English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Taj Mahal a blot on Indian culture, says BJP MLA Sangeet Som

Published

8 years ago

on

Sangeet Som

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Som, accused of inciting Hindu mobs during Muzaffarnagar riots, says the UNESCO World Heritage site was built by traitors, BJP disowns remarks

Weeks after the Uttar Pradesh government drew flak for excluding the Taj Mahal from its brochure on tourism hot spots in the state, controversial BJP legislator Sangeet Som has once again dragged the UNESCO World Heritage Site into a political debate, claiming that the 17th Century marble mausoleum is a “blot on Indian culture”.

Addressing a function in Sisoli village of UP’s Meerut district on Sunday, Sangeet Som, BJP MLA from the state’s Sardhana constituency, claimed that the Taj Mahal – listed as one of the 7 Wonders of the World – was “built by traitors”.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Misrepresenting historical facts, the controversial legislator also told the audience that “the person (Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan) who built the Taj Mahal imprisoned his father” and sought to use the architectural marvel as a means to foment communal tension by claiming that “the one who built the Taj targeted many Hindus in Uttar Pradesh and Hindustan”.

Clearly, Som hasn’t read much of history – or at least the history of the Mughal rulers of India – for it wasn’t Shah Jahan who imprisoned his father (Emperor Jahangir). While Jahangir went on to serve as the Mughal ruler until his death in October 1627, it was Shah Jahan who was imprisoned by his son and successor, Aurangzeb in 1658 and kept in confinement for eight years, until his death in 1666.

But then history obviously doesn’t interest Som, who is also accused of inciting Hindu mobs during the Muzaffarnagar riots of 2013 which resulted in the death of at least 42 Muslims and 20 Hindus and left nearly 50,000 people from the western UP district displaced.

The BJP legislator reportedly said at the function, which was organised to inaugurate a statue of the 8th century Hindu king Anangpal Singh Tomar, that: “Many people were worried that the Taj Mahal was removed from the list of historical places in the UP tourism booklet. What history are we talking about? The man who built Taj Mahal… wanted to massacre Hindus. If this is history, then it is very unfortunate and we will change this history, I guarantee you.”

Clearly embarrassed by the row that Som’s remarks triggered, the BJP sought to distance itself from the controversy on Monday. The party’s spokespersons – Nalin Kohli and GVL Narsimha Rao claimed that the remarks were “not the party’s view” on the Taj Mahal but were Som’s “personal views”. Rao, however, claimed that Som was entitled to make the obviously divisive comments as per his right to freedom of speech.

The BJP, however, did not categorically shun Som’s comments for their historical misrepresentation and communal overtones but instead acknowledged the Taj Mahal purely as a “tourist spot”. While Kohli said the Taj Mahal is “part of incredible India”, Rao insisted that “it is a symbol of barbarism and it is a monument.”

However, Sangeet Som’s comments did trigger strong reactions on Twitter with several political leaders and common Twitteratti lashing out the BJP legislator for his remarks and ever wondering if Prime Minister Narendra Modi would stop hoisting the Indian tricolour from the Red Fort – also built by Shah Jahan – onAugust 15 as the red sandstone monument in New Delhi was also part of the legacy of the man who had the Taj Mahal built.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

India News

Supreme Court flags risk of lawlessness, pauses FIRs against ED officers in Bengal case

The Supreme Court paused FIRs against ED officers in the Bengal I-PAC raid case, warning that obstruction of central probes could lead to lawlessness and seeking responses from the Centre and state.

Published

15 hours ago

on

January 15, 2026

By

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Wednesday delivered a sharp rebuke to the Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government, pausing FIRs lodged against officers of the Enforcement Directorate over searches linked to political consultancy I-PAC. The court said the case raises serious questions about interference in investigations and warned that failure to address them could lead to “lawlessness”.

A bench of Justice Prashant Mishra and Justice Vipul Pancholi sought replies from the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Department of Personnel and Training, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and the Trinamool Congress government on the ED’s plea. The central agency has also sought the suspension of Bengal Director General of Police Rajeev Kumar and Kolkata Police Commissioner Manoj Kumar Verma, and a probe by the CBI. The matter will be heard next on February 3.

The ruling follows a standoff between the ED and the Bengal government after the agency conducted searches at premises linked to I-PAC, which manages election campaigns for the Trinamool Congress, in connection with a corruption case.

Court questions obstruction of central probes

Recording its prima facie view, the Supreme Court said the petition raised a “serious issue” concerning investigations by central agencies and possible obstruction by state authorities.

“There are larger questions which emerge and if not answered shall lead to lawlessness. If central agencies are working bona fide to probe a serious offence, a question arises: Can they be obstructed by party activities?” the bench observed.

Earlier in the day, the court also expressed disturbance over scenes of chaos in the Calcutta High Court during a hearing related to the same dispute.

