English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Rafale deal: SC reserves its order on petitions challenging the deal and seeking court-monitored probe

Published

on

Rafale deal controversy

The Supreme Court today (Wednesday, November 14) reserved its judgment on pleas challenging the deal for procurement of 36 Rafale fighter jets from France and seeking a court-monitored probe into the matter.

A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and comprising Justices UU Lalit and KM Joseph, heard the arguments two days after the government submitted details on the decision-making process to finalise the Rafale fighter jet deal with France and the details of pricing in a sealed cover exclusively to the judges. A redacted version of decision making process was shared with petitioners.

The petitioners in the case include advocate Manohar Lal Sharma, lawyer Vineet Dhanda, AAP MP Sanjay Singh and former Union ministers Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie and activist lawyer Prashant Bhushan.

The petitioners wanted the Attorney-General, representing the Centre, to reply why a joint press statement was issued by Prime Minister along with French President Francois Hollande in April 2015, well over a year before the Cabinet Committee on Security finally approved the 36 jets’ deal signed in Sep 2016.

On the price of the Rafale aircraft, they said the government was hiding behind the secrecy clause of the agreement.

Arun Shourie, who was also present, said, “All that is spoken of as add on’s to the jets had figured in the original Request for Proposal,” adding, “Government is putting out all kinds of reports through ‘friendly media’.”

He argued that pricing was about public money and it must not be covered under secrecy agreement.

Attorney General KK Venugopal contended that “secrecy agreement has to be secret”. He argued that if the price is made public, adversaries would be able to relate it to the equipment. The AG said the secrecy is not about the price but the weaponry and avionics and if price is made public, adversaries would be able to relate it to the equipment.

The AG further asked if the court was competent to judicially review the Rafale deal, adding that the “matter is for experts to decide on, not the court”.

The bench then asked for the assistance of an Air Force officer on the issue. Deputy Chief of Air staff, Air Marshal VR Chaudhari and two other officers from Indian Air Force appeared in the Supreme Court to assist it on the issue of the procurement of 36 Rafale fighter jets from France.

They told the court that Sukhoi 30s were the latest to be inducted which is a third generation aircraft and added that the Indian Air Force does not have fourth or fifth generation aircraft in its fleet. The top court asked if there has been no induction of aircraft since 1985, the officers said “no”.

The government’s contention that procedure was followed was challenged, arguing that the Rafale deal qualified none of the three conditions laid down by the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP).

It was contrary to the procedure laid down as the choice was not disclosed to the Cabinet, Defence Acquisition Council nor the Defence Minister. They argued that the government “short-circuited” the acquisition process, as it took the Inter-Government Agreement route to avoid giving tender.

Alleging gross violation of procedure in decision making process in the deal, Bhushan asked: “Who took the decision for 36 jets? On what basis did the PM announce the deal for 36 jets? He had no authority. How was 126 jets reduced to 36 jets?”

Asserting that not a single aircraft was delivered till now even after three-and-a-half years, he told the Supreme Court bench that if the 126 aircraft deal was still on, “at least 18 jets would have been delivered by April 2019”.

The government note in the Supreme Court on the Rafale deal said the prolonged impasse over the 126-aircraft deal had caused an “urgent need” to acquire 36 Rafale jets or two squadrons in a fly-away condition.

The documents provided by the government Monday claimed that the delay in concluding the Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) deal, during the UPA rule, gave India’s adversaries time to upgrade and equip their fighter fleets with advanced weaponry.

“During this long period of inconclusive 126 MMRCA process, our adversaries inducted modern aircraft and upgraded their older versions. They acquired better capability air-to-air missiles and inducted their indigenous fighters in large numbers. Further, they modernised and inducted aircraft with an advanced weapon and radar capabilities,” the government had said.

When asked by the CJI about the argument of the petitioner that France had not given a sovereign guarantee to the deal, the attorney general said there was “letter of comfort” from the French President.

The petitioners also questioned Reliance as the choice of offset partner, a company with no experience in manufacturing defence aircraft. Regarding the contentious offset details of the Rafale deal, Justice Joseph asked the additional defence secretary as to how the country’s interests would be protected if the offset partner did not carry out production.

“What was the need to amend offset guidelines with retrospective effect?” Joseph asked. The official said that it was for the government to accept the choice made by the Original Equipment Manufacturer of the offset partner. Venugopal said that Dassault had not yet submitted details of offset partner to government.

India News

BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla’s mother injured in hit-and-run incident in Pune

BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla has alleged that his mother was deliberately hit by a car in Pune and left critically injured. She is scheduled to undergo surgery.

Published

on

Shehzad Punawalla

BJP national spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla has claimed that his mother was seriously injured after being struck by a car in an alleged hit-and-run incident in Pune. The accused reportedly fled the spot after the incident, leaving her critically injured.

According to Poonawalla, the incident occurred a few hours earlier and his mother is scheduled to undergo surgery. He appealed to authorities to identify and arrest the person responsible at the earliest.

