English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Indu Malhotra to take oath; Nothing wrong in govt rejecting collegium recommendation: CJI

Published

on

Indu Malhotra to take oath; Nothing wrong in govt rejecting collegium recommendation: CJI

As the government sent back to the Supreme Court collegium the name of KM Joseph for reconsideration while clearing the name of senior advocate Indu Malhotra for appointment as Supreme Court Judge, Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra on Thursday, April 26, said there was nothing wrong in Union law ministry move.

The Union Law Ministry had cleared the name of senior advocate Indu Malhotra, while sending back the name of Uttarakhand Chief Justice K M Joseph.

CJI Dipak Misra said that it was not wrong for the Union law ministry to send back for reconsideration one name among the two sent to it by the Collegium. “If the centre has segregated the recommendation and sent one of the names for reconsideration then they are within their rights,” he said, according to media reports.

He also clarified that the swearing-in ceremony of Indu Malhotra will be held as scheduled on Friday since the warrant had already been sent to President Ram Nath Kovind for his signature and he had signed it. It cannot be recalled.

The Chief Justice, who leads the collegium, also rejected a petition by over 100 lawyers that Indu Malhotra’s appointment be on hold until both judges were appointed together without segregation. Former Solicitor General Indira Jaising had urged him to put off Indu Malhotra’s oath, saying “independence of the judiciary must be saved at all cost”. She had requested a quick listing of the petition tomorrow (on Friday) which the CJI refused.

The other name,  of Justice KM Joseph was sent back by the ministry with a long letter asking why Justice Joseph was selected when he was only 42 on the list and as per seniority of all chief justices he is only 12th.

The CJI said: “Sometimes 30 names are recommended for the High Courts and while 22 are made judges, 8 names are sent back to the Collegium. It cannot be that 30 of the 30 names have been approved or disapproved.”

The ministry’s letter to the CJI regarding the rejection of the name of Justice Joseph said:

“With regard to the recommendation relating to Shri Justice K M Joseph, the proposal has been examined and the following observations are made:

a) In the All India High Court Judges’ Seniority List Shri Justice K M Joseph is placed at serial No. 42. There are presently 11 chief justices of various high courts who are senior to him in All India High Court Judges’ Seniority List.

b) The high courts, namely Calcutta, Chattisgarh, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand and some smaller high courts namely Sikkim, Manipur, Meghalaya are not represented in the Supreme Court at present.

c) Shri Justice K M Joseph’s parent high court is the Kerala High Court. If he is to be appointed as judge of the Supreme Court, the Kerala High Court – a comparatively small high court – would have two judges from the same parent high court in the Supreme Court.

d) It may also be relevant to mention here that there is no representation of Scheduled caste/ Scheduled tribe Communities in the Supreme Court since long.

India News

Mamata Banerjee warns BJP, EC over Bengal polls, says they will be accountable

Mamata Banerjee holds BJP and Election Commission responsible for any incidents during Bengal polls, raising concerns over officer transfers.

Published

on

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has held the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Election Commission of India responsible for any untoward incidents in the state during the upcoming assembly elections, following the transfer of key officials.

Addressing concerns over administrative reshuffles, Banerjee said that changes involving senior bureaucrats, including the chief secretary and home secretary, could affect governance and law and order in the state during a crucial period.

The Trinamool Congress chief also announced candidates for 291 constituencies for the elections scheduled to be held in two phases on April 23 and 29.

Criticising the Election Commission, Banerjee alleged that the transfers were being carried out in a manner that benefits the BJP. She questioned the timing of the decisions and said such actions weaken the state administration at a sensitive time.

She further raised concerns about disaster management and essential services, stating that experienced officials familiar with the state’s situation have been replaced. According to her, this could impact administrative efficiency if any emergency arises before the new government is formed.

Protecting Bengal’s identity

Banerjee emphasised that the election is not merely about forming a government but about safeguarding Bengal’s identity and existence. She accused the BJP of misusing central agencies and attempting to influence the electoral process.

She urged that elections should be conducted peacefully, without external interference, and in line with democratic principles. The chief minister also expressed confidence that her party would return to power with a stronger mandate.

