English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Jaitley sat with Mallya for 15-20 minutes, check CCTV, says Congress after FM denied a meeting

Published

on

Jaitley sat with Mallya for 15-20 minutes, check CCTV, says Congress after FM denied a meeting

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]In an outright rejection of Finance Minister Arun Jaitley’s assertion of having met the fugitive millionaire Vijay Mallya, the Congress on Thursday, September 13, said the two had a meeting and discussion in Parliament just two days before the latter’s flight to UK and challenged the government to check the CCTV footage to check the truth.

The allegation, levelled by Congress leader PL Punia, was taken up by Congress president Rahul Gandhi. Speaking to journalists, Rahul, flanked by Punia, said, “Arun Jaitley is lying, Congress leader PL Puniya witnessed his meeting with Vijay Mallya,”

A day earlier, the FM had rubbished Vijay Mallya’s claim that he had met him before leaving for London in 2016.

“It was a 15-20 minute, sit-down meeting…The finance minister has to explain to the country why he has colluded with the criminal and why was he having a meeting with a criminal, what was discussed?” Rahul Gandhi said.

PL Puniya said he had seen Mallya and finance minister Jaitley speak in the Central Hall of parliament in March 2016, days before the liquor baron left India and flew to the UK amid attempts to recover over Rs. 9,000 crore in unpaid loans from him.

“I was in the central hall of Parliament House. I saw Jaitley and Mallya standing and talking in the corner. After 5-7 minutes, they sat on the bench and started talking. Mallya had come for the first time just to meet Jaitley,”Puniya said. “It is my challenge. You can look at CCTV footage and see if I am wrong. If I am wrong, I will resign,” he declared.

“After that on March 3 – heleft for London on March 2 – myreaction was: he met Jaitley two days ago,” said Punia.

Mallya, 62, flamboyant liquor baron and former parliamentarian, is being investigated for fraud and money-laundering. In the UK for the past two years, he has been fighting India’s attempts to bring him back to face trial.

Asked whether he was tipped off about the investigations, Mallya told reporters yesterday outside a UK court hearing a case on his extradition to India: “I left because I had a scheduled meeting in Geneva. I met the finance minister before I left, repeated my offer to settle with the banks. That is the truth.”

Mallya said he had also told the minister that he was leaving for London.

Arun Jaitley, who was the finance minister in 2016 when Mallya left India, emphatically denied his claims. “Since 2014, I have never given him any appointment to meet me and the question of his having met me does not arise,” he wrote on Facebook.

“He misused that privilege (of being an MP) on one occasion while I was walking out of the House to go to my room. He paced up to catch up with me and while walking uttered a sentence that ‘I am making an offer of settlement’ …Having been fully briefed about his earlier ‘bluff offers’, without allowing him to proceed with the conversation, I curtly told him ‘there was no point talking to me and he must make offers to his bankers’,” Jaitley said.

Speaking to news agency ANI, Jaitley said: “I have never given him an appointment. Never at my office, never at my residence. Nor have I ever offered to meet him. I do remember on one occasion he misused his privileges as member of Rajya Sabha and while I was walking out of Rajya Sabha to my room, he paced up towards me in Parliament building and suggested that he was going to make some offer of settlement. I did not even bother to get any detail from him. I curtly told him he must go and make it to the bankers because I was fully aware that he had been bluffing on several occasions in the past and he had no intention of paying back the banker’s money.”

“Besides this one-sentence exchange where he literally barged on to me while I was walking and tried to make some offer or suggestion which I refused to entertain, there is no question of my having met him, spoken to him… I even did not receive any paper from him at that time. And therefore, to convey an impression that he met me with an offer of settlement and if this is what he is referring to then this is not correct and he must come out with the complete facts,” Jaitley said.

Accusing Jaitley of colluding with fugitive business tycoon Vijay Mallya, Rahul Gandhi said, “He (Jaitley) had not informed ED, CBI. What does it mean? He has to explain why when a criminal has told him he is running away to London, he has done nothing.”

“The finance minister talks to an absconder. He tells the minister I am going to London and the finance minister didn’t even tell the CBI or police. Why not,” Rahul Gandhi said.

He also referred to questions swirling around the dilution of a lookout notice against Mallya by the CBI. “Who changed the notice on Mallya’s arrest? If Jaitley has done it himself, then he should confess. It’s an open and shut case.”

Demanding that Jaitley resign, Gandhi said: “Finance Minister is responsible to take action against economic offenders. Finance minister himself is meeting them. Finance minister has admitted that Mallya told him he is going to London. Yet the Finance Minister took no action. Did not inform CBI, ED or other arms of the govt. Why? What was the deal? There is a notice to restrain Mr Mallya. That notice is changed from a restrain notice to an inform notice. Who did it? There are only two people – Prime Minister and Finance Minister,” he alleged.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1536840837985{border-top-width: 10px !important;border-right-width: 10px !important;border-bottom-width: 10px !important;border-left-width: 10px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-right: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;padding-left: 10px !important;background-color: #b5b5b5 !important;border-radius: 10px !important;}”]Not just the Congress and other Opposition parties, BJP’s Subramanian Swamy also unleashed an attack on the finance minister.