ED alleges interference, seeks action against top cops

The Enforcement Directorate accused the West Bengal administration of interfering with its searches and investigation. Appearing for the agency, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta alleged that evidence was removed from the residence of an I-PAC co-founder and argued that such actions could encourage state police officers to aid and abet obstruction. He sought suspension of senior police officials.

Describing the disruption in the Calcutta High Court on January 9, Mehta called it “mobocracy”, saying a group of lawyers unconnected to the case disrupted proceedings, forcing an adjournment. The bench asked whether the high court had been turned into a protest site, to which Mehta responded that messages had circulated calling lawyers to gather at a specific time.

Banerjee’s counsel defends move, cites election confidentiality

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Mamata Banerjee, questioned the timing of the ED’s presence in Bengal ahead of Assembly elections. He said the last development in the coal scam case dated back to February 2024 and argued that I-PAC handled election-related work under a formal contract with the Trinamool Congress.

According to Sibal, election data stored at the premises was confidential and critical to campaign strategy. He said the party leadership had a right to protect such information.

Representing the Bengal government and the DGP, senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi referred to the January 9 disruption but argued it could not justify parallel proceedings in different courts. The bench responded that emotions “cannot go out of hand repeatedly”.

Continue Reading

India News

Shashi Tharoor warns US tariffs on Iran could make Indian exports unviable

Shashi Tharoor has warned that cumulative US tariffs linked to Iran trade could rise to 75%, making most Indian exports to America commercially unviable.

Published

24 hours ago

on

January 15, 2026

By

Shashi Tharoor

Congress MP and chairman of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs Shashi Tharoor has expressed serious concern over the United States’ latest tariff announcement targeting countries that continue to trade with Iran, warning that such measures could severely impact Indian exporters.

Reacting to the decision by US President Donald Trump to impose a 25% tariff on countries doing business with Iran, Tharoor said Indian companies would struggle to remain competitive if cumulative tariffs rise to 75%. He noted that India was already at a disadvantage compared to several regional competitors.

Tharoor said he had been troubled by the US tariff regime from the outset, pointing out that India was initially subjected to a 25% tariff while rival exporting nations in Southeast Asia were charged significantly lower rates. According to him, countries such as Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Pakistan and Bangladesh faced tariffs ranging between 15% and 19% on labour-intensive goods exported to the US.

He explained that the situation had worsened with additional sanctions-linked duties. With the existing 25% tariff, another 25% related to Russia-linked sanctions, and a further 25% tied to Iran-related measures, the total burden could rise to 75%. At that level, Tharoor said, most Indian exports would no longer be commercially viable in the American market.

While noting that certain sectors such as pharmaceuticals may continue to export as they are not heavily impacted by sanctions, he warned that other key export categories would be hit hard. Tharoor described the situation as very serious and said it required urgent attention.

The Congress MP also expressed hope that the newly appointed US Ambassador could help facilitate progress on a bilateral trade agreement. He stressed that India could not afford to wait through the entire year for a deal and said an agreement should ideally be concluded in the first quarter of 2026.

Commenting on recent diplomatic engagements between India and the US, Tharoor underlined the need for faster consensus on trade issues. He said that at tariff levels as high as 75%, the idea of a meaningful trade deal loses relevance. According to him, a rate closer to what the UK enjoys with the US, around 15%, would reflect the respect due to a strategic partner.

Tharoor’s remarks come after President Trump announced that any country continuing business with Iran would face a 25% tariff on all trade with the United States, a move that has raised concerns among several trading partners.

Continue Reading

India News

Indian Army symbolizes selfless service and duty, says PM Modi on Army Day

PM Narendra Modi on Army Day praised the Indian Army as a symbol of selfless service and unwavering duty, saluting the courage and sacrifice of its soldiers.

Published

1 day ago

on

January 15, 2026

By

pm modi speech

On the occasion of Army Day, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday paid tribute to the Indian Army, describing its soldiers as a symbol of selfless service who protect the nation with unwavering resolve, even in the most challenging circumstances.

In a message shared on social media platform X, the prime minister said the country salutes the courage and steadfast commitment of Indian Army personnel. He noted that their dedication to duty inspires confidence and gratitude among citizens across the country.

“Our soldiers stand as a symbol of selfless service, safeguarding the nation with steadfast resolve, at times under the most challenging conditions,” PM Modi said. He added that the nation remembers with deep respect those who have laid down their lives while serving the country.

Army Day is observed every year on January 15 to commemorate a historic moment in India’s military history. The day marks the appointment of Field Marshal K M Cariappa as the first Indian Commander-in-Chief of the Indian Army in 1949, when he took over from British officer General Sir F R R Bucher.

The occasion serves as a reminder of the Indian Army’s role in defending the country’s sovereignty and honour, as well as the sacrifices made by its personnel in the line of duty.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com