English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

SC held Prashant Bhushan guilty in a Contempt Case.

Published

on

Advocate Prashant Bhushan

The Supreme Court has found Advocate Prashant Bhushan guilty of contempt of court for his tweets criticising Chief Justice of India SA Bobde and the judiciary posted earlier this year.

The order was passed today by a Bench of Justices Arun Mishra, BR Gavai, and Krishna Murari. The Court is yet to decide on the quantum of punishment. The hearing on the sentence will be held on August 20. The Court had registered the suo motu contempt case against Bhushan over two of his tweets criticising the judiciary.

Orders were reserved in the matter on August 5 after a day’s hearing, in which Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave made vociferous submissions on behalf of Bhushan.  The two tweets in question were posted in June this year.

Dave submitted that Bhushan was airing only bona fide criticism against the judiciary without any malice. Dave also submitted that there were several shortcomings in the functioning of the judiciary, which warranted Bhushan’s criticism. Bhushan filed a detailed reply affidavit to the contempt notice, stating that expression of bona fide opinion about the Court cannot amount to contempt.

The first tweet pertained to Bhushan’s commentary on a picture of Chief Justice of India SA Bobde on a high-end motorcycle, whereas in the second, Bhushan expressed his opinion on the role of last four CJIs amid the state of affairs in the country. Madhya Pradesh-based advocate Mahek Maheshwari had also filed a contempt petition against Bhushan and Twitter India on July 2 over the tweet pertaining to CJI Bobde on a motorcycle.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan

In his reply to the Court by a 142-page affidavit, Bhushan stated that his tweets are justified, and could not be considered contempt of court.

He said that his tweet on CJI Bobde appearing in a picture on a motorcycle without a helmet or a mask was a mere expression of his anguish with an intention to highlight the incongruity of the situation. As far as the tweet on the role of the last four CJIs is concerned, Bhushan submitted that he was expressing his bona fide opinion about the state of affairs. 

As regards his tweet about Chief Justice of India, S A Bobde, seated on a Harley Davidson motorcycle, Bhushan said in the affidavit that his comment was to underline his angusih at the non-physical functioning of the Supreme Court for the last more than three months, “as a result of which fundamental rights of citizens, such as those in detention, those destitute and poor, and others facing serious and urgent grievances were not being addressed or taken up for redressal“.

Along with the reply, Bhushan had also moved the Supreme Court challenging the action of its Secretary-General to list the contempt petition filed against him on the judicial side, without the consent of the Attorney General.

Read Also: PM’s push to Atmanirbhar Bharat from Red Fort

Moreover, this plea had also questioned the sudden listing of an 11-year-old contempt matter pending against Bhushan in light of recent developments. On August 10, the Court decided to hear this case on merits. This 2009 case concerns Bhushan’s statements on corruption in the judiciary in an interview with Tehelka magazine.

India News

Mamata Banerjee writes to poll chief over officers’ reshuffle, calls move arbitrary

Mamata Banerjee has written to the Chief Election Commissioner, calling the reshuffle of senior Bengal officials arbitrary and raising concerns over constitutional norms.

Published

on

mamta banerjee

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has written to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, raising strong objections to the recent reshuffle of senior bureaucrats in the state ahead of the assembly elections.

In her letter, Banerjee described the move by the Election Commission of India as “arbitrary” and expressed “deep concern” over what she termed a unilateral decision. She urged the Commission to refrain from adopting such measures in the future.

The Chief Minister pointed out that while the Election Commission does have the authority to make administrative changes during elections, past practice has involved consultation with the state government. According to her, the Commission would typically seek a panel of officers from the state and make its selections from that list, maintaining what she called constitutional propriety and administrative convention.

Banerjee warned that bypassing this process could undermine the institutional credibility and long-standing legacy of the poll body, and may also affect the foundational principles of the constitutional framework.

The controversy stems from the Commission’s decision, taken soon after announcing election dates, to remove several top officials from election-related duties. These include the state’s Chief Secretary, Director General of Police, Kolkata Police Commissioner, and Home Secretary.

The Commission has maintained that the reshuffle was aimed at ensuring a peaceful and violence-free electoral process.

Reacting sharply, Banerjee alleged bias in the decision-making, claiming that the removal of the Chief Secretary indicated an anti-women stance. She also accused the Commission of selectively targeting officers, suggesting that the move favoured individuals aligned with the Bharatiya Janata Party.

Meanwhile, the Trinamool Congress escalated its protest, staging a day-long walkout from the Rajya Sabha earlier in the day.

Responding to the criticism, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the Election Commission is a constitutional authority, adding that questioning its decisions in Parliament is inappropriate and unproductive.