Appealing to voters, she called for support for the Trinamool Congress, asserting that the people of Bengal will ultimately decide the outcome and protect their democratic rights.

Continue Reading

India News

Centre assures action on LPG supply disruption, court closes distributors’ plea

The Bombay High Court closed a plea by LPG distributors after the Centre assured diplomatic efforts to stabilise supply amid global disruptions.

Published

on

LPG cylinder

The Union government on Tuesday informed the Bombay High Court that it is taking diplomatic steps to address disruptions in Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) supply linked to the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict, following which the court disposed of a petition filed by LPG distributors.

Appearing before the Nagpur bench, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the Centre was actively engaged in international-level negotiations to stabilise LPG supply. However, he noted that specific measures could not be disclosed due to their sensitive nature.

The matter was heard by a division bench comprising Justices Anil S Kilor and Raj D Wakode. The bench accepted the government’s assurances and closed the plea.

Distributors flagged supply disruption in Vidarbha

The petition was filed by six LPG distributors, including Omkar Sales, who raised concerns over disruptions in supply chains across Maharashtra’s Vidarbha region. They claimed the situation had led to a significant shortage of LPG for domestic consumers.

The distributors, dependent on Confidence Petroleum India Ltd (CPIL), alleged that despite directives prioritising domestic consumption, LPG was being diverted for export to capitalise on high international prices.

Government cites policy compliance, CPIL denies diversion

The petitioners referred to recent orders issued under the Essential Commodities Act and the Natural Gas (Supply Regulation) Order, 2026, which mandate prioritising household LPG supply during crises.

However, CPIL rejected the allegations, stating it was fulfilling pre-existing export commitments and had not violated any policy norms.

Court had earlier termed issue ‘serious’

During earlier hearings, the court had described the matter as “serious” and of “grave importance”, issuing notices to the Centre and the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas.

On Tuesday, the Centre reiterated that macro-level supply challenges arising from global geopolitical tensions were being handled through diplomatic channels. It also said that any localised supply issues could be resolved by state authorities.

Taking note of these submissions, the bench disposed of the petition.

Continue Reading

India News

Om Birla likely to move motion to revoke suspension of 8 opposition MPs today

The Lok Sabha is likely to revoke the suspension of eight opposition MPs today, with a motion expected to be moved by the government following consensus on maintaining discipline.

Published

on

Om Birla

The suspension of eight opposition Members of Parliament in the Lok Sabha is expected to be revoked on Tuesday, with Speaker Om Birla likely to initiate the process, according to sources.

The MPs, including seven from the Congress and one from the CPI(M), were suspended on February 3 for unruly conduct during the first phase of the Budget session after a resolution was adopted by the House.

Motion to be moved in Lok Sabha

Congress leader K Suresh said that Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju is expected to move a motion around noon seeking revocation of the suspensions.

Although the suspension was initially imposed for the entire session, scheduled to conclude on April 2, opposition parties have consistently demanded reconsideration since the second phase of the session began on March 9.

Agreement on maintaining decorum

At a recent meeting convened by the Speaker, both ruling and opposition sides reportedly agreed on maintaining discipline in the House.

Key understandings include:

  • No member will enter the well of the House to protest
  • Papers will not be torn or thrown toward the Chair
  • MPs will not climb onto officials’ tables

The Lok Sabha Secretariat has also reminded members to keep areas within the Parliament premises obstruction-free to ensure smooth movement.

Speaker raises concern over conduct

Earlier, Om Birla had expressed concern over the use of banners, placards, and inappropriate language by some MPs. In a letter to party leaders, he stressed the need to uphold the dignity and traditions of parliamentary democracy.

He had also indicated that actions like suspension are taken in cases of serious misconduct, such as climbing onto tables during proceedings.

Suspended MPs

The suspended MPs include Gurjeet Singh Aujla, Hibi Eden, C Kiran Kumar Reddy, Amarinder Singh Raja Warring, Manickam Tagore, Prashant Padole, Dean Kuriakose (Congress), and S Venkatesan (CPI-M).

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com