Swamy retweeted his own old tweet from 12 June 2018:

He went on tweet on Wednesday:

He further added:

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]On Wednesday, Rahul Gandhi had demanded an immediate investigation into the “extremely serious” allegations and Jaitley’s resignation.

“Given Vijay Mallya’s extremely serious allegations in London today, the PM should immediately order an independent probe into the matter. Arun Jaitley should step down as Finance Minister while this probe is underway,” Gandhi tweeted.

Party spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi said that for the past 18 months, the Congress had been asserting that not only Mallya, but Mehul Choksi and so many others had been allowed to leave the country with impunity. And despite the hullabaloo to bring them back, the Narendra Modi government had failed to do so.

Congress media in-charge RandeepSurjewala in a tweet said that Mallya’s “consultation meetings” with the “Fiscal Management Blog Minister” makes it clear that the BJP is running “tour travels and immigration” for “loot scoot and settle abroad” brigade.

The Congress, which has since March 2016 consistently held that Mallya met the finance minister a day before he fled the country, said on Wednesday that the government’s complicity in facilitating the escape had now been established.

Within minutes of the revelation by Mallya, Congress communications chief RandeepSurjewala: “Vijay Mallya met Arun Jaitley, sought his permission and ran away with India’s money. Chowkidar nahin, bhagidarhai (Not a custodian, a partner).”

Rahul had first aimed the “chowkidar nahin, bhagidarhai” barb at Modi in Parliament, bringing up his promise to voters in 2014 that he would guard over India’s wealth and alleging that he had turned a partner in corruption instead.

On Tuesday, the Congress released the Modi government’s reply in Parliament that said the Prime Minister’s Office was aware of complaints against Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi in 2016, long before the uncle and nephew fled the country.

The Congress has been alleging a Mallya-Jaitley meeting since March 2016, the month the liquor baron escaped.

On March 14, 2016, Surjewala had told a news conference that Mallya had met Jaitley before he fled. Surjewala had said: “Mallya was present in Parliament on March 1, 2016, where he reportedly met finance minister Jaitley and had a conversation with him. We all know what happened then, while CBI, banks, SFIOs, SEBI, IT, Service Tax, etc were looking for him, yet he left on March 2.”

Surjewala had further said: “People now understand the reason for converting a CBI look-out notice of detention to information only.”

Several Congress spokespersons repeated the charge over the last two years.

CPI(M) general secretary Sitaram Yechury said Mallya’s revelation puts the Modi government in the dock. This only reconfirms how the government enabled big defaulters to loot public money and scoot.

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal too questioned that the Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his ministers need to explain their meetings with the economic fugitives. “PM Modi meets Nirav Modi before he flees the country. Finance Minister Vijay Mallya before he flees India. What transpired in these meetings? People want to know,” he said.

Not only Finance Minister, the entire BJP must come clean on its relations with Vijay Mallya, BJP rebel Yashwant Sinha said. Mallya was elected to Rajya Sabha with support of BJP.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Nana Patole’s feet-washing video sparks BJP attack, Congress leader responds

A Guru Purnima video showing Congress leader Nana Patole’s feet being washed has sparked a political controversy in Maharashtra, drawing criticism from the BJP and a strong response from Patole.

Published

on

A video showing senior Congress leader Nana Patole’s feet being washed during a Guru Purnima event has triggered a political controversy in Maharashtra, with the BJP criticising the ritual and the Congress leader defending it as a family tradition.

The viral clip shows Mr Patole seated on a sofa while two men wash his feet, shower flowers on him and place fruits near his feet as part of the ceremony. The incident quickly drew attention on social media and prompted sharp reactions from political leaders.

BJP calls it ‘Congress culture’

Reacting to the video, Maharashtra minister and BJP leader Chandrashekhar Bawankule said the incident reflected the “culture of Congress leaders”.

He said such acts only invite criticism and negative publicity, adding that Congress leaders should learn from similar controversies instead of repeating them.

Nana Patole defends Guru Purnima ritual

Responding to the criticism, Mr Patole rejected the allegations and said he neither instructed nor compelled anyone to perform the ritual.

According to the Congress leader, the ceremony took place on Guru Purnima when two younger members of his family voluntarily chose to honour him as their Guru.

He said they insisted on performing the ritual as a mark of respect.

Congress leader hits back at BJP

Mr Patole also countered the BJP’s criticism, saying the party had no authority to lecture others on culture and traditions.

In an apparent reference to the alleged Ram temple donation theft case, he remarked that those who “loot donation funds” should not advise others on cultural values.

The exchange has added to the political sparring between the BJP and the Congress in Maharashtra, with the viral video continuing to generate debate on social media.

Continue Reading

India News

Bypoll results today: First electoral test after student protests begins in BJP-ruled states

Vote counting is underway in three BJP-ruled states, with the bypoll results expected to indicate voter sentiment after nationwide protests over alleged examination paper leaks.

