English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Modi won. The voter lost

Published

on

Opinion Verdict 2017

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The Congress won three (states) but lost two because the BJP has fulfilled LK Advani’s prophecy that it is Congress Part 2

By Ranjona Banerji

Who won and who lost? Okay, okay, the Bharatiya Janata Party won hands down, outright, no contest in Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand. The BSP lost, the Samajwadi Party and the Congress lost, Akhilesh Yadav and Rahul Gandhi lost and most likely Amar Singh won and so did some various uncles and aunties of Akhilesh who did not want him to win.

In Uttarakhand, the Congress chief minister lost, the BJP man who frightened the horse won and no one knows who the new BJP chief minister will be. It may not be the man who spent crores on a house nobody wants to live in and it may not be the man who repaired the roads. Rumours abound that it will be a new person altogether. Though in the Uttarakhand BJP, sometimes you can’t tell which person is Congress and which person is BJP because they keep changing places. So maybe a former Congress chief minister could become a current BJP chief minister. Which makes him a new BJP prime minister, see?

This is the straightforward stuff. So on to Punjab where the alliance between the Shiromani Akali Dal and the Bharatiya Janata Party lost. I mean really lost. They were in power and they lost. However, according to new rules written into the social media contract of all Indian journalists who are important (i.e. not me), you are not allowed to mention Punjab. If you must, do it in passing: “That’s anti-incumbency, harrumph, but Narendra Modi is the greatest and look at Uttar Pradesh.”

This may or most probably may not guarantee one or two Padma awards for serious media folk in the next season.

In Punjab though, the Congress won. AAP did not win though many said that AAP would win. But AAP still got more seats than SAD-BJP. Everyone knew, however, that SAD-BJP would lose. And this is one of those few times when experts were proved correct. However, no experts as you can see are interested in their foresight because there can be no credit for Modi here. Instead, members of the SAD are now saying that it is BJP’s fault that they lost? How ungrateful. Haven’t they seen the results in UP and Uttarakhand?

Manipur comes next. Now we reach a strange little kink in our journey. What the winners really want to say is who cares about these small states, we won the big one. But they can’t, because, India. The Congress won more seats than any other party but still lost because the BJP jumped in and cobbled together an alliance to try and run the government. How many of you are old enough to have seen this game being played before? Exactly. Whether you call it horse-trading or legitimate nonsense, stitches often come loose and threads unravel. The poor voters of Manipur. No one knows what they really wanted except they certainly did not want their former hero Irom Sharmila to become a politician. But 90 votes? That was a bit mean.

In Goa, India’s defence minister has become the chief minister. Of course, neither he nor his party won the election. In fact the BJP definitely lost the election. The chief minister lost, other ministers lost. The Congress got more seats than anyone else, AAP got no seats at all. The parties that fought on an anti-BJP platform quickly tied up with the BJP because why should they stop Manohar Parrikar from eating Goan fish curry and rice? Everyone should be allowed the chance to eat more Goan fish curry and rice, especially the defence minister who never wanted to be defence minister and in fact did not win the mandate to be chief minister of Goa.

So who won and who lost? Modi won. But did not lose Punjab or Goa because Modi can never lose. AAP won and lost. The Congress won three but lost two because the BJP has fulfilled LK Advani’s prophecy that it is Congress Part 2. And it also lost another one. The BJP lost two but Modi cannot be blamed. Irom Sharmila lost but no one won in Manipur except a number of opportunists including one called the BJP. Yeah. Modi won. The voter lost.

Mic drop.

The writer is a senior journalist based in Dehradun.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Centre asks Blinkit, Zepto and Swiggy to stop 10-minute delivery claims

The Centre has urged Blinkit, Zepto and Swiggy to remove 10-minute delivery claims, citing safety concerns for delivery partners, government sources said.

Published

on

10 minutes delivery

The Centre has asked quick commerce platforms such as Blinkit, Zepto and Swiggy to remove claims related to 10-minute deliveries, citing concerns over the safety of delivery partners, according to government sources.

The issue was discussed during a meeting between Union Labour Minister Mansukh Mandaviya and representatives of major food and grocery delivery aggregators. Executives from platforms including Zomato, Swiggy, Blinkit and Zepto were present at the meeting, sources said.

