English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Ideology out for summer vacation, Congress Group of 23 becomes 22 with Jitin Prasada exit but who’s next?

The move comes on the back of his long-running differences with the Congress leadership while other reports claimed Prasada had wanted to be the UP Congress Committee chief.

Published

on

G23 REBELS

The Congress, which is already reeling from successive electoral losses and bickering, suffered another setback on Wednesday as former Union Minister Jitin Prasada joined the BJP. The move comes on the back of his long-running differences with the Congress leadership while other reports claimed Prasada had wanted to be the UP Congress Committee chief. But is this really a setback or a favour for the party?

The two-time MP was among the 23 leaders who had written to then Congress interim president Sonia Gandhi in 2020 demanding organisational changes and for introspection. Formally, the Congress is yet to reply to the letter though some of the so-called rebels found place in inter-party posts. Prasada’s move comes after another Young Turk Jyotiraditya Scindia scrammed into the BJP in 2020 leading to the fall of the Kamal Nath government. Similarly, Sachin Pilot’s rebellion against Ashok Gehlot was managed by the party with some promises that are yet to be fulfilled.

Why Jitin Prasada? Why now?

Jitin Prasada’s move is a different kettle of fish though. A Brahmin face, his move to the BJP mirrors that of Rita Bahuguna Joshi’s in 2016. His injection is expected to balance out the Thakur-Brahmin equation in the BJP which is heading for polls. It is not immediately clear if the BJP will ask Prasada to contest the 2022 polls.

The BJP’s discomfort with the public perception of the Yogi Adityanath government lies at the heart of its efforts to come up with failsafes. Opposition parties have tried to corner Yogi Adityanath on his government’s response to the Covid-19 situation, even as the government says it has efficiently dealt with the brutal second wave. But the heightened political activity in the state indicates that not everyone in the BJP has bought into the defence.

Read Also: Sonam Kapoor turns 36, wishes pour in from Anil Kapoor, Anand Ahuja, and others

Congress cup of woes now down to 22

The Congress G23 list includes five former chief ministers, MPs Shashi Tharoor and Manish Tewari, members of Congress Working Committee and over a dozen former union ministers with years of political experience.

1.    Ghulam Nabi Azad: A former Leader of the Opposition in Rajya Sabha and a party veteran from Sanjay Gandhi days.

2.    Kapil Sibal: Former Chandni Chowk MP and former union minister.

3.    Shashi Tharoor: Thiruvananthapuram MP since 2009.

4.    Manish Tewari: Former Union Minister for Information and Broadcasting.

5.    Anand Sharma: Former Union Minister and had been Deputy Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha, but has been relieved of upper house party duties.

6.    Pallath Joseph Kurian: Former Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha till June 2018, he had been Union Minister several times.

7.    Renuka Chaudhary: Rajya Sabha member from Andhra Pradesh and former union minister.

8. Milind Deora: A former Union Minister of State and was MP from Mumbai in the 15th Lok Sabha.

9. Mukul Wasnik: Former Union Minister.

10. Bhupendra Singh Hooda: Former Chief Minister, Haryana.

11.  Rajinder Kaur Bhattal: A former Punjab Chief Minister.

12. Marpadi Veerappa Moily: A former Karnataka CM and union minister.

13.  Prithviraj Chavan: Former Mhaarshtra CM and former PMO minister.

14.  Ajay Singh, former Leader of Opposition of Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly, also has been elected 5 times from Churhat Vidhan Sabha constituency. Singh is the son of Arjun Singh, former Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh and former Union Minister.

15. Raj Babbar: Actor, three-time Lok Sabha MP and a two-time Rajya Sabha member. He was president of the Uttar Pradesh Congress Committee.

16.  Arvind Singh Lovely: Congress prodigal from Delhi, left party briefly for the BJP in 2017 but now back in.

17. Kaul Singh Thakur: Leader from Himachal Pradesh, he served as PCC president twice despite strong opposition from Virbhadra Singh and Vidya Stokes.

18. Kuldeep Sharma: Former MP from Haryana.

19. Yoganand Shastri: Speaker of Delhi Legislative Assembly from 2008 to 2013.

20. Sandeep Dixit: Son of former Delhi CM Sheila Dikshit, represented East Delhi constituency in Lok Sabha.

21.  Vivek Tankha: Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha, senior advocate at the Supreme Court of India.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com