The Commission has appointed a new Chief Secretary in place of the outgoing official as part of the reshuffle.

Continue Reading

India News

Pakistan airstrike allegations on Kabul hospital leave hundreds dead, claims Taliban

Taliban alleges 400 deaths after a Pakistani airstrike hit a Kabul hospital, but Islamabad denies targeting civilian infrastructure.

Published

on

pakistan fire

At least 400 people have been killed and around 250 others injured following an alleged Pakistani airstrike on a hospital in Afghanistan’s capital, Kabul, according to Taliban officials.

Afghanistan’s deputy government spokesperson Hamdullah Fitrat said the strike occurred around 9 pm local time and hit a major drug rehabilitation hospital in Kabul. The facility, which reportedly has a capacity of 2,000 beds, suffered extensive damage, with large sections destroyed in the attack.

Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid strongly condemned the incident, accusing Pakistan of deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure. In a statement posted on X, he alleged that the strike hit a medical facility where patients were undergoing treatment, calling the act a violation of international norms and “a crime against humanity.”

Pakistan, however, rejected the accusations. The country’s officials termed the claims “baseless” and denied targeting any hospital in Kabul.

Pakistan’s Information Minister Attaullah Tarar stated that the military had carried out “precision airstrikes” but insisted the targets were military installations. According to him, the operations focused on “technical support infrastructure and ammunition storage facilities” at two locations in Kabul and in the eastern province of Nangarhar.

He further claimed that the strikes were aimed at infrastructure allegedly used to support militant groups, stressing that only specific targets were engaged.

The reported airstrike comes amid rising tensions between the two neighbouring countries. Afghan authorities said clashes along the border in recent days have resulted in casualties, with at least four people killed in Afghanistan.

The ongoing hostilities reportedly began in late February after Afghanistan launched cross-border actions in response to earlier Pakistani strikes, which Kabul claimed had caused civilian deaths.

The situation has further strained relations despite a ceasefire brokered last October. The truce had followed earlier violence that left dozens of civilians, soldiers, and suspected militants dead.

Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has described the situation as an “open war,” signalling a sharp escalation in the conflict between the two nations.

Continue Reading

India News

BJP releases first list of 47 candidates for Kerala assembly polls

The BJP has released its first list of 47 candidates for the Kerala Assembly elections scheduled for April 9, including three former Union ministers.

Published

on

BJP releases list of candidates

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Monday released its first list of 47 candidates for the upcoming Kerala Assembly elections scheduled for April 9.

Voting will take place for all 140 seats in the state assembly, with counting of votes scheduled for May 4. A party or coalition needs at least 70 seats to secure a majority in the House.

Among the candidates announced in the first list are three former Union ministers — Rajeev Chandrasekhar, V. Muraleedharan and George Kurian.

Key candidates announced

Kerala BJP chief and former Union minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar has been fielded from the Nemom assembly constituency. In the 2024 Lok Sabha election, Chandrasekhar lost the Thiruvananthapuram seat to three-time MP Shashi Tharoor, but he led in the Nemom assembly segment during that contest. The party believes this performance strengthens its prospects in the constituency.

Nemom has held political significance for the BJP since 2016, when senior leader O. Rajagopal won the seat and became the party’s first-ever MLA in the 140-member Kerala Legislative Assembly. The victory marked the BJP’s initial breakthrough in the state assembly.

However, the seat returned to the Left camp in the 2021 Assembly election when V. Sivankutty defeated BJP leader Kummanam Rajasekharan.

Former Union minister V. Muraleedharan will contest from the Kazhakoottam constituency, while George Kurian has been nominated from Kanjirappally.

Other candidates in the list

According to the list released by the party, several other candidates have also been announced for key constituencies. P. C. George will contest from Poonjar, R. Sreelekha from Vattiyoorkavu and Padmaja Venugopal from Thrissur.

The BJP has also nominated Sobha Surendran from Palakkad, Navya Haridas from Kozhikode North and Kavitha K. S. from Sulthanbathery, a reserved constituency.

Raji Prasad will contest from the Kunnathur seat reserved for Scheduled Castes, while R. Rashmi has been fielded from Kottarakkara.

Political backdrop in Kerala

Kerala’s electoral politics has traditionally alternated between the Left Democratic Front (LDF) and the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF). However, the BJP has been attempting to expand its presence in the state.

The alternating trend was interrupted in the 2021 Assembly election when the electorate returned the Pinarayi Vijayan-led government to power for a second consecutive term.

The BJP believes recent electoral performances and local body successes have strengthened its position as it prepares to contest the upcoming assembly polls.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com