Published

on

Bypolls

Counting is underway in Bankipur, Datia and Manjalpur, with the bypolls being closely watched as the first electoral contest following nationwide student protests over alleged paper leaks.

The counting of votes is underway for Assembly by-elections in three BJP-ruled states—Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat—in what is being seen as the first electoral test since nationwide student protests over alleged examination paper leaks.

The bypolls were held on Thursday in Bihar’s Bankipur, Madhya Pradesh’s Datia and Gujarat’s Manjalpur Assembly constituencies. Political observers are watching the outcome closely as the results are expected to offer an indication of voter sentiment, particularly among young voters who participated in or were influenced by the protests.

Bankipur contest draws attention amid BJP candidate change

The Bankipur Assembly seat in Bihar has traditionally been considered a BJP stronghold, with the party retaining the constituency in every election so far. The bypoll was necessitated after former MLA and BJP leader Nitin Nabin was elected to the Rajya Sabha.

The contest attracted attention after the BJP’s original nominee, Abhishek Kumar Sinha, withdrew from the race a day after filing his nomination, citing family reasons. The party later fielded its youth wing leader, Neeraj Kumar Sinha.

The opposition seized on the development, claiming the BJP was concerned about retaining the seat. Rashtriya Janata Dal leader Tejashwi Yadav expressed confidence that his party’s candidate, Rekha Gupta, had secured support across different communities and could deliver an unexpected result.

The election also marked the anticipated electoral entry of political strategist-turned-politician Prashant Kishor, adding further interest to the contest.

Datia sees straight BJP-Congress fight

In Madhya Pradesh, the Datia Assembly seat fell vacant after Congress MLA Rajendra Bharti was disqualified on April 2 under provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The BJP has fielded first-time Assembly candidate Ashutosh Tiwari against Congress nominee Kunwar Ghanshyam Singh.

Datia has long been associated with former state Home Minister Narottam Mishra, who represented the constituency for three consecutive terms between 2008 and 2018 before losing the 2023 Assembly election. The selection of a new BJP candidate reportedly led to protests by some of Mishra’s supporters.

Congress candidate Kunwar Ghanshyam Singh, a two-time former MLA and member of the erstwhile royal family, is banking on his previous electoral victories, personal connect with voters and dissatisfaction among sections of BJP workers.

Manjalpur bypoll follows veteran BJP MLA’s death

In Gujarat, voting took place in the Manjalpur Assembly constituency after the death of sitting BJP MLA Yogeshbhai Narandas Patel.

The contest is between BJP candidate Satish Govindbhai Patel, a former Vadodara Municipal Corporation councillor, and Congress leader Bhikhabhai Rabari, a former state minister and Gujarat Congress vice president.

Yogesh Patel had represented the Raopura Assembly constituency five times before shifting to the newly created Manjalpur seat after delimitation. He went on to win Manjalpur in 2012, 2017 and 2022, completing eight consecutive Assembly election victories over a span of 36 years.

The bypoll comes after the BJP’s record performance in the 2022 Gujarat Assembly elections, when the party won 156 of the state’s 182 seats.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi Police to drop case against minor accused of abusing PM Modi, say reports

Delhi Police have decided not to pursue a case against the minor accused of using abusive language against Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the CJP protest at Jantar Mantar after her apology and the Prime Minister’s call for forgiveness.

Published

on

Delhi Police have decided not to register a case against a minor girl accused of using abusive language against Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) protest at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar, according to sources.

The development follows the filing of a Zero FIR by Noida Police over the viral video. The FIR had identified the accused as a 25-year-old woman. However, the girl later clarified through a public apology video that she is 15 years old and claimed she made the remarks after being influenced by others present at the protest.

Minor apologises for remarks

In her apology video, the teenager admitted that her comments were unacceptable and expressed remorse.

She said she was only 15 years old and described the incident as her “first and last mistake.” She apologised to the country and sought forgiveness, adding that she felt deeply ashamed of her actions.

PM Modi appeals for forgiveness

Last week, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said he had forgiven the “misguided children” who abused him and appealed to society not to seek punitive action against them.

In an Instagram reel, he said that dragging such children through legal proceedings would not improve the situation and urged people to accept his decision to forgive them.

Mother seeks cancellation of FIR

Following the Prime Minister’s remarks, the girl’s mother thanked him for showing compassion and requested that the FIR registered against her daughter under an incorrect name and age be withdrawn.

She said the Prime Minister had given her daughter a “new life” and appealed for the cancellation of the case.

The mother also urged the government to restrict access to social media platforms such as Instagram and Facebook for children below the age of 18, arguing that minors can be easily influenced and should focus on their education instead of participating in protests.

Background of the CJP protest

The incident occurred during the Cockroach Janta Party’s protest at Jantar Mantar, which continued for more than five weeks over the alleged NEET paper leak. The agitation drew support from thousands of people, primarily students.

The protest concluded last month after Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned and the government agreed to several of the group’s demands, including assurances of no coercive action against protesters.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com