English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

PM Modi directs withdrawal of the Fake News order slammed as motivated to stifle media

Published

on

PM Modi directs withdrawal of the Fake News order slammed as motivated to stifle media

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Prime Minister Narendra Modi has ordered withdrawal of the Information and Broadcasting Ministry’s controversial move to black list journalists, making them liable to lose their accreditation with Press Information Bureau (PIB) on mere accusation of fake news.

As per reports, the PM office has directed Smriti Irani-led Information and Brodcasting Ministry to leave the final decision on recent law on fake news on press bodies.

The order issued last evening had said that journalists could be denied government access just on the accusation of fake news and they could lose their accreditation with Press Information Bureau (PIB).

The guidelines were seen by journalists as an attempt to control the media in an election year.

Responding to angry tweets, I&B Minister Smriti Irani had said today that she was “more than happy to engage with journalists or organisations wanting to give suggestions so that together we can fight the menace of ‘fake news’ and uphold ethical journalism”.

In its four-para statement, now withdrawn, the government said it had amended accreditation guidelines for journalists after noting “increasing instances of fake news in various mediums including print and electronic media”.

Government accreditation for journalists allows them to access ministries and enter restricted buildings or events. A journalist is accredited with the PIB of the Centre after she/he has least five years’ experience as a full-time working journalist. Freelance journalists need to have 15 years experience and foreign correspondents five years with a valid work visa.

The I&B Ministry press release on Monday, April 2, said that if a journalist is found to have “created and/or propagated” fake news, her/his accreditation would be suspended or permanently cancelled.

Without defining fake news, it said a journalist’s PIB accreditation would be suspended the moment there was any complaint of fake news.

“The accreditation will be suspended till such time the determination regarding the fake news is made by the regulating agencies,” the government order said.

The press release said that the responsibility of determining whether a news item is fake or not would lie with the Press Council of India (PCI) for print journalists and the News Broadcasters Association (NBA) for TV journalists.

The guidelines said the PCI and the NBA would decide within 15 days whether the complaint was legit.

If the journalist was found guilty of publishing or propagating fake news, accreditation would be suspended for six months for the first violation and for a year in the case of a second violation. For a third offence, the journalist’s accreditation will be cancelled permanently.

The Accreditation Committee of the Press Information Bureau (PIB), which consists of representatives of both the PCI and the NBA, would be reached out for validating any accreditation request of any news media agency, it said.

While examining the requests seeking accreditation, the regulatory agencies would check whether the Norms of Journalistic Conduct’ and Code of Ethics and Broadcasting Standards’, prescribed by the PCI and NBA respectively, are adhered to by the journalists as part of their functioning, the ministry said. It would be obligatory for journalists to abide by these guidelines, it said.​

As journalists protested against the press release and “fake news” became the top trend on Twitter on Tuesday, Irani acknowledged the matter had “generated debate”.

Senior journalist Shekhar Gupta described the move as a “breathtaking assault on mainstream media,” and referred to a law proposed by the Rajiv Gandhi government, which had sought to make “criminal imputation” and “scurrilous writings” a crime. Gupta tweeted: “Make no mistake: this is a breathtaking assault on mainstream media. It’s a moment like Rajiv Gandhi’s anti-defamation bill. All media should bury their differences and resist this.”

NDTV’s Akhilesh Sharma questioned whether the I&B Ministry was assuming that only accredited journalists spread fake news. “What about non-accredited journalists, editors, news portals,” he asked.

Smriti Irani tweeted in reply: “Those will be considered as well @akhileshsharma1 ji through other departments of @MIB_India . Will put information in public domain soon.”

Congress leader Ahmed Patel also questioned whether the guidelines were aimed at preventing journalists from reporting news uncomfortable to the establishment. “What is guarantee that these rules will not be misused to harass honest reporters? Is it not possible that motivated complaints will be filed to suspend accreditation until enquiry is on?” he tweeted.

In response, Smriti Irani tweeted: “Glad to see you awake Ahmed Patel ji. Whether a News article / broadcast is fake or not will be determined by PCI & NBA; both of whom I’m sure you know are not controlled/ operated by GOI.”

The term “fake news” has in the past few months become a staple charge by leaders in several countries to describe media reports and organisations critical of them.

Karnataka Congress Committee president G Parmeswara said: “Irony just died a slow death as Ministry of Information & Broadcasting issued guidelines against #FakeNews. Wasn’t the #postcardnews founder arrested for peddling fake news recently? Also, the most important question is: Who has been encouraging fake news in India? Any answers?”

Congress communications incharge Randeep Singh Surjewala tweeted: “Fascism reaches its ‘nadir’ as a shaky Modi Govt, caught in its web of lies, seeks to muzzle all independent voices in media through fallacious rules!

Will the 13 Union Ministers answer for the lame duck portal tarnishing mainstream media?#FakeNewshttp://indianexpress.com/article/india/look-who-is-busting-fake-news-for-13-ministers-site-with-exam-warriors-link-5121254/ …”[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

India hits back at Shehbaz Sharif at UN, says terror will have consequences

India hit back at Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s UN speech, with New Delhi warning that terrorism will have consequences.

