English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

“Of his own security, Gill famously said: That’s Sharma’s concern”

Published

on

“On his own security, Gill famously said: That’s Sharma’s concern”

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Former director general of Punjab police KPS Gill played a unique role in eliminating Khalistani terrorism in the Punjab in the eighties and early nineties. He was brought to Punjab as Inspector General of Punjab Armed Police at a very difficult period but he won the admiration of the citizens with the success of Operation Black Thunder which freed the Golden Temple in Amritsar of militants. Speaking to Rashme Sehgal, his son-in-law Dr Ajai Sahni, executive director of the Institute of Conflict Management, reminiscences about this dynamic and controversial personality

What is the quality you remember most about KPS Gill?

What I remember most about him is the sheer intensity of his commitment and sense of purpose. Nothing detracted him from what he had set out to do. He had a tremendous ability to focus on his goals. He had clear ideas about the nature and origins of the terrorist challenge in the Punjab and also how it should be tackled. In that sense he was fearless because he spent no time worrying about his own security. When he was once asked whether he was apprehensive about him being attacked by terrorists, his reply was ‘that is Sharma’s concern’. (Sushil Sharma was the officer in charge of his security.) During the period of terrorism in the Punjab, he used to travel for 26-28 days in a month.

This is not to say that he was not a target of terrorist attack. He was targeted endlessly and once came within shooting distance of a group of terrorists who chickened out at the last minute. This is in contrast to both his predecessor and his successor as DG Punjab police. To cite one example, in 1990-91, Gill was transferred to the CRPF in Delhi. The officer who succeeded him was targeted in a bomb attack following which he is known never to have stepped out of his official place of residence during his remaining tenure.

He introduced the whole concept of Operation Night Dominance by which the Punjab police would move around at night patrolling as well as attacking militant. Earlier, the police would barricade themselves in their police station at night but Operation Night Dominance saw them gaining an upper hand against terrorists.

Gill did write about his experiences in tackling militancy in his book Knights of Falsehood and also wrote an extensive paper on this subject titled Endgame in Punjab?

Endgame in Punjab provides details about the overall strategy and tactical changes deployed to defeat militancy in Punjab. His book titled Knights of Falsehood exposes the false version of Sikkhism  that was espoused by  Akali Dal leaders such as  Parkash Singh Badal, Gurucharan Singh Tohra, Bhindarwale and others. The role of the Akalis was shameful but has been largely forgotten today. Militancy spread in the Punjab because of them.

In the last interview Gill gave before his death, he regretted the fact that Indian institutions lacked institutional memory. For example, he highlighted how mistakes made in the 80s in tackling insurgency were being repeated today?

Yes indeed. The Khaslistani movement was brought to an end 22 years ago but the question is what has been the learning curve ? How should we apply principles of counter insurgency especially when this has been dealt with earlier.  We need to understand the importance of routine policing and more important, we must also understand the dynamics of a conflict. Apart from a half-day conference on the Punjab experience organised by the Punjab police, not a single meet has been organised in these 22 years at the level of  the National Police Academy on how this insurgency was tackled. Today, the theory doing the round is that the situation in Punjab was not so bad but people should not be allowed to forget  how serious the situation  in the Punjab was. We  were close to losing Punjab. Senior politicians used to say we have lost the people and it is only a matter of time before we lose the land.

I must also highlight how the suicide of Ajit Singh Sandhu ( former SSP of Tarn Taran)  and persecution of other Punjab police officers who fought insurgency saw him writing at length on this subject and how it was this police which helped to bring Punjab back from the brink.

Mr Gill was critical about the way Operation Blue Star had been conducted by the army?

He was written on this subject. I think for him it was not a question of the army or the police because they had been asked to respond to a political time table. The fact is that the army went in without the assistance of the local intelligence. We must not forget that following Operation Blue Star, militants crossed over and sought Pakistan’s help which they received and which helped start a proxy war that was spearheaded by Pakistan.

One of the reasons why he was able to combat this was because he brought about a unique model of co-operative command. He helped ensure that every officer of a particular rank in the police was in touch with his army counterpart so that there was complete intelligence sharing in a unified command system. They met on a daily basis and the aim of this exercise was very clear that they support each other. It helped construct a level of personal relationships which have not been replicated since. All control rooms were manned by police, army and CPRF officials- no one was kept out of the loop.

He believed the army was a national force and could not be seen fighting the people; the dirty work was left to the cops who had to conduct cordon and search operations. But look at the effect on the ground. No single village with more than three Hindu families was allowed to push these families out of their village. Orders were given to provide protection to the Hindu families and this was done. Militants always want an ethnic separation to occur, a polarisation of the population, because this helps to create greater discord. But this was not allowed to happen in the Punjab.

His greatest regret is that he was not allowed to handle Kashmir. I believe if he had been sent there, the issue would have been resolved by now. He took a demoralised Punjab police and helped to raise their morale. Punjab even during the period of the militancy, right up to the early 2000s remained the second most prosperous state of the country. After the recent Akali rule, it has climbed down to fourteenth position and its per capita income has plunged. Not even the Khalistanis did as much harm as the Akali rule.

Gill received praise for his handling of Operation Black Thunder?

The entire operation has been very well documents. He took two decisions against very strong opposition. The first was to allow the media to watch the entire operation unfold before their eyes. The second was to maintain it as a protracted siege by surrounding them and starving the militants off. Later, when they capitulated, the world got a chance to see just how they had desecrated Harmander Sahib. The terrorists were exposed completely.

I must mention that he was a virtual legend in Assam. He was called in to help quell the riots in Gujarat in 2002. He was called two months after the rioting had started in Gujarat. Before leaving, he asked Captain Amarinder Singh who was then chief minister of Punjab for a contingent of the Punjab police. Singh agreed but the request was turned down by the centre. Again, he had to deal with an extremely demoralised Gujarat police with some of them having colluded in the rioting. Within a week of his arrival, the rioting stopped.

He helped create confidence amongst the Muslims and mobs of petitioners used to be standing outside his office for hours on end. He published the phone numbers of the police officials and told the victims they should talk directly to him. He did not allow people to shirk responsibility. Some police officers who were known for their strong communal views were made in charge of getting the mosques cleaned.

He majored in English literature and had a great love of both English and Urdu poetry?

Yes. He had a phenomenal memory and could recite poems of both the great and minor poets. He thought it was his love of literature which helped provide him insights into human nature and helped him understand the wide range of responses on how people respond to different situations.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Continue Reading

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com