Sharing details on social media, Poonawalla said an unidentified individual ran a car over his mother and escaped from the scene. He requested prayers for her recovery and expressed anguish over the incident, describing his mother as a compassionate person whose injury had deeply shaken him.

He also tagged Pune City Police, senior police officials, and Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, urging strict legal action against the accused and ensuring that the person does not evade accountability.

CCTV footage surfaces, police complaint to be filed

In a related development, Poonawalla’s brother and political analyst Tehseen Poonawalla shared CCTV footage on social media that allegedly shows the moment their mother was hit by the vehicle.

Tehseen stated that his mother, a senior citizen, had stepped out of the car while it was being refuelled when the incident occurred. He alleged that the act appeared deliberate and said efforts were underway to identify the vehicle involved.

He further confirmed that a police complaint would be filed and questioned how the vehicle could have hit his mother when she was standing at a distance from the car.

Fractured hip, surgery planned

Providing an update on her medical condition, Tehseen said their mother had suffered a fractured hip and would require surgical intervention. She has been admitted to hospital and doctors are monitoring her vitals ahead of surgery.

He described the incident as infuriating and heartbreaking, adding that his mother would need a rod implant following the hip surgery. He also said he had spoken to senior police officials and expressed hope that swift action would be taken.

Authorities have not yet issued an official statement on the incident. Further details are awaited as investigations continue.

Continue Reading

India News

Three sisters die after jumping from ninth floor in Ghaziabad

Three minor sisters died after jumping from the ninth floor of their Ghaziabad apartment, allegedly following a dispute over online gaming, police said.

Published

on

Three sisters die after jumping from ninth floor in Ghaziabad

Three minor sisters died after jumping from the ninth floor of their apartment building in Uttar Pradesh’s Ghaziabad, allegedly following objections by their parents to their online gaming habits.

The incident occurred at Bharat City, a residential township in Ghaziabad, at around 2 am on Wednesday. The girls were found dead at the spot.

The sisters have been identified as Pakhi, aged 12, Prachi, 14, and Vishika, 16.

According to police, the three siblings were extremely close and spent most of their time together. They reportedly followed the same daily routine, including bathing, eating, attending school, and sleeping together.

Preliminary findings suggest the girls had become addicted to online gaming during the COVID-19 pandemic. They were reportedly playing an online task-based game referred to as a ‘Korean love game’. Police also said the sisters were not attending school regularly.

Investigators said the parents had objected to the girls’ excessive gaming, following which the incident allegedly took place. Police teams reached the spot soon after and have begun an investigation to ascertain the exact sequence of events.

Further details are awaited as the probe continues.

Continue Reading

India News

US tariff cut to 18% is positive signal for Indian exporters, says Sitharaman

Nirmala Sitharaman says India’s exports could recover after the US reduced tariffs on Indian goods to 18%, restoring competitiveness in key sectors.

Published

on

Nirmala Sitharaman

India’s exports to the United States are expected to gain momentum following Washington’s decision to reduce tariffs on Indian goods to 18%, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said on Tuesday, describing the move as a “good auguring” for exporters.

Speaking in an interview to media, Sitharaman said the tariff reduction would help Indian exporters regain competitiveness in the US market, particularly after the sharp impact of punitive duties imposed last year.

“So, actually our exports will pick up now, that is my expectation,” she said, adding that exporters had also identified alternative markets during the period of elevated tariffs and would continue operating in them.

Tariff rollback brings relief after export setback

The US had imposed steep tariffs of up to 50% on Indian goods last year, which significantly raised landed costs and squeezed exporter margins. Several sectors, including steel, aluminium, textiles, engineering goods and certain agricultural products, were affected as US buyers diverted orders to other suppliers.

On Monday, US President Donald Trump announced a reduction in tariffs on Indian goods to 18% as part of a broader trade understanding. The agreement includes India lowering trade barriers and committing to stop purchases of Russian oil, instead sourcing energy from the US and potentially Venezuela.

On implementation, the revised tariff structure would bring duties on Indian exports broadly in line with other Asian economies, where rates range between 15% and 19%.

Improved competitiveness against regional rivals

The 18% tariff undercuts duties imposed on key regional competitors such as Vietnam and Bangladesh, which face tariffs of around 20%. This is expected to restore India’s price advantage in the US market.

Labour-intensive sectors such as apparel, footwear and jewellery are likely to see the most immediate benefit. These segments had witnessed a sharp fall in orders after the 50% tariffs imposed in August severely dented competitiveness.

Earlier in the day, Sitharaman described the development as “good news for #MadeInIndia products” in a social media post, noting that Indian goods would now face reduced duties in the US market.

Trade and capital flow impact

Earlier punitive tariffs had also weighed on bilateral trade. India’s trade surplus with the US shrank by an average of USD 2.5 billion per month between September and December 2025 compared to the January–August period, according to research cited in the report.

Investor sentiment had weakened as well, with foreign investors pulling out nearly USD 14 billion in equities since July 2025.

The rollback of the additional 25% punitive tariff linked to Russian oil purchases effectively lowers the applied tariff on Indian exports from 50% to 18%, offering significant relief to exporters and improving prospects for a recovery in trade flows.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com