Published

on

India has responded to Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s remarks at the United Nations, delivering a strong message on terrorism and warning that such actions will have consequences.

The response came after Mr Sharif addressed the UN and raised issues concerning India and Pakistan. New Delhi rejected the narrative presented by the Pakistani prime minister and highlighted the issue of terrorism.

India’s message was delivered by Petal Gehlot, who represented New Delhi in the response to Pakistan.

India warns Pakistan over terrorism

India’s response focused on Pakistan’s record and its approach towards terrorism. New Delhi made clear that terrorism cannot be separated from its consequences and that those responsible cannot expect such actions to go unanswered.

The Indian side also pushed back against the claims and allegations made by Mr Sharif during his UN speech.

The exchange comes amid continuing tensions between India and Pakistan, with terrorism remaining a major point of disagreement between the two countries.

Shehbaz Sharif’s UN remarks

In his address, Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif spoke about India-Pakistan relations and raised several issues concerning New Delhi.

India subsequently exercised its right of reply to respond to Pakistan’s statements at the United Nations.

New Delhi’s response underlined its position that terrorism remains a serious issue in the relationship and that there would be consequences for terrorist actions.

The latest exchange at the UN adds to the continuing diplomatic confrontation between the two neighbouring countries.

Continue Reading

India News

Veeramani POCSO case: Vijay questions Stalin over earlier probe

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay has questioned MK Stalin over the handling of the Veeramani POCSO case, while Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected anyone.

Published

on

Actor Vijay

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) president C Joseph Vijay has questioned DMK president MK Stalin over the handling of the POCSO case involving Gem Granites founder R Veeramani. The political exchange follows renewed investigation into allegations involving minor girls.

Vijay’s remarks came as the ruling TVK stepped up its questions about how the case was handled during the previous DMK government. The party’s IT wing has alleged that the earlier investigation was weakened and questioned why a final report was filed.

The allegations have been rejected by the DMK. Stalin has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to protect anyone in the case and has called the allegations false and defamatory.

What did Vijay say about the Veeramani case?

Vijay questioned Stalin over the handling of the case and demanded an explanation from the former chief minister.

The TVK has specifically questioned why action was not taken against Veeramani during the previous administration and why the earlier investigation resulted in a closure report.

The party has also raised questions about the role of officials involved in the earlier investigation. These are political allegations made by the TVK and have not been established as facts.

What is the Veeramani POCSO case?

The case concerns allegations of sexual abuse of minors involving R Veeramani, the founder of Gem Granites.

The case came under renewed scrutiny after a special POCSO court rejected an earlier closure report and ordered further investigation. The expanded probe has subsequently identified additional alleged survivors who were minors at the time of the alleged offences, according to current reporting.

The investigation is also examining the circumstances surrounding the earlier probe and whether there were any lapses in how the case was handled.

What has MK Stalin said?

Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected Veeramani.

He has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to shield anyone in the case. Stalin has also said that everyone responsible for the alleged offences, including anyone who aided or attempted to protect the accused, should face the law.

The DMK president has further said that the focus should remain on securing justice for the affected girls rather than making political allegations.

Why has the case become a political issue?

The Veeramani case has become the subject of a political dispute between the ruling TVK and the DMK over the handling of the earlier investigation.

The TVK is questioning the previous government’s handling of the case, while the DMK has denied that it intervened to protect the accused.

At this stage, claims about political interference or deliberate weakening of the earlier investigation should be treated as allegations unless established by the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

Continue Reading

India News

Women wrestlers challenge Brij Bhushan’s acquittal in sexual harassment case

Four women wrestlers have challenged the acquittal of former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and co-accused Vinod Tomar in a sexual harassment case.

Published

on

Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh

Four women wrestlers have approached a Delhi court challenging the acquittal of former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief and BJP leader Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in a sexual harassment case.

The wrestlers have also challenged the acquittal of co-accused Vinod Tomar. The matter is scheduled to be heard by a Special Judge at the Rouse Avenue Courts.

The appeal challenges the order passed by an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on August 3, 2026, when Brij Bhushan and Tomar were acquitted in the case.

Wrestlers challenge court’s reasoning

In their appeal, the wrestlers have argued that the acquittal order is legally unsustainable and that the evidence was not assessed appropriately.

They have also alleged that the order relied on assumptions about how victims of sexual assault and harassment were expected to behave instead of assessing the evidence and circumstances of the complainants.

The challenge seeks judicial scrutiny of the findings that resulted in the acquittal of Brij Bhushan and Tomar.

Brij Bhushan was acquitted in August

The Rouse Avenue court acquitted Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh on August 3 in the sexual harassment case involving women wrestlers. The court’s decision followed consideration of the evidence and statements presented during the proceedings.

The case had emerged after several women wrestlers accused the former WFI chief of sexual harassment. The allegations had led to a major protest by wrestlers in 2023.

The latest appeal means the acquittal is now being challenged before a higher court.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com