English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

“Of his own security, Gill famously said: That’s Sharma’s concern”

Published

on

“On his own security, Gill famously said: That’s Sharma’s concern”

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Former director general of Punjab police KPS Gill played a unique role in eliminating Khalistani terrorism in the Punjab in the eighties and early nineties. He was brought to Punjab as Inspector General of Punjab Armed Police at a very difficult period but he won the admiration of the citizens with the success of Operation Black Thunder which freed the Golden Temple in Amritsar of militants. Speaking to Rashme Sehgal, his son-in-law Dr Ajai Sahni, executive director of the Institute of Conflict Management, reminiscences about this dynamic and controversial personality

What is the quality you remember most about KPS Gill?

What I remember most about him is the sheer intensity of his commitment and sense of purpose. Nothing detracted him from what he had set out to do. He had a tremendous ability to focus on his goals. He had clear ideas about the nature and origins of the terrorist challenge in the Punjab and also how it should be tackled. In that sense he was fearless because he spent no time worrying about his own security. When he was once asked whether he was apprehensive about him being attacked by terrorists, his reply was ‘that is Sharma’s concern’. (Sushil Sharma was the officer in charge of his security.) During the period of terrorism in the Punjab, he used to travel for 26-28 days in a month.

This is not to say that he was not a target of terrorist attack. He was targeted endlessly and once came within shooting distance of a group of terrorists who chickened out at the last minute. This is in contrast to both his predecessor and his successor as DG Punjab police. To cite one example, in 1990-91, Gill was transferred to the CRPF in Delhi. The officer who succeeded him was targeted in a bomb attack following which he is known never to have stepped out of his official place of residence during his remaining tenure.

He introduced the whole concept of Operation Night Dominance by which the Punjab police would move around at night patrolling as well as attacking militant. Earlier, the police would barricade themselves in their police station at night but Operation Night Dominance saw them gaining an upper hand against terrorists.

Gill did write about his experiences in tackling militancy in his book Knights of Falsehood and also wrote an extensive paper on this subject titled Endgame in Punjab?

Endgame in Punjab provides details about the overall strategy and tactical changes deployed to defeat militancy in Punjab. His book titled Knights of Falsehood exposes the false version of Sikkhism  that was espoused by  Akali Dal leaders such as  Parkash Singh Badal, Gurucharan Singh Tohra, Bhindarwale and others. The role of the Akalis was shameful but has been largely forgotten today. Militancy spread in the Punjab because of them.

In the last interview Gill gave before his death, he regretted the fact that Indian institutions lacked institutional memory. For example, he highlighted how mistakes made in the 80s in tackling insurgency were being repeated today?

Yes indeed. The Khaslistani movement was brought to an end 22 years ago but the question is what has been the learning curve ? How should we apply principles of counter insurgency especially when this has been dealt with earlier.  We need to understand the importance of routine policing and more important, we must also understand the dynamics of a conflict. Apart from a half-day conference on the Punjab experience organised by the Punjab police, not a single meet has been organised in these 22 years at the level of  the National Police Academy on how this insurgency was tackled. Today, the theory doing the round is that the situation in Punjab was not so bad but people should not be allowed to forget  how serious the situation  in the Punjab was. We  were close to losing Punjab. Senior politicians used to say we have lost the people and it is only a matter of time before we lose the land.

I must also highlight how the suicide of Ajit Singh Sandhu ( former SSP of Tarn Taran)  and persecution of other Punjab police officers who fought insurgency saw him writing at length on this subject and how it was this police which helped to bring Punjab back from the brink.

Mr Gill was critical about the way Operation Blue Star had been conducted by the army?

He was written on this subject. I think for him it was not a question of the army or the police because they had been asked to respond to a political time table. The fact is that the army went in without the assistance of the local intelligence. We must not forget that following Operation Blue Star, militants crossed over and sought Pakistan’s help which they received and which helped start a proxy war that was spearheaded by Pakistan.

