English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Supreme Court orders CBI probe into all Bihar shelter home cases

Published

on

SUPREME-COURT

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The Supreme Court today (Wednesday, November 28) transferred to the CBI probe into the “gamut of allegations” involving 17 Bihar shelter homes for children, destitute women, beggars and senior citizens.

Yesterday the court had expressed unhappiness at finding that FIRs so far registered in these cases mention only petty offences and none of the serious offences find mention in the FIRs so far lodged in cases of abuse and torture in the 17 shelter homes. It had given the State government 24 hours to repair the situation or hand over the case to the CBI.

The CBI is already investigating the case of sexual abuse of children in a Muzaffarpur shelter home in the State as per apex court orders.

The apex court slammed the Nitish Kumar government in the presence of the Bihar Chief Secretary for “not doing its job properly.”

The State, represented by advocates Gopal Singh and Manish Kumar, repeatedly urged the court to not transfer the cases to the CBI, but the court remained firm.

“If the State government had done its job properly, these cases would not have gone to the CBI. You had enough time, yet you did not do your job properly,” Justice Madan B Lokur told the Bihar government.

The last straw was when the court realised that FIRs so far registered in these cases mention only petty offences. None of the serious offences alleged find mention in the 11 FIRs so far lodged in cases of abuse and torture in the 17 shelter homes. Yesterday the court had given the State government 24 hours to repair the situation or hand over the case to the CBI.

The court called the state government’s behaviour “shameful” and “inhuman” for not invoking more stringent sections of Indian law (when local police filed FIRs). In the Muzaffarpur shelter home, girls were regularly raped, beaten and terrorised, according to a report by the Tata Institute of Social Sciences.

“It’s very shameful,” Justice Lokur said. “If a child is being sodomised and you say it’s nothing. How can you do this? It’s inhuman.”

The court said yesterday that it may hand over the investigation of the cases to the CBI, which was earlier probing only one – the Muzaffarpur shelter home case.

On Wednesday, the Bihar side came up with a “communication” from a police higher-up to the investigation officer, blandly asking the latter to include some serious offences in the FIRs.

The “communication” had been meant to be a last resort for the State to retain the investigation with the State Police, but the court refused to even take note of the letter. Bihar government then pleaded with the court to give it a week’s time to file a status report before transferring the case to the CBI.

“When do you want to give the status report? Take one or two months, but we will transfer the investigation to the CBI today,” Justice Lokur snubbed the State’s plea.

The CBI, however, seemed reluctant initially to take up the investigation into the 17 shelter homes. Acting CBI Director, M Nageshwar Rao, through the agency counsel, informed the Bench about a bar imposed on him by the Supreme Court to not take any major or policy decisions.

Rao had been earlier ordered by the Supreme Court to restrict his official decisions to only routine tasks until the cloud over the removal of his former boss, exiled CBI chief Alok Verma, was cleared by the court.

“So, all investigations should stop then? What is this? That bar has nothing to do with this case” Justice Lokur reacted, asking the CBI counsel to ring up Rao and get his confirmation over phone about taking up the probe into the 17 homes.

The agency counsel was back shortly and conveyed Rao’s “in-principle” agreement to conduct the probe.

The court directed the Bihar government to fulfill any request from the CBI team for additional manpower or infrastructure. It ordered that no officer in the team should be transferred during the pendency of the probe. The probe team would be led by senior CBI officer, AK Sharma. The court asked the CBI to file a status report in February on the progress of the investigation till January 31, 2019.

The CBI, already probing the Muzaffarpur shelter home case, told the court the agency is expected to file a chargesheet by December 7.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

DU VC Prof Yogesh Singh entrusted with additional charge of AICTE Chairman

Published

on

By

Prof. Yogesh Singh, Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi, has been entrusted with the additional charge of the post of Chairman, AICTE till the appointment of a Chairman of AICTE or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

It is noteworthy that AICTE Chairman Prof. TG Sitharam was relieved of his duties after his term ended on December 20, 2025. According to a letter issued by the Ministry of Education, Government of India, on Monday, Prof. Yogesh Singh’s appointment is until the appointment of a regular AICTE Chairman or until further orders whichever is earlier.

Prof. Yogesh Singh is a renowned academician with excellent administrative capabilities, who has been the Vice-Chancellor of University of Delhi since October 2021. He has also served as the Chairperson of the National Council for Teacher Education. In August 2023, he was also given the additional charge of Director of the School of Planning and Architecture (SPA).

Prof. Yogesh Singh served as the Vice-Chancellor of Delhi Technological University from 2015 to 2021; Director of Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Delhi from 2014 to 2017, and before that, he was the Vice-Chancellor of Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda (Gujarat) from 2011 to 2014. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra. He has a distinguished track record in quality teaching, innovation, and research in the field of software engineering.

Continue Reading

India News

Goa nightclub fire case: Court extends police custody of Luthra brothers by five days

A Goa court has extended the police custody of Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra, owners of the nightclub where a deadly fire killed 25 people, by five more days.

Published

on

Luthra brothers

A court in Goa on Monday extended the police custody of Saurabh Luthra and Gaurav Luthra, the owners of the Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub, by five more days in connection with the deadly fire incident that claimed 25 lives on December 6.

The order was passed as investigators sought additional time to question the two accused in the case linked to the blaze at the Anjuna-based nightclub.

Owners were deported after fleeing abroad

According to details placed before the court, the Luthra brothers had left the country following the incident and travelled to Thailand. They were subsequently deported and brought back to India on December 17, after which they were taken into police custody.

Advocate Vishnu Joshi, representing the families of the victims, confirmed that the court granted a five-day extension of police custody for both Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra.

Another co-owner sent to judicial custody

The court also remanded Ajay Gupta, another owner of the nightclub, to judicial custody. Police did not seek an extension of his custody, following which the court passed the order, the victims’ counsel said.

The Anjuna police have registered a case against the Luthra brothers for culpable homicide not amounting to murder along with other relevant offences related to the fire incident.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi High Court issues notice to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi in National Herald case

Delhi High Court has sought responses from Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on the ED’s plea challenging a trial court order in the National Herald case.

Published

on

The Delhi High Court has sought responses from Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on a petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the National Herald case. The petition challenges a trial court order that refused to take cognisance of the agency’s prosecution complaint.

Justice Ravinder Dudeja issued notices to the Gandhis and other accused on the main petition, as well as on the ED’s application seeking a stay on the trial court’s December 16 order. The high court has listed the matter for further hearing on March 12, 2026.

The trial court had ruled that taking cognisance of the ED’s complaint was “impermissible in law” because the investigation was not based on a registered First Information Report (FIR). It observed that the prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was not maintainable in the absence of an FIR for a scheduled offence.

According to the order, the ED’s probe originated from a private complaint rather than an FIR. The court further noted that since cognisance was declined on a legal question, it was not necessary to examine the merits of the allegations at that stage.

The trial court also referred to the complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and the summoning order issued in 2014, stating that despite these developments, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) did not register an FIR in relation to the alleged scheduled offence.

The ED has accused Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and a private company, Young Indian, of conspiracy and money laundering. The agency has alleged that properties worth around Rs 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), which publishes the National Herald newspaper, were acquired through Young Indian.

The agency further claimed that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi held a majority 76 per cent shareholding in Young Indian, which allegedly took over AJL’s assets in exchange for a Rs 90 crore loan.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com