Safety of delivery partners discussed in meeting

Government sources indicated that the minister raised concerns about strict delivery timelines and their potential impact on the safety and well-being of delivery partners. Platforms were advised to prioritise safe working conditions instead of promoting ultra-fast delivery promises.

The discussion focused on delivery expectations, rider pressure and the broader responsibility of aggregators towards their workforce, sources added.

Blinkit revises tagline after government intervention

Following the meeting, Blinkit has revised its marketing tagline. The platform earlier promoted “10,000 plus products delivered in 10 minutes” but has now changed it to “30,000 plus products delivered at your doorstep,” according to sources.

The revision reflects a shift away from highlighting delivery speed as a key promise, in line with the concerns raised during the discussions.

The government is expected to continue engaging with aggregators on labour welfare and safety-related issues, sources said.

Continue Reading

India News

AI errors in voter list digitisation causing hardship during SIR, Mamata writes to EC chief

Mamata Banerjee has written to the chief election commissioner alleging that AI-driven digitisation errors in electoral rolls are causing hardship, harassment and distress to genuine voters during the SIR process in West Bengal.

Published

on

mamta banerjee

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again written to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, alleging that errors arising from AI-driven digitisation of the 2002 electoral rolls are causing widespread hardship to genuine voters during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in the state.

In her fifth letter since the SIR process began, Banerjee claimed that the use of artificial intelligence tools to digitise older voter lists led to serious inaccuracies in electors’ personal details. According to her, these errors have resulted in large-scale data mismatches, with many genuine voters being wrongly flagged as having “logical discrepancies”.

The chief minister accused the Election Commission of disregarding statutory processes that had been followed over the past two decades. She said voters were now being forced to re-establish their identity despite corrections having been made earlier through quasi-judicial hearings.

Calling the approach arbitrary and illogical, Banerjee alleged that it went against the constitutional spirit by effectively disowning the commission’s own past actions and mechanisms. She further claimed that voters submitting documents during the SIR exercise were not being given proper acknowledgements, terming the procedure “fundamentally flawed”.

Raising concerns over the nature of hearings, Banerjee said the SIR process had become largely mechanical and overly dependent on technical data, lacking sensitivity, human judgment and compassion. She argued that such an approach undermines democratic values and the constitutional framework.

Highlighting the human impact of the exercise, the chief minister claimed that the revision process had already seen 77 deaths, four suicide attempts and 17 cases of hospitalisation. She attributed these incidents to fear, intimidation and excessive workload caused by what she described as an unplanned exercise by the Election Commission.

Banerjee also criticised the treatment of several eminent citizens, alleging that they were subjected to harassment during the process. She further expressed concern over the handling of cases involving women voters, particularly those who had changed their surnames after marriage or shifted to their matrimonial homes.

According to her, women electors were being questioned and summoned to prove their identity, reflecting a lack of social sensitivity and amounting to an insult to women and genuine voters. She questioned whether a constitutional authority should treat half of the electorate in such a manner.

Urging immediate corrective steps, Banerjee called on the Election Commission to address the issues arising from the SIR exercise to end what she described as harassment and agony for both citizens and officials, and to safeguard democratic rights.

Continue Reading

India News

Communist Party of China delegation visits BJP headquarters in Delhi

A delegation from the Communist Party of China, led by Vice Minister Sun Haiyan, visited the BJP headquarters in Delhi and held discussions on inter-party communication.

Published

on

China delegation visits BJP office

A delegation from the Communist Party of China (CPC), led by Sun Haiyan, Vice Minister of the International Department of the CPC Central Committee (IDCPC), visited the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) headquarters in Delhi on Monday.

During the visit, the Chinese delegation held discussions with a BJP team headed by party general secretary Arun Singh. The talks focused on ways to advance inter-party communication and engagement between the BJP and the CPC.

Sharing details of the meeting, BJP foreign affairs department in-charge Vijay Chauthaiwale said the interaction involved an in-depth exchange on strengthening party-to-party dialogue. He confirmed the visit in a post on social media, stating that the CPC delegation was received at the BJP head office as part of ongoing inter-party interactions.

The Chinese Ambassador to India, Xu Feihong, was also present during the meeting, accompanying the CPC delegation.

According to Chauthaiwale, the visit was led by Sun Haiyan in her capacity as Vice Minister of the IDCPC, underscoring the importance attached to party-level exchanges between the two sides.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com