One of the reasons why he was able to combat this was because he brought about a unique model of co-operative command. He helped ensure that every officer of a particular rank in the police was in touch with his army counterpart so that there was complete intelligence sharing in a unified command system. They met on a daily basis and the aim of this exercise was very clear that they support each other. It helped construct a level of personal relationships which have not been replicated since. All control rooms were manned by police, army and CPRF officials- no one was kept out of the loop.

He believed the army was a national force and could not be seen fighting the people; the dirty work was left to the cops who had to conduct cordon and search operations. But look at the effect on the ground. No single village with more than three Hindu families was allowed to push these families out of their village. Orders were given to provide protection to the Hindu families and this was done. Militants always want an ethnic separation to occur, a polarisation of the population, because this helps to create greater discord. But this was not allowed to happen in the Punjab.

His greatest regret is that he was not allowed to handle Kashmir. I believe if he had been sent there, the issue would have been resolved by now. He took a demoralised Punjab police and helped to raise their morale. Punjab even during the period of the militancy, right up to the early 2000s remained the second most prosperous state of the country. After the recent Akali rule, it has climbed down to fourteenth position and its per capita income has plunged. Not even the Khalistanis did as much harm as the Akali rule.

Gill received praise for his handling of Operation Black Thunder?

The entire operation has been very well documents. He took two decisions against very strong opposition. The first was to allow the media to watch the entire operation unfold before their eyes. The second was to maintain it as a protracted siege by surrounding them and starving the militants off. Later, when they capitulated, the world got a chance to see just how they had desecrated Harmander Sahib. The terrorists were exposed completely.

I must mention that he was a virtual legend in Assam. He was called in to help quell the riots in Gujarat in 2002. He was called two months after the rioting had started in Gujarat. Before leaving, he asked Captain Amarinder Singh who was then chief minister of Punjab for a contingent of the Punjab police. Singh agreed but the request was turned down by the centre. Again, he had to deal with an extremely demoralised Gujarat police with some of them having colluded in the rioting. Within a week of his arrival, the rioting stopped.

He helped create confidence amongst the Muslims and mobs of petitioners used to be standing outside his office for hours on end. He published the phone numbers of the police officials and told the victims they should talk directly to him. He did not allow people to shirk responsibility. Some police officers who were known for their strong communal views were made in charge of getting the mosques cleaned.

He majored in English literature and had a great love of both English and Urdu poetry?

Yes. He had a phenomenal memory and could recite poems of both the great and minor poets. He thought it was his love of literature which helped provide him insights into human nature and helped him understand the wide range of responses on how people respond to different situations.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Continue Reading

India News

LPU students protest over reported rape allegation, police call it rumour

Students at Lovely Professional University protested over a reported rape allegation involving a worker, with police describing the claim as a rumour.

Published

on

Students of Lovely Professional University (LPU) in Punjab staged a protest after an allegation involving the reported rape of a student by a worker at the university surfaced.

The protest led to disruption around the university, with students taking to the streets and blocking the Jalandhar-Phagwara National Highway, according to the report.

The allegation triggered anger among students, who demanded action over the reported incident.

Police describe rape claim as rumour

Police, however, described the rape claim as a rumour, indicating that the allegation had not been established as a confirmed incident.

The distinction is important because the reported sexual assault allegation should not be treated as a confirmed rape unless investigators or other authoritative sources establish that fact.

The protests nevertheless continued as students sought clarity and action over the issue.

Protest disrupts traffic

The student demonstration also affected traffic on the Jalandhar-Phagwara National Highway. The protest brought attention to the allegations and the concerns being raised by students at the university.

With police calling the claim a rumour, further verification and investigation would be necessary to establish what actually happened.

Continue Reading

India News

INDIA bloc likely to meet on September 30 over Gyanesh Kumar row

INDIA bloc parties are likely to meet in New Delhi on September 30 amid growing opposition to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.

Published

on

Rahul-Gandhi

Opposition parties belonging to the INDIA bloc are set to meet in New Delhi on September 30 to discuss concerns surrounding the Election Commission, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and a proposed removal motion against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

The proposed meeting comes amid growing coordination among opposition parties over the functioning of the poll panel and demands for action against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The parties are also discussing a possible joint response to the developments.

