English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Told PM Modi that India shouldn’t be divided on sectarian lines: Barack Obama

Published

on

Told PM Modi that India shouldn’t be divided on sectarian lines: Barack Obama

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Former US President Obama says he likes Narendra Modi but adds that he was great friends with Dr Manmohan Singh who laid the foundation of modern Indian economy

Former US President Barack Obama’s address at the HT Leadership Summit in New Delhi, on Friday, comes as a mixed bag of applause and understated criticism for Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his central government.

At a time when India is witnessing a raging debate on a perceived rise in religious intolerance and communal disharmony – particularly between the Hindu and Muslim communities – Obama said that he had, during a private conversation, told Prime Minister Narendra Modi that “a country shouldn’t be divided on sectarian lines”. He, however, declined to comment on what Prime Minister Modi’s response was on the issue.

Obama was perhaps referring to his discussion with Modi during his last visit to India, in January 2015, when he was still the US President. During that visit, Obama had red-flagged the issue of religious intolerance – or the lack of it – while speaking to journalists before his departure for the US. Though Obama had not specifically said that he was speaking with regard to the situation in India, his comments had stoked a controversy as they were seen as his endorsement of the claims of rising religious intolerance that were making headlines in the country at the time.

On Friday, Obama spoke at length about the issue of religious polarisation. While his comments were, possibly, largely in the context of US politics which has seen a resurgence of Islam -bashing ever since he demitted office and was succeeded by President Donald Trump, they could just as well be juxtaposed on the Indian socio-political scenario. Perhaps, they were even meant to.

While asserting that multiculturalism was a “common bond” between the US and India, former president Obama stressed on tolerance and warned that “the distinction between ‘us’ and ‘them’ is dangerous and can wreak havoc on us all”.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]In specific comments about India, Obama said: “For a country like India, where there is a Muslim population that is successful, integrated and considers itself as Indian, which is not the case in some other countries, this should be nourished and cultivated. It’s important to continue reinforcing it (sic).”

Obama, who during his eight year stint in office became the only US president to have visited India twice in the official capacity as the Head of State, had the chance of working on Indo-US ties and other issues with Prime Minister Narendra Modi as well as his predecessor Dr Manmohan Singh. And so, it was obvious for questions to be asked on his impressions of the two Indian leaders.

The former US President’s reply to an otherwise tricky question came as one that would please both Modi and Dr Singh, although it could also upset the current Indian Premier a little.

For starters, Obama said he “likes” Modi but was quick to add that he was “great friends with Dr Manmohan Singh”. On the stints of the two Indian prime ministers, Obama made a clear differentiation – one that could rile the BJP and unnerve Prime Minister Modi, who during Obama’s 2015 visit to India, had been at the receiving end of many a jokes for referring to the then US President as ‘Barack’ – a clear departure from normal diplomatic protocol.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Modi said he believes Modi “has a vision for the country” and that he “is in many ways modernising certain elements of bureaucracy” but that Dr Singh “laid the foundation of the modern Indian economy”.

Obama’s praise for Dr Singh’s contribution towards modernising the Indian economy comes at a time when the Modi-led BJP government is facing flak – domestically and by some economists in the West – for pushing the Indian economy on a downward spiral with his demonetisation move and an alleged hasty implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime.

The former US president also underlined that he had worked closely with Dr Singh to get the US and India out of the effects of the 2008 global economic meltdown.

In a remark that almost seemed like a consolation for Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Obama added: “Both (Modi and Dr Singh) of them were sound leaders. Dr Singh was the primary partner while we were working during the financial meltdown. Modi was the primary partner during making of Paris accord.”

However, in comments that the BJP and Modi would surely be thrilled about, Obama also said: “I know PM Modi believes in unity of India…I think his impulses are to recognise Indian unity. I think he firmly believes unity is necessary for the progress of the nation.”

Of course a discussion with Obama could not be complete without his views on his successor – US President Donald Trump – with whom he is known to share a frosty, often acrimonious relationship. But the former US President dealt with these questions with a tact that has come to define his style as a world leader.

When senior journalist Karan Thapar asked Obama, “Donald Duck or Donald Trump, which represents America,” the former US President said: “The cacophony of America is what I love about the country. The political trends are a thread of life. One of the joys and frustrations about America is that it can be contradictory. We can be kind and cruel. I think it’s the same with India.”

He did, however, take a few swipes at Trump. Asked how his Twitter habits were different from the indiscriminate and often controversial tweets put out by President Trump, Obama said: “I use punctuation in my text” and added for good measure: “I have more Twitter followers than some people who use it more often.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

India hits back at Shehbaz Sharif at UN, says terror will have consequences

India hit back at Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s UN speech, with New Delhi warning that terrorism will have consequences.

Published

on

India has responded to Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s remarks at the United Nations, delivering a strong message on terrorism and warning that such actions will have consequences.

