English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Kerala top performance index, UP last in NITI Aayog’s School Education Quality Index

Kerala has been adjudged the top performer in School Education Quality Index (SEQI) released by NITI Aayog while Uttar Pradesh was last.

Published

on

Kerala school

Kerala has been adjudged the top performer in School Education Quality Index (SEQI) released by NITI Aayog which said 18 of the 20 large states in the country have improved their overall performance between 2015-2016 and 2016-2017.

The SEQI, aimed to evaluate the performance of states and Union Territories (UTs) in the school education sector, was launched today (Monday Sep 30).

Kerala’s score in incremental performance, which was recorded 77.6% in 2015-2016, went up to 82.2% in 2016-2017. Uttar Pradesh was the worst performer among large states.

The SEQI was conceptualized by MHRD and NITI Aayog. The index is divided into two categories Outcomes (including learning, infrastructure and facility, access and equity) and Governance processes aiding outcomes (covering student and teacher attendance, teacher availability, administrative adequacy, training, accountability and transparency).

Of the 20 Large States, 10 perform better on the Outcomes category, with the most noticeable performance differences observed in the cases of Karnataka, Jharkhand and Andhra Pradesh.

The other Large States perform better on the Governance Processes Aiding Outcomes category, with the most noticeable performance differences observed in the cases of Odisha, Punjab and Haryana.

Of the eight Small States, seven perform better on the Outcomes category, with the most noticeable performance differences observed in the cases of Manipur, Tripura and Goa.

Sikkim is the only Small State that performs better on the Governance Processes Aiding Outcomes category.

Of the seven UTs, four perform better on the Outcomes category, with the most noticeable performance differences observed in Dadra & Nagar Haveli. Delhi, Daman & Diu and Lakshadweep perform better on the Governance Processes Aiding Outcomes category.

Among the 20 Large States, 18 improved their overall performance between 2015-16 and 2016-17. The average improvement in these 18 states is 8.6 percentage points although there is a lot of variation around that average in terms of the fastest and slowest improving States. Due to this variation, many States that improved their overall performance score still show a decline in rank.

Five Small States have shown an improvement in their overall performance score between 2015-16 and 2016-17, with the average improvement being around nine percentage points. However, as in the case of Large States, there is considerable variation between the fastest and slowest improving States. States such as Meghalaya, Nagaland and Goa outpaced the others, improving by 14.1, 13.5 and 8.2 percentage points respectively, thus improving their ranks in the process.

All seven UTs have shown an improvement in their overall performance scores. The average improvement is 9.5 percentage points. Daman & Diu, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Puducherry improved their overall performance scores by 16.5, 15.0 and 14.3 percentage points respectively, which enabled them to improve their ranking on incremental performance.

States/UTs Overall Performance Ranking (2016-17)
Large States
  1. Kerala
  2. Rajasthan
  3. Karnataka
18. Punjab

19. Jammu & Kashmir

20. Uttar Pradesh

Small States
  1. Manipur
  2. Tripura
  3. Goa
6. Sikkim

7. Meghalaya

8. Arunachal Pradesh

Union Territories
  1. Chandigarh
  2. Dadra and Nagar Haveli
  3. Delhi
  1. Daman & Diu
  2. Andaman & Nicobar Islands
  3. Lakshadweep

 

States/UTs Annual Incremental Performance (Between Base Year: 2015-16 and Reference Year: 2016-17)
Large States
  1. Haryana
  2. Assam
  3. Uttar Pradesh
18. Jharkhand

19. Uttarakhand

20. Karnataka

Small States
  1. Meghalaya
  2. Nagaland
  3. Goa
  1. Sikkim
  2. Mizoram
  3. Arunachal Pradesh
Union Territories
  1. Daman & Diu
  2. Dadra and Nagar Haveli
  3. Puducherry

 

  1. Lakshadweep
  2. Chandigarh
  3. Andaman & Nicobar Islands

Source: Press Information Bureau

LARGE STATES

States Education Index Base year ranks Reference year ranks Change in base year to reference year rankings
Base year Reference year
Kerala 77.64 82.17 1 1
Tamil Nadu 63.16 73.35 2 2
Haryana 51.04 69.54 8 3 Up 5
Gujarat 52.35 63.01 6 4 Up 2
Himachal Pradesh 58.12 62.78 4 5 Down 1
Maharashtra 58.64 62.55 3 6 Down 3
Odisha 47.78 60.23 13 7 Up 6
Rajasthan 51.25 59.43 7 8 Down 1
Punjab 50.74 59.06 9 9
Assam 39.28 56.12 15 10 Up 5
Andhra Pradesh 48.42 56.08 11 11
Chhattisgarh 48.4 54.94 12 12
Karnataka 56.56 52.95 5 13 Down 8
Uttarakhand 49.48 48.15 10 14 Down 4
Madhya Pradesh 44.42 47.24 14 15 Down 1
Jammu & Kashmir 34.79 47.14 16 16
Uttar Pradesh 32.81 46.45 18 17 Up 1
Telangana 34.7 39.02 17 18 Down 1
Bihar 30 37.3 19 19
Jharkhand 28.48 30.65 20 20

Source: NITI Aayog

SMALL STATES

States Education Index Base year ranks Reference year ranks Change in base year to reference year rankings
Base year Reference year
Tripura 48.7 56.1 1 1
Goa 45.84 53.79 3 2 Up 1
Manipur 45.41 46.87 4 3 Up 1
Mizoram 47.83 46.53 2 4 Down 2
Sikkim 43.89 43.02 5 5
Meghalaya 24.41 38.43 7 6 Up 1
Nagaland 22.42 35.89 8 7 Up 1
Arunachal Pradesh 30.52 28.42 6 8 Down 2

Source: NITI Aayog

UNION TERRITORIES

States Education Index Base year ranks Reference year ranks Change in base year to reference year rankings
Base year Reference year
Chandigarh 70 73.87 1 1
Delhi 59.96 69.89 2 2
Puducherry 40.84 55.11 4 3 Up 1
Daman & Diu 34.08 50.42 6 4 Up 2
D & N Haveli 30.24 45.28 7 5 Up 2
A&N lslands 42.81 44.22 3 6 Down 3
Lakshadweep 37.49 42.83 5 7 Down 2

 

Source: NITI Aayog

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com