Why is the INDIA bloc meeting being planned?

The INDIA bloc meeting on September 30 comes amid reports of objections within the Election Commission over certain decisions and orders related to the SIR exercise. 

According to the report, Opposition leaders have been discussing a coordinated response to their concerns over the Election Commission and the electoral-roll revision process. 

The issue is also expected to be discussed at the Congress Working Committee meeting scheduled for September 29, a day before the proposed INDIA bloc meeting.

Gyanesh Kumar removal demand in focus

The demand for the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar has become a major point of contention between the Opposition and the Election Commission.

The CPI(M), CPI and CPI(ML)-Liberation have demanded Kumar’s removal and an immediate halt to the SIR exercise. Congress has also intensified its criticism of the CEC.

Opposition parties are also working on a fresh removal motion against Gyanesh Kumar. The September 30 meeting is expected to finalise the strategy for the motion, including the collection of signatures. According to the report, this would be the Opposition’s third such attempt. 

What is the SIR controversy?

The political dispute is linked to the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, or SIR.

The controversy intensified following a report that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had recorded objections on several occasions concerning decisions and orders related to the SIR process.

The Election Commission has said that differing views and observations are part of normal deliberations in a multi-member constitutional body. The poll panel has also maintained that its orders have legal sanction and follow statutory procedures, while stating that the final decisions on the SIR were taken unanimously. 

TMC and Left parties coordinate over the issue

The developments have also brought the Trinamool Congress and the CPI(M) together on the Election Commission issue, despite their political differences in West Bengal.

CPI(M) general secretary M A Baby proposed an immediate meeting to discuss a joint strategy. According to the report, Mamata Banerjee spoke with M A Baby and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, after which the leaders settled on September 30 for the meeting. 

What could be discussed at the September 30 meeting?

The proposed meeting is expected to focus on:

  • Concerns surrounding the Election Commission
  • The Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls
  • Opposition demands concerning CEC Gyanesh Kumar
  • A possible fresh removal notice against the CEC
  • A coordinated response by INDIA bloc parties

The exact agenda and participation will depend on the discussions among the opposition parties before the proposed meeting.

Continue Reading

India News

“Will die but won’t give up”: Sahil Wakode’s parents urge IIT students to continue fight 

Sahil Wakode’s parents have appealed to IIT Bombay students to continue their fight for justice amid the ongoing investigation into their son’s death.

Published

on

Sahil Wakode

The parents of IIT Bombay student Sahil Wakode have appealed to students to continue raising their voices and fighting for justice following their son’s death.

Sahil Wakode, a second-year student at IIT Bombay, died in his hostel room on September 18. His death has led to student protests and an ongoing investigation by the Mumbai Crime Branch.

What Sahil Wakode’s parents have alleged

Sahil’s parents have alleged that their son faced caste-based discrimination and harassment at IIT Bombay before his death. They have sought action against those they hold responsible and have demanded a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death.

The family has also called for a CBI inquiry and has sought the arrest of officials named in the case. These remain allegations and are part of the ongoing investigation.

The Mumbai Crime Branch took over the probe after an FIR was registered following the complaint by Sahil’s parents.

IIT Bombay’s position

IIT Bombay has said that Sahil was allegedly caught using a mobile phone during a mid-semester examination and had uploaded the question paper to ChatGPT to seek answers.

The institute has maintained that no disciplinary action had been initiated against him. It said the matter had been discussed with him by the instructor and the Head of the Department, who counselled him and assured him that the incident would not adversely affect his academic career.

The circumstances surrounding Sahil’s death are being investigated by the appropriate authorities.

Investigation continues

The case remains under investigation, with the Mumbai Crime Branch examining the circumstances surrounding Sahil’s death and the allegations made by his family.

His parents have continued to demand justice and action against those they believe were responsible, while the investigation is expected to establish the facts surrounding the case.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com