25

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is scheduled to visit Odisha on October 25 to inaugurate the Reserve Bank of India’s Rs. 169-crore data centre in Jatni, near Bhubaneswar.

Published

on

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is scheduled to visit Odisha on October 25 to inaugurate the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) Rs. 169-crore data centre at Info Valley-II in Jatni, on the outskirts of Bhubaneswar.

According to the tentative itinerary shared by the Odisha Chief Secretary’s office, the Prime Minister is expected to arrive at Biju Patnaik International Airport in Bhubaneswar at around 4:30 pm aboard a special Indian Air Force aircraft. He will then travel by helicopter to the Khurda helipad before proceeding by road to the RBI facility for the inauguration.

The Prime Minister is likely to spend around an hour at the facility before returning to Bhubaneswar and departing from the state at approximately 6:30 pm.

RBI data centre to strengthen financial infrastructure

Spread across 18.55 acres, the new data centre is designed to strengthen the RBI’s data management, disaster recovery, cybersecurity and business continuity capabilities.

The facility will support critical central banking functions, including currency management, payment and settlement systems, and regulatory operations. It is also expected to serve as a backup to the RBI’s existing data centre in Navi Mumbai.

The new facility will be the RBI’s second data centre of this kind, following its existing centre in Navi Mumbai.

Why the data centre is located in Jatni

The site at Info Valley-II was selected for its geographical stability. According to an official, its location away from seismically active zones and high-risk international border areas is intended to reduce exposure to natural disasters and geopolitical vulnerabilities.

The project is intended to help maintain the continuity of essential RBI operations while strengthening the security and resilience of India’s financial infrastructure.

The foundation stone for the facility was laid by then RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das on March 22, 2023.

PM Modi’s ninth Odisha visit since 2024

The October 25 programme is expected to be Prime Minister Modi’s ninth visit to Odisha since the BJP government was formed in the state in 2024, according to Odisha BJP vice-president Jatin Mohanty.

Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi and Chief Secretary Anu Garg have reviewed preparations for the Prime Minister’s scheduled visit.

The inauguration is part of efforts to strengthen Odisha’s digital infrastructure. The project is also expected to support the state’s ambitions in technology and electronics manufacturing, as stated by the BJP leader.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com