The response came after Mr Sharif addressed the UN and raised issues concerning India and Pakistan. New Delhi rejected the narrative presented by the Pakistani prime minister and highlighted the issue of terrorism.

India’s message was delivered by Petal Gehlot, who represented New Delhi in the response to Pakistan.

India warns Pakistan over terrorism

India’s response focused on Pakistan’s record and its approach towards terrorism. New Delhi made clear that terrorism cannot be separated from its consequences and that those responsible cannot expect such actions to go unanswered.

The Indian side also pushed back against the claims and allegations made by Mr Sharif during his UN speech.

The exchange comes amid continuing tensions between India and Pakistan, with terrorism remaining a major point of disagreement between the two countries.

Shehbaz Sharif’s UN remarks

In his address, Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif spoke about India-Pakistan relations and raised several issues concerning New Delhi.

India subsequently exercised its right of reply to respond to Pakistan’s statements at the United Nations.

New Delhi’s response underlined its position that terrorism remains a serious issue in the relationship and that there would be consequences for terrorist actions.

The latest exchange at the UN adds to the continuing diplomatic confrontation between the two neighbouring countries.

Continue Reading

India News

Veeramani POCSO case: Vijay questions Stalin over earlier probe

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay has questioned MK Stalin over the handling of the Veeramani POCSO case, while Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected anyone.

Published

on

Actor Vijay

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) president C Joseph Vijay has questioned DMK president MK Stalin over the handling of the POCSO case involving Gem Granites founder R Veeramani. The political exchange follows renewed investigation into allegations involving minor girls.

Vijay’s remarks came as the ruling TVK stepped up its questions about how the case was handled during the previous DMK government. The party’s IT wing has alleged that the earlier investigation was weakened and questioned why a final report was filed.

The allegations have been rejected by the DMK. Stalin has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to protect anyone in the case and has called the allegations false and defamatory.

What did Vijay say about the Veeramani case?

Vijay questioned Stalin over the handling of the case and demanded an explanation from the former chief minister.

The TVK has specifically questioned why action was not taken against Veeramani during the previous administration and why the earlier investigation resulted in a closure report.

The party has also raised questions about the role of officials involved in the earlier investigation. These are political allegations made by the TVK and have not been established as facts.

What is the Veeramani POCSO case?

The case concerns allegations of sexual abuse of minors involving R Veeramani, the founder of Gem Granites.

The case came under renewed scrutiny after a special POCSO court rejected an earlier closure report and ordered further investigation. The expanded probe has subsequently identified additional alleged survivors who were minors at the time of the alleged offences, according to current reporting.

The investigation is also examining the circumstances surrounding the earlier probe and whether there were any lapses in how the case was handled.

What has MK Stalin said?

Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected Veeramani.

He has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to shield anyone in the case. Stalin has also said that everyone responsible for the alleged offences, including anyone who aided or attempted to protect the accused, should face the law.

The DMK president has further said that the focus should remain on securing justice for the affected girls rather than making political allegations.

Why has the case become a political issue?

The Veeramani case has become the subject of a political dispute between the ruling TVK and the DMK over the handling of the earlier investigation.

The TVK is questioning the previous government’s handling of the case, while the DMK has denied that it intervened to protect the accused.

At this stage, claims about political interference or deliberate weakening of the earlier investigation should be treated as allegations unless established by the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

Continue Reading

India News

Women wrestlers challenge Brij Bhushan’s acquittal in sexual harassment case

Four women wrestlers have challenged the acquittal of former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and co-accused Vinod Tomar in a sexual harassment case.

Published

on

Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh

Four women wrestlers have approached a Delhi court challenging the acquittal of former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief and BJP leader Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in a sexual harassment case.

The wrestlers have also challenged the acquittal of co-accused Vinod Tomar. The matter is scheduled to be heard by a Special Judge at the Rouse Avenue Courts.

The appeal challenges the order passed by an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on August 3, 2026, when Brij Bhushan and Tomar were acquitted in the case.

Wrestlers challenge court’s reasoning

In their appeal, the wrestlers have argued that the acquittal order is legally unsustainable and that the evidence was not assessed appropriately.

They have also alleged that the order relied on assumptions about how victims of sexual assault and harassment were expected to behave instead of assessing the evidence and circumstances of the complainants.

The challenge seeks judicial scrutiny of the findings that resulted in the acquittal of Brij Bhushan and Tomar.

Brij Bhushan was acquitted in August

The Rouse Avenue court acquitted Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh on August 3 in the sexual harassment case involving women wrestlers. The court’s decision followed consideration of the evidence and statements presented during the proceedings.

The case had emerged after several women wrestlers accused the former WFI chief of sexual harassment. The allegations had led to a major protest by wrestlers in 2023.

The latest appeal means the acquittal is now being challenged before a higher court.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com