English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Trinamool govt slammed on social media after Tata Motors wins Singur case

A social media user remarked that the suffering of the people of West Bengal in the Singur land case is undeniable. He continued that the loss of industry, jobs and the unfavorable investment climate has had a significant impact in the state.

Published

on

Trinamool govt slammed on social media after Tata Motors wins Singur case

In a massive setback for the Trinamool government in West Bengal, Tata Motors on Monday won the Singur land dispute case. The controversy dates back to 2008 when Tata Motors, facing the then opposition led by TMC chief Mamata Banerjee, announced the withdrawal of its ambitious Nano car production plant. During that time, the CPI(M) led Left Front was in power in the state and the BJP accused the TMC of driving industries away from the state. 

Now, the social media user slammed the Trinamool government for the same after a three member Arbitral Tribunal gave an unanimous award in favour of Tata Motors to be compensated Rs 766 crore plus interest for its investment in the now-scrapped Singur plant in West Bengal. Taking to social media platform X, formerly Twitter, Dr. Indranil Khan, the state president of  Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha said that the Singur Case is not a loss to Mamata Banerjee or her party TMC. 

He added that it is the loss of the people of West Bengal as they lost industry, jobs, favorable investment climate and now a staggering 1700 crores of taxpayers money. He noted that the government of West Bengal will now pay the compensation of 765 Crore principal along with 997.97 Crore interest and 1 Crore compensation amounting to Rs 1762.97 crores not from the TMC party fund or Mamata Banerjee’s personal account, but from the taxes that have been deducted from the hard-earned money. 

He further underlined that Trinamool government got all that they sought for, Power along with all possible varieties of Corruption from coal to cattle, rich to sand in order to enrich themselves and their families. Another social media user remarked that the suffering of the people of West Bengal in the Singur Land Case is undeniable. He continued that the loss of industry, jobs and the unfavorable investment climate has had a significant impact in the state. He mentioned that the financial burden placed on the taxpayers is also a concerning aspect.

Commenting on the matter, BJP Leader Gopal Krishna Agarwal who is also an economist said that West Bengal might end up paying huge sums to Tata Motors as compensation and Singur remains a shining example of bad economic effects of cheap politics.  In addition, multiple social media users slammed that Mamata Banerjee is directly responsible for the debacle. 

https://twitter.com/Assameseguy108/status/1718999760017784897?s=20

A timeline of the Singur land dispute

In May, 2006, Ratan Tata declared the Nano car project at Singur on the day coinciding with then West Bengal chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee taking oath for the second term. Nonetheless, the project ran into trouble with farmers staging protests against forcible acquisition of land for the Tata project.

The then opposition leader Mamata Banerjee carried out an indefinite hunger strike on December 3 that year against the project. Banerjee called off her protest following appeals by then President APJ Abdul Kalam and then prime minister Dr. Manmohan Singh.

In March, 2007, Tata and the then Left government signed the Singur land deal lease. By May, the talks between the Left regime and the TMC had failed. On February 15, 2008, Tata announced the Nano roll out by October. However, on September 3, Tata suspended work and a month later, it announced that it was moving out Nano operations from West Bengal to Gujarat.

Consecutively in 2011, Mamata Banerjee-led TMC swept the state assembly election defeating the CPI (M) nearly after 34 years. After coming to power, Mamata Banerjee announced the ordinance to take back Singur land. On June 22, 2011, Tata Motors challenged the Singur Act in the Calcutta high court seeking stay on government order. The Calcutta high court denied the grant stay and Tata had moved the Supreme Court.

India News

PM Modi urges people to read Tirukkural on Thiruvalluvar Day

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thiruvalluvar Day appealed to people to read the Tirukkural, calling it a reflection of the humane and harmonious ideals of Tamil philosopher-poet Thiruvalluvar.

Published

on

pm modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday urged people across the country to read the Tirukkural, highlighting its enduring relevance and the intellectual legacy of Tamil philosopher-poet Thiruvalluvar.

Marking Thiruvalluvar Day, which coincides with the Pongal celebrations every year, the prime minister paid tribute to the revered scholar, describing him as a symbol of harmony, compassion and Tamil cultural excellence.

In a message shared on social media platform X, Modi said Thiruvalluvar’s works and ideals continue to inspire countless people even today. He noted that the philosopher envisioned a society rooted in compassion and balance.

The prime minister encouraged citizens to engage with the Tirukkural, a classical Tamil text that deals with various aspects of human life, ethics and governance, calling it a window into the profound intellect of Thiruvalluvar.

Thiruvalluvar Day is observed annually to honour the philosopher-poet, whose literary contributions remain central to Tamil culture and thought.

Continue Reading

India News

BJP, Thackerays or Pawars: Maharashtra civic body poll results awaited today

Counting of votes for 29 municipal corporations in Maharashtra, including the key BMC and Pune civic bodies, begins today, with BJP, Thackerays and Pawars awaiting crucial results.

