English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

NIA summons Punjab farmers’ leader, actor Deep Sidhu for questioning in Sikhs For Justice case

The anti-terrorism agency has summoned around 40 people including farmers’ leader for examination as witnesses in the SFJ case under Section 160 CRPC (Code of Criminal Procedure).

Published

on

Farmers protest

The National Investigation Agency(NIA) has summoned around 40 people including farmers’ leader Baldev Singh Sirsa and Punjabi actor Deep Sidhu for questioning in a case against banned outfit Sikhs For Justice(SFJ).

The anti-terrorism agency has summoned the protesting farmers’ leader for examination as witnesses in the SFJ case under Section 160 CRPC (Code of Criminal Procedure). The actor has been supporting the farmers protesting against the three contentious farm laws. The NIA has asked the actor to appear before its Delhi headquarters on Sunday. 

A case was filed against Sikhs For Justice, a US-based pro-Khalistan group, alleging that they have engaged in a conspiracy to create an atmosphere of fear and lawlessness among people, inciting them towards rising in rebellion against the Government of India. It further alleged that huge funds are being collected abroad and sent to pro-khalistani elements based in India to undertake terrorist acts and strike terror in the people of the country.

Also Read: Delhi Police announce Rs 1 lakh reward for leads on actor Deep Sidhu and 3 others

The Shiromani Akali Dal leader Sukhbir Singh Badal has condemned the summons by the anti-terror agency. He alleged that the central government has attempted to use the central agencies to intimidate farmer leaders and those supporting the protests against the farm legislations enacted by them.

He tweeted that the centre’s attempt to intimidate the farmer leaders and supporters of Kisan Andolan by calling them for questioning by NIA and ED(Enforcement Directorate).The farmers  are not anti-nationals. After the failure of talks for the 9th time, it was absolutely clear that the government was only trying to tire out farmers, said the tweet.

The NIA summons were also issued to the officials of non-profit Khalsa Aid, which has been backing the protests by providing essentials.Reacting to the summons, the organisation issued a statement on Saturday, saying that their team will cooperate with the NIA team.

The Khalsa Aid in the statement said that it was deeply concerned to learn of the summons being issued by the anti-terrorism agency to individuals involved in the farmers’protest, ranging from bus drivers to union leaders. All have been summoned to appear before the agency for being anti-national and supporting terrorism. The Khalsa team have also been summoned for questioning. The team will cooperate and answer any queries raised by the NIA team, it said 

Read Also: Tale of two parades: On Republic Day, farmers to hold Tractor Rally on Delhi’s Outer Ring Road

Thousands of farmers, mostly from Punjab and Haryana have been staging protests against the three farms near Delhi borders for more than a month. After several rounds of talks, Centre and farmers have failed to end the deadlock. While the Centre has offered amendment to the laws, the farmers have been adamant on their demands to completely repeal the laws.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has stayed the laws and constituted a 4-member committee to facilitate the resolution between the Centre and farmers.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com