English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Kerala love jihad case: SC to hear Hadiya’s submission in open court on Nov 27

Published

on

File photo of Hadiya alias Akhila with her husband Shafin Jahan. Photo credit: Agencies

Supreme Court expresses surprise over Asokan seeking his adult daughter’s custody, says consent is prime and no law prevents marriage with a criminal 

The Supreme Court, on Monday (October 30), made it clear that any decision on the Kerala ‘love jihad’ case will only be taken after Hadiya alias Akhila – the Hindu girl who had married a Muslim man Shafin Jahan, a marriage that had been annulled by the Kerala High Court – had expressed her opinion in open court for which the time and date has been set for 3 pm on November 27.

The order of the apex court bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud, is a modification of an earlier directive issued by the same court in which it had said that the statements of 24-year-old Hadiya before the SC will be recorded ‘in camera’.

The proceedings in what has come to be called the Kerala love jihad caseon Monday, saw high voltage arguments being put forth by senior advocates Shyam Divan and Kapil Sibal and Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh – each of them trying hard to pursue their respective stands in the matter. The arguments were countered by equally pointed, often curt, observations by the apex court bench.

The proceedings on Monday began with the Chief Justice asking ASG Maninder Singh – who is appearing in the case on behalf of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) – on how Hadiya’s marriage with Shafin Jahan could be annulled in a Habeas Corpus petition.

Singh submitted that this is a case in which the girl has been indoctrinated and hence “court can invoke parental authority” though she is a major.

The Additional Solicitor General submitted that Akhila doesn’t want to be in the custody of her father, Asokan. A new application had been filed in the high court.

He said that as far as marriage is concerned “it is her personal consent. Who can say there is no free consent? I know my Lakshman Rekha and I am following the law. But the previous order passed by this court said the court has the authority to set the time of investigation. She married a criminal.”

The CJI asked: “Is there any law by which a girl can never fall in love with a criminal? I am really very surprised that her father wants custody of a major (she is now 25, was 24 when she married) person who is married to another major person.”

The ASG said: “We have to decide it within two or three hearings and the high court must know the fact that she does not want to be with her father.”

This is a critical part that the court would want to pay heed to. In a recent video made by social activist Rahul Eashwar in Kochi, Hadiya had said that her father was ill-treating her and that there was a threat to her life.  She has been quoted as saying in the video: “You have to get me out. I am sure I will be killed tomorrow or the day after. My father is getting angry, I know. When I walk, he is pushing me and kicking me. If my head or any body part hits somewhere and I die…”

The bench said thereafter: “Unless we call the person we cannot decide if she can express herself or if she has given consent. Then we can take a call. Prima facie you have to satisfy our constitutional obligation of producing her in court.”

Senior advocate Shyam Divan, who is appearing on behalf of Haditya’s father Asokan, reiterated the call for constitutional obligation. “When you talk about unity and diversity we are not going by impulse of society, but we will go by the law,” he said.

Arguing that “there is an organizational apparatus” operating for getting inter-religious marriages between Hindu girls and Muslim men operating, Divan said that this apparatus “consists of PFI and such organisations… They have students, preachers, psychologists etc and they radicalize impressionable minds.The question is do courts respond to such radicalization or do they remain silent?”

Leveling serious allegations against Hadiya’s husband, Divan told the top court that Shafin Jahan also questioned the antecedents of Hadiya’s has contacts with a person who recruits people for global terror outfit Islamic State.

Divan went on to submit that “Kerala has a huge contingent of people who have joined ISIS,” a contention that evoked sharp objections from senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who is appearing for Hadiya’s husband.

Asserting that Divan’s allegations against his client were “false and baseless”, Sibal said: “He (Divan) is saying that entire Kerala has gone to ISIS…the antecedents of Shafin Jahan had been investigated by the Kerala Police.”

The CJI, after hearing the heated arguments, directed Hadiya’s father to produce her on the next date of hearing, set for November 27.

India News

Enforcement Directorate seizes Shilpa Shetty’s husband Raj Kundra’s properties worth Rs 97 crore

The Enforcement Directorate said in a statement that the Mumbai zonal office of ED has provisionally attached immovable and movable properties of Kundra under the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

Published

on

The Enforcement Directorate on Thursday seized businessman Raj Kundra’s properties worth Rs 97.79 crore. The siezed properties include a residential flat in Mumbai’s Juhu, which is named after his wife and Bollywood actor Shilpa Shetty.  The Enforcement Directorate said the seized properties include another property which is a residential bungalow in Pune and Equity shares in the name of Raj Kundra.

The Enforcement Directorate said in a statement that the Mumbai zonal office of ED has provisionally attached immovable and movable properties of Kundra under the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. The Enforcement Directorate began the investigation on the basis of a number of FIRs which were registered by Delhi Police and Maharashtra Police. It is being said that Kundra collected large sums of money in the form of bitcoins which were worth Rs 6,600 crore in 2017 from the public with the false promises of 10 % monthly return in the form of bitcoins.