Published

on

The political balance in Maharashtra’s urban centres will become clearer today as votes are counted for elections to 29 municipal corporations across the state. The results are keenly awaited amid high-stakes contests involving the BJP, the Thackeray cousins and the reunited Pawar factions.

Polling was held for 2,869 seats across 893 wards, with 3.48 crore eligible voters deciding the fate of 15,931 candidates. Counting is scheduled to begin at 10 am.

Mumbai and Pune in sharp focus

All eyes are on Mumbai, where the contest for the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has drawn statewide attention. Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray joined hands after more than two decades in a bid to reclaim control of the country’s richest civic body.

The BMC, which has an annual budget of over Rs 74,400 crore, went to polls after a nine-year gap, following a four-year delay. A total of 1,700 candidates contested the 227 seats.

Exit polls suggest a strong performance by the BJP–Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde faction) alliance in Mumbai. An aggregate of multiple surveys projects the ruling alliance ahead, with the Shiv Sena (UBT) and allies trailing, while the Congress is expected to secure a limited number of seats. Exit polls have also indicated possible voting consolidation among Maratha and Muslim voters behind the Thackeray-led alliance, while women and young voters may tilt towards the BJP.

The last BMC election in 2017 saw the undivided Shiv Sena retain control of the civic body it had dominated for decades.

In Pune, the spotlight is on the unusual alliance between rival NCP factions led by Ajit Pawar and Sharad Pawar. Exit polls indicate the BJP could emerge as the largest party in the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC), with both NCP factions and the Shiv Sena also expected to secure a share of seats.

Statewide counting underway

Apart from Mumbai and Pune, counting will take place in several other key municipal corporations, including Thane, Navi Mumbai, Kalyan-Dombivli, Nagpur, Nashik, Pimpri-Chinchwad, Mira-Bhayandar, Vasai-Virar, Solapur, Kolhapur, Amravati, Akola, Jalgaon, Malegaon, Latur, Dhule, Jalna, Sangli-Miraj-Kupwad, Nanded-Waghala, Chandrapur, Parbhani, Panvel, Bhiwandi-Nizampur, Ulhasnagar, Ahilyanagar and Ichalkaranji.

With major parties treating these civic polls as a referendum on their urban appeal ahead of future state and national elections, today’s results are expected to shape Maharashtra’s political narrative in the months to come.

Continue Reading

India News

Supreme Court flags risk of lawlessness, pauses FIRs against ED officers in Bengal case

The Supreme Court paused FIRs against ED officers in the Bengal I-PAC raid case, warning that obstruction of central probes could lead to lawlessness and seeking responses from the Centre and state.

Published

on

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Wednesday delivered a sharp rebuke to the Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government, pausing FIRs lodged against officers of the Enforcement Directorate over searches linked to political consultancy I-PAC. The court said the case raises serious questions about interference in investigations and warned that failure to address them could lead to “lawlessness”.

A bench of Justice Prashant Mishra and Justice Vipul Pancholi sought replies from the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Department of Personnel and Training, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and the Trinamool Congress government on the ED’s plea. The central agency has also sought the suspension of Bengal Director General of Police Rajeev Kumar and Kolkata Police Commissioner Manoj Kumar Verma, and a probe by the CBI. The matter will be heard next on February 3.

The ruling follows a standoff between the ED and the Bengal government after the agency conducted searches at premises linked to I-PAC, which manages election campaigns for the Trinamool Congress, in connection with a corruption case.

Court questions obstruction of central probes

Recording its prima facie view, the Supreme Court said the petition raised a “serious issue” concerning investigations by central agencies and possible obstruction by state authorities.

“There are larger questions which emerge and if not answered shall lead to lawlessness. If central agencies are working bona fide to probe a serious offence, a question arises: Can they be obstructed by party activities?” the bench observed.

Earlier in the day, the court also expressed disturbance over scenes of chaos in the Calcutta High Court during a hearing related to the same dispute.

ED alleges interference, seeks action against top cops

The Enforcement Directorate accused the West Bengal administration of interfering with its searches and investigation. Appearing for the agency, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta alleged that evidence was removed from the residence of an I-PAC co-founder and argued that such actions could encourage state police officers to aid and abet obstruction. He sought suspension of senior police officials.

Describing the disruption in the Calcutta High Court on January 9, Mehta called it “mobocracy”, saying a group of lawyers unconnected to the case disrupted proceedings, forcing an adjournment. The bench asked whether the high court had been turned into a protest site, to which Mehta responded that messages had circulated calling lawyers to gather at a specific time.

Banerjee’s counsel defends move, cites election confidentiality

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Mamata Banerjee, questioned the timing of the ED’s presence in Bengal ahead of Assembly elections. He said the last development in the coal scam case dated back to February 2024 and argued that I-PAC handled election-related work under a formal contract with the Trinamool Congress.

According to Sibal, election data stored at the premises was confidential and critical to campaign strategy. He said the party leadership had a right to protect such information.

Representing the Bengal government and the DGP, senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi referred to the January 9 disruption but argued it could not justify parallel proceedings in different courts. The bench responded that emotions “cannot go out of hand repeatedly”.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com