The ED said that it was planned that the collected bitcoins will be used for bitcoin mining and investors will get to get a large return in Crypto assets. But the promoters cheated the investors as they concealed the ill-gotten bitcoins in obscure online wallets. The Enforcement Directorate revealed in its investigation that Raj Kundra received 285 bitcoins from the mastermind and promoter of Gain Bitcoin Ponzi Scam Amit Bhardwaj for setting up bitcoin mining farm in Ukraine.

The Enforcement Directorate in its statement said that the bitcoins were sourced out of proceeds of crime collected by Amit Bhardwaj from gullible investors. Since the deal did not go through, so Kundra is still in possession and enjoyment of 285 bitcoins which are valued at more than Rs 150 crore. Earlier a number of search operations were conducted in connection with this case, leading to the arrest of three people — Simpy Bhardwaj on December 17, 2023, Nitin Gaur on December 29, 2023, and Nikhil Mahajan on January 16, 2023.

Continue Reading

India News

Religious outfit vandalises The Blessed Mother Teresa High School in Telangana after teachers object to students wearing Hanuman Deeksha dress

The Religious group broke glass windows and flower pots and pelted stones on the statue of St. Mother Teresa at the school’s entrance. The religious outfit also attacked Father Jaimon Joseph, the school manager.

Published

on

A religious group shouting Jai Shri Ram has vandalised a Catholic school and assaulted a priest in Telangana’s Mancherial district on Tuesday. The saffron mob staged protest and vandalised The Blessed Mother Teresa High School in Kannepally village. They broke glass windows and flower pots and pelted stones on the statue of St. Mother Teresa at the school’s entrance. The religious outfit also attacked Father Jaimon Joseph, the school manager.

The priest who is a member of the Missionary Congregation of the Blessed Sacrament (MCBS) said some of members of the mob even slapped and threw punches at him while others attacked him from behind. The religious outfit accused the school management of not allowing Hindu students to wear their religious costumes. The school authorities said the allegation made by the mob is misleading and has no truth in it.

Earlier, the students who wore religious costumes had informed the school principal that it was part of a 21-day special religious practice. The principal said he had only asked the students to bring their parents to school after noticing that they are not wearing the school uniform.

Later, members of the religious outfit started protesting outside the school. They demanded action should be taken against the management for stopping the students from entering the school and appearing for their annual examinations as they were wearing the Hanuman deeksha dress.

The priest said soon after the video started circulating on social media and became viral with hate messages against Christians. After this incident many Hindus reached the school and vandalized it. A complaint has been lodged at the local police station by the school management, but no arrests have been made so far. Instead of taking action against the miscreants, the police have filed a case against the school management for hurting religious sentiments of the local people.

Continue Reading

India News

Clashes erupt during Ram Navami procession in West Bengal’s Murshidabad district

BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari wrote a letter to the West Bengal Governor and sought a probe by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) into clashes and violence during a Ram Navami procession in Murshidabad’s Rejinagar area.

Published

on

Clashes and violence erupted during the Ram Navami procession in the Shaktipur area of Rejinagar, Murshidabad district, West Bengal on Wednesday. According to reports, the stone-pelting started taking place when the Ram Navami parade was underway as people threw stones from their rooftops. The situation reached a point where the police had to resort to a lathi charge. Some individuals sustained injuries during the clashes and violence. The BJP alleged that Hindu devotees were targeted in Rejinagar.

BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari wrote a letter to the West Bengal Governor and sought a probe by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) into clashes and violence during a Ram Navami procession in Murshidabad’s Rejinagar area. Around 20 people were injured after stones were thrown at the Ram Navami parade from rooftops. The police has imposed Section 144 in the area.

Another incident took place during the Ram Navami parade, as an explosion went off in Shaktipur, Murshidabad, which resulted in injuring a woman. The woman was taken to the Murshidabad Medical College and Hospital, and the police have started investigating the matter. But, it is still not clear whether the explosion was caused by a bomb or some other reason.

The BJP also alleged that another Ram Navami parade was attacked and pelted with stones in Medinipur’s Egra. BJP leader Amit Malviya said party workers would gherao the Egra police station to protest the brutal attack. Amit Malviya tweeted that Hindu devotees were singled out during the Ram Navami celebrations in Rejinagar, Murshidabad.  He further added Mamata Banerjee is a blot on West Bengal. 

Many videos are circulating on social media, which show people throwing stones at the procession from their rooftops. The police had to conduct a lathi charge and also fired tear gas shells to disperse the crowd. The police have said that the situation has been brought under control, and additional security forces have been stationed in the area.

Continue Reading

Trending

-->

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com